Connect with us

Published

on

RK PLAYER POS HOMETOWN HT WT STARS GRADE SCHOOL

1 QB-PP Belleville, MI
Belleville High School 6’4” 205 92

2 OT Charlotte, NC
Providence Day School 6’6” 250 91

3 WR Saraland, AL
Saraland High School 6’1” 175 91

4 DE Miami, FL
Miami Central High School 6’4” 250 90

5 DT Savannah, GA
Savannah Christian Preparatory School 6’4” 280 90

6 CB Birmingham, AL
A. H. Parker High School 6’2” 185 90

7 DT Manchester, GA
Manchester High School 6’6” 280 90

8 OG Las Vegas, NV
Bishop Gorman High School 6’3” 285 90

9 OT Las Vegas, NV
Bishop Gorman High School 6’6” 285 90

10 WR Duncanville, TX
Duncanville High School 5’11” 180 90

11 OT Lewisville, TX
Lewisville High School 6’6” 290 90

12 CB Houston, TX
North Shore High School 6’2” 170 88

13 S Zephyrhills, FL
Zephyrhills High School 6’3” 170 88

14 OLB Ellaville, GA
Schley High School 6’3” 225 88

15 WR Jacksonville, FL
Mandarin High School 6’2” 185 87

16 S Alabaster, AL
Thompson High School 6’2” 190 87

17 WR Ackerman, MS
Choctaw County High School 6’3” 190 86

18 RB Metairie, LA
Saint Martins Episcopal School 6’0” 185 86

19 TE-H Los Alamitos, CA
Los Alamitos High School 6’5” 235 86

20 DE Edwardsville, IL
Edwardsville High School 6’4” 235 86

21 TE-Y Folkston, GA
Camden County High School 6’7” 235 86

22 OT Jacksonville, FL
Raines High School 6’5” 300 86

23 ATH Chattanooga, TN
Baylor School 6’3” 215 86

24 OT Prichard, AL
Vigor High School 6’5” 290 86

25 CB Mission Viejo, CA
Mission Viejo High School 6’4” 190 86

26 OLB San Juan Capistrano, CA
JSerra Catholic High School 6’3” 210 86

27 OT Roswell, GA
Fellowship Christian School 6’5” 255 86

28 QB-PP Brentwood, TN
Brentwood Academy 6’6” 185 86

29 ATH Selma, AL
Southside High School 6’2” 190 85

30 CB Baltimore, MD
St. Frances Academy 5’11” 185 85

31 DE Birmingham, AL
Spain Park High School 6’7” 235 85

32 CB Winter Garden, FL
West Orange High School 6’0” 175 85

33 WR Tampa, FL
Tampa Bay Tech Senior High 6’4” 190 85

34 DE Norfolk, VA
Maury High School 6’6” 235 85

35 CB Atlanta, GA
Douglass High School 6’1” 185 85

36 RB Santa Ana, CA
Mater Dei High School 6’0” 215 85

37 S Thomasville, GA
Thomas County Central High School 5’11” 175 84

38 OLB Buford, GA
Buford High School 6’4” 210 84

39 DE College Park, GA
Woodward Academy 6’3” 245 84

40 RB Bradenton, FL
IMG Academy 5’9” 190 84

41 OLB Santa Ana, CA
Mater Dei High School 6’3” 215 84

42 DE Houston, TX
Summer Creek High School 6’5” 230 84

43 S Monroe, NC
Monroe High School 6’0” 185 84

44 DE Troy, AL
Charles Henderson High School 6’4” 225 84

45 S Washington, DC
Gonzaga College High School 6’0” 190 84

46 CB New Iberia, LA
Westgate High School 6’1” 180 84

47 WR Fulshear, TX
Jordan High School 6’1” 180 84

48 QB-PP Saraland, AL
Saraland High School 6’0” 175 84

49 ATH Clayton, OH
Northmont Senior High School 6’2” 190 84

50 QB-PP Warner Robins, GA
Houston County High School 6’5” 215 84

51 RB Lynchburg, VA
Liberty Christian Academy 6’0” 195 84

52 DE Philadelphia, PA
Imhotep Institute Charter High School 6’7” 225 84

53 S Olney, MD
Our Lady of Good Counsel High School 6’3” 205 84

54 OLB La Verne, CA
Bonita High School 6’4” 215 84

55 RB Bradenton, FL
IMG Academy 6’1” 210 84

56 CB Katy, TX
Patricia E. Paetow High School 5’11” 175 84

57 RB Elba, AL
Elba High School 5’10” 195 84

58 OT Mesquite, TX
Horn High School 6’7” 280 84

59 OLB Galveston, TX
Ball High School 6’3” 210 84

60 RB Quitman, MS
Quitman High School 6’0” 205 84

61 OLB North Palm Beach, FL
The Benjamin School 6’5” 210 84

62 OT Spanish Fork, UT
Spanish Fork High School 6’8” 295 84

63 CB Santa Ana, CA
Mater Dei High School 6’1” 185 84

64 OLB McKinney, TX
McKinney High School 6’2” 205 84

65 CB Detroit, MI
Cass Technical High School 6’1” 180 83

66 WR Santa Ana, CA
Mater Dei High School 6’0” 185 83

67 OLB Jesup, GA
Wayne County High School 6’1” 200 83

68 DE Tallahassee, FL
James S. Rickards High School 6’5” 260 83

69 S Pittsburg, CA
Pittsburg High School 6’2” 185 83

70 CB Buford, GA
Buford High School 5’11” 170 83

71 RB Leesburg, GA
Lee County High School 6’2” 215 83

72 DE Greensboro, NC
Grimsley High School 6’4” 245 83

73 OT Evans, GA
Evans High School 6’6” 305 83

74 OLB Vero Beach, FL
Vero Beach Senior High School 6’3” 215 83

75 OG Lilburn, GA
Parkview High School 6’4” 280 83

76 OT Salem, VA
Salem High School 6’5” 310 83

77 ATH Oradell, NJ
Bergen Catholic High 6’3” 200 83

78 OT Atlanta, GA
Westlake High School 6’8” 330 83

79 DT Lake City, SC
South Florence High School 6’5” 295 83

80 S Enterprise, AL
Enterprise High School 6’3” 205 83

81 OT Cedar Rapids, IA
John F. Kennedy High School 6’7” 345 83

82 QB-DT San Diego, CA
Abraham Lincoln High School 6’6” 210 83

83 DT Birmingham, AL
A. H. Parker High School 6’2” 310 83

84 WR West Palm Beach, FL
Cardinal Newman High School 6’1” 175 83

85 OLB Omaha, NE
Westside High School 6’3” 215 83

86 OT Toms River, NJ
Toms River North High School 6’6” 305 83

87 WR Bradenton, FL
IMG Academy 5’10” 175 83

88 OLB Bradenton, FL
IMG Academy 6’2” 205 83

89 DE Weatherford, OK
Weatherford High School 6’5” 225 83

90 WR Pleasanton, CA
Archbishop Riordan High School 6’1” 180 83

91 QB-DT Lucedale, MS
George County High School 6’5” 200 83

92 OC Las Vegas, NV
Bishop Gorman High School 6’4” 300 83

93 DT Snow Hill, NC
Greene Central High School 6’4” 265 83

94 DE Cocoa, FL
Cocoa High School 6’5” 235 83

95 TE-H Alpharetta, GA
Alpharetta High School 6’3” 235 83

96 WR Mission Hills, CA
Bishop Alemany High School 6’2” 190 83

97 OT Denton, TX
Billy Ryan High School 6’5” 285 83

98 WR Toms River, NJ
Monsignor Donovan High School 6’0” 190 83

99 OLB Sugar Land, TX
Fort Bend Christian Academy 6’3” 210 83

100 WR Homestead, FL
Homestead Senior High School 6’1” 180 83

101 TE-H Mukilteo, WA
Kamiak High School 6’4” 225 83

102 CB Lexington, MS
Holmes County Central High School 6’1” 180 83

103 DT Hattiesburg, MS
Oak Grove High School 6’3” 275 83

104 ATH Shaker Heights, OH
Shaker Heights High School 6’0” 180 83

105 S Jacksonville, FL
Mandarin High School 6’2” 190 82

106 DT Hattiesburg, MS
Hattiesburg High School 6’2” 285 82

107 OLB Lake Cormorant, MS
Lake Cormorant High School 6’2” 210 82

108 S Little Rock, AR
Parkview Arts & Science Magnet High 6’0” 180 82

109 ATH Cleveland Heights, OH
Cleveland Heights High School 6’1” 200 82

110 RB Cleveland, OH
Villa Angela-St. Joseph High School 6’1” 215 82

111 DT Nashville, TN
The Ensworth School 6’5” 280 82

112 TE-H Washington, OK
Washington High School 6’4” 225 82

113 ATH San Antonio, TX
Alamo Heights High School 6’3” 215 82

114 RB Plantation, FL
American Heritage High School 5’11” 210 82

115 WR Ennis, TX
Ennis High School 5’10” 170 82

116 OLB Dallas, TX
Skyline High School 6’2” 220 82

117 CB Cedartown, GA
Cedartown High School 6’0” 180 82

118 DE Texarkana, TX
Pleasant Grove High School 6’5” 250 82

119 ATH Saint Louis, MO
Vashon High School 5’11” 190 82

120 OLB Jersey City, NJ
Snyder High School 6’1” 215 82

