Connect with us

Published

on

Mason Greenwood will not play for Manchester United after an attempted rape charge against him was dropped earlier this year.

In a statement the club said: “All those involved, including Mason, recognise the difficulties with him recommencing his career at Manchester United.

“It has therefore been mutually agreed that it would be most appropriate for him to do so away from Old Trafford, and we will now work with Mason to achieve that outcome.”

The club added that after its internal investigation “the material posted online did not provide a full picture and that Mason did not commit the offences in respect of which he was originally charged”.

In 2022 a woman posted a video on social media in which she is bruised and bleeding, claiming she was attacked by the footballer.

In the video a man, said to be Greenwood, shouts at his alleged victim to “move your f****** legs up”.

The woman replies that she does not want to have sex.

The man responds: “I don’t give a f*** what you want, you little s***.”

The forward was charged with attempted rape, assault and controlling and coercive behaviour in October 2022. He was initially arrested in January that year.

In February 2023 the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said it had a “duty to stop the case” following the “withdrawal of key witnesses and new material that came to light”.

Those developments meant there was “no longer a realistic prospect of conviction” and led to the decision by the CPS to discontinue prosecution and drop the charges against Greenwood.

In a statement this afternoon Greenwood, 21, said: “I fully accept I made mistakes… and I take my share of responsibility”.

He has always denied any criminal charges.

Greenwood called the decision to not play for the team a “collaborative” one between Manchester United and him and his family.

Last week the club said they were working “through the final stages” of their internal investigation into Greenwood, having completed the “fact-finding phase”.

Richard Arnold, Manchester United’s CEO, said the club’s investigation “sought to collate as much evidence as possible to establish facts and context”.

In an open letter to fans on Monday, he said timings had been “influenced by my desire to minimise the impact of the investigation on our men’s and women’s teams, as well as our Lionesses”.

Mr Arnold said the investigation “led us to conclude that Mason did not commit the acts he was charged with”.

He said: “While I am satisfied that Mason did not commit the acts he was charged with, Mason’s accepted that he has made mistakes which he takes responsibility for.”

Protests have been held at the start of the new season, with some fans threatening to withdraw their support for United if the club reintegrates Greenwood into the team.

Among them is well-known supporter and Countdown presenter Rachel Riley.

She said she wouldn’t be able to remain a fan if Greenwood stays at United.

Continue Reading

UK

Major incident declared in Birmingham as ‘17,000 tonnes’ of rubbish piles up

Published

on

By

Major incident declared in Birmingham as '17,000 tonnes' of rubbish piles up

A major incident has been declared in Birmingham over an ongoing bin strike, which has left around 17,000 tonnes of waste on the streets of the city.

Birmingham City Council said the “regrettable” step was taken in response to public health concerns, with picket lines blocking depots and preventing waste vehicles from collecting rubbish.

Members of Unite have been on all-out strike since 11 March in a row over pay, which the union claims will leave some members of staff £8,000 worse off. A series of walkouts have also impacted refuse collections since January.

Politics latest: Follow live updates

By declaring a major incident, the council will be able to increase the availability of street cleansing and fly-tip removal with an additional 35 vehicles and crews around the city.

This action will also allow the council to explore what further support is available from neighbouring authorities and the government to assist in the management of the situation.

Council leader John Cotton said it was a “regrettable” step, but the situation was “causing harm and distress” to local people.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Birmingham suffers bin crisis

“I respect the right to strike and protest, however actions on the picket line must be lawful and sadly the behaviour of some now means we are seeing a significant impact on residents and the city’s environment,” he said.

Jim McMahon, the minister for local government, said the all-out strike by Unite members is causing “misery and disruption” to residents, as well as posing a “public health risk to the city’s most vulnerable and deprived”.

He said the government “stands ready” to respond to any request for extra resources, but insisted that any deal to end the bin strike must “maintain value for money”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘They can’t hold the city to ransom’

Mr McMahon told the Commons: “This is causing a public health risk to the city’s most vulnerable and deprived residents. As a result, I am aware that Birmingham has today declared a major incident to give them the mechanisms to better manage the impact on local residents.

“I support that decision, and I will back local leaders.”

The minister added that the government will “not hesitate to give support in any way that Birmingham leaders need”.

He said: “If local leaders on the ground in Birmingham feel that tackling these issues goes beyond the resources available to them and they request national support, then of course we stand ready to respond to any such request.”

