Connect with us

Published

on

Adam Smiths The Wealth of Nations was published in 1776, the same year as the Declaration of Independence, and it was just as revolutionary. The work explains that in a free enterprise system the free choice of the consumer, like the corollary free vote of the citizen, would determine what products would be produced in the marketplace. Everyone in such a marketplace was free to produce, free to choose, and free to purchase for the benefit of the consumer and to the general benefit and prosperity of the whole society. Smiths revolutionary work did away with the feudal system of having to have a tyrants favor to produce goods in the tyrants marketplace, for the despots subjects. There was no choice.

When Joe Biden took office in January 2021, he immediately attacked our economys energy sector via executive orders, administrative regulations, and cutting off federal land leases for energy exploration and development. The effects of such an onslaught were predictable. When you make energy costs higher, every product that is shipped from point A to point B will cost more. Every product produced in a plant that uses electricity will cost more. Every service facility, such as hospitals and schools, will cost more to operate.

So, it was predictable that the price of a barrel of oil, a gallon of gas, and home heating oil would all increase. Each of these costs rippled through the whole economy, creating a national rise in inflation of 12.7% in the first two years of Bidens presidency.

It was equally predictable that the Democratic Party would blame the increases in costs on evil energy companies, and that they would generate a Climate Bill to finish the job of taking command and control of the energy sector to save our economy, having first imperiled it. However, there was one sensible Democratic Senator, who knew the bill would increase inflation further, so the original Climate Bill was sidelined.

In the original Climate Bills stead, just one year ago, came a Trojan horse called The Inflation Reduction Act, refashioned as a gift that would reduce costs across the economy for hard-working families. In fact, just as the Greeks fashioned a horse to get through the walls of Troy, which they could not breach by other means, the Democrats offered this act as a sales pitch, a fashionable vessel, that contained the same regulatory armies that created the countrys runaway inflation in the first place.

Why would one of Americas political parties do such a thing?

The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) was not passed to reduce inflation nor was it written to reduce global warming. Its real function is to take control of Americas most vital economic sector, one that is literally at the crossroads of the wealth and prosperity of our country. The IRA functions as a means of transferring power through control of the energy sector to the administrative state, and it functions as a means of transferring wealth to the Democratic Party and their friends and business associates, through taxpayer-funded, stock market-supported, alternative energy business start-ups.

So, how do you do that?

You use the administrative state to regulate, tax, fine, and persecute the fossil fuels industry out of business while using taxpayer wealth to fund its alternative the companies the administrative state and the Democratic Party favor with regulations, grants, subsidies, and tax breaks.

Though sold as a simple bill designed to contain inflation, in reality, the IRA is a textbook example of how to perform a socialist takeover of an economic sector. And do note the diversionary title of the Inflation Reduction Act. If the real intent of the IRA had been written into the bill and had to gain the publics approval to pass Congress, it would never have passed. Titled and sold as a means of curing the problem of inflation the Democratic Party itself created it did pass.

So, what does it mean?

It means that, like the walls of Troy, the fossil fuel industry is under siege from a disguised, internal enemy. It means taxpayers will be looted of more wealth than the Trojans ever dreamed of, to the tune of $1.4 trillion and counting. It also means another kind of plundering with government command and control comes higher consumer prices for everything. It means one political party in alliance with the administrative state will dictate which companies can produce what products. What is produced that is in any way related to the energy sector will need the favor of a new tyrant: The Democratic Party.

It means that the American consumer will have no choice in what materials are used to build their homes or what type of car they can buy, or what type of stove to use or what light bulb to choose. The American consumer will have as much choice as the Trojan slaves had after the war, when their masters dictated what they consumed.

But they say the worlds going to die! The planets burning and there is no way off! We must do something!

When choosing whether to believe a myth or follow the money follow the money.

Richard C. Lyons, author of The DNA of Democracy: Volume I and Shadows of the Acropolis: Volume II is a third generation printer, whose early career centered on religious and special education publishing. Lyons has since engaged in literary pursuits as a poet, essayist, screenwriter and indie publisher.

The views expressed in this piece are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Daily Wire.

Continue Reading

Politics

Angela Rayner insists 1.5m housing target can be met as extra £350m pledged for affordable homes

Published

on

By

Angela Rayner insists 1.5m housing target can be met as extra £350m pledged for affordable homes

Angela Rayner has insisted the government can meet its target to build 1.5m homes over the next five years as ministers pledged an extra £350m for housebuilding.

An extra £300m has been injected to the affordable homes programme, a move ministers believe will allow 2,800 additional homes to be built.

