After nearly a month of conversations, the ACC presidents and chancellors voted Friday morning to add Stanford, Cal and SMU, giving the league 18 schools — 17 in football — starting with the 2024-25 season. The protracted conversations gained steam over the past week, as financial models that projected more of a windfall for existing members were enough to garner 12 votes to pass the additions.
The ACC now expands literally from coast to coast, and though there has been pushback on adding teams from several league members — including a pointed statement from the North Carolina board of trustees — the vast majority of presidents ultimately decided this was in the best interest of the ACC, as the SEC, Big Ten and Big 12 have expanded over the past two years. This is, quite frankly, a matter of survival.
So why did this happen and what’s next? ESPN reporters Andrea Adelson, Kyle Bonagura, Heather Dinich, David Hale and Dave Wilson answer those questions and more.
There are two primary reasons for expanding. The first is money. The second is security.
On the financial front, Stanford, Cal and SMU have all agreed to forgo a sizable portion of TV revenue the ACC generates by adding teams. Sources indicated that SMU is expected to take no television money for nine years, while Cal and Stanford are expected to initially join at approximately 30% shares.
That would create a pool of between $50 million and $60 million annually to divide among ACC schools. Some of that would be distributed to all members, and the rest would be put into a pool for success initiatives. Those initiatives, which were passed in May and would begin next season, are based on performance in revenue-generating postseason competition — more specifically, the College Football Playoff and NCAA men’s and women’s basketball tournaments. A larger share of that revenue will go to the teams participating rather than getting divided equally among all members.
This money can alleviate some of the financial stress that has been a dark cloud hanging over the ACC since the SEC and Big Ten inked lucrative new TV deals over the past few years. It’s not a long-term solution, and it certainly doesn’t instantly put ACC teams on par with schools in those other two leagues, but it’s a needed Band-Aid at a time when some programs were making a lot of noise about revenue concerns.
Having said that, Florida State has been pushing for a change in the revenue distribution model when it comes to the current television payouts for existing members. Currently, that money is divided equally among league members. But Florida State athletic director Michael Alford has pushed for that money to be distributed based on each school’s value to the television deal — including ratings, brand and marketability. ACC presidents have not been willing to consider this plan, but that does not mean Florida State will give up the fight to keep pushing for it.
But the fallout for the Pac-12 also offered its own lesson to the rest of the ACC. As one league administrator said, “no one wants to end up like Oregon State and Washington State.” Jim Phillips routinely touted the ACC’s standing as a clear No. 3 in the conference pecking order, but the Big 12 made waves by adding Colorado, Arizona, Arizona State and Utah, and that league also has a chance to negotiate another new TV deal six years before the ACC will. That at least left the door open to a Plan B for schools unlikely to get an offer from the Big Ten or SEC, meaning an all-out collapse of the ACC wasn’t entirely impossible. On the heels of seeing it happen to the Pac-12, a number of ACC presidents wanted assurances against dissolution. Adding three new teams changes the math enough as to make that all but impossible. “It’s strength in numbers,” one AD said and “essentially a math problem,” another added. Even if the big brands ultimately go elsewhere, Stanford, Cal and SMU provide enough of a cushion to keep the league afloat. — David Hale and Andrea Adelson
How does this affect the short- and long-term plans of FSU and Clemson?
The immediate future for Florida State and Clemson was always going to be murky, and this probably doesn’t change that much. But a decision to challenge the ACC’s grant of rights — which gives the league rights to each school’s media packages through 2036 — comes with some serious legal and financial peril. To challenge the document in court isn’t anyone’s idea of an easy exit strategy. It still might be the only long-term option for the biggest brands, but this move could at least delay the process. Each year FSU or Clemson can wait to leave, the cost of doing so gets a little smaller, so if added revenue through expansion helps bridge the short-term gap, the definition of long term gets a little more manageable. As one ACC administrator put it, a lot can change in five years. It’s entirely possible the whole collegiate system looks entirely different by then. Buying time via expansion has real value in allowing schools contemplating departure to get more information about what the future holds before making a final decision. — Hale
How will the ACC address travel and logistical issues?
