Connect with us

Published

on

The amount of money available for schools to repair and maintain their buildings has fallen by more than a quarter since 2010 (28%), a real terms cut of £2.2bn per year.

Since the Conservatives formed a majority government in 2015, the Department for Education’s capital budget has averaged £5.6bn per year – compared with £7.8bn per year in the last four years under Labour.

That is the money earmarked for things like construction, maintenance and repair work.

More than 100 schools and colleges have been told to shut buildings, partially or completely, because of concerns about the safety of the reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (RAAC) used to construct them.

The Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has denied suggestions that he is to blame for cuts to schools’ repair and maintenance budgets, saying it was “completely and utterly wrong” to suggest he was to blame for failing to fully fund a programme to rebuild England’s crumbling schools.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

PM denies limiting school repairs fund

Funding for the repair and maintenance of schools has fallen significantly since 2010, when Conservative education secretary Michael Gove scrapped Labour’s Building Schools for the Future Programme.

Since then, capital spending has remained far below levels seen under Labour, dropping to just £5bn during the pandemic before rising to £5.3bn last year.

Yet the department’s overall budget has grown significantly, from an average of £72bn per year during Labour’s last four years in office to £87bn under the Conservatives, a real terms increase of 23%.

The entirety of that increase has gone into the department’s fund for day-to-day spending, its resource budget, which has received an £18bn boost. At the same time, the capital budget has been cut by £2.2bn.

As a result, many schools in need of funding for repairs and maintenance have been raiding their resource budgets, which are used to pay salaries and energy bills, to fund capital projects.

A report released in June by the National Audit Office found that, in 2021-22, 71% of academy trusts used resource funding for capital projects, transferring a total of £518m from their day-to-day running costs – despite growing pressure on teachers’ pay and rising energy bills.

Read more:
All the schools we know are affected by concrete safety fears
The once wonder material causing chaotic start to academic year

“The government’s own analysis shows that the school estate is in a very poor state of repair – that includes ceilings and concrete, but it also includes gas and electric,” says Luke Sibieta, a research fellow at the Institute for Fiscal Studies.

“Those sorts of issues can become urgent, so it’s not surprising at all to be seeing schools raiding their day-to-day budgets to spend on capital budgets – those capital expenditures may well be urgent.”

Schools’ electrical and plumbing systems are also in urgent need of repair

The report by the National Audit Office found, based on data from 2020, that schools required £8.5bn of repairs for issues “key to the building remaining usable and safe”, as well as £425m for things that “could present major issues”.

Among the most serious items were £2.5bn of repairs needed to schools’ electrical services, and £2.1bn to mechanical services such as plumbing.

Within the capital budget, the money ring-fenced specifically for maintenance and repairs has also fallen significantly in recent years.

The Department for Education spent £5bn on maintenance and repairs in the two years to March. Accounting for inflation in the construction sector, that is a drop of 20% compared with the two years to March 2017.

“It’s not surprising that we’re seeing a crisis in school repairs and school maintenance,” says Mr Sibieta.

“The government has been underinvesting in school repairs and maintenance for around 10-15 years now. The amount of spending falls short of what the government itself thinks it needs.

“As part of the spending review in 2020, the Department for Education thought we needed around £5.3bn per year just to repair and maintain the existing school estate. In the end, the Treasury allocated around £3bn per year.”

What is RAAC?

Also known as ‘bubbly’ concrete, reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (RAAC) is a building material that was popular in the post-war period as a cheap, lightweight alternative to traditional concrete mixes. It was used in UK public buildings from the 1950s to the 1990s, mostly in roofing.

Its convenience came at a cost, however, as the material was found to be less durable than ‘traditional’ reinforced concrete and is prone to crumbling and cracking, especially after exposure to moisture.

Failures in RAAC roof panels started to become apparent in the 1980s, and a string of reports identified its weaknesses and short 30-year lifespan.

The issue reignited in 2018, when a Kent school roof containing RAAC collapsed, although no one was injured.

Then this summer, an RAAC beam previously thought to be low risk collapsed, leading the government to label all buildings containing RAAC potentially dangerous and order the closure of classrooms in hundreds of schools.

