Connect with us

Published

on

13.2K

Stocking antibiotics for a catastrophe has been a topic of conversation among preppers for as long as Ive been writing about prepping (now 15 years). The challenge, of course, is trying to find over the counter antibiotics. Its impossible, right?

Not exactly. It can be done, but it requires unconventional approaches.

Ill explain, but lets back up for a second. Why Preppers Need to Stock Antibiotics

Ive found most new preppers tend to first dive into firearms and food. Theyll buy up whatever they think the best gun for SHTF is, then theyll stock canned goods and freeze-dried foods. Intermediate preppers begin calculating how much water they should store, start storing rice and beans, etc.

Stock beans, bullets, and bandages!
survivalist saying

Sprinkled between the food and firearms, newer preppers will begin adding some medical supplies. They may buy a first aid kit or make an IFAK kit. Theyll buy a copy of Where There is No Doctor, and usually thats about as far as theyll go for medical supplies. Sale Where There Is No Doctor: A Village Health Care Handbook Used Book in Good ConditionDavid Werner (Author) $24.26 Buy on Amazon

These are great steps to take, and without question, the prepper that takes these medical measures will be significantly better-suited to surviving a catastrophe than the average American. However, we can always do better, and during a crisis, odds are high that antibiotics will be needed by many. Theyre one of the main drugs I recommend people pack in a bug out bag, and theyre equally important at home for an extended crisis. We Take Access to Antibiotics for Granted

It is easy to take our collective dependence on antibiotics for granted. Were sick so we head to the doctors office, end up seeing the nurse practitioner instead, and then leave with a prescription called in to our local pharmacy.

Easy peasy.

However, this wasnt always the case. The first antibiotics were not prescribed until the late 1930s. After that, the rates of bacterial infection as a cause of death plummeted. Between 1944 and 1972, human life expectancy jumped by eight years as a result of it. Penicillin ushered in a whole new era in medicine.

If access to health care and antibiotics became a problem, simple diseases and infections that we think nothing of today could once again pose serious risk to our lives. Antibiotics are Critical After a Crisis

During a humanitarian crisis, whether its the result of war or natural disaster, communicable diseases pose a serious risk to the surviving population. Its the risks associated with population displacement that causes problems.

According to a study from the National Library of Medicine:

The availability of safe water and sanitation facilities, the degree of crowding, the underlying health status of the population, and the availability of healthcare services all interact within the context of the local disease ecology to influence the risk for communicable diseases and death in the affected population. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2725828/

So, the breakdown in infrastructure and cleanliness leads to a spread in infectious diseases. An earthquake, as an example, destroys infrastructure and displaces people, which then gives way to disease outbreaks because people are huddled together in an unsanitary environment.

Examples include an outbreak of norovirus in Texas after Hurricane Katrina in 2005and cutaneous leishmaniasis outbreaks during the Syrian conflict beginning in 2013.

In other parts of the world, cholera remains a serious problem. Its an acute diarrheal disease that can kill within hours if left untreated. Severe cases require you guessed it antibiotic treatment. What is considered a problem only in developing countries could quickly create problems in modern countries following a local or national catastrophe. How to Buy Over the Counter Antibiotics

Back in the early days of prepping, when prepping was still a largely hush hush topic lest you be viewed as an extremist, there was only my site and a handful of others dedicated to prepping. The biggest by far was Survival Blog. There people would often discuss how to convince their doctors to prescribe antibiotics even though they medically didnt need them at the time.

That puts the doctor in a precarious position, and they are not likely to just go prescribing unnecessary antibiotics because their patient fears the end of the world is coming. It is possible, more so today than yesteryear, to find a sympathetic doc who might help you out, but the odds are stacked against you.

If you want to stock antibiotics, youre going to have to find another way. Following are three ways Ive bought over the counter antibiotics. 1 Buying Antibiotics Online

This approach is a bit of a cheat, because technically it does involve a prescription (thats how theyre legally distributed), but you dont have to visit or talk with the doctor. While its not physically over the counter it is the same idea buying them online. Jase Medical

Jase Medical is an example of this service. They market themselves as a business that provides people who are preparing for a catastrophe, pandemic, foreign travel, etc. with a variety of different antibiotics.

Jase Medical is not a scam. I tried the service and received the medication. The antibiotics I received from Jase Medical. They came with a spiral-bound guide and case.

This service is great because you can just log on to your computer or phone, go through the online consultation (a series of questions), and then the doctor reviews your answers and you receive approval for the antibiotics which are then promptly mailed to you.