The ACC has run a number of models looking at ways to reduce travel and limit the impact on its athletes, but the reality is impossible to ignore: Stanford’s campus is 3,100 miles from Miami’s, and nothing the ACC does can shrink that distance. In the end, one administrator said, it’s a trade-off that had to be made. Other conferences are moving to become more national, and the ACC is simply following suit. No one likes the logistical component of cross-country travel, but the extra revenue can at least help make it an easier pill to swallow. — Hale
Cal Chancellor Carol Christ on non-revenue travel for sports like baseball, softball, volleyball and soccer. “The ACC is really interested in using Dallas as a place where teams may come together to minimize the travel.”
What’s next for Washington State and Oregon State?
The easiest, most obvious option is probably what will happen: go to the Mountain West as a package deal. Culturally, geographically and — what is shockingly rare in realignment — logically, it just makes sense. The more complicated possibility is for the Beavers and Cougars to forge ahead as the two “refounding” members of the Pac-whatever. The thought with this route is that it could possibly allow the schools to claim whatever the conference still has, plus additional units yet to be distributed. The question then becomes who can they get to join? None of the MWC schools could justify leaving on their own and the possibility that nine would vote to dissolve the conference to join WSU and OSU for branding purposes doesn’t make sense. It’s hard to imagine either as an independent in football, either. — Kyle Bonagura
What does no TV revenue mean for SMU?
SMU has been stewing since the Southwest Conference played its last football game in December 1995, when Texas, Texas A&M, Texas Tech and — most galling to the Mustangs — Baylor, a similarly sized private school, ventured north to merge with the Big Eight and form the Big 12. Since then, they’ve seen Gary Patterson win big at TCU and get enough financial backing to storm back into the Big 12. They’ve seen Houston do the same. Only the Mustangs and Rice remain from the SWC’s left-behinds. So they’re taking drastic measures, offering to forgo any television revenue for nine years, and are in the midst of a $250 million athletics makeover, including a $100 million expansion of Gerald J. Ford Stadium, sparked by a $50 million donation by the Garry Weber Foundation, the biggest gift in SMU athletics history. The Mustangs’ 1980s financial flex is now a strength in the modern era of college football, and they’re banking on boosters — who have expressed their willingness to help boost SMU back to the Power 5 — becoming reenergized by a return to big-time football and covering the lack of television revenue they’ll be forgoing by leaving the guaranteed AAC money behind and not getting any in return from the ACC. — Dave Wilson
What comes next for the College Football Playoff?
The CFP’s management committee, which is composed of the 10 FBS commissioners and Notre Dame athletic director Jack Swarbrick, will revisit the format of the 12-team playoff, which begins next season. The current model includes the six highest-ranked conference champions, plus the next six highest-ranked teams, which would typically reward five Power 5 champions, plus a Group of 5 winner. Without the Pac-12, though, they have discussed a 5+7 model, which would include the five highest-ranked conference champions and seven at-large teams. While the idea of 12 at-large teams has been discussed, there doesn’t seem to be much traction for it, though the commissioners didn’t have an in-depth discussion about it yet.
At their most recent in-person meeting in late August, Mid-American Conference commissioner Jon Steinbrecher said moving forward, the principle of honoring conference champions should remain important. “I think that’s a bedrock principle of what we are doing and what we’ve built into this,” he said. “I think it’s important that that is continued as we move forward. Depending on number of conferences we have, I think you can have a legitimate conversation about the number of champions that are set here, as well as the number of at-larges, but to me you start with the bedrock principle and I think it’s important we keep that in there. I felt good coming out of that conversation. Didn’t take any sort of hands, I just felt good about that conversation.”