121 OG Fort Valley, GA
Peach County High School 6’4” 285 82

122 QB-DT Lawrence, MA
Central Catholic High School 6’3” 215 82

123 WR Lee’s Summit, MO
Lee’s Summit North High School 6’1” 190 82

124 OLB Philadelphia, PA
St. Joseph’s Prep School 6’4” 215 82

125 QB-PP Corona, CA
Centennial High School 6’1” 190 82

126 CB Kahuku, HI
Kahuku High School 6’0” 165 82

127 WR Allen, TX
Lovejoy High School 6’0” 175 82

128 DT Washington, DC
Friendship Collegiate Academy 6’5” 320 82

129 CB Hollywood, FL
Chaminade-Madonna College Preparatory School 6’0” 170 82

130 QB-PP Findlay, OH
Findlay High School 6’3” 210 82

131 OT Waukesha, WI
Catholic Memorial High School 6’6” 280 82

132 RB Philadelphia, PA
Imhotep Institute Charter High School 6’1” 210 82

133 DE HIghland Home, AL
Highland Home High School 6’4” 235 82

134 QB-PP Midwest City, OK
Carl Albert High School 6’1” 200 82

135 DT Lufkin, TX
Lufkin High School 6’3” 295 82

136 WR Oklahoma City, OK
Millwood High School 6’4” 190 82

137 CB Santa Ana, CA
Mater Dei High School 6’0” 185 82

138 S Jackson, TN
Jackson Christian School 6’1” 190 82

139 WR Scottsdale, AZ
Notre Dame Prepatory 6’1” 190 82

140 ILB Dallas, TX
South Oak Cliff High 6’0” 210 82

141 CB Los Alamitos, CA
Los Alamitos High School 6’2” 165 82

142 ATH Owings, MD
McDonogh School 6’2” 215 82

143 CB Chester, VA
Thomas Dale High School 6’2” 180 82

144 DT Madison, MS
Hartfield Academy 6’3” 265 82

145 CB Brownsboro, TX
Brownsboro High School 6’1” 180 82

146 RB Seminole, FL
Osceola High School 5’9” 185 82

147 CB Quartz Hill, CA
Quartz Hill High School 6’2” 170 81

148 DT Cypress, TX
Cy-Fair High School 6’2” 270 81

149 RB Humble, TX
Atascocita High School 5’11” 180 81

150 CB Pearland, TX
Shadow Creek High School 6’0” 170 81

151 OLB El Centro, CA
Central High School 6’2” 210 81

152 TE-Y West Chester, OH
Lakota West High School 6’8” 240 81

153 OLB Cincinnati, OH
Winton Woods High School 6’4” 215 81

154 CB Miami, FL
Booker T. Washington High School 6’1” 170 81

155 S Eastman, GA
Dodge High School 6’2” 205 81

156 OG Rabun Gap, GA
Rabun Gap Nacoochee School 6’5” 275 81

157 DT Port Charlotte, FL
Port Charlotte High School 6’5” 285 81

158 OLB Danville, CA
San Ramon Valley High School 6’4” 220 81

159 OT Toledo, OH
Whitmer High School 6’5” 290 81

160 S Las Vegas, NV
Faith Lutheran High School 6’3” 190 81

161 DT Philadelphia, PA
St. Joseph’s Prep School 6’4” 280 81

162 OG Fairburn, GA
Langston Hughes High School 6’3” 295 81

163 WR Sachse, TX
Sachse High School 6’2” 185 81

164 OLB Spanaway, WA
Bethel High School 6’3” 215 81

165 OT Buford, GA
Buford High School 6’8” 315 81

166 ATH Tampa, FL
Berkeley Prep 6’1” 175 81

167 DT Baltimore, MD
St. Frances Academy 6’3” 275 81

168 WR Geneva, IL
Geneva High School 6’1” 170 81

169 RB Gaithersburg, MD
Quince Orchard High School 5’11” 190 81

170 WR DeSoto, TX
DeSoto High School 5’11” 170 81

171 RB Tampa Bay, FL
Plant Senior High School 6’1” 195 81

172 OT Houston, TX
Lamar High School 6’6” 305 81

173 CB Miami, FL
Booker T. Washington High School 6’2” 180 81

174 TE-Y Pittsburgh, PA
North Catholic High School 6’7” 240 81

175 OT Boerne, TX
Boerne High School 6’6” 320 81

176 CB Montvale, NJ
Saint Joseph Regional High School 6’1” 180 81

177 WR Pearland, TX
Shadow Creek High School 5’10” 180 81

178 TE-Y Green Bay, WI
Notre Dame De La Baie Academy 6’5” 225 81

179 OG San Jose, CA
Valley Christian High School 6’4” 325 81

180 DT Bellville, TX
Bellville High School 6’3” 285 81

181 CB Washington, DC
St. John’s College High School 6’0” 180 81

182 WR Pflugerville, TX
Weiss High School 6’1” 170 81

183 QB-PP Orange, CA
Orange Lutheran High School 6’2” 190 81

184 OLB Opelousas, LA
Opelousas High School 6’3” 210 81

185 TE-H Jasper, TX
Jasper High School 6’5” 245 81

186 RB Tyler, TX
Chapel Hill High School 5’10” 185 81

187 WR Red Oak, TX
Red Oak High School 5’11” 175 81

188 OT Overland Park, KS
Blue Valley Northwest High School 6’6” 270 80

189 RB Plantation, FL
American Heritage High School 5’10” 185 80

190 TE-H El Dorado Hills, CA
Oak Ridge High School 6’6” 220 80

191 S Miami, FL
Miami Central High School 5’11” 175 80

192 QB-PP Fort Myers, FL
Bishop Verot High School 6’3” 185 80

193 RB Houma, LA
Vandebilt Catholic School 5’8” 165 80

194 OLB Baton Rouge, LA
University Laboratory School 6’2” 220 80

195 DT Oak Park, IL
Fenwick High School 6’4” 270 80

196 OLB Baltimore, MD
St. Frances Academy 6’1” 205 80

197 DE Hyattsville, MD
DeMatha Catholic High School 6’3” 210 80

198 OLB Salem, NJ
Salem High School 6’1” 195 80

199 S Chattanooga, TN
Brainerd High School 6’1” 190 80

200 RB Fort Worth, TX
North Crowley High School 5’10” 175 80

201 DE Port Arthur, TX
Memorial High School 6’3” 240 80

202 ILB Las Vegas, NV
Arbor View High School 6’2” 200 80

203 RB Covington, GA
Newton High School 5’9” 180 80

204 DE Warner Robins, GA
Warner Robins High School 6’5” 250 80

205 QB-PP Harrisburg, PA
Bishop McDevitt High School 6’1” 205 80

206 OT Beverly Hills, MI
Groves High School 6’5” 280 80

207 RB DeSoto, TX
DeSoto High School 5’11” 200 80

208 WR West Bloomfield, MI
West Bloomfield High School 5’11” 175 80

209 OG Bradenton, FL
IMG Academy 6’3” 285 80

210 DE Quebec, CAN
Cegep Garneau 6’4” 260 80

211 S Norfolk, VA
Maury High School 6’3” 190 80

212 OLB Pittsburgh, PA
Imani Christian Academy 6’3” 220 80

213 QB-DT Murrieta, CA
Murrieta Valley High School 6’2” 215 80

214 TE-H Calhoun, GA
Calhoun High School 6’2” 230 80

215 RB Shreveport, LA
Calvary Baptist Academy 5’11” 200 80

216 QB-PP Chatsworth, CA
Sierra Canyon High School 6’2” 185 80

217 ILB Culpeper, VA
Eastern View High School 6’3” 235 80

218 CB Murfreesboro, TN
Siegel High School 6’3” 180 80

219 WR Hollywood, FL
Chaminade-Madonna College Preparatory School 6’2” 185 80

220 DT Saraland, AL
Saraland High School 6’2” 270 80

221 OG Nashville, TN
David Lipscomb High School 6’4” 320 80

222 ILB Seminole, FL
Osceola High School 6’2” 225 80

223 CB Baltimore, MD
St. Frances Academy 5’11” 185 80

224 QB-PP Miami, FL
Miami Central High School 6’6” 195 80

225 WR Gautier, MS
Gautier High School 5’11” 180 80

226 CB Indianapolis, IN
Ben Davis High School 6’0” 170 80

227 WR Wayne, NJ
DePaul Catholic High School 6’0” 185 80

228 OG Dyersburg, TN
Dyersburg High School 6’4” 325 80

229 ILB Bradenton, FL
IMG Academy 6’0” 230 80

230 WR Lafayette, LA
Acadiana High School 5’8” 170 80

231 TE-Y Derby, KS
Derby Senior High School 6’5” 225 80

232 S Miami, FL
Belen Jesuit Prep 6’1” 180 80

233 OLB Princeton, NJ
The Hun School Of Princeton 6’1” 215 80

234 DE Shawnee, KS
Mill Valley High School 6’3” 220 80

235 ATH Saint Louis, MO
Cardinal Ritter College Prep 6’0” 185 80

236 QB-PP Severn, MD
Archbishop Spalding High School 6’4” 205 80

237 DE Red Oak, TX
Red Oak High School 6’4” 235 80

238 CB Midwest City, OK
Carl Albert High School 6’2” 170 80

239 DE Chicago, IL
Simeon Career Academy 6’5” 250 80

240 ILB Auburn, WA
Auburn-Riverside High School 6’0” 195 80