According to their website the consultation requires you to Fill out our simple online form for an evaluation from a board-certified physician.

See the screenshot below as an example of the types of questions asked: Sample question from Jase Medical.

Their service is available to everyone in the United States and Canada. Its fully legal because they contract with physicians who are licensed to prescribe medications in your area and they comply with all governing medical laws.

So, while it technically requires a prescription, its not the type of prescription that most people are accustomed to obtaining. Its easy.

There is a downside to this approach, however cost. You are unlikely to get your insurance to cover their services. You have to pay out of pocket, and thats where they make their money.

As of this writing, Jase Medical charges $259.95 USD for the following antibiotics: Metronidazole 30-500mg Tablets Azithromycin 6-250mg Tablets Amoxicillin-Clavulanate 28-875/125mg Tablets Ciprofloxacin 28-500mg Tablets Doxycycline 120-100mg Capsules

That price includes their booklet and case. Canadian orders for the same assortment costs $435.95 CAD.

Expensive? Yes. Worth it? That depends on the results of your SHTF plan, your medical conditions, and how much youre willing to spend. In Case

Another company offering a similar service is In Case, a play off just in case. They provide a kit of doctor-prescribed antibiotics for emergency use.Ive also used this company and the customer service was solid. I went through their online health questionnaire and the package of just in case medications came in the mail shortly thereafter.

The company describes their service as:

The IN CASE Kit is a box containing 6 doctor-prescribed medications which target treatment of severe infections and injuries for use in emergency situations. These medications treat natural and biological disaster pathogens causing infections throughout the body including thelungs, pelvic and urinary tract, skin wounds, gastrointestinal, eyes, ears, and central nervous system. IN CASE was co-founded by an ER physician who is also one of the countrys leading infectious disease researchers. IN CASEs doctor network covers all 50 states. In Case marketing statement I found the In Case Emergency Medication Usage Guide to be particularly informative. Its a simple explanation of which drugs to use under what circumstances.

My In Case package included: Cephalexin 500mg Ciprofloxacin HCL 500mg Doxycycline Hyclate 100mg Gentamicin 0.3% eye drops Metronidazole 500mg Mupirocin 2% ointment

As you can see, the In Case package has some similarities to the Jase Medical package, but also a few different medications. The similarities are the key antibiotics that most preppers will want to stock.

In an ideal world, you would be able to purchase a package from each, as I have. That way you have a greater variety of medications, but also a more robust supply of key antibiotics. 2 Buy Them in Another Country

Every time I travel to Mexico, Im surprised by what can be purchased over the counter. Antibiotics? Check. Prozac? No problem. Valium? Ritalin? Viagra? Steroids? All of that. Pictures I took of street signs advertising drugs for sale over the counter in Mexico.

To be sure, these are advertised in tourist destinations and what is available in one area of Mexico may not be available in another area. I have found drugs of this type available over the counter in Puerto Vallarta and Playa del Carmen. A trip to Oaxaca did not yield any drug stores that would sell these without a prescription (though many pharmacies have someone who can prescribe).

Is there a catch? Yes.

Its not that these drugs dont work (they do, Ive tried them). Its that bringing them back to the United States without a prescription could yield legal problems. According to an article from Very Well Health:

You are allowed to bring prescription medications approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from Mexico into the United States for your personal use. But there is a limit. In general, you may bring up to 50 dosage units into the U.S. without a prescription. https://www.verywellhealth.com/prescription-drugs-from-mexico-2966765

That prescription must be from a U.S.-based doctor.

It is not an uncommon practice for people living near the border with Mexico who have limited funds/insurance and need lower-cost prescription drugs to hop across the border for them and return home.

Another way to obtain antibiotics through travel is to speak with your physician in advance of travel and ask for antibiotics in case you encounter digestion problems (like travelers diarrhea). Azithromycin is often used to treat travelers diarrhea and many doctors will prescribe it as a just in case prescriptions when you travel.

My doctor has done it before for me. I didnt need the medication, so I stored it after the trip with my other medical preps. 3 Buy Fish Antibiotics

Anyone that has been in the prepping circles for any length of time is familiar with the idea of buying fish antibiotics for human use. This is the easiest approach, no? You go to your local pet supply store pick some off the shelf.

Does this also have a catch? Of course safety concerns. Are fish antibiotics safe for humans? Good luck finding an exact answer to that question.