More than half of these extra homes will be for social rent, the government has said, while more than 250 council homes are expected to be made available through a £50m boost to the local authority housing fund.

The scale of the challenge is stark, with more than 123,000 households in temporary accommodation – including nearly 160,000 children – while almost 6,000 families with children are in bed and breakfast accommodation.

Asked whether she was worried about whether the government could meet the 1.5m homes target, Ms Rayner said she was “determined” to meet the challenge.

Politics latest: No 10 says it will work with Trump on tariffs

A construction worker uses a tape measure on the construction site of residential buildings in Worcester, Britain December 5, 2024. REUTERS/Temilade Adelaja

“We will meet that target because we can’t afford not to,” she told broadcasters.

More on Angela Rayner

“We have 1.3 million people waiting on housing waiting lists, there isn’t a person listening to this show that will not know somebody who is desperate to get on the housing ladder.

“So, therefore, we’re determined to turn that tide.”

And pressed on whether the expected 250 increase of council homes was a big enough increase to meet the need, Ms Rayner said: “We think the measures we’re taking will unlock thousands more council and social homes as part of that programme. We want to help councils who want to build those homes.

“We see 160,000 children in temporary accommodation, and the cost of that on local authorities is significant, as well as the impact on children’s life chances,” she said.

“So we need to build the homes, and we’re doing everything we can to turn the tide of decline and build the houses that people desperately need.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What are Labour’s housing plans?

The extra £350m promised comes on top of £500m that was earmarked for affordable housing in October’s budget.

According to housing charity Shelter, at least 90,000 social rent homes would need to be built each year for the next 10 years to clear most social housing waiting lists in England and to house every homeless household.

A report by MPs last month found that a record number of children are living in B&Bs beyond the legal limit as England’s homelessness crisis pushes councils to breaking point.

MPs on the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) said there was a “dire need” for housing reform, with the lack of affordable homes forcing cash-strapped local authorities to haemorrhage their funds on temporary accommodation.

A recent Sky News investigation found that children in some parts of England were spending as long as five-and-a-half years on average in temporary accommodation.

The length of stay has increased significantly in many areas since 2021, with particularly long stays in London and the South East.

Read more:
Labour suspends 11 councillors over WhatsApp scandal
Sue Gray takes up seat in House of Lords

Elsewhere, ministers are expected to set out plans to crack down on exploitative behaviour by rogue landlords who they say are costing the taxpayer by claiming uncapped housing benefit in return for providing homes that are unsuitable.

Last week the government announced that a law to force social landlords to investigate and fix hazards within a set timescale will be phased in from October.

The legislation is named after two-year-old Awaab Ishak, who died in December 2020 from a respiratory condition caused by prolonged exposure to mould in the social home his family rented in Rochdale, Greater Manchester.

Continue Reading

Politics

Top candidate for borders watchdog says he would commute from Finland

Published

on

By

Top candidate for borders watchdog says he would commute from Finland

The government’s top candidate to become the chief of the borders and immigration watchdog has told MPs he lives in Finland and commutes to the UK when he needs to.

John Tuckett, who has worked as the immigration services commissioner for six years, was questioned by the Home Affairs Select Committee on Tuesday ahead of the appointment of the next independent chief inspector of borders and immigration (ICIBI).

Asked if he lives in commuting distance from the London office, he replied: “No I don’t, I have a family home in Finland and I come across to this country whenever I need to.”

When MPs put it to him that he would expect to inspect the UK’s borders without being a resident here, he added: “I work in UK and I would be in the UK, I’m resident in Finland.”

Mr Tuckett told the committee he pays for travel and accommodation himself and “always have done”.

Follow latest: Live politics updates

He also said he would be fine to work five days in the office if needed, adding: “I have done this kind of work before, and when I was asked this question at my interview, I said, I think that my judgment is you need time when you’re available for ministers, visits, all the things where you need to do face to face.

More from UK

“You also need time where you can think, sit back, write, because you don’t write a report, you know, in 10 spare minutes in between two major appointments. So I think there’s a 60-40, split between for the chief inspector this is.!

Mr Tuckett was announced as the preferred applicant for the chief inspector position by the Home Office in January, with previous experience as the chief executive of the Marine Management Organisation and working for the Archbishop of York.

Read more politics news:
CCTV to be installed in Parliament bar after drink-spiking claim
Labour suspends 11 councillors over WhatsApp scandal
Grenfell Tower – what happens now?

Announcing the recommendation of Mr Tuckett for the role, migration minister Seema Malhotra said: “His track record of delivering complex change programmes across government, combined with his current role as immigration services commissioner, makes him ideally suited to take on this crucial independent oversight role at an important time for our border security.”