241 WR San Antonio, TX
Brandeis High School 6’1” 175 80

242 DE Wyncote, PA
Cheltenham High School 6’4” 230 80

243 RB The Woodlands, TX
The Woodlands High School 6’0” 185 80

244 QB-DT Little Rock, AR
Robinson High School 6’2” 190 80

245 OLB Jefferson, GA
Jefferson High School 6’3” 210 80

246 WR The Woodlands, TX
The Woodlands High School 6’0” 175 80

247 DT Overland Park, KS
Saint Thomas Aquinas High School 6’6” 270 80

248 S Wellington, FL
Palm Beach Central High School 6’1” 190 80

249 OT Phoenix, AZ
Brophy Prep 6’5” 255 79

250 WR Houston, TX
Andy Dekaney High School 6’0” 175 79

251 S Nashville, TN
David Lipscomb High School 6’3” 195 79

252 DT Palatine, IL
Palatine High School 6’6” 280 79

253 OT Honolulu, HI
Saint Louis School 6’3” 265 79

254 S Spring, TX
Legacy The School of Sport Sciences 6’0” 180 79

255 WR Checotah, OK
Checotah High School 6’1” 185 79

256 DE Concord, CA
De La Salle High School 6’6” 250 79

257 RB North Richland Hills, TX
Richland High School 6’0” 200 79

258 TE-H Orange, CA
Orange Lutheran High School 6’6” 215 79

259 WR Columbia, MS
Columbia High School 6’1” 200 79

260 RB Tampa, FL
Jesuit High School 6’0” 190 79

261 CB Rabun Gap, GA
Rabun Gap Nacoochee School 6’2” 175 79

262 S Winston-Salem, NC
Mount Tabor High School 6’4” 190 79

263 DE Indianapolis, IN
Warren Central High School 6’5” 235 79

264 TE-H Clear Lake, IA
Clear Lake High School 6’5” 210 79

265 WR Pembroke Pines, FL
West Broward High School 6’3” 210 79

266 DT Melbourne, FL
Eau Gallie High School 6’2” 275 79

267 CB Chatsworth, CA
Sierra Canyon High School 5’11” 165 79

268 ATH Winston-Salem, NC
Mount Tabor High School 6’2” 175 79

269 DE HIghland Home, AL
Highland Home High School 6’4” 230 79

270 RB Montvale, NJ
Saint Joseph Regional High School 6’0” 190 79

271 QB-DT Kernersville, NC
East Forsyth High School 6’3” 185 79

272 WR Pembroke Pines, FL
Somerset Academy 6’2” 190 79

273 ATH Hesperia, CA
Sultana High School 6’1” 180 79

274 DE Galveston, TX
Ball High School 6’4” 245 79

275 OT Riverview, FL
Jule F. Sumner High School 6’4” 260 79

276 DT Bogart, GA
Prince Avenue Christian School 6’4” 260 79

277 TE-Y Milton, GA
Milton High School 6’5” 220 79

278 OLB Sanford, FL
Seminole High School 6’2” 195 79

279 TE-H Leo, IN
Leo Junior Senior High School 6’3” 210 79

280 DT Chesterfield, VA
Matoaca High School 6’6” 260 79

281 DE Pittsburg, CA
Pittsburg High School 6’3” 235 79

282 ATH Lubbock, TX
Estacado High School 6’4” 210 79

283 DE Detroit, MI
Martin Luther King High School 6’5” 220 79

284 CB Atco, NJ
Winslow Township High School 5’11” 165 79

285 QB-PP San Juan Capistrano, CA
JSerra Catholic High School 6’1” 185 79

286 ATH Omaha, NE
Millard North High School 6’0” 190 79

287 WR Richmond, VA
Trinity Episcopal School 6’2” 185 79

288 OG Sanford, FL
Seminole High School 6’5” 285 79

289 RB Wynnewood, OK
Wynnewood High School 5’11” 190 79

290 DT Buford, GA
Buford High School 6’2” 280 79

291 QB-PP Downey, CA
Warren High School 6’3” 185 79

292 RB Greer, SC
Greer Senior High School 5’10” 180 78

293 ATH Germantown, TN
Germantown High School 5’10” 190 78

294 S East Saint Louis, IL
East St. Louis High School 6’2” 190 78

295 RB Southlake, TX
Carroll High School 5’10” 180 78

296 OT Slinger, WI
Slinger High School 6’5” 305 78

297 RB Philadelphia, PA
St. Joseph’s Prep School 6’0” 210 78

298 WR Drexel Hill, PA
Monsignor Bonner High School 6’5” 195 78

299 OLB Belleville, MI
Belleville High School 6’0” 205 78

300 ATH College Park, GA
Woodward Academy 5’11” 180 78

Continue Reading

Sports

Someone had to ‘challenge NASCAR,’ says Jordan

Published

on

By

Someone had to 'challenge NASCAR,' says Jordan

CHARLOTTE, N.C. — Retired NBA great Michael Jordan took the stand at the landmark NASCAR antitrust case and testified Friday that he has been a fan of the stock car series since he was a child but felt he had little choice but to sue to force changes in a business model he sees shortchanging teams and drivers risking their lives to keep the sport going.

Jordan testified before a packed courtroom for an hour. His celebrity drew quips from the judge and even a defense attorney as he outlined why the team he co-owns, 23XI, had joined Front Row Motorsports in going to court against the top auto racing series in the United States.

“Someone had to step forward and challenge the entity,” the soft-spoken Jordan told the jury. “I sat in those meetings with longtime owners who were brow-beaten for so many years trying to make change. I was a new person, I wasn’t afraid. I felt I could challenge NASCAR as a whole. I felt as far as the sport, it needed to be looked at from a different view.”

Jordan’s highy anticipated appearance followed dramatic testimony from Heather Gibbs, the daughter-in-law of race team owner Joe Gibbs, about the chaotic six-hour period in which teams had to sign an extension or forfeit the charters that guarantee revenue week to week throughout NASCAR’s 38-race season.

“The document was something in business you would never sign,” said Heather Gibbs, who is also a licensed real estate agent. “It was like a gun to your head: if you don’t sign, you have nothing.”

Charters are the equivalent of the franchise model used in other sports and in NASCAR it guarantees every chartered car a spot in every race, plus a defined payout from the series. The system was created in 2016, and during the two-plus years of bitter negotiations on an extension teams begged for the renewable charters to be made permanent for revenue stability.

When NASCAR refused to make them permanent and gave the teams six hours in September 2024 to sign the 112-page extension, 23XI and Front Row Motorsports were the only two organizations out of 15 to refuse. They instead filed the antitrust suit and the trial opened Monday to hear their allegations that NASCAR is a monopolistic bully. 23XI is co-owned by Jordan and three-time Daytona 500 winner Denny Hamlin, and Front Row is owned by fast food franchiser Bob Jenkins.

Jordan testified that 23XI bought a third charter late in 2024 for $28 million even with all the uncertainty.

“I’m pretty sure they know I love to win,” the six-time NBA champion said. “Denny convinced me getting a third driver improved our chances to win, so I dove in.”

Like other witnesses this week, Jordan described a NASCAR that refused to discuss options or potential changes to the charter system, which he supports. He was asked why 23XI didn’t sign the extensions last fall.

“One, I didn’t think it was economically viable. Two, it said you could not sue NASCAR, that was an antitrust violation, I felt. Three, they gave us an ultimatum I didn’t think was fair to 23XI,” Jordan said, adding: “I wanted a partnership and permanent charters wasn’t even a consideration. The pillars that the teams wanted, no one on the NASCAR side even negotiated or compromised. They were not even open-minded to welcome those conversations, so this is where we ended up.”

