Connect with us

Published

on

The federal government might soon take an interest in how many cold ones you’ve been cracking open.

George Koob, director of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, tells the Daily Mailthat the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) might soon revise its dietary guidelines to recommend that adults consume no more than two alcoholic drinks per week. Canada’s health authorities recently shifted to that guideline, and Koob says that the U.S. could follow suit.

“I mean, they’re not going to go up, I’m pretty sure,” Koob said of the ongoing reevaluation of federal alcohol guidelines, a process that likely won’t be completed until 2025, according to the Daily Mail. “So, if [alcohol consumption guidelines] go in any direction, it would be toward Canada.”

Currently, the federal dietary guidelines advise no more than two drinks perday for adult men and one drink per day for adult women. Revising that down to two drinks per week would be a dramatic shift, to say the least.

Thankfully, most Americans don’t give a shit what the federal guidelines for drinking say. Following federal dietary guidelines to the letter of the law would mean a joyless existence devoid of many fine drinks (particularly if you’re a woman), anything less than well-done steak, or eggs benedict. Oh, and don’t forget to microwave your prosciutto!

It’s also true, of course, that the government is in no way forcing Americans to follow these rules. This doesn’t even rise to the level of a backhanded ban like the ones that are aimed at driving gas stoves into extinction. Still, these guidelines come with an air of authority to themor, at least, the sense that they were made by people who know what they’re talking about.

But, often, they don’t. Remember the food pyramid? My entire generation was raised on the notion that we were supposed to eat six to 11 servings of starch per day, thanks to poorly researched government-based dietary guidelines

If the U.S. follows Canada in issuing dramatically lower guidelines for alcohol consumption, the USDA will likely justify the decision by pointing to a headline-generating 2018 article published in the British medical journal The Lancetthat argued the safe level of alcohol consumption was basically zero. Indeed, in his remarks to the Daily Mail, Koob echoed that study by claiming there are “no benefits” to drinking alcohol in terms of physical health. The World Health Organization has been pushing a similar message in recent years.

Of course, that ignores many of the possible benefits that human beings derive from drinkinglike social lubrication, relaxation, and fun.

“[Alcohol] helps us to be more creative. It helps us to be more communal. It helps us to cooperate on a large scale,” Edward Slingerland, author of Drunk: How We Sipped, Danced, and Stumbled Our Way to Civilizationtold ReasonTV last year. “It helps to make it easier for us to kind of rub shoulders with each other in these large-scale societies that we live in. So it solved a bunch of adaptive problems that we uniquely face as a species because of this weird lifestyle we have.”

As with so many other public health policiesmany of which were on obvious display during the COVID-19 pandemicalcohol guidelines focused exclusively on physical well-being at the expense of everything else that makes a life worth living will naturally be overly cautious and unrealistic.

Setting strict rules about alcohol consumption also requires ignoring other evidence that, actually, drinking might be good for you, as long as it’s done in moderation.

A study published in June by the medical journal BMC Medicine comparing drinkers and nondrinkers found that “infrequent, light, or moderate drinkers were at a lower risk of mortality from all causes, CVD, chronic lower respiratory tract diseases, Alzheimer’s disease, and influenza and pneumonia” when compared to lifelong teetotalers. Of course, heavy drinkers had a higher risk of dying “from all causes, cancer, and accidents.”

Having more information about the ways alcohol affects our healthpositive and negativeis essential for adults who want to make informed decisions about what they ingest. But there’s no need for formal guidelines promulgated by government agencies, and that’s especially true when the people writing those rules are only looking at part of the picture.

Continue Reading

Business

Heathrow set to announce multibillion-pound investment – as it prepares proposal for third runway

Published

on

By

Heathrow set to announce multibillion-pound investment - as it prepares proposal for third runway

Heathrow is set to announce a multibillion-pound expansion plan to create extra capacity at the airport – as it prepares its proposal for a third runway.

The UK’s biggest airport has announced a “once-in-a-generation investment” beginning this year to improve existing buildings and boost passenger numbers.

The development is separate from a new runway – which the government recently announced support for – and will be funded by Heathrow shareholders with airlines and customers charged for the expanded services.

Money blog: Major lender cuts mortgage rates below 4%

As part of the investment, the capacity of terminals two and five will be increased and the layout of the airfield will be reconfigured in a bid to improve punctuality and to increase the number of aircraft stands.

In a speech on Wednesday, chief executive Thomas Woldbye is expected to say: “This privately-funded programme will upgrade existing infrastructure while laying the groundwork for a third runway, boosting UK investment and economic growth, with tangible benefits felt this year.”

Heathrow was last month criticised by Europe’s largest airline Ryanair for being “incredibly operationally inefficient”. Because of this, Ryanair chief executive Michael O’Leary said the airline had no interest in and would “never” fly from the airport, even if it were free.

More on Heathrow Airport

Proposals for a third runway will be submitted to the government “by summer”, the airport said, after Chancellor Rachel Reeves backed the expansion as part of her aim of growing the economy.

The support is seen as controversial as many senior Labour politicians such as London mayor Sadiq Khan and cabinet members including Energy Secretary Ed Miliband have long opposed a third runway on environmental and health grounds.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Miliband declines to criticise Heathrow expansion

It’s unclear how the additional carbon emissions from the extra flights would be compatible with the state’s legally binding 2050 emissions reduction targets.

A third runway?

Doubt has been cast over whether a runway could even be built during Labour’s time in power. The process would have to be planned and approved before construction could begin.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Village would have to be levelled for new runway

Rivers and the M25 road would have to be diverted and hundreds of homes would need to be demolished as part of construction.

Ryanair’s Mr O’Leary said the chance of it being built was “slim” but it could be 2050 even if it does get built.

