Connect with us

Published

on

Summer haze in NYC

Hundreds of wildfires are still raging in Canada and experts are saying this may be the summer of smoky haze with air quality concerns looming until winter.

NEW YORK – An air quality alert remains in effect Saturday evening. It ends Sunday, but the smoky haze from Canadian wildfires could be an on-going feature this summer.

Right now, there are 500 active wildfires burning in Canada. The smoke they're sending down south isn't as bad as it was last month, but you can still see a layer of haze blanketing the horizon. And get used to it, as forecaster warn this could be a tough season for people with breathing conditions. 
  RELATED: NYC air quality: Holiday weekend forecast RELATED: Gnats or something more? NYC gripped by flying creature mystery

The hundreds of wildfires burning throughout Canada will keep burning, according to experts, throughout the summer until the first snowfall of winter, leading Accuweather forecasters to coin this the summer of smoke and haze for much of the Midwest and Northeast.

People suffering from asthma and respiratory disease are being encouraged to dust off those N-95 masks and keep them handy as smoky haze is expected to descend on the horizon, clearing out only temporarily with rain and wind pattern changes until settling back in the skies again and lowering the air quality to dangerous levels.

A view of the city as smoke from wildfires in Canada shrouds sky on June 30, in New York City. Canadian wildfires smoke creating a dangerous haze as the air quality index reaches 160 in New York City. People warned to avoid outdoor physical activitie Expand

Low air quality can lead to serious health effects. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention warning people to watch out of symptoms of breathing in the smoke: headache, chest pain, coughing, sneezing, eye irritation, trouble breathing and fatigue. 

In New York, to keep people safe, the Public Theater canceled Hamlet in Central Park, the Essex County Fireworks Spectacular was rescheduled, and the New Jersey Symphony’s outdoor concert was moved inside. 

The air quality alert is expected to end by Sunday morning. But it’s best to buckle up for a tough to breathe in smoky summer season. 

Right now, wildfire smoke is not expected to affect the Macy's Fireworks show on Tuesday. It is scheduled to go on, rain, shine or smoke. 

Continue Reading

Politics

Bill preventing children from ‘doom scrolling’ to get govt backing – but plan watered down

Published

on

By

Bill preventing children from 'doom scrolling' to get govt backing - but plan watered down

A Labour MP’s bill to prevent children from “doom scrolling” on social media is expected to get government backing today, after its proposals were watered down.

Josh MacAlister, a former teacher, has been campaigning for tighter limits on younger teenagers spending hours a week on apps such as TikTok and Snapchat.

He told Sky News that today’s bill, which will be debated by MPs, was a “meaningful first step” towards making children safer online and hoped it would be “just the start” of government action on the issue.

The MP had originally called for a smartphone ban in schools, tougher action by Ofcom and raising the “digital age of consent” at which children can use most social media to 16.

But in the face of ministerial opposition, his bill now just calls for chief medical officers to review the evidence on screen-based harms – which was last looked at in 2019 – within a year.

File pic: PA
Image:
File pic: PA

When that review is complete, the government must decide whether there is a case to raise the age at which children can use social media from the current age of 13.

Mr MacAlister said: “We’ve managed to persuade lots of MPs and make a big noise about this issue, which is that for too many children, smartphones and social media are really addictive and taking a lot of their time and attention.

More on Online Safety Bill

“That issue for too long hasn’t been debated in parliament. My private members’ bill will get the government to come back within a year on the question of raising the age of digital consent, and that would be a really important step forward in this campaign to make sure that parliament takes these issues seriously.

“We chose 13 a long, long time ago. Is that right? You know, in Norway it’s 15. In France it’s 15. I’m asking them to consider, ‘should we be setting it at a higher age?’

“Different countries are trying different things out, but they all start with the same common problem, which is kids spending lots of time online that they used to spend in real life outdoors, doing things with their friends.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

From December: Government cracks down on social media

Charities urge minister to back bill

Asked if he was disappointed that ministers had not been willing to go further, he said: “This is just the start. If you look back at previous debates about smoking or car seatbelts, often it was dozens of pieces of legislation that led to the conclusion.”

Mr MacAlister, the MP for Whitehaven and Workington, will tell MPs that changing the age at which a child can consent for their data to be shared online to 16 would give parents more control, and force platforms to enforce more rigorous age verification.

A minister will respond to the plans, which have attracted cross-party support. It’s expected that the government will agree to take the proposals further.

Ten children’s charities, including Barnardo’s and the NSPCC, have written to Peter Kyle urging him to support the bill, saying that the online world poses “significant risks to children” and that “current legislation does not go far enough” in restricting screen time.

Read more:
Loophole in law on apps ‘leaves kids vulnerable to abuse’
Websites hosting pornographic content must have age checks by July – Ofcom

It’s understood that the tech secretary wanted to make sure the Online Safety Act, which was passed by MPs in 2023 and is being implemented in stages this year, is completed first. It intends to protect young people from illegal and harmful content.

The government has opposed a smartphone ban in schools, saying this should be up to headteachers.

