Connect with us

Published

on

Labour’s shadow education secretary has called for the government to publish a full list of schools being forced to close because of fears over the safety of their buildings.

It comes after the government announced school buildings in England made with a certain type of concrete prone to collapse will be closed immediately.

Around 104 schools or “settings” are set to be disrupted – on top of 52 that have already been affected this year.

However, the government has refused to publicly reveal the facilities, which have buildings constructed with the material Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete – known as RAAC.

It is the same type of concrete that has been found in some hospitals that have been deemed to be unsafe, prompting Health Secretary Steve Barclay to fast-track them into the government’s hospitals-building programme.

Labour's shadow education secretary Bridget Phillipson
Image:
Labour’s shadow education secretary Bridget Phillipson

Labour’s shadow education secretary, Bridget Phillipson, says the government should publish a full list of impacted facilities and “come clean with parents and set out the full scale of the challenge that we’re facing”.

“They are still not being upfront about it,” she said.

Read more:
How will I know if my child’s school is being closed?

“They should publish that full list, come clean to parents and make sure that all our children can avoid this kind of disruption.

“They’ve already faced so much lost learning [as a result of COVID], this has to be different.”

‘Could be the tip of the iceberg’

Critics, meanwhile, have warned the problems with RAAC could be even wider than so far outlined, with the Unison union’s head of education, Mike Short, warning the issue could “just be the tip of the iceberg”.

The Department for Education (DfE) have insisted that the vast majority of schools and colleges “will be unaffected” and that the issue is “isolated” to the 156 schools identified as having buildings containing RAAC.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Most parents should not be worried’

The DfE said the majority of the school sites would remain open for face-to-face learning and only specific parts of buildings closed where RAAC is used.

However, the department has said a “minority” will need to “either fully or partially relocate” to alternative accommodation such as nearby schools, community centres or “empty local office buildings” while safety measures are installed.

Schools have also been advised that pandemic-style remote education should only be considered as a “last resort and for a short period”.

According to guidance from the DfE, funding will only be provided for works that are “capital funded” and schools will have to pay for rental costs for emergency or temporary accommodation.

‘Safety-first approach’

“We’re taking a very safety-first approach and we’re really being cautious here,” said Education Secretary Gillian Keegan.

“The first thing we’ll do is we’ll identify where the RAAC is, so some children will be moved to a different part of the building, some of the buildings will be propped up, so the roofs will be propped up, some of them will be having temporary classrooms,” she said.

Ms Keegan urged schools to get in touch with DfE if they were concerned, but added: “If you don’t hear then don’t worry about it – this is something that is isolated to those 156 schools.”

She said “at some point” the department would produce a list of all the schools that had been affected.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

England’s crumbling schools

Secretary of state must ‘get a grip on her department’

Paul Whiteman, general secretary of school leaders’ union NAHT, described the news as “shocking”, but added: “Sadly it is not hugely surprising.”

“What we are seeing here are the very real consequences of a decade of swingeing cuts to spending on school buildings,” he said.

“The government is right to put the safety of pupils and staff first – if the safety of buildings cannot be guaranteed, there is no choice but to close them so urgent building work can take place.

“But there is no escaping the fact that the timing of this couldn’t be worse, with children due to return from the summer holidays next week.”

What is Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete?

Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete – handily shortened to RAAC – is essentially a lightweight form of concrete.

It was used to build roofs, schools, colleges and other buildings from the 1950s until the mid-1990s, according to GOV.UK.

In comparison to traditional concrete, RAAC is weaker. It is made in factories using fine aggregate, with chemicals to create gas bubbles and heat.

Both the material properties and structural behaviour differs significantly from traditional reinforced concrete.

In 2019, the Standing Committee on Structural Safety highlighted the significant risk of failure of RAAC planks.

Three years later in 2022, the Office of Government Property sent a safety briefing notice to all property leaders, saying that “RAAC is now life-expired and liable to collapse”.