Members of the Unite union met with Birmingham City Council last Thursday, but talks have so far failed.

Unite says the dispute will not end unless the “hugely damaging” cuts to bin collectors’ wages are reversed.

But Birmingham City Council says the aim of the restructuring is to create a “modern, sustainable and consistently reliable waste collection service”.

Continue Reading

UK

‘Extensive search’ under way for 11-year-old girl who fell into River Thames

Published

on

By

'Extensive search' under way for 11-year-old girl who fell into River Thames

An “extensive search” is under way to find an 11-year-old girl after she fell into the River Thames in east London.

The Metropolitan Police said it was called at around 1.15pm on Monday to reports the girl had entered the river near Barge House Causeway, near London City Airport.

All emergency services are forming a “large-scale response” to the incident.

The girl’s next of kin have been made aware and are being supported by officers.

The London Ambulance Service was also called at a similar time, after receiving a report of a person in the water at Lowestoft Mews, which is close to the airport.

“We sent resources to the scene, including an ambulance crew, an advanced paramedic, an incident response officer and members of our hazardous area response team,” a spokesperson said.

“Our crews assisted our emergency services partners at the scene but were later stood down.”

London Fire Brigade Deputy Assistant Commissioner Joseph Kenny added that “firefighters responded to reports of a person in the River Thames near Lowestoft Mews, Newham”.

He said crews from East Ham, Barking, Ilford and Bexley fire stations were sent to the scene alongside other emergency services.

“The brigade also deployed its drone team and fire boat as part of its response, with crews carrying out a systematic search of the area,” he added.

“The brigade was first called about the incident at 1.23pm. Search operations for firefighters were concluded at 3.49pm when responsibility for the incident was left with the police.”

This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.

Please refresh the page for the fullest version.

You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow us on WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.

Continue Reading

UK

Sentencing guidelines for ethnic minority suspects delayed after backlash

Published

on

By

Sentencing guidelines for ethnic minority suspects delayed after backlash

Controversial sentencing guidelines that were due to come into force on Tuesday have been delayed after a political backlash.

The Sentencing Council, the independent body that sets out sentencing guidance to courts in England and Wales, was due to bring in new rules around how judges should determine punishment for people from ethnic minority backgrounds.

The new guidance states that a pre-sentence report – the results of which are taken into account when considering a criminal’s sentence – will “usually be necessary” before handing out punishment for someone from an ethnic, cultural or faith minority, alongside other groups such as young adults aged 18 to 25, women and pregnant women.

Politics latest: Follow live updates

Shabana Mahmood, the justice secretary, had said the proposed guidance was “unacceptable” and amounted to “differential treatment before the law” as she urged the council to reverse it.

When the Sentencing Council initially refused her request, Ms Mahmood threatened to legislate to overturn the guidance if necessary.

She confirmed this evening that she would introduce legislation on Tuesday to block these guidelines coming into effect.

More on Ministry Of Justice

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Robert Jenrick has hit out at what he says is

The Sentencing Council has now delayed the “in force date of the guideline pending such legislation taking effect”.

It said in a statement that the council “remains of the view that its guideline, imposition of community and custodial sentences, as drafted is necessary and appropriate”.

However, in a meeting between the chairman Lord Justice Davis and Ms Mahmood on Monday, the minister “indicated her intention to introduce legislation imminently that would have the effect of rendering the section on ‘cohorts’ in the guideline unlawful”.

The council said it is unable to introduce a guideline when there is a draft bill due for introduction that would make it unlawful.

Ms Mahmood said: “This differential treatment is unacceptable – equality before the law is the backbone of public confidence in our justice system. I will change the law to ensure fairness for all in our courts.”

The Sentencing Council also attracted criticism from shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick, who said its updated guidance was an example of “two-tier justice” that would lead to “blatant bias” against Christians and straight white men.

He also argued that it would make “a custodial sentence less likely for those from an ethnic minority, cultural minority, and/or faith minority community” – something the council denied.

The council previously rejected calls from the government to abandon the guidelines, which ask judges to consider offenders’ racial, cultural and religious background when deciding a sentence.

Lord Davis denied that pre-sentence reports reduced the prospect of a jail sentence.

However, he said the council would provide “some clarification of the language” to avoid confusion.

Continue Reading

Trending