The problem is that fish antibiotics are not regulated by the FDA, so theres no guarantee what youre taking is what the label says it is. For this reason, and because youre not first consulting a doctor on the need for antibiotics, most people advise against using fish antibiotics.

Is this just medical professionals being overly cautious? Perhaps. In other cases, like a Pharmacy Times article arguing against it, its logical to assume these groups have a vested interest in keeping people coming to the pharmacy counter and not the fish store.

However, based on another study from the National Library of Medicine, its clear that many humans are self-treating with fish antibiotics.

Im not going to dispense any medical advice here. You need to talk to your own doctor for that.

However, I can tell you that if there is a serious, catastrophic event that results in my needing to take antibiotics and the only ones I have on hand are fish antibiotics thats better than the alternative in my mind, which is leaving the condition untreated. Conclusion

Preppers would be wise to stock antibiotics once they have other essentials squared away (food, water, etc.). They should know what antibiotics treat which conditions and they should always start by trying to obtain a prescription from a prepper-friendly doctor.

Short of that, there are options to obtain antibiotics over the counter, but each comes with a potential drawback.

What are your thoughts? Let me know in the comments section.

Continue Reading

Politics

Victims’ families criticise ‘deeply sensitive decision’ to demolish Grenfell Tower

Published

on

By

Grenfell Tower to be demolished, as campaigners react to 'divisive and painful debate' over decaying block

Grenfell campaigners have reacted to the “deeply sensitive decision” by the deputy prime minister to demolish the tower block.

Victims’ families and survivors were given the news in a meeting attended by Angela Rayner on Wednesday night.

Grenfell Next of Kin, which represents some of the bereaved families, described it as a “deeply sensitive decision… after a thorough engagement process in person” following an “uncomfortable conversation with uncomfortable truths”.

In a statement on X the group said: “The lack of closure, the continuous discussions and consultations, the retraumatisation of a divisive and painful debate brings nothing to the table except pain and further division.

“We want a discussion about what will go in the Tower’s place so it can be seen and remembered forever. We need to re-imagine a future and rebuild our broken shattered lives and our families.”

The government has previously said there will be no changes to the site before the eighth anniversary of the fire disaster, which claimed 72 lives on 14 June 2017.

It is expected more details will be set out by ministers by the end of the week.

More on Grenfell Tower

Engineering experts have said that while the tower remains stable, and it is safe for people to live, work and study nearby, its condition will worsen over time and there is no realistic prospect of bringing it back into use.

The latest advice issued to the government in September was that the building, or the part of it that was significantly damaged, should be taken down.

Grenfell Tower pictured days after the devastating fire. Pic: AP
Image:
Grenfell Tower pictured days after the devastating fire. Pic: AP

Meanwhile, another campaign group, Grenfell United, claimed Ms Rayner had not given a reason behind her decision during the meeting and refused to say how many of the victims’ families and survivors had been consulted.

In a statement, it said: “But judging from the room alone – the vast majority of whom were bereaved – no one supported her decision. But she claims her decision is based on our views.

“Ignoring the voices of bereaved on the future of our loved ones’ gravesite is disgraceful and unforgivable.”

Members of a support group for the next of kin and families of some the 72 people killed in the Grenfell Tower Fire in 2017 ahead of a press conference.
Pic: PA
Image:
Members of a support group for the next of kin and families of some the 72 people killed in the Grenfell Tower fire. Pic: PA

Grenfell Next of Kin expressed a different opinion, suggesting the decision by Ms Rayner “must have been difficult” and adding that “all the previous Secretaries of State [for Housing, Communities and Local Government] avoided making a decision despite the harm it did to us and the community.”

Local Labour MP Joe Powell also defended Ms Rayner posting on X that following “intensive engagement with our community… the decision to start planning for the Tower to come down has not been taken lightly”.

What is left of the tower has stood in place since the tragedy, with a covering on the building featuring a large green heart accompanied by the words “forever in our hearts”.

Views have varied on what should happen to the site.

Some of the bereaved and survivors feel the tower should remain in place until there are criminal prosecutions over the failings which led to the disaster.

The final report of the Grenfell Tower Inquiry, published in September, concluded the fire was the result of “decades of failure” by government and the construction industry to act on the dangers of flammable materials on high-rise buildings.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Key takeaways from the Grenfell Inquiry

The west London tower block was covered in combustible products because of the “systematic dishonesty” of firms who made and sold the cladding and insulation, inquiry chairman Sir Martin Moore-Bick said.