While the commissioners are expected to have monthly meetings until all of the details to implement the 12-team format are done, their next in-person meeting is later this month at the Big Ten headquarters in Rosemont, Illinois. The ACC’s expansion will also trigger more discussions about how playoff revenue will be distributed. The CFP and ESPN, which is the sole media rightsholder through the duration of the 12-year contract, have to determine if ESPN will remain the lone broadcast partner for the additional games until the contract expires after the 2025 season. — Heather Dinich
Eli Lederman covers college football and recruiting for ESPN.com. He joined ESPN in 2024 after covering the University of Oklahoma for Sellout Crowd and the Tulsa World.
Disappointed. Embarrassed. An unsmiling Venables had plenty of words to describe a disastrous 2024 football season in the minutes after last December’s Armed Forces Bowl. It had ended, mercifully, in a 21-20 defeat to Navy that afternoon. The Sooners had dropped six of the final eight games in their eagerly anticipated debut SEC campaign. For the second time since 1998 — and the second time under Venables — the Sooners would finish with a losing record.
Three seats to Venables’ left, veteran Sooners linebacker Kobie McKinzie felt a different energy radiating from his head coach. Minutes later, in an otherwise empty locker room inside TCU’s Amon G. Carter Stadium, Venables spoke like a man who knew what was coming.
“He looked me in my eyes and told me, ‘We’re going to be all right,'” McKinzie recalled after a recent practice. “I saw the passion. I could feel it in his presence. He couldn’t take enough deep breaths to calm himself down because he was so eager to get this figured out. He was ready to go to work.”
Venables left the Armed Forces Bowl on the hot seat. A month later, he announced plans to take over as the Sooners’ defensive playcaller this fall, assuming full control of the defense for the first time as a head coach and placing a calculated bet on a make-or-break season in Norman. As No. 8 Oklahoma rolls into its first College Football Playoff appearance since 2019 on Friday, the decision stands as one of the most consequential offseason moves in the sport in 2025.
Disguising blitzes, overwhelming opposing quarterbacks, blowing up backfields; Oklahoma’s oft-red-faced defensive mastermind got back to doing what he does best this fall, in turn dispelling doubts over his coaching future and launching a vintage Venables defense reminiscent of the units he sculpted as a three-time national champion coordinator at Oklahoma and Clemson.
Along the way, perhaps no one has enjoyed the move more than Venables himself.
“Everything’s just different for you when you’re calling it,” Venables told ESPN. “You feel this responsibility of doing it on your side of the ball …You live and die in the course of the week. Literally you’re born and then you die at the end of it. I think in a good, healthy way.”
Venables’ latest elite defense is powered by a core of experienced defenders, many of them in their third and fourth years playing in the system. It shows. Oklahoma entered the postseason ranked in the top 10 nationally in points per game (13.9), total defense (273.9 YPG) and run defense (81.4 YPG). Its 41 sacks are tied with Texas A&M for the national lead. No program across the country has logged more tackles for loss (115) in 2025.
That defensive unit stifled Auburn, LSU, Missouri and Tennessee en route to a CFP berth. But no win in Oklahoma’s path looms larger than its Nov. 15 win at Alabama, a 23-21 victory fueled by a defensive master class from Venables. On Friday, the Sooners host the No. 9 Crimson Tide (8 p.m. ET, ABC) in a playoff rematch, looking to defeat Alabama for the second time in 34 days.
Venables’ confidence at Oklahoma never wavered. Nor did his determination. Operating with a matured defensive core and what Venables calls “the best staff I’ve been a part of,” one of college football’s most creative defensive minds is back in the saddle, firmly at the center of a ferocious defensive juggernaut and a seismic turnaround in Norman.
“It’s pure passion and pure heart coming from him,” McKinzie said. “That’s what the program has been built on. That’s what the defense has been built on. It will never be replicated.”
OF COURSE, VENABLES was never not involved in the defense at Oklahoma over the past few years. But after nearly three decades spent living and breathing it every day, it took him four years to find the right balance as he adjusted to the duties of life as a head coach with the Sooners.
