Simon Davis is the co-founder and CEO of Mighty Bear Games, a multiplatform game developer in Southeast Asia creating accessible multiplayer experiences in Web3.
Davis has spent almost two decades working in the gaming industry, but he never planned to actually work in this field.
Before crypto, he was a professional guitarist who made ends meet by playing in metal bands and cover bands and by teaching guitar. But after his money dried up one summer, he scored a six-week gig as a professional game tester — and he’s never looked back.
During his time in the gaming industry, Davis has held management and product lead positions at gaming companies including King Digital Entertainment, Ubisoft, Bigpoint, AKQA, Empire Interactive, and Laughing Jackal.
In 2017, Davis teamed up with some friends and fellow industry veterans to launch Mighty Bear Games in Singapore, where they intended to focus on creating traditional games — before pivoting to blockchain in 2022. And in 2023, the firm launched an open beta for Mighty Action Heroes, its first Web3 gaming title.
Davis, who also goes by “Papa Bear,” said every Mighty Bear employee receives a “bear title.” Some of Papa Bear’s employees include “Arty Bear,” “Bear-Abel,” “Excel Bear,” and “Bear McNumbers.”
Why the pivot to blockchain gaming?
I was lucky enough to kind of get into Bitcoin by accident in 2015, so I’ve been in the space for a few years. In 2021, I started playing with NFTs, and I’m lucky enough to be also based in Southeast Asia, so I could see firsthand what was happening with Axie [Infinity]. I think, for me, as someone who lived through the transition to free-to-play, it felt very much like a moment, kind of like when Farmville came out on Facebook.
I think that for live service titles [games like Fortnite, League of Legends and Apex Legends], a dominant business model is going to emerge to revolve around player-owned and operated economies. Because I don’t believe you can have virtual worlds without digital property rights, essentially.
And I think that does enable a lot of new things that we’re really starting to scratch the surface on. So, I think that really was the pull factor.
What format do you think serves as the best way to attract users to blockchain gaming?
The Mighty Bear Games team. (Simon Davis)
I think mobile gaming is going to be the dominant platform because of geography. You see this if you look at the charts for the countries that have a great slope of interest in crypto or Web3. They tend to be countries where existing payment rails are not super developed.
People are largely unbanked in places like Indonesia and Brazil. These markets are mobile-first. Like, people in the Philippines and India are not necessarily using high-end PCs.
So, you need to go where the users are. And this is a bit of a spicy take, but this is why I’m very bearish on people making super HD high-end Web3 games because it’s just not where the markets are today. So, you see a lot of these teams raising, like, mega bucks to make console-quality titles, but if no one can play them, then they aren’t going to do very much.
What do you think the current hurdles are for large-scale blockchain gaming adoption?
A lot of people talk about it in terms of silver bullets, right? Like, “Oh, we need one good game,” or like, “We need to solve the wallet problem.” I don’t think it’s any one of those things. I actually think it is just a lot of lead bullets, a lot of small things that need to happen.
What I’ve experienced today is still pretty terrible, and scary, like social recovery. And it’s starting to become a thing, but that needs to become a lot easier.
I just think, in general, it needs to be as easy and as brainless to use as a Web2 experience. And so I think there is an inherent conflict today with how people think about Web3, you know. They say things like, “Oh, you need to educate the users,” or, “Train people to hold their private keys.”
But you know, my mom doesn’t want to hold her own private keys. She does all her trading on Crypto.com. We need to make it essentially idiot-proof so anyone can do it.
I think we’re still quite a long way away, but I am seeing meaningful improvements, actually. I’m seeing products that are going to go to market next year which are going to help a lot.
I don’t know how old you are, but I’ve just turned 40 this year. I remember in the 90s setting up a home internet connection on dial-up. It took me two days of calling technical support and someone telling me like configs. I was having to go in and change manually and stuff. And now, you know, we solved that, right? And then, the internet became a mass market, and then people could just put a CD in their computer, and it just worked. I think we need to get to that stage.