Jordan referred to the NBA business model, which shares approximately half its revenue with players, far more than NASCAR.

“The revenue split was far less than any business I’ve ever been a part of. We didn’t think we’d ever get to what basketball was getting but we wanted to move in that direction,” he said. “The thing I see in NASCAR that I think is absent is a shared responsibility of growth as well as loss.”

Jordan said he owns 60% of 23XI and has invested $35 millioin to $40 million in the team. Jenkins testified earlier this week that has never turned a profit since launching his NASCAR team in the early 2000s and estimates he’s lost $100 million even while winning the Daytona 500 in 2021.

Heather Gibbs earlier told the jury how she became co-owner of Joe Gibbs Racing the day after her husband, Coy, unexpectedly died in his sleep the same night their son, Ty, won NASCAR’s second-tier Xfinity Series championship in 2022. Coy Gibbs had moved into a leadership role with JGR following the death of his older brother, J.D., in 2019.

Because Gibbs had lost both his sons and had built the team as a legacy for his family, his daughter-in-law took an active role in the organization and personally participated in negotiations for the charter extensions. When NASCAR made its final offer at 6 p.m. on a Friday night with just hours to sign, the agreement did not include permanent charters. Gibbs testified the organization was devastated.

“Everything was going so fast, the legacy of Coy, the legacy of J.D., everyone at JGR was very upset,” she told the jury. She said her father-in-law called NASCAR chairman Jim France pleading for a resolution.

“Joe said, ‘Jim, you can’t do this,'” she said. “And Jim was done with the conversation.”

Heather Gibbs said she had to leave to take her son to a baseball game in Chapel Hill and left worried about her father-in-law, who was 84 at the time.

“I left him sitting in the dark, listening to his blood sugar monitors going off,” she testified. “We decided we had to sign. We can’t lose everything. I did not think it was a fair deal to the teams.”

Joe Gibbs is both a Hall of Fame NASCAR owner and NFL Hall of Fame coach. He led the Washington football team to three Super Bowl titles and JGR has won five Cup Series championships. JGR has 450 employees, charters for four Cup cars and relies solely on outside sponsorship and investors to keep the team afloat. The team will mark its 35th season next year and Gibbs told the jury that JGR needs permanent charters to protect its investment in NASCAR.

“It’s the most important point, a permanent place in their history books,” she testified. “It is absolutely vital to the teams for us to know we have security, it can’t be taken away, to know what we’ve invested in is ours.”

Continue Reading

Sports

Week 15 preview: A look at Championship Week matchups and players to watch

Published

on

By

Week 15 preview: A look at Championship Week matchups and players to watch

After Georgia knocked off Georgia Tech to close out the regular season last week, coach Kirby Smart lamented the new era of college football, in which the playoff supersedes everything, and some programs would rather miss a conference championship game to rest up and get healthy than chase a trophy.

It’s true. Championship Week isn’t what it used to be, and a number of this year’s participants — Georgia included — have their spot in the playoff already secured, regardless of the outcome of their conference title game.

But if the playoff has taken some of the shine off a championship trophy, there will still be plenty of action this weekend with high stakes.

In the Big 12, BYU hopes to avenge its only loss — a blowout to Texas Tech — and steal a playoff bid.

In the ACC, chaos has been the conference’s true dominant force, but its best team — Miami — won’t take the field. Instead, Virginia looks to add another chapter to a magical season, while a Duke win could potentially push the conference out of the playoff completely.

The Big Ten championship doesn’t have much in the way of playoff implications. Indiana and Ohio State are both shoo-ins, and both probably getting first-round byes. But that doesn’t mean there’s nothing on the line. A showdown between quarterbacks Fernando Mendoza and Julian Sayin could ultimately determine who wins the Heisman Trophy.

Then there’s the games in the American and Sun Belt conferences. Tulane has the inside track on the Group of 5’s guaranteed playoff berth, but North Texas could prove a serious obstacle. Meanwhile, James Madison needs to win the Sun Belt title, then state its case to the committee to be ranked ahead of the American champ — unless the folks in the committee room opt for both in lieu of a five-loss Duke winning the ACC.

And what about that Georgia-Alabama game? How committed are the two blue bloods to winning an SEC title?

For Alabama, a win guarantees a playoff bid, while a loss opens the door to some harder conversations. For Georgia — well, just ask its coach.

“It’s an opportunity to win an SEC championship,” Smart said. “I grew up thinking that was the greatest game in the world. I’m just different from everybody else.” — David Hale

Jump to:
ACC | Big Ten
Big 12 | SEC
American | Quotes of the week

What does Duke need to do to win? When these two teams met in Durham less than a month ago, Virginia dominated the line of scrimmage on both sides, and the result was an ugly loss for the Blue Devils. Virginia ran for 224 yards and a pair of touchdowns, and Duke’s vaunted defensive front produced minimal pressure, failing to record a sack of Chandler Morris. Inside the pocket, Morris has been dangerous all season, completing 69% of his throws with 12 touchdowns and five interceptions. But when he has moved off of his spot, he has completed onlyt 55% with two touchdowns and a pair of interceptions. On the flip side, Duke needs to run the ball. Coach Manny Diaz said Virginia was the one team all season that pushed around Duke’s O-line, and the result was only 42 rushing yards, while quarterback Darian Mensah was sacked four times.

Must-watch player: Mensah

Duke invested heavily in Mensah this offseason, signing him to a reported two-year deal worth $8 million. So far, he has been worth every penny. Mensah is sixth nationally with 3,450 passing yards and 28 touchdowns, while throwing only four picks. He has been good outside the pocket, throws an excellent deep ball and is capable of extending plays. He has thrown six touchdowns and only one interception this season when under pressure. — Hale

What does Virginia need to do to win? Virginia used the perfect blueprint to beat Duke in their first meeting this season — taking advantage of a beat-up secondary with big plays through the air, while dominating on the offensive and defensive lines. Virginia was particularly impressive on defense, holding Duke to a season-low 42 yards rushing while harassing Mensah all game. Can that blueprint be replicated? Virginia will certainly try. The biggest key is to slow down a Duke offense that can put up points in a hurry. The Blue Devils are best when they have balance. Just once this season did they win a game when they had fewer than 100 yards rushing, and that was in a win over Clemson when they were able to throw the ball at will. If Virginia can get another effort like that from its defense, the offense should be able to score on a Duke defense that has struggled over the second half of the season.

Must-watch player: QB Chandler Morris.

The veteran quarterback said in January that he came to Virginia to play for a championship, and here he is, backing up his talk. He had one of his best performances of the season against Duke earlier, coming off an injury no less. In that 34-17 win, Morris threw for 316 yards and two touchdowns, though he did throw two interceptions — including one returned for a touchdown. Morris will have to avoid those mistakes with the stakes much higher this time, but it certainly feels as though everything he has done for Virginia has led it to this moment. No pressure. — Andrea Adelson


What does Indiana need to do to win? The Hoosiers must control the game with their rushing attack, which has improved substantially this season, as the team ranks No. 9 nationally (229.8). Michigan had early success running against Ohio State until losing Jordan Marshall to an apparent shoulder injury. IU coach Curt Cignetti was candid after last season that the team’s offensive line didn’t measure up against the best opponents. Several transfer portal additions have helped Indiana’s front, which must keep the offense out of obvious pass-rushing situations and limit Buckeyes defensive standouts Arvell Reese, Caden Curry and Kayden McDonald. Indiana also must avoid any special teams breakdowns like it had last year, when Caleb Downs‘ punt return touchdown broke open the game.

Must-watch player: WR Omar Cooper Jr.

Cooper has delivered highlights all season, most notably his back-of-the-end zone toe-tap touchdown to cap a comeback at Penn State on Nov. 8. Cooper had a touchdown catch in each of IU’s final four regular-season games, and opened the season with a reception of 39 yards or longer in the team’s first four games. Ohio State’s receiver crew and IU teammate Elijah Sarratt will get attention, but don’t forget about Cooper in this game. — Adam Rittenberg

What does Ohio State need to do to win? Ohio State’s ferocious front must pressure Indiana quarterback Fernando Mendoza and force him to make plays under duress. That won’t be easy. The Hoosiers have given up only 15 sacks. And Mendoza is No. 1 in the Big Ten in getting rid of the ball (an average of 2.55 seconds before throwing). Offensively, the Buckeyes have to stay balanced and establish Bo Jackson early. That will set up shots downfield to Jeremiah Smith and Carnell Tate. Indiana’s stout defense has surrendered only six passing touchdowns all season. But Ohio State is at its best when Julian Sayin is heaving the ball downfield. If the Buckeyes can run the ball effectively, they’ll eventually generate favorable opportunities for their superstar wideouts.