Venables handed playcalling to former Duke coach Ted Roof in 2022, then split the duties with Roof in 2023. When Venables fired Roof following the 2023 season, the Sooners brought in Zac Alley, a 30-year-old protégé who had worked for Venables at Clemson, to call plays in 2024.
None of those arrangements lasted more than a season. More crucially, although Oklahoma showed flashes of brilliance, it didn’t look like a Venables unit. The Sooners never finished better than 29th in scoring defense from 2022 through 2024. After Alley left for West Virginia last December, Venables didn’t necessarily need a nudge, but two of his former bosses still shared their thoughts.
“I expressed to him that calling plays was the best thing he could do,” former OU coach Bob Stoops told ESPN. Weeks after the Armed Forces Bowl, Clemson coach Dabo Swinney and Venables spent a few days together at the American Football Coaches Association Convention in Charlotte, North Carolina. “He knew what was at stake this year,” Swinney said. “He just took it head on.”
After cutting his teeth under Bill Snyder at Kansas State, Venables joined Stoops at Oklahoma in 1999 and won a national title the next year. A decade later, he landed with Swinney at Clemson. While capturing a pair of national championships, Venables burnished his reputation as a loud-barking mad scientist and emerged as one of the nation’s sharpest tactical minds.
When he decided to take over playcalling duties earlier this year, Venables’ explanation was simple: “Why am I going to call the defense?” he said in March. “Because I’m good at it.”
Peyton Bowen, an All-SEC safety, felt Venables’ heightened impact immediately this spring.
Venables, notoriously, likes to tinker pre-snap. Under previous setups, Bowen recalled, there could be occasional confusion around signal calling to the field when Venables and another coordinator were operating together. Sometimes playcalls got crossed entirely. With Venables in full control, multiple Sooners said those processes have run more smoothly in 2025.
“Everything just goes through him,” Bowen said. “You just got to remember your stuff.”
McKinzie swears the 55-year-old coach has a photographic memory. “It’s crazy, dude, he doesn’t have to see the play or have anybody draw anything,” McKinzie said. “He can literally tell you the exact formation and exactly what they did. That’s how you know you’re around one of the great ones.”
In previous seasons, Venables roamed across multiple meetings while coordinators — Roof or Alley — led the primary defensive sessions. Known for his meticulous film study and attention to detail dating to his earliest days as an assistant at Oklahoma, Venables is now at the forefront of Oklahoma’s defensive meetings, offering his players an essential asset.
“You just get to pick his mind throughout the whole week,” McKinzie said. “I try to sit as close to him as possible.”
Playcalling duties have altered nearly every part of Venables’ game week schedule. In his words, it has taken the job into a more “intimate space,” both relationally and logistically. Breaking down film. Building packages. Game-planning. Meeting with his staff. Meeting with players.
“The anticipation of game day is different, too,” Venables said. “It all just becomes more a part of your DNA each week and then across the season as opposed to a CEO-type coaching of role.”
For that, Venables credits the staff around him, from assistant coaches to a revamped front office. One of Venables’ favorite parts of the week, he says, is the morning meetings with his defensive staff, which includes offseason hires Wes Godwin — who replaced Venables as Clemson’s defensive coordinator in 2022 — and former Utah State defensive coordinator Nate Dreiling. The arrival of first-year general manager Jim Nagy has freed Venables up more, too.
“I knew I needed to trust the people that I’ve hired,” Venables said. “It’s all, ‘Coach Venables is getting back and calling plays,’ Man, the collaboration is very real. It’s not like I’m giving that lip service.”
Given his perpetual well of intensity, it would be misleading to suggest Venables is reenergized this fall. But settled into the rhythms of his playcalling duties, ingrained in the minutiae and fully hands-on with his defense, Venables appears as comfortable as he ever has been as a head coach.
“You’d like to be a head coach where you can be the good guy and a connector,” Venables said. “I certainly like to have fun. But fun for me is when we’re whupping people.”