Mighty Action Heroes. (Game website)
Do you think the bad rap blockchain/NFT gaming gets is a big issue?
It’s funny because gaming got a pretty bad rap in the 90s. You know, everyone was talking about how games were making children violent. There was a big moral panic, just like there was in music a few years before.
But I think that when you start to get these things in people’s hands and experience them, perceptions change. I do think a lot of the reputation that we have in crypto and Web3 is deserved. There are a lot of bad actors exploiting the lack of regulation, but the things that excite me: I’ve seen some games, for example, that allow players to earn small amounts of Bitcoin, And this sort of thing’s retention numbers are very strong, like the initial metrics are very promising. And I think that’s a really nice use case.
Reddit is also a great example, right? They put NFTs in the hands of huge numbers of people. A lot of people didn’t even realize they were interacting with NFTs. So then they had their first taste, and yeah — there are some stats that have come up, and not a huge amount of them have transacted on-chain.
But I actually don’t think that’s such a bad thing. If people are not dumping the assets on day one, I don’t see that as a negative. So, I think onboarding through stealth is pretty good.
What kind of adoption metrics are you looking for with your games?
So, people talk about installs and sign-ups — it’s just a vanity metric. For me, I’m interested in how many people are coming in every day, how regularly they’re coming back, and what the growth curve of that looks like initially.
And then once we do the mobile launch [of Mighty Action Heroes], which will be around August/September, how well are we doing on attracting non-crypto-native people into the game as well? That will be very interesting, and to see how they play together. It’s a different angle, but it’s one that I’m pretty bullish on.
What are some ideas or tech upgrades that could help blockchain gaming?
ERC-6551 tokens.
Essentially, they give a smart contract account or a smart contract wallet to a 721 [token]. So, you know, a traditional NFT would be a JPG with some metadata attached. But essentially, the JPG or the asset, whatever that is, is then bound to a smart contract.
And this is pretty cool because it means that assets can communicate directly with each other. So NFT to NFT, without using MetaMask. And it could also be compatible with other smart contract wallets.
I think the really cool thing is that, essentially, your asset becomes a wallet and can have its own logic as well. So you could have a base character in a game as the 6551 token, and then all the clothes or the items or everything that that character has, the kind of sub-assets, can change within, each with its own logic.
As a game developer, you start thinking of how your characters could evolve and how you can attach new assets without updating the core.
Then as a dev, I think it’s really good for reputation management as well. Like, if you did a soulbound version, you could have achievements, proof-of-work, proof-of-play, social identity. I think it’s pretty cool. […] It’s more secure because it’s not just an asset within a wallet like it is on smart contracts with its own private key.
Subscribe
The most engaging reads in blockchain. Delivered once a
week.
Brian Quarmby
Brian Quarmby discovered crypto in 2013 and instantly fell in love with the idea of decentralization. Brian has since lived and worked Asia and returned to Melbourne in late 2019. Brian is a lover of sport and art and is bullish on the potential for NFTs to transform artists lives in the near future.
Who is the man behind the record-breaking multi-million pound donation to Reform UK?
Christopher Harborne gave Nigel Farage‘s party £9m in August, according to new data published by the Electoral Commission. The contribution ranks as the largest ever single donation from a living person in UK political history.
Born in Britain, Mr Harborne is a businessman who owns several companies, employing more than 600 people worldwide, according to a court filing dated last year.
Image: Reform UK leader Nigel Farage
Yet he’s not resident in the UK, and is also a citizen of Thailand, where he is known as Chakrit Sakunkrit, and has lived and worked there for 20 years.
Nonetheless, he has a long history of political donations to British parties.
Electoral Commission data shows he has previously donated to the Conservatives, gifting them £10,000 in May 2001, and continuing to support them with close to £2m in donations by October 2022.
More from UK
Image: Christopher Harborne, furthest right, joins Boris Johnson, left, during his visit to Lviv, Ukraine. Pic: City of Lviv
But there was been some overlap with his backing of Reform, which first received a donation from him in April 2019, for £200,000.