Must-watch player: Smith

All eyes will be on Heisman hopeful quarterbacks Sayin and Mendoza, but Smith remains the most electric player in college football — when healthy. Smith returned to help the Buckeyes take down Michigan last weekend with a touchdown grab after sitting out a game-and-a-half because of a lower body injury. As his game-clinching grab against Notre Dame in last season’s national championship victory underscored, Smith is the ultimate game-changing playmaker on the big stage. — Jake Trotter


What does BYU need to do to win? Weather the storm. In the first meeting between these teams, Texas Tech jumped out to a 13-0 halftime lead, and while that isn’t the biggest of deficits, it felt insurmountable with the way BYU was moving the ball. The Cougars need to keep this one close early, because they aren’t built to play from behind and force the ball downfield. If they can get the game into a grind-it-out type of style — one they are more experienced playing in than Tech — then they’ll have a shot. But if they let the Red Raiders dictate the game up front again, it could be another long day.

Must-watch player: RB LJ Martin.

It has been a breakout season for Martin, who leads the Big 12 with 1,229 yards rushing, to go along with 11 touchdowns. He was limited against Texas Tech the first time after sustaining a shoulder injury the previous week against Iowa State. He’s not a breakaway threat, but he is a reliable option to get tough yards — which is exactly what BYU will need. — Kyle Bonagura

What does Texas Tech need to do to win? Joey McGuire has frequently said his 11-1 squad still hasn’t even hit its stride and played up to its full potential. Texas Tech’s first Big 12 championship game is a monumental moment for the program. The Red Raiders proved they could handle big-time pressure when they last faced BYU on Nov. 8 with a flat-out dominant performance on defense in a 29-7 rout. Their 13-0 halftime lead in that game could’ve easily been 28-0 had they capitalized on all their early red zone opportunities. Getting quarterback Behren Morton in a good rhythm and keeping him protected is a must to once again to grab control and force quarterback Bear Bachmeier and the Cougars to play from behind.

Must-watch player: OLB David Bailey

The Stanford transfer has played his way into first-round NFL draft pick status with a dominant senior season in Lubbock, and is still the national leader in sacks (12.5) and edge pressures (61), according to ESPN Research. Bailey exited the Red Raiders’ regular-season finale at West Virginia because of an injury and was held out for the second half as a precaution. Coach Joey McGuire has said Bailey is “banged up,” but still expects him to play Saturday. — Max Olson


What does Georgia need to do to win? If Georgia is going to defeat Alabama for the first time in the SEC championship game, it can’t put itself in a big hole the way did in its loss to the Crimson Tide in Athens on Sept. 27. The Bulldogs trailed 14-0 early in the second quarter and by 10 at the half. The UGA defense simply couldn’t get Alabama’s offense off the field; the Tide converted their first nine third-down conversions and 13 of 19 in the game. Georgia has to do a better job of pressuring quarterback Ty Simpson, who hasn’t been as accurate lately. Getting him off rhythm will be key. Georgia’s defense has been better at putting pressure on quarterbacks in the second half of the season. Smart’s teams are 1-7 against Alabama (0-3 in the SEC title game), and the Bulldogs will have to play very well on defense to end that drought.

Must-watch player: QB Gunner Stockton

Stockton has played very well in his first season as a full-time starter, but he’s coming off his worst performance. He passed for only 70 yards, one touchdown and one interception and was sacked twice by Georgia Tech. He played OK against Alabama in the first meeting, throwing for 130 yards with one score. Georgia’s defense simply couldn’t get the ball back for him. The Bulldogs need to establish their running game the way they did in the first meeting, and that includes Stockton being more involved in designed QB runs. It won’t be easy with starting center Drew Bobo probably sidelined because of a left foot injury. — Mark Schlabach

What does Alabama need to do to win? Alabama has to be better against the run than it was in its first meeting with Georgia. The Crimson Tide used a quick start to their advantage, jumping to a 10-point lead before holding on for a 24-21 victory. The reason Alabama had to hold on is because Georgia rushed for 227 yards, the second-highest rush total allowed all season by Alabama. Though Alabama has played better against the run over the past month of the season, Georgia will want to establish its ground game. Ty Simpson will have to be on point once again, as the Alabama ground game remains a significant question — especially with Jam Miller injured and his status uncertain. If he can’t play, Alabama would be without two of its top three backs, as Kevin Riley is expected to be out because of a broken jaw.

Must-watch player: WR Ryan Williams.

This has been a down season for Williams, who was a breakout freshman star a year ago. But the reason he is a player to watch is because of how little he has been utilized over the past month of the season. Against Auburn last week, Williams had zero targets for the first time in his career. In November, he had seven total catches for 103 yards and a score. Can Alabama win without him playing much of a role? — Adelson


play

0:13

Drew Mestemaker throws 13-yard touchdown pass to Terrence Lewis

Drew Mestemaker airs it out for 13-yard touchdown pass

What does North Texas need to do to win? The Mean Green can strike quickly and often with their offense, and have played much better defensively since their lone loss, in which they surrendered 63 points, 32 first downs and 580 yards to South Florida. North Texas has the superior offense and quarterback in Drew Mestemaker, who has been brilliant since the South Florida loss with 2,252 passing yards, 16 touchdowns and only one interception. Tulane’s only losses have been blowouts, as the Green Wave were outscored 93-36 by Ole Miss and UTSA. If North Texas throws a big first punch, Tulane could hit the mat.

Must-watch player: Mestemaker

Mestemaker’s story cannot be told enough, from not starting a game during his final three seasons of high school, to becoming one of the top passers in the FBS. Mestemaker has become a national star under coach Eric Morris, leading the FBS in passing yards (3,835), while tying for fourth in passing touchdowns (29) and ranking ninth in completion percentage (70.9). The American Conference Offensive Player of the Year has only four interception on 382 attempts. — Rittenberg

What does Tulane need to do to win? The Green Wave did not run into North Texas during the regular season, but last year’s showdown in Denton, Texas, featured a combined 997 offensive yards and 82 points. Bottom line, coach Jon Sumrall’s squad needs to find a way to get a couple of timely stops against an offense that has put up 50-plus points in seven of its wins. Tulane had the American’s top scoring defense in league play (20.9 points) and responded well in November after getting burned for 48 points by UTSA. But it’s going to take great third-down defense and probably a couple of takeaways to take control.

Must-watch player: DL Santana Hopper

The App State transfer has now earned first-team all-conference honors in back-to-back seasons as a versatile and disruptive defensive lineman. Hopper has produced 29 pressures, 7.5 tackles for loss and 2.5 sacks this season while lining up all over for a D-line that helped Tulane finish with the best run defense in conference play, giving up only 99.8 rushing yards per game. He’ll need to be at his best to get after Mestemaker and help contain 1,200-yard rusher Caleb Hawkins, the American Conference’s Rookie of the Year. — Olson

Quotes of the week

Notre Dame coach Marcus Freeman on falling in the rankings: “We’re never always going to agree, especially when your program is the one that’s getting dropped after winning by 20-something points.”

Lane Kiffin at his LSU news conference: “Someone very close to me reminded me this week in this decision that LSU is the best job in football.”

Ole Miss AD Keith Carter on Kiffin’s comments since his departure: “There’s been a lot of things he’s said publicly that I’m not sure have been totally accurate. I think that both coach and his representation knew several weeks ago that coaching in the playoffs was not an option if he was not going to be the Ole Miss head coach.”

Ole Miss OL Brycen Sanders on Kiffin’s departing statement that insinuated players asked for him to coach the team in the playoff: “I think everyone that was in that room would disagree.”

Stanford coach Tavita Pritchard on restoring good offensive line play: “We’re going to make sure that position room is right. That was a common thread through all the great Stanford teams, was the offensive line. That’s a place we know we will recruit. We will make that kind of the heart and soul of the offense.”

Ohio State offensive coordinator Brian Hartline after being named the head coach at South Florida: “Becoming a first-time head coach at a place like USF is a dream come true for me and my family. I look forward to leading the team to new heights, both on and off the field.”

New Florida coach Jon Sumrall: “I’m built for this job. I was made for this job. Winners win. I’m a winner. We’re going to win.”

New Oregon State coach Jamarcus Shephard: “We will win the Pac-12 championship and a bowl game with class, integrity, and academic excellence. That is what we will do here.”

Continue Reading

Sports

Breaking down every conference title game, plus CFP chaos scenarios

Published

on

By

Breaking down every conference title game, plus CFP chaos scenarios

It took a while for college football to orient itself this season. Three of the top four teams in the preseason AP Top 25 poll started poorly, and only one really recovered. Nine of the preseason top 17 went 8-4 or worse. Meanwhile, some teams that were expected to be good — preseason No. 20 Indiana, No. 21 Ole Miss and No. 23 Texas Tech — turned out to be playoff-caliber dynamite.

Things were pretty messy for a while as the sport figured itself out, but once the hierarchy was established, it was established. Over the past three weeks, teams ranked 14th or higher in the AP poll have gone a combined 35-3, and all three losses were to opponents ranked 16th or higher.