Sarah Skinner, chief executive of the Penrose Learning Trust, has been forced to close 12 classrooms at Surrey’s East Bergholt High School due to the presence of RAAC.

She has secured six temporary replacements, but hasn’t been told when they’ll be available.

Click to subscribe to the Sky News Daily wherever you get your podcasts

“Once we get the porta cabins, we will get children back, but they won’t have specialist resourcing,” she says.

“We think it will be months before the remedial works can be undertaken – at a huge cost. So, I am worried about getting children back in classrooms before Christmas.”


The Data and Forensics team is a multi-skilled unit dedicated to providing transparent journalism from Sky News. We gather, analyse and visualise data to tell data-driven stories. We combine traditional reporting skills with advanced analysis of satellite images, social media and other open source information. Through multimedia storytelling we aim to better explain the world while also showing how our journalism is done.

Continue Reading

Politics

Ex-SEC Chair Gary Gensler privately supported crypto — McHenry

Published

on

By

Ex-SEC Chair Gary Gensler privately supported crypto — McHenry

Ex-SEC Chair Gary Gensler privately supported crypto — McHenry

Former US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Gary Gensler may not have been as hostile to crypto behind closed doors as he appeared to be in public, according to former US Representative Patrick McHenry.

In a May 13 appearance on the Crypto in America podcast, McHenry revealed that during private meetings with Gensler, the former regulator expressed a far more nuanced view of digital assets.

“Did he come across, or was he as anti-crypto in private as he did in public?” McHenry was asked. His response: “No… Nope.”

McHenry noted that Gensler “saw the value of digital assets” and acknowledged the potential of blockchain technology during his time at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Gerald Gallagher, general counsel at Sei Labs, also noted that Gensler played a role in developing the concept of the airdrop during his academic work, calling it a largely forgotten chapter in his background.

However, once Gensler became SEC chair, McHenry said, his stance shifted dramatically. “I had this weird, mistaken, stupid belief that he wouldn’t be that bad as SEC chair,” McHenry admitted. “And I mean, just the level of dismay.”

Ex-SEC Chair Gary Gensler privately supported crypto — McHenry
Source: Crypto in America

Related: SEC chair suggests ‘huge benefits’ in agency’s third crypto roundtable

Gensler’s crypto stance was “confusing”

McHenry said discussions with Gensler on crypto regulation were often confusing.

McHenry said conversations with Gensler about legal frameworks and content structures often started off as reasonable, but quickly became contradictory. He described how Gensler would initially agree with certain points, only to later reject the same facts he had acknowledged moments earlier.

According to McHenry, Gensler’s public opposition may have been shaped more by “Senate politics and confirmation politics than anything else.”

After departing the SEC on Jan. 20, Gensler returned to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to teach fintech and AI.

Under Gensler’s tenure, which started in 2021, the SEC took an aggressive regulatory stance toward crypto, bringing upward of 100 regulatory actions against industry companies.

The regulatory hostility caused Gensler and his team much scrutiny and backlash from industry leaders.

In December 2024, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong announced that the crypto exchange would sever ties with law firms employing former SEC officials involved in what he said was an effort to “unlawfully kill” the crypto industry.

Ex-SEC Chair Gary Gensler privately supported crypto — McHenry
Source: Brian Armstrong

In January 2025, Gemini said it wouldn’t hire any MIT graduates unless the university dropped Gensler from his teaching role.

Magazine: Metric signals $250K Bitcoin is ‘best case,’ SOL, HYPE tipped for gains: Trade Secrets

Continue Reading

Politics

Kima joins Mastercard sandbox to enable stablecoin card top-ups

Published

on

By

Kima joins Mastercard sandbox to enable stablecoin card top-ups

Kima joins Mastercard sandbox to enable stablecoin card top-ups

Decentralized settlement protocol Kima has integrated into Mastercard’s sandbox program, enabling stablecoin-powered top-ups for prepaid cards directly from self-custody wallets.

According to an announcement shared with Cointelegraph, Mastercard partners can now rely on Kima’s settlement infrastructure to enable their prepaid cards to be topped up with stablecoins, including USDC (USDC) and Tether’s USDt (USDT), from self-custody wallets across more than 10 blockchains.