He said the “simple truth” is that all the deaths were avoidable and that those who lived in the tower were “badly failed” by authorities “in most cases through incompetence but, in some cases, through dishonesty and greed”.

However, the Metropolitan Police said last year that decisions on criminal charges for the Grenfell Tower blaze are not expected until the end of 2026.

Read more from Sky News:
Met crackdown on phone thieves
Trump ban on trans women athletes
Orebro survivor who escaped shooting

It would mean a near 10-year wait for justice if anyone is ultimately charged – a period of time described by families as “unbearable”.

The disaster was Britain’s deadliest residential fire since the Second World War and began a national reckoning over the safety and conditions of social housing and tower blocks.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

September 2024: Grenfell community ‘brave and hopeful’

Separately, the Grenfell Tower Memorial Commission has been consulting on plans for a permanent memorial in the area of the tower.

A shortlist of five potential design teams was announced last month, with a winner expected to be selected this summer to enable a planning application to be submitted in late 2026.

A government spokesperson said: “The priority for the deputy prime minister is to meet with and write to the bereaved, survivors and the immediate community to let them know her decision on the future of the Grenfell Tower.

“This is a deeply personal matter for all those affected, and the deputy prime minister is committed to keeping their voice at the heart of this.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Conservatives pledge to tighten immigration rules in Reform fightback

Published

on

By

Conservatives pledge to tighten immigration rules in Reform fight back

The Conservative Party is pledging to tighten immigration rules after Reform topped a landmark poll for the first time earlier this week.

In her first major policy announcement as Tory Party leader, Kemi Badenoch is pledging to double the amount of time an immigrant needs to have been in the UK before claiming indefinite leave to remain from five to 10 years.

In order to claim indefinite leave to remain after 10 years, the individual must also meet new, tightened conditions.

These include not having claimed benefits or used social housing during the entire qualification period, not having a criminal record and being able to demonstrate that their household would be a “net contributor”.

Ms Badenoch accused Labour of being “not serious about tackling immigration” and said there needs to be a “new approach”.

“Our country is not a dormitory, it’s our home,” she said.

“The right to citizenship and permanent residency should only go to those who have demonstrated a real commitment to the UK. That’s why we should double the length of time before people can qualify for indefinite leave to remain from five to 10 years.

More on Conservatives

“The Conservative Party is under new leadership. We’re going to tell the hard truths about immigration.

“The pace of immigration has been too quick and the numbers coming too high for meaningful integration. We need to slow down the track for citizenship. A UK passport should be a privilege not an automatic right.

“Far from reducing the number of people coming into Britain, the Labour government are presiding over an incoming disaster.

“The Border Security Bill will actually make it easier for illegal immigrants to stay in the UK, let alone legal migrants. No one can trust Labour on immigration.”

The announcement comes just days after Reform topped a Sky News/YouGov poll for the first time as the party continues to shake up British politics.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Reform UK tops landmark poll

The poll, taken on 2 February and 3 February, showed Nigel Farage’s party has edged in front on 25%, with Labour pushed into second on 24% and the Tories on 21%.

It also put the Lib Dems on 14% and Greens on 9%.

All the polling moves that push Reform UK to the top for the first time this week are within the margin of error and the overall picture remains unchanged – with Britain in a new period of three party politics in the polls.

According to the poll, one in five Tory voters at the last election would now vote for Reform.

The Sky News/YouGov poll also found Kemi Badenoch has slipped behind Nigel Farage when voters are asked whether they have a favourable or unfavourable opinion of the leaders.

Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch giving a speech at 116 Pall Mall.
Pic: PA
Image:
Kemi Badenoch has fallen behind Nigel Farage in terms of net favourability rating. Pic: PA

Last month, Badenoch had a net favourability rating of -25, but that has now dropped to -29 this month.

This puts her below Farage, who had a net favourability rating of -32 last month, which has now risen to -27 this month.

Labour’s border security minister Dame Angela Eagle said: “While [the Conservatives] scramble around for relevance, this Labour government is getting on with clearing up the mess they left behind – raising deportations, returns and removals to the highest rate in six years, increasing the number of illegal working raids and cutting the costs of the asylum system.”

Continue Reading

Politics

CFTC fines EmpiresX founders $130M in crypto fraud case

Published

on

By

CFTC fines EmpiresX founders 0M in crypto fraud case

A US court fined the Brazilian founders of EmpiresX over $130 million for operating a fraudulent crypto scheme that misled investors.

Continue Reading

Trending