The ACC and the coaching carousel did their best to ensure that there was always something messy and/or chaotic happening, but we’ve reached Championship Week with the balance of power firmly set. Now we get to find out if college football decides to offer one last burst of absolute nonsense. Here’s everything you need to follow during what is likely to be either a very orderly or incredibly fraught Championship Week.

All times Eastern

Championship Week chaos scenarios

This weekend is basically setting up like college football’s version of one of those “We can do this the easy way or the hard way” moments in a mob movie. If Texas Tech and Virginia win as favorites in the Big 12 and ACC championship games, respectively, and if Alabama beats Georgia as it almost always does — since 2017, Kirby Smart’s Bulldogs are 1-7 against the Crimson Tide and 107-8 against everyone else — then college football will have chosen the easy way.

If it unfolds that way, we’ll be able to predict with near certainty who will be in the College Football Playoff. The at-large bids will go to current No. 1 Ohio State or No. 2 Indiana (whichever loses the Big Ten championship game), No. 3 Georgia, No. 5 Oregon, No. 6 Ole Miss, No. 7 Texas A&M, No. 8 Oklahoma and either No. 10 Notre Dame or No. 12 Miami, depending on how much overthinking the playoff committee decides to undertake. Per SP+, however, there’s only a 22% chance we get those three results. And things could get weird if we stray from the script.

(* If No. 11 BYU’s ranking slips, therefore putting Notre Dame and Miami next to each other in the rankings, the committee could decide to move Miami ahead because of the Hurricanes’ head-to-head win. It’s what they tend to do when teams with a head-to-head result end up next to each other. I personally think that win is the only reason Miami deserves to rank even as high as 12th — they have neither played nor beaten any other ranked teams, and they lost to two unranked teams in by far the worst of the power conferences. Notre Dame’s résumé undoubtedly has similar holes, but the committee had many weeks to rank Miami ahead of Notre Dame and didn’t do it, and it would be impossibly silly to do it after a week in which neither team — and only one of their 2025 opponents — played a single game. I’m extremely ready to go back to a BCS-like formula.)

What if BYU beats Texas Tech (23% chance, per SP+)? Last year, Clemson became the first official bid thief of the 12-team playoff era with its win over SMU in the ACC championship game. This year, BYU appears to be the designated thief. The Cougars have lost only to No. 4 Texas Tech and, at 11th, could claim to have been slighted by the committee. They clearly need to win to get in, and if they do, they will likely steal Notre Dame’s (or Miami’s?) ticket. The Fighting Irish, who have won 10 straight games by an average of 43-14, were ranked ninth for three straight weeks before mysteriously slipping to 10th on Tuesday. That puts them in line to get snubbed with a Big 12 upset.

What if BYU wins and Alabama loses (13% chance)? Last season, SMU made the CFP despite losing in the ACC championship game; from that, we derived that the committee had decided not to punish a team for earning a 13th game when others around it in the rankings had not. The Mustangs did fall from eighth to 10th, however. It wasn’t enough to knock them from the playoff field, but they still dropped.

So what will happen if Alabama loses to Georgia, perhaps by a solid margin? Will Bama fall behind Notre Dame? And if BYU has also won … will that mean the Cougars steal the Tide’s bid?

Tuesday’s rankings give us reason to doubt that Bama would move at all, of course. In fact, the only real justification for the Tide jumping Notre Dame this week is that the committee was giving itself a cushion in case of a Bama loss. There is, after all, no universe in which the Tide beating 5-7 Auburn in the last minute was more impressive than Notre Dame beating 4-8 Stanford by 29, and I wouldn’t think that A&M falling from third to seventh would make the Irish’s loss to the Aggies look significantly worse. Regardless, now the committee might not have to worry about eliminating Bama with a bad performance in Atlanta. But what if BYU wins and the Tide lay an absolute egg?

What if Duke wins (32% chance)? BYU aside, Championship Week’s biggest chaos agent is clearly Duke. Manny Diaz’s 7-5 Blue Devils eked out an ACC championship bid thanks to a set of tiebreakers that will almost certainly be redrawn soon. They are only 3.5-point underdogs against Virginia, and a Blue Devils win could give a playoff ticket to a second Group of 5 champion. James Madison would be first in line, though an 11-2 UNLV team will be intriguing if JMU loses and the Rebels finally figure out how to beat Boise State for the Mountain West championship.

Of course, with the lengths the committee went to avoid ranking another G5 team besides Tulane — JMU and North Texas didn’t make it in until this week, and barely at that — Duke itself could still simply hop JMU. The Blue Devils hold about four teams’ playoff hopes in their upset-minded hands.

And before you complain about undeserving teams making the field, this is how playoffs work! Teams with bad records reach the high school playoffs all the time. So do the champions of various lower-budget FCS, Division II or Division III conferences. Four teams with losing records have made the NFL playoffs since 2010. This is the way it should be. We should let more conference champs in, actually.

These are the chaos scenarios to watch for. Now let’s talk about the actual games.


Saturday, 8 p.m., Fox

Back in the BCS days, the people in charge would change the way the computer ratings portion of the BCS formula worked anytime they disagreed with the results. Constantly saying, “I don’t like that, let’s change something” creates a worse process as often as not.

One year into the 12-team playoff era, the college football world declared, “I don’t like that, let’s change something.” When the “top four conference champions receive first-round byes” rule produced odd results in Year 1 — namely, byes going to No. 9 Boise State and No. 12 Arizona State — the title-winner byes were immediately ditched. As a result, we get the most low-consequence No. 1 versus No. 2 December game imaginable. Barring an absolute blowout, Ohio State and Indiana are likely to receive top-four seeds and first-round byes no matter what happens in Indianapolis on Saturday.

Now, Indiana is playing for its first Big Ten title in 58 years; that’s pretty big. Plus, since both quarterbacks, IU’s Fernando Mendoza and OSU’s Julian Sayin, are among the three betting favorites in the Heisman race, it’s hard not to look at this game as a winner-take-all situation for that award. (Root for a defensive slugfest, Diego Pavia!) But this might turn out to be the first of two Hoosiers-Buckeyes games, and the second one will be much bigger.

This one will still be educational, though, and I have two huge questions:

Will Indiana’s offensive line hold up? In 2024, the Hoosiers lost to only the two national title game participants, Ohio State and Notre Dame. In both games, the IU defense mostly held up, but the offense vanished: Whereas the Hoosiers averaged 464 yards in wins, they gained a total of 429 yards in the two losses. Quarterback Kurtis Rourke’s injury limitations didn’t help, but IU running backs averaged only 4.0 yards per carry, and Rourke took eight sacks in 60 pass attempts.

This season, Indiana ranks first in rushing success rate* and a solid 35th in sack rate allowed. Backs Roman Hemby and Kaelon Black keep the Hoosiers on schedule, and Mendoza gets the ball out of his hands quickly. The offense performed well enough against a pair of SP+ top-10 defenses (Iowa and Oregon), but Ohio State’s defense is the best in the country. How well will the Hoosiers hold up, especially up front?

(*Success rate: How frequently an offense is gaining 50% of necessary yardage on first down, 70% on second and 100% on third and fourth.)

Can Ohio State turn on the explosiveness? Ryan Day and coordinator Brian Hartline have created a sturdy offensive structure for maximizing Sayin’s ridiculous accuracy and keeping the redshirt freshman out of awkward downs and distances. The Buckeyes operate with one of the nation’s slowest tempos, and Sayin throws the ball as quickly as possible. He has completed a record 78.9% of his passes, and with a good-not-great run game as a complement, Ohio State ranks second nationally in success and three-and-out rates.

The tradeoff, however, is a major lack of big plays.

The Buckeyes rank just 111th in yards per successful play (11.5), and while we know all about the epic talent of receivers Jeremiah Smith and Carnell Tate, Sayin very selectively looks deep. That keeps both the negative and big-play counts low.

Big plays are the way to score on Indiana, however. The Hoosiers have allowed only 11 offensive touchdowns this season: Six were from 44 yards or longer, and two more were set up by gains of 40-plus. IU is fifth in success rate allowed and ninth in sack rate — the Hoosiers don’t let you dink and dunk all the way down the field. Can Ohio State create chunk plays without exposing Sayin to hits and mistakes?

Current line: OSU -4 (down from -5.5 at open) | SP+ projection: OSU by 0.9 | FPI projection: IU by 0.1


Saturday, 4 p.m., ABC

If Alabama beats Georgia, we could end up with a situation in which a) the extremely top-heavy Big Ten gets only three CFP teams, but they all get top-four seeds and first-round byes, and b) the SEC gets five teams, but none of them are in the top four. Granted, there’s also a chance that the committee surges Bama up to fourth in this scenario, but based on the season the SEC has had, “five bids and no byes” would be apt. It currently has no top-five teams in the SP+ rankings, but it still has seven of the top 13 and, comfortably, the best average rating.