Chris Goodier, professor of construction engineering and materials at Loughborough University, said: “It is RAAC from the 1950s, 60s and 70s that is of main concern, especially if it has not been adequately maintained.

“RAAC examples have been found with bearings (supports) which aren’t big enough, and RAAC with the steel reinforcement in the wrong place, both of which can have structural implications.”

Kevin Bentley, senior vice-chairman of the Local Government Association, said the timing of the announcement meant schools and councils had been left with “very little time to make urgent rearrangements and minimise disruption to classroom learning”.

He called on the government to urgently set up a task force to tackle the issue and to provide councils with further funding and technical expertise to repair or replace buildings with RAAC.

Read more:
Cabinet reshuffle latest
Pupils face disruption due to probe into school buildings firm
Hundreds of crumbling schools to be renovated

Some hospitals deemed ‘unsafe’ because of RAAC

The department said the government has been aware of RAAC in public sector buildings since 1994 but the issue came to light in 2018, when a roof collapsed at a Kent school.

That year the DfE published guidance for schools stating the need to have “adequate contingencies” in the event of evacuations caused by concerns over the use of RAAC.

In June this year, the National Audit Office said a school collapse in England that causes death or injury was “very likely” – but that the government did not have sufficient information to manage “critical” risks to the safety of pupils and staff.

Around 24,000 school buildings – more than a third of the total number in England – are beyond their estimated design lifespan – with school leaders branding the scale of building safety issues “shocking”.

Questions were also raised about the state of UK hospitals after Mr Barclay said that five new sites would be added to the government’s programme to build 40 new hospitals because the presence of RAAC made them unsafe to operate “beyond 2030”.

Five new sites – Airedale General in Keighley, Queen Elizabeth Hospital in King’s Lynn, Hinchingbrooke near Huntingdon, Leighton Hospital in Cheshire and Frimley Park in Surrey – were added to the programme as a priority.

Is your school being closed down or has it already been closed due to RAAC? Are you concerned about the problem at your school? Contact us at Sky.today@sky.uk

If you want to send us pictures and video from your mobile phone use ‘Your Report‘ on the Sky News app.

Or send us a message on WhatsApp here or through this link

Continue Reading

UK

Resident doctor strikes: I don’t want people to suffer but we have to walk out again, says BMA chief

Published

on

By

Resident doctor strikes: I don't want people to suffer but we have to walk out again, says BMA chief

The British Medical Association (BMA) has defended a new round of resident doctor walkouts starting on Friday, insisting medics’ pay is still “way down” compared with 2008 and that the government has failed to finish “a journey” towards restoring it.

BMA chair Dr Tom Dolphin told Sky News the dispute remains rooted in years of pay erosion that have left resident doctors far behind other public sector workers.

“When we started the dispute, […] the lowest level of the resident doctors were being paid £14 an hour,” he said.

“There were some pay rises over the last couple of years that brought that partly back to the value it should be at, but not all the way.

“The secretary of state (Wes Streeting) himself called it a journey, implying there were further steps to come, but we haven’t seen that.”

Resident doctors outside Newcastle's Royal Victoria Infirmary during a five-day strike in July. File pic: PA
Image:
Resident doctors outside Newcastle’s Royal Victoria Infirmary during a five-day strike in July. File pic: PA

When asked if the row ultimately “comes down to money”, he replied: “In the sense that the secretary of state doesn’t want to or isn’t able to fund the pay increases to match the value that we had in 2008.”

Dr Dolphin argued that while “the general worker in the economy as a whole” has seen pay catch up since the 2008 financial crash, “doctors are still way down”.

The government points out that its 29% settlement last year was one of the largest in the public sector and was intended to draw a line under two years of walkouts.

How much do resident doctors earn?

After the most recent pay awards, in 2025/26 a medic just out of university receives a basic salary of £38,831 and has estimated average earnings of £45,900 after factors like extra pay for unsociable hours are taken into account, according to medical think tank the Nuffield Trust.