Today, the most extensive polling of young people aged 16-24 shows that 62% of this age group say social media does more harm than good, both men and women.

Only 22% of the 2,000 young adults polled by the company More in Common think it does more good than harm.

Four in five of this age group also say they would try to keep their own children off social media for as long as possible.

Half of this generation, who grew up with smartphones, agree they spent too much time on their phones and social media during childhood.

Read more from Sky News:
Killer convicted of raping ex-girlfriend before murdering her
Nigel Farage hits back at one of his own Reform MPs

‘This isn’t just parents’

Anna McShane, director of The New Britain Project, which commissioned the polling, said: “This isn’t just parents worrying about their kids, young people themselves are saying social media has become more addictive, more negative, and more harmful.

“They’ve grown up with it, and now they’re warning us about its dangers.”

A Department for Technology spokesperson added: “We are committed to keeping young people safe online whilst also ensuring they can benefit from the latest technology.

“By the summer, robust new protections for children will be in force through the Online Safety Act to protect them from harmful content and ensure they have an age-appropriate experience online.

“The government’s response to the private members’ bill will follow during second reading of the bill, as per parliamentary process.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Rachel Reeves: ‘People want to talk me down… I’ll prove I can do it’

Published

on

By

Rachel Reeves: 'People want to talk me down... I'll prove I can do it'

👉 Click here to listen to Electoral Dysfunction on your podcast app 👈

Beth’s been to 11 Downing Street to talk to the chancellor for Electoral Dysfunction.

She took some of your questions (and a couple of Electoral Dysfunction mugs) with her.

Rachel Reeves reflects on her first few months in the job, explains what she thinks of the “Rachel from Accounts” label and shares her own money-saving tip which she tries to do every day when at Downing Street.

She also hints on what might come in her Spring Statement with some strong words on the need for welfare reform.

Email us at electoraldysfunction@sky.uk, post on X to @BethRigby, or send a WhatsApp voice note on 07934 200 444.

And remember, you can also watch us on YouTube!

Continue Reading

Technology

Cryptocurrencies decline as Trump’s U.S. bitcoin reserve plan falls short of expectations

Published

on

By

Cryptocurrencies decline as Trump's U.S. bitcoin reserve plan falls short of expectations

Jakub Porzycki | Nurphoto | Getty Images

Cryptocurrencies fell Thursday night after President Donald Trump signed an executive order creating a strategic bitcoin reserve for the United States and, separately, a “digital asset stockpile.”

The price of bitcoin was last lower by 3% at $87,586.86, according to Coin Metrics. Shortly after the news broke, it fell to as low as $84,688.13.

Earlier losses in other coins – specifically those that rallied at the beginning of the week after Trump said they would be included in the strategy – also eased. Ether was down 2%, trading at $2,184.08. XRP and Solana’s SOL token retreated 1% and 3%, respectively. Cardano’s ADA token tumbled 13%.

Stock Chart IconStock chart icon

hide content

Bitcoin (BTC)

White House crypto and AI czar David Sacks detailed in a post on X that the bitcoin reserve will include bitcoin already owned by the U.S. government that it seized from past law enforcement actions – a move, he emphasized, that will “not cost taxpayers a dime.” The U.S. currently owns more than 198,000 bitcoins worth about $17 billion, according to Arkham.

The stockpile of other coins will include “digital assets other than bitcoin forfeited in criminal or civil proceedings.” Sacks said the government will not acquire additional assets for it “beyond those obtained through forfeiture proceedings.” Arkham data shows the U.S. government owns about 56 ether tokens worth almost $119 million. It does not list XRP or the Solana or Cardano tokens.

Investors initially dumped their coins at the notion of the U.S. having no immediate planned purchases of bitcoin, per the order, against the backdrop of major weakness in equities.

“It is good news, but not what the market wanted in the short term,” said Steven Lubka, head of private clients and family offices at Swan Bitcoin. “People were hoping for near-term buy pressure.”

Sacks did point out that the Secretaries of Treasury and Commerce are authorized to develop “budget-neutral strategies for acquiring additional bitcoin, provided that those strategies have no incremental costs on American taxpayers,” and that there’s no plan to accumulate additional assets for the crypto stockpile beyond what’s already been obtained by the government.

The announcement came days after Trump teased new details on the highly anticipated bitcoin reserve that had become one of his biggest promises to the crypto industry on his campaign trail, and on the eve of the first White House Crypto Summit.

The crypto market has been rocked this week by the tariff war and inflation concerns, which have largely overshadowed the speculative excitement around the bitcoin reserve. JPMorgan on Wednesday said it doesn’t expect a big move higher in crypto in the near term, given the broader economic uncertainty and weakening demand.

Bitcoin briefly returned to the key $90,000 level earlier this week and is now hovering just below it. Investors and analysts have warned that until bitcoin can meaningfully hold above it, it’s at risk of a bigger pullback toward $70,000.

James Lavish of Bitcoin Opportunity Fund reacts to proposed U.S. strategic crypto reserve

Don’t miss these cryptocurrency insights from CNBC Pro:

Continue Reading

Trending