If Mr Tuckett is confirmed as the next inspector, he will replace interim watchdog boss David Bolt – who has served since June last year.

Mr Bolt’s appointment came after the previous borders watchdog David Neal was sacked in February last year amid claims he breached the terms of his appointment.

He later voiced his frustrations of the time taken for his reports to be published, and said there were “very few” ways of speaking out about his concerns on security.

Continue Reading

US

Elon Musk denies ‘hostile takeover’ of US government – as son sits on his shoulders in Oval Office

Published

on

By

Elon Musk denies 'hostile takeover' of US government - as son sits on his shoulders in Oval Office

Elon Musk joined Donald Trump in the Oval Office as the US president signed an executive order allowing the tech billionaire to make large-scale reductions in the federal workforce.

As head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), an advisory group, Mr Musk says he wants to add “common sense controls” to government and ensure taxpayer money is spent wisely.

The executive order requires government agencies to work with DOGE, in some cases so they can be “eliminated or combined because their functions aren’t required by law”.

In addition, the agencies have been told to “hire no more than one employee for every four employees that depart from federal service”, with exceptions for immigration, law enforcement and public safety.

Answering reporters’ questions in the Oval Office, Mr Musk was asked to respond to accusations he is orchestrating a “hostile takeover” of government in a non-transparent way.

President Donald Trump listens as Elon Musk speaks in the Oval Office at the White House, Tuesday, Feb. 11, 2025, in Washington. (Photo/Alex Brandon)
Image:
Elon Musk told reporters in the Oval Office that ‘the public voted for major government reform’. Pic: AP

The Tesla CEO and owner of X said “the public voted for major government reform… and they’re going to get what they voted for. And that’s what democracy is all about”.

“We have this unelected, fourth unconstitutional branch of government, which is the bureaucracy, which has in a lot of ways, currently more power than any elected representative,” he added, while stood alongside his son X Æ A-12.

More on Donald Trump

Mr Musk also spoke about what he described as a lack of Treasury controls. “Your tax dollars need to be spent wisely on things that matter to the people… it’s just common sense. It’s not draconian or radical”.

U.S. President Donald Trump looks on as X Æ A-12, Elon Musk's son, scratches his nose in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., February 11, 2025. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque
Image:
Elon Musk brought his son to the White House for Oval Office news briefing. Pic: Reuters

When challenged about what checks and balances are in place to ensure accountability for Mr Musk, who is unelected, he replied: “We are trying to be as transparent as possible… I don’t know of a case where an organisation has been more transparent”.

👉 Follow Trump 100 on your podcast app 👈

Another reporter raised the possibility of conflicts of interest, pointing out Mr Musk has received billions of dollars in federal contracts.

“All of our actions are fully public,” he says, adding that he fully expects to be “scrutinised nonstop” – comparing it to “a daily proctologist exam” – but also admitting “we will make mistakes, but we’ll also fix the mistakes very quickly”.

“Some of the things that I say will be incorrect and should be corrected,” he said. “So nobody can bat 1,000.”

Musk’s awkward, full-scale assault on federal government

This was the most awkward news conference starring the most awkward man, with his son picking his nose.

It was quite a remarkable event. The president of the US was justifying a full-scale assault on the federal government in the Oval Office with Elon Musk by his side.

There was little in the way of accountability, even if the country did vote for Donald Trump.

Nobody saw Elon Musk coming. Nobody saw the half dozen young men that have been sent into these federal agencies to sack people by the thousands.

Musk’s description of bureaucracy as an unconstitutional branch of government is “a stretch to say the least”.

Over many years, the will of the people has been to construct a bureaucracy to deal with their interests, whether that’s social security payments or high finance.

At the same time, team Trump is attempting to “railroad” their legislation through the courts despite the objections of judges.

Earlier on Tuesday, Mr Musk posted an attack aimed at judges who have issued rulings that paused Mr Trump’s executive actions.

“Democracy in America is being destroyed by judicial coup,” Mr Musk wrote on X.

The president voiced a similar complaint in the Oval Office alongside Mr Musk.

Read more from Sky News:
Kanye blocked from selling swastika T-shirts
‘Historic blow’ landed against Sicilian mafia
Russia releases American teacher from prison

“We want to weed out the corruption. And it seems hard to believe that a judge could say, we don’t want you to do that,” he said.

“So maybe we have to look at the judges, because that’s very serious. I think it’s a very serious violation.”

Mr Trump also held discussions with Jordan’s King Abdullah at the White House.

The president repeated his pledge to “take Gaza” and move its residents to Jordan and Egypt, something the king has rejected.

Continue Reading

Trending