VENABLES ADDRESSED HIS team in the visiting locker room of Alabama’s Bryant-Denny Stadium last month after Oklahoma snapped the host’s 17-game home winning streak. His face was red. His voice was hoarse. In his hands: an “Original Can of Whoop Ass.” It retails for $14.99 online.
In the 23-21 win over then-No. 4 Alabama on Nov. 15, Oklahoma had looked as close to Venables’ vaunted Clemson defenses as it had at any point across his four seasons in charge.
The Sooners puzzled Crimson Tide quarterback Ty Simpson with exotic pressures and sacked the Heisman hopeful six times. They turned three Alabama turnovers into 17 points, headlined by an 87-yard pick-six from Eli Bowen. Oklahoma created constant pressure in the pocket and smothered every available lane, angle or opening in the run game.
“Every one of you guys putting that freaking jersey on,” Venables told his players. “You guys have made the decision to work. To improve. To get better. To kick the door in. To believe. To respond. That’s what you guys have chosen to do. I didn’t make one freaking tackle tonight.”
The performance was everything Venables had promised in his introductory news conference on Dec. 6, 2021. On Friday, the Sooners will attempt to stifle the Crimson Tide again, led by Venables and perhaps the most suffocating defense across the 12-team CFP field, a unit that has all the very best elements that have defined Venables’ elite units of the past.
Like his swarming Clemson defenses of the 2010s, Oklahoma is built on the defensive line.
That group, led by All-Americans Austin Bryant, Clelin Ferrell and Christian Wilkins, logged six sacks in the national semifinal against Notre Dame. This fall, Oklahoma hammered Auburn quarterback Jackson Arnold for nine sacks in September. A month later, the Sooners taxed South Carolina’s LaNorris Sellers six times before creating 13 pressures against Alabama.
Within a unit nicknamed the “Dog Pound,” the Sooners roll deep, too. Per ESPN Research, Oklahoma had 10 defensive linemen register 100-plus snaps during the regular season, more than all but three other defenses across the SEC.
“They just do a great job of causing chaos,” Alabama coach Kalen DeBoer said of the Sooners’ defense this week. “They love the tackles for loss and the sacks. There’s obviously a triggerman. Coach Venables [is] one of the best that there is at doing it.”
Venables’ penchant for disguised blitzes and unique pressures has popped often this fall, too. “They do a great job of creating confusion,” Alabama offensive coordinator Ryan Grubb said.
Halton, a member of Venables’ first Oklahoma signing class in 2022, points out Venables’ knack for halftime adjustments. In 2018, Clemson finished with the nation’s ninth-ranked second-half scoring defense. This fall, the Sooners are giving up 7.4 points and 125.8 yards per game after halftime, per ESPN Research, ranked fifth and 11th nationally in the respective categories.
Last month, Missouri ran for 70 yards on 26 carries led by All-American rusher Ahmad Hardy. After halftime, the Tigers’ running lanes disappeared. On nine second-half rushing attempts, Missouri gained zero yards with minus-13 yards before contact, per ESPN Research.
“BV comes in at halftime completely dialed in on the offense,” Halton said. “He knew what they were doing. They had a great offense and some really good running backs. He locked it down.”
There’s perhaps no time when Venables’ acumen is more valuable than in the seconds before the ball is snapped. Along with his complex pre-snap alignments, Venables is an astute reader of opposing offenses, often waiting deep into the play clock to call a pre-snap audible.
“He’s always just trying to win that chess match,” Peyton Bowen said.
Bowen’s mind goes back to the fourth quarter at Alabama. With the Crimson Tide facing third-and-5 and 12:22 remaining, Oklahoma’s sideline was a barrage of movement. “Alabama was switching back and forth between formations,” Bowen said.
“We’re checking and checking and checking and checking. The defense communicated perfectly.”
After loading the defensive line pre-snap, Venables sent sophomore cornerback Devon Jordan in on a delayed blitz. After overpowering a blocker, Jordan swarmed Simpson for a critical sack.