He’s also donated to Mr Farage personally, giving £27,616.76 in January so the Reform leader could attend the second inauguration of Donald Trump.
He paid another £32,836 for the Reform and a member of staff to fly to the US following the attempted assassination of Trump in July last year.
And he gave one of the biggest donations ever made to an individual UK politician when he backed Boris Johnson to the tune of £1m in 2022.
Image: Christopher Harborne sits second left from Boris Johnson, centre, during his visit to Lviv, Ukraine. Pic: City of Lviv
He served as an advisor to Mr Johnson during the former PM’s trip to Kyiv in 2023.
His latest cash injection to Reform UK breaks the previous record for a donation from a living person, which was £8m from supermarket tycoon Lord David Sainsbury to the Liberal Democrats in 2019.
The largest ever single donation to a UK political party was from his cousin, Lord John Sainsbury, who left more than £10.2m to the Conservatives in 2022 in his will.
Electoral Commission records show Mr Harborne has made at least £24.5m in UK political donations since 2001.
But where is his money from?
Several of his businesses come under the banner of AML Global, including one registered in the UK, which has a London address listed with Companies House.
AML Global is described in a court filing as an international jet fuel broker that works with oil companies, and which has been awarded $39m (£29m) worth of contracts by the US Department of Defense.
Harborne was also an early investor in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
On his LinkedIn page, the businessman further describes himself as chair of Sherriff Global Group.
His profile shows he was educated at INSEAD business school, Cambridge University, and Westminster School.
Figures from the Electoral Commission released this week show Reform UK reported the most donations of any party in the third quarter of 2025, a total of £10,526,846.
By contrast, the Conservatives reported £7,038,861 in the same period, Labour £2,564,786, and the Liberal Democrats £2,174,712.
“She doesn’t belong in the Treasury; she belongs in la-la land.”
Chess claims made up? Where did that attacking move from Kemi come from? Hasn’t the chancellor told us for years that she was a national chess champion in 1993?
Indeed she has. “I am – I was – a geek. I played chess. I was the British girls’ under-14 champion,” she declared proudly in a 2023 interview with The Guardian.
She posted a video showing her playing chess in parliament and before last week’s budget posed for photos with a chessboard.
More on Rachel Reeves
Related Topics:
But her chess champion claim has been disputed by a former junior champion, Alex Edmans, who has accused her of misrepresenting her credentials.
“Her claim was quite specific,” Edmans, now a professor of finance at the London Business School, told Ali Fortescue on the Politics Hub on Sky News.
“She said she was the British girls’ under-14 champion. There was one event that can go on that title, which is the British Championship. And in the year that she claimed, it was Emily Howard who won that title instead.
“She did indeed win a quite different title. There was a British Women’s Chess Association championship, but that’s a more minor title. I’ve won titles like the British squad title, but that’s not the same.
“Just like running a marathon in London is not the same as the London Marathon, there was one event which is very prestigious, which is the British Championship.
“So the dispute is not whether she was a good or bad chess player. That shouldn’t be the criterion for a chancellor. But if you weren’t the British champion, you shouldn’t make that statement.”
Oh dear! So now, along with allegations of plagiarism, a dodgy CV and “lying” – according to Ms Badenoch – about the nation’s finances, the chancellor is between a rook and a hard place.
Or is she? “This story is absolute nonsense,” a Treasury mate told Sky News. No word from the No.10 knight, Sir Keir Starmer, or his Downing Street ranks, however.
Emily Howard, as it happens, is now an accomplished composer, having graduated from the chessboard to the keyboard.
The chancellor’s opponents, meanwhile, claim her budget blunders means the Treasury queen has now become a pawn, there for the taking.
But since Rachel Reeves did indeed win a chess title, just not the one she claimed, her supporters insist she can justifiably claim to have been a champion.
So it’s too soon for Kemi Badenoch and the Conservatives to claim checkmate. The dispute remains a stalemate. For now.
Nigel Farage’s Reform UK have received its largest ever donation, with former Conservative donor Christopher Harborne handing the party £9m.
