Connect with us

Published

on

Facing possible indictment in Georgia for his efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election, former President Donald Trump asked the state’s highest court to step in on his behalf. On Monday, the court unanimously declined to do so.

Last week, Trump’s legal team filed a petition with the Supreme Court of Georgia, against Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and Judge Robert McBurney of the Atlanta Superior Court. The filing sought to disqualify Willis from involvement in the unfolding case against Trump.

In February 2021, Willis opened a criminal investigation into Trump’s conduct after the 2020 electionspecifically, his January 2, 2021, phone call to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger in which he was recorded pressuring Raffensperger to “find 11,780 votes” to win Trump the state. The following year, Willis impaneled a special grand jury with the power to issue subpoenas, expanding her investigation to include any attempts to “disrupt the lawful administration of the 2020 elections” in Georgia. McBurney is the Superior Court judge overseeing the grand jury’s proceedings.

The grand jury interviewed around 75 witnesses before concluding in January. While its report has not been fully released, the available evidence indicates bad news for Trump: Willis recently signaled that indictments may be unsealed in August.

In the July 13 filing, Trump asked the court to compel McBurney to “quash” the grand jury’s report, “bar its use in regular grand-jury proceedings,” and “bar the use of any evidence obtained” in the process “in any subsequent proceedings.” It also asked the court to prevent Willis from any further involvement in Trump’s case.

On Monday, less than a week after Trump’s complaint was filed, the Georgia Supreme Court decided unanimously against him. In an unsigned five-page decision, the court declined to rule on the merits of many of Trump’s arguments, contending instead that his filing was improper. Instead of petitioning the superior court and “appeal[ing] from any adverse decision,” the judges wrote, Trump was skipping ahead and asking the higher court to “step in and allow him to circumvent the regular judicial process.” And while Trump accurately claims that the court would have the legal authority to step in, “he
makes no showing that he has been prevented fair access to the ordinary channels.”

Trump’s filing cited a litany of complaints, from claiming the law authorizing special grand juries was too “vague” and, therefore, “facially unconstitutional under the 14th Amendment” and the Georgia Constitution, to alleging that Willis has an “impermissible and actual conflict of interest.” (Last year, Willis hosted a fundraiser for a Democratic candidate for lieutenant governor after already having named the candidate’s Republican opponent, state Sen. Burt Jones, a “target” of her investigation. McBurney barred the grand jury from targeting Jones or issuing subpoenas to him, though he declined to do the same for any other targets of the investigation.)

The filing even complains that the process has gone too fast, observing that “criminal processes, particularly in Georgia, can be ponderously slow,” and the fact that this case would proceed so quickly is “grossly unrealistic.”

Much of Trump’s complaint also hinges on the novelty of the situation. “That this case is extraordinary goes almost without saying,” it states. “No prosecutor, state or federal, has ever indicted a former president for conduct committed while in office.” In that respect, Trump is correct: It is indeed novel and unprecedented for a former president to be indicted. But that by itself doesn’t mean that an indictment is unwarranted. Publicly available evidence of a defeated incumbent leaning on a state official to “find” enough votes for him to carry that state is also novel and unprecedented.

As Eric Boehm wrote in the July 2023 issue of Reason, the Georgia case “could be important in setting clear standards for how much pressure future presidents can exert on state and local election officials.”

The Georgia case is just one of several across the country that pose serious legal risk to Trump. In April, the former president was indicted in Manhattan over 2016 hush money payments to pornographic actress Stormy Daniels. And a federal grand jury in Washington, D.C., is considering whether Trump, in his actions after the 2020 election, may have committed federal crimes.

Continue Reading

Business

Jobless rate hits four-year high- but makes interest rate cut more likely

Published

on

By

Jobless rate hits four-year high- but makes interest rate cut more likely

The UK’s unemployment rate has risen to a four-year high, in a surprise deterioration that boosts the case for a Bank of England interest rate cut.

The Office for National Statistics (ONS) reported a rise in the jobless rate from 4.6% to 4.7% in the three months to May.