“In the end, BV made the right call.” Bowen said.
FOR THE PAST two weeks, Venables has knocked down suggestions of a potential advantage in seeing an opponent for a second time. “They have certain matchups they like, and we have certain matchups that we like,” he said on Dec. 7. “But at the end of the day you can throw that all out.”
All told, Venables is 4-0 in same-season rematches from 2000 through 2020, all as a coordinator. That record shouldn’t have much bearing on Friday night’s game. But if any of those games could be instructive, it might be the most recent one: a December 2020 win over Notre Dame.
The Fighting Irish, provisional members of the ACC that fall, dropped 510 yards on Venables’ Clemson defense and outlasted the Tigers in a 47-40, double-overtime thriller that November.
When the programs met again in the ACC title game a month later, Venables had an answer for everything. Clemson cruised to a 34-10 victory. A Notre Dame rushing attack that averaged 211.1 yards per game that fall finished with just 44 yards on the ground. “There were new looks for sure, in the secondary as well as up front,” Irish quarterback Ian Book said afterward.
It was a Venables special.
Despite being outgained 406-212, the Sooners left Tuscaloosa with their biggest victory of the Venables era last month. From that performance, they’ll have a formula for Friday’s game. OU allowed just four first downs over the final 15:09 and limited Simpson to one of his least productive second-half showings of the season, sealing the win that ultimately vaulted Oklahoma into the CFP by limiting mistakes and winning on the margins.
Afterward, Venables demurred at the suggestion that Oklahoma had won ugly.
“Who’s it not pretty for? What does that mean?” he said. “I happen to like it.”
NEW ORLEANS — Tulane coach Jon Sumrall mourned the death of his father Friday, a day before the Green Wave make their College Football Playoff debut against Ole Miss.
Sumrall said his father died in his sleep Thursday night after lengthy health issues. George Sumrall was 77.
“God gave us more time with my dad than we thought we would get,” Sumrall said in a message posted on social media. “Dad was a fighter. I learned so much from him … being a man of faith, grit, hard work, attitude, service and more.”
Sumrall said he will always remember how his father was well enough to attend Tulane’s 34-21 win over North Texas in the American Athletic Conference championship two weeks ago, and the recent news conference held at Gainesville, Florida, announcing Sumrall’s hiring as Florida’s coach.
“He was always there for me and I know he will be watching,” said Sumrall, who is staying on as Tulane’s coach through the playoffs. He then credited his parents for setting great examples and closed his note by writing, “Love you always Dad!”
Tulane (11-2) travels to face Ole Miss (11-1) at Oxford, Mississippi, with the winner advancing to face No. 2 Georgia at the Sugar Bowl.
College football reporter; joined ESPN in 2008. Graduate of Northwestern University.
Arizona State wide receiver Jordyn Tyson has declared for the NFL draft, where he is projected as a top-10 selection.
Tyson, a third-team Associated Press All-America selection this season, made his announcement in an Instagram video Friday, thanking his family, teammates and coaches. ESPN’s Mel Kiper Jr. lists Tyson at No. 7 on his Big Board for the 2026 draft, and Field Yates has Tyson going No. 7 in his latest mock draft.
He is not expected to participate in Arizona State’s Tony the Tiger Sun Bowl matchup against Duke on Dec. 31.
A transfer from Colorado, Tyson shone the past two seasons at Arizona State, recording 136 catches for 1,812 yards and 18 touchdowns. He was named Big 12 Offensive Newcomer of the Year in 2024, when he finished with 1,101 receiving yards and 10 touchdowns on 75 receptions.
Tyson recorded five 100-yard games in 2024 before being injured in the regular-season finale and missing the Big 12 championship game and the College Football Playoff. He also earned third-team AP All-America honors last year.
This season, Tyson has four 100-yard receiving games, including a 105-yard effort in Arizona State’s upset win against Texas Tech. Tyson missed several games in November with a lingering hamstring injury.