The donation – one of the largest in British political history – was made in August this year, according to filings from the Electoral Commission.
Mr Harborne, a British businessman based in Thailand, previously donated millions to Reform in 2019, when it was known as the Brexit Party, and has continued to give the party and Mr Farage cash.
Between 2001 and 2022, he donated close to £2m to the Conservatives, according to Companies House.
The £9m handed to Reform UK on 1 August this year is the largest political donation on record from a living person, after Lord Sainsbury left £10m to the Conservatives in his will in 2023.
Educated in the UK, Mr Harbone is now based in Thailand, where he chairs the investment company Sherriff Global Group.
More on Reform Uk
Related Topics:
He also paid around £28,000 for Mr Farage to travel to the US for Donald Trump’s inauguration this year, and roughly £33,000 for the Reform leader to visit the president after the failed assassination attempt in the run-up to the election.
Responding to a question at a news conference from Sky News deputy political editor Sam Coates, Mr Farage said Mr Harborne has business interests all around the world, but his “natural home” was the UK.
Image: Mr Farage says no promises were made in exchange for the money. Pic: PA
He says the donation is “nothing out of the blue”, pointing to Mr Harbone donating significant sums to the Brexit Party.
“I think what he wants to do, really, is to try and help us get onto a level playing field with the trade union funded Labour Party, and a Conservative Party where there seems to be a remarkable correlation, I can’t think why, between donations and membership of the House of Lords,” Mr Farage said.
He added that “hand on heart” he has not promised anything to Mr Harborne in exchange for the money, adding that speaks to the Bangkok-based businessman “maybe once a month, maybe once every six weeks”.
Professor Justin Fisher of Brunel University, an expert in political donations, told Sky News: “It exposes the fact that this is a person who is a British citizen but is able to influence British politics without being subject to the laws that any Reform government might bring in, any tax arrangements that a Reform might bring in.
“This is foreign money by any other name.”
The professor pointed to the fact that in the 2022 Election Act under the Conservatives, the law was changed so that British citizens could live abroad their whole lives and stay on the electoral roll, allowing them to donate.
Previously, the cap had been set at 15 years of living overseas.
He added that it was not surprising to see a person with an interest in a particular policy area – like cryptocurrencies – give money to a political advocating for this cause.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
4:53
Will Tories and Reform unite?
According to the Electoral Commission, political parties raised £24m in the third quarter of this year – up from £10m over the same time period last year, and £11m last quarter.
With the local and national assembly elections coming up in May next year, parties are building their war chests for the campaign.
Reform reported taking a total of £10,526,846, more than the Tories (£7,038,861), Labour (£2,564,786), and the Lib Dems (£2,174,712).
This means Mr Farage’s party raised almost as much as the three main parties combined (£11,778,359).
While the Green Party has reported an increase in donations since Zack Polanski became leader, these figures mostly cover the time before he took office, with the party only accepting £371,753.
Professor Jonathan Hopkin of the London School of Economics told Sky News the donation “shows the power of money in politics if one individual can make such a big difference to the resources available to a political party”.
He added that big donors giving to Reform who also have links to the Tories could separately “pressurise the Conservatives to step aside their candidates in seats that Reform are better placed to win”.
The fact that Reform has received large volumes of cash from a former Tory donor will do nothing to extinguish reports that the two parties are considering an electoral pact in time for the next general election.
The Financial Times reported that such an agreement was spoken about by Mr Farage in a discussion with party donors.
Image: YouGov graphic of voter intention from 30 November to 1 December 2025. Pic: YouGov
Spotify
This content is provided by Spotify, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spotify cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spotify cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spotify cookies for this session only.
Both the Conservatives and Reform have denied they will do a deal.
Reform currently lead voting intention polls, with the Conservatives and Labour together in joint second place, followed by the Greens.
A spokesperson for the Reform Party said: “This quarter’s figures show the incredible progress Reform UK is making. This is further evidence that we have all the momentum in British politics.”