Kima CEO Eitan Katz said the integration shows that stablecoins can be practical for everyday use, removing friction and intermediaries from crypto-to-fiat conversions while expanding crypto usability.

“Our goal at Kima is to eliminate barriers between digital assets and traditional finance,” Katz said.

Related: Mastercard tokenized 30% of its transactions in 2024

Infrastructure designed for interoperability

Katz described Kima’s settlement system as asset-agnostic and designed to simplify cross-ecosystem payments, supporting public blockchains, private ledgers and traditional banking rails:

“Kima’s asset-agnostic settlement layer is designed to abstract the complexity of transferring value across disparate ecosystems, whether that’s public blockchains, private ledgers, or even traditional banking systems.”

According to the announcement, Kima’s infrastructure is aligned with Mastercard’s aim to bring stablecoins into mainstream financial usage. Katz rejects the Bitcoin and crypto hardliner vision of digital assets being contraposed to fiat currency, claiming that “crypto and fiat must coexist seamlessly to reach their full potential.”

Katz explained that Kima’s solution allows easy crosschain interoperability and eliminates reliance on intermediaries, custodians or complex smart contracts. This, in turn, reportedly enhances security and efficiency for all parties involved.

Related: Mastercard links with Circle, Paxos for merchant stablecoin payments

ECB includes Kima in digital euro initiative

Earlier in May, the European Central Bank (ECB) included Kima in a list of 70 private sector partners tasked with helping in digital euro innovation. The firms on the list have signed up to work with the ECB to explore digital euro payment functionalities and use cases.

“The breadth and creativity of the proposals highlights the digital euro’s potential as a catalyst for financial innovation in Europe,” ECB executive board member Piero Cipollone said at the time.

Mastercard, ECB, European Union, Stablecoin
Source: Kima

Despite Kima’s institutional partnerships, Katz told Cointelegraph that “compliance shouldn’t mean giving up control of your funds or your data.” He said that know-your-client and Anti-Money Laundering checks are handled by third-party banks and virtual asset service providers at onboarding, and Kima never has access to the data.

Katz added that “once a user is cleared, every transaction carries immutable metadata tags that our protocol-level engine checks against local rules.” This, he said, covers compliance “from the European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation to Singapore’s regulatory guidelines — before settlement.”

Katz said that “keys are kept entirely under the users’ control,” while cryptographic proofs still allow for compliance.

“Institutions get a plug-and-play control layer and users enjoy true self-custody,” Katz added.

Magazine: Crypto wanted to overthrow banks, now it’s becoming them in stablecoin fight

Continue Reading

Politics

Crypto swapper eXch shows signs of life after post-Bybit shutdown

Published

on

By

Crypto swapper eXch shows signs of life after post-Bybit shutdown

Crypto swapper eXch shows signs of life after post-Bybit shutdown

Once a go-to swapper for hackers and drainers, eXch was shut down by German police in April — but continued activity suggests the story isn’t over.

Without Know Your Customer (KYC) checks, eXch wasn’t your typical crypto exchange. It acted more like an instant swapper, allowing bad actors and cybercriminals to fly under the radar for years.

Among its clients was the Lazarus Group. The North Korean state-backed hacking unit thrust eXch into the spotlight back in February, when it used the platform to funnel some of the $1.4 billion it stole from Bybit. When Bybit traced its stolen funds to eXch, it requested assistance — but the platform refused.

This led to a fierce discussion over privacy versus security, but ultimately, eXch announced it would close its doors on April 17; on April 30, German authorities made it official.

But according to security firm TRM Labs, the platform may have continued operating in stealth mode after the takedown. Here’s the rise, fall and afterlife of alleged crypto laundromat eXch.

eXch shuts front door, keeps back door unlocked

Alongside its shutdown announcement, eXch posted a message claiming it would not facilitate criminal proceeds. The post was removed within hours, and operations quietly resumed — signs of an internal disagreement or perhaps even a calculated attempt to lower visibility, according to TRM.