A question over the third runway’s ability to boost the economy was raised by left-leaning thinktank the New Economics Foundation (NEF)

According to its analysis, growth in the number of business travellers – who may grow commercial links – has ceased and instead, passenger growth has been driven by wealthy British residents rather than foreign tourists entering the country.

The air travel industry is also one of the poorest job creators in the economy per pound of revenue, the NEF said, while the environmental downsides of more flights are “significant”.

Steel pact

As part of interim, pre-third runway expansion Heathrow signed a charter to maximise opportunities for the use of British steel, a move welcomed by steel bosses, unions and the government.

Continue Reading

US

Trump doubles down on plans to ‘take Gaza’ as he meets Jordan’s King Abdullah

Published

on

By

Trump doubles down on plans to 'take Gaza' as he meets Jordan's King Abdullah

Donald Trump has doubled down on US plans to take over Gaza in a meeting with Jordan’s King Abdullah II at the White House.

The meeting came the day after the president said he would withhold aid to Jordan, Egypt and other Arab countries if they refused to take in people forcibly displaced from Gaza.

King Abdullah’s “steadfast position” – as he laid out on X after the news conference – was “against the displacement of Palestinians.”

He said Jordan, which is already home to millions of Palestinians, will take in 2,000 children who have cancer or are otherwise unwell.

But on taking in more Gazans, he stressed a solution that was “good for everybody” – including Americans, the “people in the region” and Jordanians – was his priority.

However, the King sat quietly as Mr Trump reiterated his plans to displace two million Palestinians, which he said was a “very small number of people”.

Mr Trump also said he believes there will be “parcels of land” in Jordan, Egypt and “someplace else” where Palestinians will live “happily and very safely”.

Donald Trump meets with Jordan's King Abdullah in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington.
Pic Reuters
Image:
Pic: Reuters

“They only want to be in the Gaza Strip because they don’t know anything else, they’ve never had an alternative,” Mr Trump said.

“They are being killed there at levels that nobody has ever seen – no place in the world is as dangerous as the Gaza Strip.”

He claims – contrary to what Gazans have said – that “not one person” wants to stay in Gaza.

Asked to respond to the widespread view among experts in international law that his plan amounts to ethnic cleansing, Mr Trump said: “We are moving them to a beautiful location.”

Jordan's King Abdullah looks on, during a meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump.
Pic: Reuters
Image:
Pic: Reuters

However, Trump appeared to ease off his previous threat to withdraw aid to countries that refused to take in people from Gaza.

“Well, I don’t want to say that… we don’t have to threaten that, I do believe we’re above that,” he said.

In the same news conference, Mr Trump said the US won’t buy Gaza, it will simply “have it”.

“We don’t have to buy, there’s nothing to buy,” he said.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Palestinians don’t want to be on Gaza Strip’

“It’s a war-torn area, we’re going to hold it, we’re going to take it… Gaza the way it is, civilisation has been wiped out in Gaza. It’s going to be a great economic development.”

He declined to answer how that would work – and how he can avoid spending US taxes running it.

Read more:
Elon Musk speaks in Oval Office
Israel says Gaza truce will end if hostages are not freed

👉 Follow Trump 100 on your podcast app 👈

“We’re going to run it very properly and eventually we’ll have economic development at a very large scale”, he said, promising “peace in the Middle East”.

“With the United States in control of that piece of land… you’re going to have stability in the Middle East for the first time.

“The Palestinians, the people who live now in Gaza, will be living beautifully in another location.

“They are going to be living safely – they’re not going to be killed, murdered and having to leave every 10 years.”

Trump added that he is 99% sure he will work out a deal with Egypt.

Continue Reading

US

Russia releases American teacher Marc Fogel from prison

Published

on

By

Russia releases American teacher Marc Fogel from prison

An American teacher sentenced to 14 years in a Russian jail has been released and is flying home to be reunited with his family.

Marc Fogel, 63, was pictured on a flight to the US on Tuesday – more than three years after he was arrested in Moscow for drug smuggling.

He was detained after travelling with what his family said was medically prescribed cannabis. In December, the US government designated him as wrongfully detained.

Mr Fogel left Russia with Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff in what officials said could help bring about talks to end the Ukraine war.

US national security adviser Mike Waltz said: “President Trump, Steve Witkoff and the president’s advisers negotiated an exchange that serves as a show of good faith from the Russians”.

“By tonight, Marc Fogel will be on American soil and reunited with his family and loved ones thanks to President Trump’s leadership,” he added.

Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff (left) helped secure the release. File pic: Reuters
Image:
Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff (left) helped secure the release. File pic: Reuters

Moscow has so far not commented and it is unclear what concessions the US might have made.

“We are beyond grateful, relieved, and overwhelmed that after more than three years of detention, our father, husband, and son, Marc Fogel, is finally coming home,” the family said in a statement.

They said their time apart had been “the darkest and most painful period of our lives”.

Mr Waltz said the deal was “a sign we are moving in the right direction to end the brutal and terrible war in Ukraine”.

Donald Trump said last month his administration was involved in “very serious” talks with Russia about the future of the conflict.

Read more from Sky News:
Trump imposes 25% tariffs on steel and aluminium imports
Armie Hammer addresses cannibalism and assault allegations

Mr Fogel’s release comes six months after he was excluded from the biggest prisoner swap since the Cold War.

That historic deal won the release of Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich and former US Marine Paul Whelan, among others.

Russian hitman Vadim Krasikov was among those released from Western prisons in exchange.

However, US-Russian national Ksenia Khavana remains locked up after getting a 12-year treason sentence in August related to a $52 donation to a charity benefiting Ukraine.

Continue Reading

Trending