That average figure rises to £54,400 by the second year and a more senior speciality registrar earns an average of £80,500.

The BMA says that when the dispute started, the most junior doctors were making around £14 per hour. That works out at £29,120 per year for a 40-hour week.

That’s very close to the earnings of a doctor fresh out of medical school in 2022/23 – £29,384, according to Full Fact.

But that’s over a 52-week year without taking into account paid holiday or unsociable hours.

But Dr Dolphin said the deal still fell short: “The gap was biggest for doctors and needed the biggest amount of restoration, and that’s what we got.”

He defended the BMA’s use of the Retail Price Index (RPI), a metric rejected by the Office for National Statistics, saying it “better reflects the costs people face”.

Should resident doctors get a pay rise? Have your say in the poll at the bottom of this story.

Dr Tom Dolphin says resident doctors are still underpaid
Image:
Dr Tom Dolphin says resident doctors are still underpaid

‘Who do you think is treating the patients?’

With Chancellor Rachel Reeves preparing her budget amid warnings of deep cuts, Dr Dolphin said the BMA is not demanding an immediate cash injection.

“We’re quite happy for that money to be deferred with some kind of multi-year pay deal so that we can end the dispute and avoid having further industrial action about pay for several years to come,” he said.

“Money spent in the NHS is returned to the economy. For every pound you spend, you get several pounds back.”

When pressed on whether the £1.7bn cost of previous strike action could have been better spent on treatment and technology for NHS cancer patients, he hit back: “Who do you think is treating the cancer patients? It’s the doctors.”

Read more on Sky News:
Thousands of NHS redundancies
Sentence and fine over patient death

Health Secretary Wes Streeting has criticised the BMA for striking again. File pic: PA
Image:
Health Secretary Wes Streeting has criticised the BMA for striking again. File pic: PA

Strikes will cause disruption, union boss admits

Dr Dolphin rejected suggestions that the dispute could destabilise the government, calling the idea “implausible”.

He admitted prolonged strikes have tested public patience, but said the government had left doctors with no choice.

“A prolonged industrial dispute makes people annoyed with both sides,” he said. “It is vexing to us that we are still in this dispute.”

“I don’t want patients to suffer,” he added. “I accept that the strikes cause disruption… of course that’s upsetting for them. I completely get that. And I’m sorry that it’s happening.”

Continue Reading

UK

PM apologises to health secretary over coup accusations

Published

on

By

PM apologises to health secretary over coup accusations

Sir Keir Starmer has apologised to his health secretary after allies of the prime minister accused him of plotting a coup.

Sky News understands Sir Keir spoke briefly to Wes Streeting on Wednesday evening, though did not share details about the briefing campaign.

Politics Hub: Follow latest updates

Speaking at Prime Minister’s Questions earlier in the day, he denied authorising the attacks on Mr Streeting, who was accused of planning a leadership challenge after the budget later this month.

Mr Streeting said the allegations are “not true”, telling Sky News’ Mornings With Ridge And Frost that whoever was behind the briefings had been “watching too much Celebrity Traitors”.

He insisted he was loyal to the prime minister, who has been under mounting pressure as he and the Labour Party flounder behind Reform in the polls.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Health secretary insists he’s ‘a faithful’

Downing Street went on the attack on Tuesday night to ward off any potential challenge to Sir Keir after the budget, which could see the government announce manifesto-breaking tax rises.

Sir Keir and Rachel Reeves have refused to rule out raising income tax, national insurance, or VAT.

One senior figure told Sky News political editor Beth Rigby while a post-budget challenge is unlikely, it could come if next May’s elections – including in London and Wales – go badly for Labour.

Labour face a challenge from Reform on the right and parties like the Greens and Plaid Cymru on the left.

Read more: How No 10 plunged itself into crisis

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Starmer backs Streeting at PMQs

Also under pressure is the prime minister’s chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, after Mr Streeting hit out at a “toxic culture” inside Number 10.