No change had been expected after the 0.1 percentage point rise seen just last month.

The ONS data, which still comes with a health warning due to poor participation rates, also showed a reduction in the pace of wage rises, with average weekly earnings rising by 5%. That was down from the 5.2% level reported a month ago.

Money latest: The rising cost of airport drop-off fees

ONS director of economic statistics, Liz McKeown, said of its findings: “The labour market continues to weaken, with the number of employees on payroll falling again, though revised tax data shows the decline in recent months is less pronounced than previously estimated.

“Pay growth fell again in both cash and real terms, but both measures remain relatively strong by historic standards.

More from Money

“The number of job vacancies is still falling and has now been dropping continuously for three years.”

The data was released 24 hours after a surprise rise in the rate of inflation, to 3.6%, was revealed by the ONS.

It was seen as muddying the waters as the Bank considers the timing of its next interest rate cut.

But a quarter point reduction, to 4%, is widely expected at the next meeting of the rate-setting committee in early August,

The Bank, experts say, will be looking past the headline inflation numbers and see scope to introduce the third cut of the year due to the softening labour market seen in 2025 – a factor the Bank’s governor Andrew Bailey had suggested would come more into focus in a recent interview with The Times.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What does ‘inflation is rising’ mean?

Weaker pay awards remain a compulsory element to bringing down borrowing costs as there are fears the UK’s difficulties in bringing down inflation are partly linked to wage growth outpacing price hikes since August 2023.

Add to that the slowdown in economic growth and you have a Bank seemingly grappling the effects of so-called stagflation – as scenario of weak growth with inflation persistently well above the Bank’s 2% target.

While there are conflicting forces at play for the Bank’s interest rate deliberations, rising inflation, coupled with weakening growth and jobs data, are all unwelcome for a chancellor under growing pressure.

Rachel Reeves was accused on Wednesday of contributing to inflation through taxes on employment deployed from April – with industry bodies in the grocery sector claiming an element of rising food price growth was down to businesses passing on those extra costs, alongside hikes to minimum pay requirements.

At the same time, those budget measures have clearly held back hiring since the spring.

One crumb of comfort for her is that the prospect of a rate cut next month remains on – with any reduction helping bring down the cost of servicing government debt as the headroom she has within the public finances remains under severe pressure.

Government U-turns on winter fuel payment curbs and welfare reforms have squeezed her fiscal rules, leaving her to cover likely at the autumn budget to cover shortfalls either through further tax hikes or spending cuts.

Yael Selfin, chief economist at KPMG UK, said of the rate cut prospects: “Slowing activity in the labour market, coupled with pay pressures easing, will likely prompt the Bank of England to lower interest rates next month.

“The impact of April’s tax and administrative changes has led to a marked slowdown in hiring activity among firms. With domestic activity remaining sluggish, the MPC will likely want to provide support via looser policy to prevent a more significant deterioration in the labour market.”

Continue Reading

Politics

‘We’re a team’: Jess Phillips defends PM’s decision to suspend Labour rebels

Published

on

By

Starmer suspends four Labour MPs for breaches of party discipline

A minister has defended Sir Keir Starmer’s decision to discipline rebellious MPs, saying they would have used “stronger” language against those who are “continually causing trouble”.

Home Office minister Jess Phillips told Sky News’ Matt Barbet that Labour MPs were elected “as a team under a banner and under a manifesto” and could “expect” to face disciplinary action if they did not vote with the government.

It comes after the prime minister drew criticism for suspending four Labour MPs who voted against the government on its flagship welfare bill earlier this month, while stripping a further three of their roles as trade envoys.

Politics latest: PM to welcome German chancellor

Brian Leishman, Chris Hinchliff, Neil Duncan-Jordan and Rachael Maskell.
Pic: Uk Parliament
Image:
Brian Leishman, Chris Hinchliff, Neil Duncan-Jordan and Rachael Maskell.
Pic: Uk Parliament

Brian Leishman, Chris Hinchliff, Neil Duncan-Jordan and Rachael Maskell all lost the whip, meaning they are no longer part of Labour’s parliamentary party and will sit as independent MPs.