Of course, for all the talk of parity within this conference, we’re getting our fourth Bama-Georgia title game in eight years, and a Georgia win — the Dawgs are favored — will be its third title in four years. Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose and whatnot.

Writing about Alabama this season has been a strange experience. The Crimson Tide have mostly been “little things” masters, owning the red zone on both ends, winning the field position and turnover battles and closing games out beautifully, going 4-1 in one-score games. But they have also only rarely looked dominant despite the legion of former blue-chippers on their roster. They’ve ranked between ninth and 12th in SP+ for the past seven weeks, and in that span, they’ve played almost precisely to projections (which suggests that the ranking is pretty accurate).

They beat Georgia 10 weeks ago, however, and that brings them back to Atlanta to face a Georgia team that … has rarely dominated despite the legion of former blue-chippers on their roster. The Dawgs are also 4-1 in one-score finishes, and while they had to lean heavily on offense early in the season — they beat Tennessee 44-41 and beat Ole Miss 43-35 — they’ve allowed just 22 total points in their past three games, a run that includes their one truly resounding performance, a 35-10 blowout of Texas.

In the teams’ first meeting, two major habits came to bear. Alabama, which ranks eighth nationally in points per drive in the first half (and only 33rd in the second), bolted to a 14-0 lead and led 24-14 at halftime. In the second half, however, Georgia took control, tilting the field and creating a pair of red zone opportunities to Bama’s zero. A fourth-down stop in the fourth quarter, however, made the difference in a 24-21 Tide win. For the game, the Dawgs averaged 6.7 yards per play to Bama’s 5.2, but the Tide won 19 of 27 total third downs and finished plus-1 in turnovers. That was just enough.

This was one of five games in which Georgia took snaps while trailing in the second half. It was the only one the Dawgs didn’t win. For whatever their upside might be this year, there’s never going to be any question about their ability to brawl for 60 full minutes.

Georgia’s defense has rounded into form of late, but the Dawgs still face an awkward matchup with the Tide offense, in that it defends the run far better than the pass and Bama is happy to abandon the run and put the game in Ty Simpson‘s hands. Regardless, the early going will be huge: Georgia is more experienced and more effective at playing from behind. And if you’re rooting for the “What happens if Bama gets genuinely thumped?” scenario, Georgia going up early is an obvious step one.

Current line: UGA -2.5 | SP+ projection: UGA by 2.8 | FPI projection: Bama by 0.3


Saturday, noon, ABC

I don’t think we’ve talked enough about how good Texas Tech is this season. I mean, everyone knows the Red Raiders are good — they’re 11-1, they’re fourth in the CFP rankings and defenders Jacob Rodriguez and David Bailey are surefire All-Americans. They aren’t exactly flying under the radar. But while SP+ has locked in pretty well on most teams, it continues to underestimate Tech’s capabilities, even while ranking it third nationally. The Red Raiders overachieved against projections by an average of 14.0 points in November, winning four games (including one against BYU) by an average of 42-9. In fact, the only time they’ve really underachieved all season was in their 26-22 loss to Arizona State, when they were without starting quarterback Behren Morton. They even managed to overachieve in three other partial or whole games without Morton. This is a scary team.

BYU has all the motivation in this one, however, knowing that its playoff hopes are now fully win or bust. (The Cougars might also get an “Our head coach just chose us over Penn State” boost.) Will that make a difference? Or is Tech just too damn good?

BYU’s defense played brilliantly in the teams’ first meeting, a 29-7 Tech win on Nov. 8. The Cougars held Tech to just a 33.3% success rate, 13 percentage points below its season average, and allowed the Red Raiders just two touchdowns in seven red zone trips. The score was only 13-0 at halftime, and wasted opportunities made it seem like Tech could be vulnerable to a comeback, but the BYU offense just couldn’t deliver. For just about the only time all season, BYU’s Bear Bachmeier looked like the true freshman he is, throwing for just 188 yards at 4.5 yards per dropback and losing an interception and fumble. Given enough opportunities, Tech finally put the game away.

An upset will require the same high level of defensive play and far better execution on offense. Having running back LJ Martin at full strength will help — Martin was hurt the week before the first matchup and gained just 35 yards in 10 carries against Tech. His 222-yard performance two weeks ago against Cincinnati suggests he’s playing at a high level, and BYU should get another couple of recently banged-up starters back as well. But we just don’t know what exactly will beat the Tech defense because almost nothing has.

The Red Raiders have given up more than 17 points just twice all season and only allowed one team, Kansas State, to top 4.8 yards per play (the Wildcats averaged a still pedestrian 5.2). BYU might be able to hold Tech under 28 points with another strong effort, but it might take the best performance of Bachmeier’s life to hit 28 or more.

Current line: Tech -12.5 | SP+ projection: Tech by 11.7 | FPI projection: Tech by 4.3


Saturday, 8 p.m., ABC

As fun as it’s been to envision wild scenarios that might unfold if Duke wins the ACC, Virginia could put an end to all of this creativity by simply repeating what happened the last time the Cavaliers met the Blue Devils. Three weeks ago, they put together probably their most complete performance of the season in a 34-17 romp.

Success rate: Virginia 40.3%, Duke 31.0%
Yards per play: Virginia 7.0, Duke 4.4
Field position margin: Virginia plus-6.7 per drive
Third downs: Virginia 12-19, Duke 4-15
Sacks: Virginia 4, Duke 0
Turnovers: Virginia 2, Duke 1

UVA played far more efficient ball than the Blue Devils, enjoyed eight gains of 20-plus yards to Duke’s three and won 23 of 34 total third downs (67%). The only reason the game finished as close as 17 points was because of two Hoos turnovers, one of which was a pick-six.

Virginia has been the better team in 2025, but these teams’ first game was a bit of an outlier. UVA’s seasonlong averages aren’t quite as advantageous, and Duke’s offense has been especially strong down the stretch. The Blue Devils have scored more than 30 points in four of the past five games (UVA being the exception), and Darian Mensah finished the regular season first in the ACC in passing yards and third in Total QBR.

Mensah has been a high-volume, high-accuracy playmaker, and Duke has improved from 71st to 23rd in offensive SP+ in a single season.

Unfortunately for Duke, the defense has fallen from 31st to 91st. Against seven top-60 offenses this season, including Virginia’s, Duke allowed 36.4 points per game. Virginia’s offensive production trailed off over the back half of the season, but the Hoos still torched the Blue Devils: Chandler Morris threw for 316 yards, Trell Harris caught eight balls for 161 yards and J’Mari Taylor rushed for 133 yards in 18 carries.

Mensah and receivers Cooper Barkate and Que’Sean Brown torched Clemson and Wake Forest — defenses that grade out about as well as UVA’s — and Duke could absolutely turn this into a track meet. But Virginia probably has the advantage in a track meet too.

Current line: UVA -3.5 | SP+ projection: UVA by 7.3 | FPI projection: UVA by 1.5


Friday, 8 p.m., ABC

With four of five Group of 5 title games taking place Friday night, we’ll have a clear view of the stakes of Virginia-Duke by Saturday morning. But it’s safe to assume that the winner of this game, pitting two ranked teams with soon-departing head coaches (UNT’s Oklahoma State-bound Eric Morris and Tulane’s Florida-bound Jon Sumrall) in potentially very rainy conditions, is in.

For all of the money being thrown around to stars in today’s college football landscape, the best offense in the country, per SP+, was crafted in Denton, Texas, and features a true freshman (RB Caleb Hawkins), a redshirt freshman who didn’t start in high school (QB Drew Mestemaker) and transfers from Kent State, Abilene Christian, Shepherd University and the now-closed Limestone University. North Texas is averaging 46.8 points and 511.8 yards; the Mean Green have topped 50 points seven times and even scored 36 in their lone loss.

The Mean Green’s schedule, however, has lacked. They’ve played only one team currently ranked higher than 57th in SP+ (South Florida), and they lost to the Bulls by 27 points. Granted, that margin was mostly due to the worst middle eight of all time — USF went on a 28-0 run between the 0:02 mark of the second quarter and 11:35 of the third — but it still counts, and UNT hasn’t had another chance to prove itself against a particularly good opponent.

Tulane is good. Granted, the Green Wave have allowed 38.5 points per game and 7.1 yards per play to the only two top-20 offenses they’ve faced. But they’re improving on D — they solidly overachieved against defensive projections down the stretch — and they have an offense that can keep up in a track meet: They’re 10th nationally in passing success rate, with Jake Retzlaff combining 2,717 passing yards with a solid 621 non-sack rushing yards.

