Connect with us

Published

on

Nigel Farage’s bank account being closed has now led to a BBC apology and NatWest’s boss resigning. 

How did we get here – and why was the account really closed?

Here’s how the controversy unfolded.

Nigel Farage’s account is closed

At the end of June, Mr Farage said a bank – later confirmed as Coutts – had decided to stop doing business with him.

He said a letter from the bank contained no explanation and he had then been told over the phone it was a “commercial decision”.

In the six-minute video posted on Twitter, he said losing his bank account was the equivalent of being a “non person” and that the decision may “fundamentally affect [his] future career and whether [he] can even go on staying living here in this country”.

“The establishment are trying to force me out of the UK by closing my bank accounts,” the caption read.

In a second Twitter video, he said he had been rejected from having bank accounts by nine different companies.

He said NatWest, the owner of Coutts, offered him an account after his announcement last week, but it was not suitable because it was a personal and not a business account.

MR Farage claimed banks did not want him as a customer due to him being a “politically exposed person“, or PEP.

A PEP is someone who holds or has held public office and therefore may be more susceptible to bribery or corruption.

BBC claims Farage didn’t have enough money

On 4 July, a BBC report claimed the bank did not want his custom because he did not have enough money in his accounts.

The prestigious private bank requires clients to have at least £1m in investments or borrowing – including a mortgage – or £3m in savings.

The BBC reported that Mr Farage’s political opinions were not a factor in the decision.

But it turned out this wasn’t the case.

Nigel Farage Pic: AP
Image:
Pic: AP

Coutts’ dossier on Farage

After Coutts first told him they were cutting ties, Mr Farage submitted a subject access request to them.

He then received a 40-page document detailing all of the evidence Coutts accumulated about him to feed back to its Wealth Reputational Risk Committee.

It revealed staff at the bank spent months compiling evidence on the “significant reputational risks of being associated with him”.

The main risks were:

  • Reputational – as Mr Farage is “high profile” and “actively courts controversy”
  • Financial crime – due to “alleged Russia connections”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Farage: ‘I was shocked with the vitriol’

The document – reported on 18 July – suggested the move was taken partly because his views did not align with the firm’s “values”, including his position on LGBTQ+ rights and friendship with former US president Donald Trump.

Ultimately it concluded the Mr Farage’s views were “at odds with our position as an inclusive organisation”.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak commented on the issue, tweeting: “This is wrong. No one should be barred from using basic services for their political views. Free speech is the cornerstone of our democracy.”

Read more:
Minister summons bank bosses after Farage account closure
Nigel Farage on ‘vitriol’ in Coutts’ dossier

The BBC apologises

On 24 July, the BBC issued an apology to Mr Farage over the story “which turned out not to be accurate”.

In a statement, the broadcaster said: “We acknowledge that the information we reported – that Coutts’ decision on Mr Farage’s account did not involve considerations about his political views – turned out not to be accurate and have apologised to Mr Farage.”

NatWest boss resigns

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

NatWest boss resigns over Farage row

NatWest chief executive Dame Alison Rose resigned on 26 July after admitting to being the source of an inaccurate story about Mr Farage’s bank account.

The resignation was expected in the wake of briefings by Downing Street that she had lost the confidence of the prime minister and chancellor.

It came after she apologised to Mr Farage for the “deeply inappropriate comments” made about him in documents prepared for the company’s wealth committee.

She said the remarks “did not reflect the view of the bank”, which has now offered him “alternative banking arrangements”.

10 banks turned down Farage after Coutts closure

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Farage: ’10 banks turned me down’

Speaking to Sky News after Dame Alison’s resignation, Mr Farage said 10 banks had turned him down after Coutts decided to close his account.

The former Brexit Party leader would not name the banks, but said: “I don’t want to take on the whole industry.”

“You can’t exist in the world without a bank account,” he said. “You effectively become a non-person.”

What could happen next?

Banks face a Treasury clampdown in the wake of the row over Mr Farage’s account.

Lenders will be forced to give customers three months’ notice of account closures and to provide a full explanation of the reasons under reforms expected to be unveiled soon, Sky News understands.

Continue Reading

Politics

CFTC chair’s final message includes a call for crypto guardrails

Published

on

By

CFTC chair’s final message includes a call for crypto guardrails

In what he said would be his last remarks as CFTC chair, Rostin Behnam said he intended to advocate for the commission to address regulatory challenges over digital assets.

Continue Reading

Politics

MPs vote against new national inquiry into grooming gangs

Published

on

By

MPs vote against new national inquiry into grooming gangs

A Tory bid to launch a new national inquiry into the grooming gangs scandal has been voted down by MPs amid criticism of “political game playing”.

MPs rejected the amendment to the Children’s Wellbeing Bill by 364 to 111, a majority of 253.

However, even if the Commons had supported the measure, it wouldn’t have actually forced the government to open the desired inquiry, due to parliamentary procedure.

Instead, it would have killed the government’s legislation, the aim of which is to reform things like the children’s care system and raise educational standards in schools.

Follow politics latest: Reaction to vote

Tonight’s vote was largely symbolic – aimed at putting pressure on Labour following days of headlines after comments by Elon Musk brought grooming gangs back into the spotlight.

The world’s richest man has hit out at Sir Keir Starmer and safeguarding minister Jess Phillips, after she rejected a new national inquiry into child sexual exploitation in Oldham, saying this should be done at a local level instead.

The Tories also previously said an Oldham inquiry should be done locally and in 2015 commissioned a seven-year national inquiry into child sex abuse, led by Professor Alexis Jay, which looked at grooming gangs.

However, they didn’t implement any of its recommendations while in office – and Sir Keir has vowed to do so instead of launching a fresh investigation into the subject.

Jess Phillips exclusive:
Victims can have inquiry if they want one

The division list showed no Labour MPs voted in favour of the Conservative amendment.

Those who backed the proposal include all of Reform’s five MPs and 101 Tory MPs – though some senior figures, including former prime minister Rishi Sunak and former home secretaries James Cleverly and Suella Braverman, were recorded as not voting.

The Liberal Democrats abstained.

Speaking to Sophy Ridge on the Politics Hub before the vote, education minister Stephen Morgan condemned “political game playing”.

“What we’re seeing from the Conservatives is a wrecking amendment which would basically allow this bill not to go any further,” he said.

“That’s political game playing and not what I think victims want. Victims want to see meaningful change.”

As well as the Jay review, a number of local inquiries were also carried out, including in Telford and Rotherham.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Grooming gangs: What happened?

Speaking earlier in the day at PMQs, Sir Keir Starmer accused Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch of “jumping on the bandwagon” after Mr Musk’s intervention and spreading “lies and misinformation”.

Referring to her time in government as children’s and equalities minister, the prime minister said: “I can’t recall her once raising this issue in the House, once calling for a national inquiry.”

He also said having spoken to victims of grooming gangs this morning, “they were clear they want action now, not the delay of a further inquiry”.

Ms Badenoch has argued that the public will start to “worry about a cover-up” if the prime minister resists calls for a national inquiry, and said no one has yet “joined up the dots” on grooming.

Girls as young as 11 were groomed and raped across a number of towns in England – including Oldham, Rochdale, Rotherham and Telford – over a decade ago in a national scandal that was exposed in 2013.

Continue Reading

Politics

We should hone ‘responsible AI’ before Copilot goes autopilot

Published

on

By

We should hone ‘responsible AI’ before Copilot goes autopilot

There is a critical need for a comprehensive, responsible AI approach to address privacy, security, bias and accountability challenges in the emerging agentic economy.

Continue Reading

Trending