Labour backbenchers lined up to criticise the move last night, arguing it was a “terrible look” that made “a Reform government much more likely”.

But speaking to Sky News, Ms Phillips said: “We were elected as a team under a banner and under a manifesto, and we have to seek to work together, and if you are acting in a manner that is to undermine the ability of the government to deliver those things, I don’t know what you expect.

“Now I speak out against things I do not like, both internally and sometimes externally, all the time.

“There is a manner of doing that, that is the right way to go about it. And sometimes you feel forced to rebel and vote against.”

Referring to a description of the rebels by an unnamed source in The Times, she said: “I didn’t call it persistent knob-headery, but that’s the way that it’s been termed by some.”

She said she would have described it as “something much more sweary” because “we are a team, and we have to act as a team in order to achieve something”.

More than 100 MPs had initially rebelled against the plan to cut personal independent payments (PIP). Ultimately, 47 voted against the bill’s third reading, after it was watered down significantly in the face of defeat.

Three other MPs – who also voted against the government – have had their trade envoy roles removed. They are Rosena Allin Khan, Bell Ribeiro-Addy and Mohammed Yasin.

However, it is understood this was not the only reason behind the decision to reprimand all seven MPs, with sources citing “repeated breaches of party discipline”.

Ms Maskell was one of the lead rebels in the welfare revolt, and has more recently called for a wealth tax to fund the U-turn.

Mr Hinchliff, the MP for North East Hertfordshire, proposed a series of amendments to the flagship planning and infrastructure bill criticising the government’s approach.

Read more:
Why suspended Labour MPs clearly hit a nerve with Starmer
Who are the suspended Labour MPs?

Mr Duncan-Jordan, the MP for Poole, led a rebellion against the cut to the winter fuel payments while Alloa and Grangemouth MP Mr Leishman has been critical of the government’s position on Gaza as well as the closing of an oil refinery in his constituency.

Ian Byrne, the Labour MP for Liverpool West Derby, wrote on X on Wednesday that the prime minister’s actions “don’t show strength” and were “damaging Labour’s support and risk rolling out the red carpet for Reform”.

Leeds East MP Richard Burgon added that “challenging policies that harm our communities” would “make a Reform government much more likely”.

Ian Lavery, Labour MP for Blyth and Ashington, warned the suspensions were “a terrible look”.

“Dissatisfaction with the direction the leadership is taking us isn’t confined to the fringes,” he wrote.

Continue Reading

Business

Jaguar Land Rover to cut hundreds of UK jobs

Published

on

By

Jaguar Land Rover to cut hundreds of UK jobs

Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) has revealed plans to cut 500 jobs as it moves to save costs while battling a sharp decline in sales.

The UK-based firm said the reduction in management roles, which amounted to 1.5% of its workforce, would be completed through a voluntary redundancy programme.

JLR has been struggling recently on the back of the US trade war.

Money latest: The rising cost of airport drop-off fees

It temporarily paused exports to the US, its biggest single foreign market, in April after Donald Trump’s hike to duties covering cars to 25%.

It was later trimmed to 10% under the US-UK trade truce agreement, but that rate only covers the cars it makes in the UK.

The terms of the deal also cap total annual car exports to the US at 100,000 models, so the higher rate will apply to those vehicles exceeding the threshold.

More on Tariffs

KEIR STARMER JLR
Image:
Sir Keir Starmer told JLR workers in April that he would protect their jobs

The tariff uncertainty, coupled with a planned wind-down of older Jaguar models, meant sales were 15% down over the three months to June to just over 94,000.

JLR confirmed its job cut plans on the day the UK’s jobless rate hit a four-year high.

It also follows on the back of a Kier Starmer speech to staff, promising to protect their jobs, back in April.

The company had said, after the US-UK truce in May, that the deal would do just that.

A spokesperson said: “As part of normal business practice, we regularly offer eligible employees the opportunity to leave JLR through limited voluntary redundancy programmes.”

Continue Reading

Trending