Sir Keir failed to say he had “full confidence” in him at PMQs in response to questions from Kemi Badenoch, but the prime minister’s political spokesperson later insisted to journalists that he does retain his backing.

Sky News understands Mr McSweeney was not discussed when Sir Keir and Mr Streeting spoke last night.

Labour chairwoman Anna Turley said the prime minister will investigate the source of the claims against the health secretary, telling ITV: “This is not what he wants to see and he’s determined to drive it out.”

Continue Reading

UK

Epstein said Andrew did have photo taken with Virginia Giuffre, emails show

Published

on

By

Epstein said Andrew did have photo taken with Virginia Giuffre, emails show

Newly released emails from Jeffrey Epstein include one in which the late paedophile financier describes how Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor did have his photo taken with victim Virginia Giuffre.

The former duke, who was recently stripped of his titles, has previously said he didn’t recall meeting Ms Giuffre and claimed an image of the pair could have been doctored.

Ms Giuffre, who took her own life earlier this year, claimed in her recently released autobiography that – as a teenager – she had sex with Andrew on three occasions after being trafficked by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.

Andrew has always strongly denied the claims.

Trump latest: 20,000 pages from Epstein files released

The details have emerged after thousands of files from the Jeffrey Epstein estate were released by Republicans on the House Oversight Committee.

The email that discusses the photograph was one of those released and features an exchange with a journalist in 2011.

More on Andrew Mountbatten Windsor

A picture emerged in 2011 of Andrew, which has become infamous, showing the former prince with his arm around Virginia Giuffre, apparently taken in Ghislaine Maxwell’s London home.

Although the name of the “girl” is redacted, Epstein appears in his email exchange to be referring to Ms Giuffre, who at the time had spoken to The Mail on Sunday, which had published the photo and her account of encountering Andrew while travelling with Epstein. After cutting ties with Epstein, she moved to Australia. She also changed her surname from Roberts to Giuffre.

An email from Epstein to the journalist read: “The girl has fled the country with an outstanding arrest warrant. The da (sic) after she accused others, said in writing that she has no credibility, she was never 15 years old working for me, her story made it seem like she first worked for trump at that age and was met by ghislaine maxwell.

“Total horseshit, the daily mail paid her money, they admitted it, with the statement that it took money to coax out the truth.

“Yes she was on my plane, and yes she had her picture taken with Andrew, as many of my employees have.

“I have never misled you, this girl is a total liar, they (sic) authorities should check her australian immigration form… I will ask if they will cooperate – Prince people.”

In a different email exchange in March 2011 about an inquiry from a news reporter, Epstein messages someone listed as “The Duke”, which is thought to be Andrew.

Epstein told him: “Im not sure how to respond, the only person she didn’t have sex with was Elvis.”

It prompted the following response: “Please make sure that every statement or legal letter states clearly that I am NOT involved and that I knew and know NOTHING about any of these allegations.

“I can’t take any more of this my end.”

It is not clear if Epstein, who killed himself in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges, was writing about Ms Giuffre.

Read more from Sky News:
What do Epstein’s emails say about Trump?
Congress summons Andrew over Epstein

Epstein: ‘She is a fraud’

In a separate email to a publicist in July 2011, Epstein writes: “The girl who accused Prince Andrew can also easily be proven to be a liar.

“I think Buckingham Palace would love it. You should task someone to investigate the girl Virginia Roberts, that has caused the Queen’s son all this agro (sic).

“I promise you she is a fraud. You and I will be able to go to ascot (sic) for the rest of our lives.”

Speaking to Newsnight in 2019, Andrew said: “I have absolutely no memory of that photograph ever being taken… you can’t prove whether or not that photograph is faked or not…

“That’s me but whether that’s my hand or whether that’s the position I… but I don’t… I have simply no recollection of the photograph ever being taken.”

Continue Reading

Trending