Neither of these defenses is amazing, but neither gives up a ton of big plays either. This one will probably come down to which defense allows the fewest big shots and easy points

Current line: UNT -2.5 | SP+ projection: UNT by 8.2 | FPI projection: UNT by 2.0


Friday, 7 p.m., ESPN

Troy has reached the Sun Belt championship game through sheer perseverance. Gerad Parker’s Trojans won three straight wild one-score games early in the season. They also overcame an early-season QB injury, with Tucker Kilcrease filling in for Goose Crowder, who is back in the lineup and slinging the ball around well. Good pass defense and random offensive spurts have given them a chance at a third Sun Belt title in four years.

The odds, of course, aren’t great. JMU did lose four times as a favorite last year, and distractions can always strike when your coach is leaving, but Troy is a three-touchdown underdog, and JMU will be hunting for style points in super-chilly Harrisonburg.

JMU’s defense ranks first in success rate allowed and has allowed more than 5.1 yards per play just once all season. They boast difference-makers at each level, from defensive ends Sahir West and Aiden Gobaira up front to safety Jacob Thomas in the back. The offense was surprisingly inconsistent early in 2025 but ignited against Old Dominion and hasn’t looked back: In their past six games, the Dukes have averaged 48.5 points and 7.4 yards per play. Alonza Barnett is 14th nationally in Total QBR in that span, distributing the ball beautifully to five different pass catchers.

The only close call JMU has suffered since the offensive ignition came against Washington State: The Cougars kept the tempo at a crawl, won third and fourth downs and limited the Dukes to just 50 snaps. It still didn’t work — JMU scored on two long second-half touchdowns and won 24-20. But if Troy pulls a scare, it will be from a similar recipe. The Trojans can land some shots defensively, and they’re pretty good on third down and willing on fourth. But the margin for error here is minimal.

Current line: JMU -23.5 (up from -21.5) | SP+ projection: JMU by 20.2 | FPI projection: JMU by 18.4


Friday, 8 p.m., Fox

Since the start of 2023, UNLV is 30-10 overall, an incredible run for a program with minimal historical success. The Rebels have gone 5-3 against power conference programs in that span, and they’re 18-7 in the Mountain West. Just imagine how great things might be if they could actually beat Boise State: The Rebels are 0-4 against the Broncos in this span, including losses in back-to-back MWC championship games. If momentum means anything in this sport, however — I often doubt it does — and the Rebels can adapt to cold and rainy conditions in Boise, the timing might finally be right.

Five weeks ago, this matchup seemed unlikely. UNLV had lost two straight games, giving up 96 combined points to Boise State and New Mexico and falling to 123rd in defensive SP+. BSU, meanwhile, had just lost quarterback Maddux Madsen to injury and had fallen 30-7 to Fresno State. The Broncos would lose to San Diego State in their next game, too.

BSU quarterback Max Cutforth found his footing, however, and helped to lead a blowout of Colorado State and a comeback win at Utah State. UNLV, meanwhile, suddenly found a defense and beat its past four conference opponents by an average of 38-16. The Rebels have looked so good that they rose from 71st to 41st in SP+ in just four weeks.

Madsen, who is scheduled to return Friday, threw for 253 yards and four touchdowns in BSU’s 56-31 win over UNLV in Week 8, while Dylan Riley rushed for 201 yards in just 15 carries. Even in the Rebels’ improved state, they still aren’t defending the run well. UNLV can keep up in most track meets, and holding the Broncos under 35 will give it a chance. But that might not be guaranteed.

Current line: BSU -4.5 (up from -1.5) | SP+ projection: UNLV by 0.4 | FPI projection: BSU by 4.0


Friday, 7 p.m., CBSSN

For the second straight season, a second-year FBS program will play for the CUSA title. Last year, second-year Jacksonville State wiped the floor with Western Kentucky; now Kennesaw State gives it a go against the champs.

Jerry Mack’s first KSU team has found success by raising its floor: The Owls don’t rank high in many of the categories I track, but they’re also near the bottom in almost none. They defend the run well — linebacker Baron Hopson is ridiculously good in this department — they hit on some deep passes to Gabriel Benyard and Christian Moss, and they wait for you to make mistakes.

JSU lost a ton from last year’s conference title squad, but after a wobbly 3-3 start, the Gamecocks found an offensive rhythm by running the hell out of the ball: Cam Cook has rushed for 1,588 yards, and not including sacks, quarterback Caden Creel has added 1,008. The defense is decent but clutch offensive play has allowed the Gamecocks to win six of seven games despite five finishing within one score.

These two met three weeks ago in a game decided by big plays and turnovers. Jax State scored on a second-quarter Hail Mary, Creel produced completions of 50 and 52 yards (plus a 40-yard rush), and the Gamecocks picked off three passes in the red zone in a 35-26 win. None of that’s particularly sustainable, though, especially since KSU has been the better overall red zone team in 2025.

Current line: KSU -2.5 (flipped from JSU -1.5) | SP+ projection: KSU by 1.4 | FPI projection: KSU by 0.3


Saturday, noon, ESPN

Miami is playing in the MAC championship game for the third straight season — the Redhawks won in 2023 and lost last year — while WMU is enjoying its best campaign, and first title game appearance, since 2016.

Chuck Martin’s Redhawks lost basically every offensive starter and half the defense after last season and landed only a few major contributors from the transfer portal. But they got rolling after an 0-3 start, and when quarterback Dequan Finn left the program in November, redshirt freshman Thomas Gotkowski took over and led comfortable wins over Buffalo and Ball State.

WMU also started 0-3, but the Broncos have since won eight of nine — losing only to Miami, in fact. Thanks in part to otherworldly outside linebacker Nadame Tucker (18.5 TFLs, 12 sacks, 4 forced fumbles), their defense ranks 46th in defensive SP+, their highest ranking since 2000.

Miami turned the tables late in their Week 9 matchup. WMU took a 17-9 lead into the fourth quarter, but the Redhawks outgained the Broncos 160-61 in the fourth, forced a turnover and finished the game on a 17-0 run. Gotkowski has gotten away with mostly quick passes to the sideline, but the Redhawks might need him to ramp up the playmaking to maintain their Week 9 advantages. Otherwise WMU could seize its first title in nine years.

Current line: WMU -2.5 | SP+ projection: Miami by 1.2 | FPI projection: WMU by 0.2


Smaller-school showcase

Let’s once again save a shout-out for the glorious lower levels of the sport. The smaller-school playoffs are hitting top speed, so here’s a game you should track at each level.

Division II quarterfinals: No. 16 Newberry at No. 13 Albany State (ESPN+, 1 p.m.). The Division II quarterfinals feature projected blowout wins for the three best teams — Ferris State, Harding and Kutztown — but the last semifinal spot will go to one of two upstarts.

Both Albany State and Newberry are seeking their first D-II semifinal appearance. ASU is the projected favorite because of defensive end Derrick Drayton and a defense that allows just 13.3 points per game. Newberry, however, just upset No. 4 West Florida thanks to 416 passing yards and two touchdowns from quarterback Reed Charpia. Do the Wolves have another upset in them?

SP+ projection: Albany State by 7.3

Division III round of 16: No. 6 Saint John’s (Minn.) at No. 4 Wisconsin-River Falls (1 p.m., ESPN+). Saint John’s has been to only one semifinal since winning the 2003 D-III national title, but the Johnnies are flying thanks to quarterback Trey Feeney and an offense averaging 50.4 points per game. UWRF, meanwhile, is looking for its first quarterfinal appearance in 30 years, and Kaleb Blaha and the Falcons also wing the ball around like crazy and score lots of points (47.5 PPG)! Track meet in River Falls!

SP+ projection: Johnnies by 1.4

NAIA quarterfinals: No. 7 Lindsey Wilson at No. 1 Grand View (1 p.m., local streaming). It’s the No. 1 team in the NAIA polls vs. the No. 1 team in NAIA SP+. Grand View is NAIA’s standard bearer; the Vikings are the defending national champions and have gone a cool 83-5 since 2019. The defense allows 8.4 points per game thanks to ace pass rusher Jackson Filer (23 TFLs, 11 sacks). But Lindsey Wilson is scoring 44.8 points per game with absurd run-pass balance. And there’s a chance of afternoon snow in Des Moines!

SP+ projection: LWU by 1.5

FCS round of 16: No. 18 South Dakota State at No. 4 Montana (2 p.m., ESPN+). So is South Dakota State suddenly South Dakota State again? The Jackrabbits needed a miracle finish against North Dakota to assure themselves a spot in the playoffs, but with quarterback Chase Mason healthy and back in the lineup, they crushed New Hampshire 41-3 in last week’s first round. Mason’s in-season injury might end up being Montana’s misfortune — SDSU is unbeaten when he starts, and now the Grizzlies have to beat the Jacks just to reach the quarterfinals. Luckily they have quarterback Keali’i Ah Yat and a pretty fantastic offense themselves.

SP+ projection: Montana by 5.6

Continue Reading

Trending