Crypto swapper eXch shows signs of life after post-Bybit shutdown
CSAM-related fund flows traced to eXch. Source: TRM Labs

German authorities seized eXch’s servers and confiscated 34 million euros ($38 million) in crypto, along with more than eight terabytes of data, effectively dismantling its public-facing infrastructure.

Related: North Korean spy slips up, reveals ties in fake job interview

“Just like we saw with Garantex rebranding as Grinex, eXch didn’t fully die after the shutdown. It quietly kept servicing a handful of partners via API, which meant laundering activity continued even after the public takedown,” said Jeremiah O’Connor, co-founder and chief technology officer of security firm Trugard.

O’Connor added that it’s not unlikely for such platforms to serve loyal customers even after seizures.

Crypto swapper eXch shows signs of life after post-Bybit shutdown
EXch website visited on May 13. Source: eXch

“The people behind eXch.ch took full advantage of operating across multiple countries. The domain was registered through a UK-based provider, listed Switzerland as an admin location, hosted infrastructure in France, and had servers seized in Germany,” O’Connor said.

It’s still unclear if eXch will kill its API or come back under a new name. TRM said in the May 2 blog post that the platform’s remaining back-end access continued to provide anonymization infrastructure for threat actors.

No KYC, pooled liquidity draws illicit funds to eXch

EXch’s origins trace back to 2014, according to “Fantasy,” lead investigator at crypto insurance firm Fairside Network. In an October 2024 investigation, Fantasy identified the platform’s first public appearance as a BitcoinTalk forum account promoting automatic swaps between Bitcoin (BTC), Perfect Money and BTC-e vouchers — payment methods commonly associated with high-risk transactions.

Fantasy also traced the original Bitcoin wallet tied to eXch and found it was likely funded via BTC-e, the now-defunct crypto exchange shuttered by US authorities in 2017 for its role in laundering criminal proceeds.

Fantasy’s forensic research found that the modernized form of eXch emerged in 2022, when its Ethereum hot wallet was first funded. Not long after, it became a hub for prominent crypto drainers.

Monkey Drainer — the first known large-scale drainer-as-a-service operator — used eXch before its retirement. Other draining service providers like Pink Drainer and Inferno Drainer also passed funds through the platform, along with several major exploiters.

Crypto swapper eXch shows signs of life after post-Bybit shutdown
EXch’s modern wallets traced to accounts held at Binance and OKX. Source: Fantasy/MetaSleuth

EXch required no identity verification, allowing users to move funds with anonymity. That made it an attractive tool for cybercriminals looking to clean stolen assets.

“EXch managed to stay active for years — despite facilitating obvious illicit activity — because there’s still a big gap between what regulators ‘can’ do and how fast technology is moving,” Amit Levin, former investigator at Binance, told Cointelegraph.

“In today’s world, anyone can launch a smart contract or run a crypto service from anywhere, often without revealing who they are. And if there’s no registration, no KYC and no one to hold accountable, enforcement becomes close to impossible.”

The platform also drew confidence from threat actors by using a pooled liquidity system that blended user deposits and withdrawals, making it difficult for investigators and law enforcement to trace the flow of funds.

When eXch knew and did nothing

EXch denied laundering funds for North Korean crypto hackers, and in its shutdown notice, it framed the project as an attempt by privacy enthusiasts to “restore balance” in the industry. It criticized Anti-Money Laundering enforcement and condemned companies offering address risk scoring APIs as “parasites” profiting off government fear.

“Service providers in the crypto space are, for the most part, not decentralized; that is, they retain control over or access to customers’ assets, as demonstrated in the case of eXch,” Gal Arad Cohen, partner at S. Horowitz & Co, told Cointelegraph.

“A financial intermediary operating in the crypto sector faces risks similar to those of traditional financial service providers and should, therefore, be held to equivalent standards and regulatory requirements,” she said.

The closure of eXch is a “huge win” for crypto, according to Alex Katz, CEO of security firm Kerberus. However, Katz warned that bad actors can migrate to alternative projects, like THORChain, which received a shoutout in eXch’s unapologetic farewell manifesto.

In the Bybit hack, decentralized swap protocol THORChain was used as the main bridge to swap around 500,000 Ether (ETH) to Bitcoin.

Crypto swapper eXch shows signs of life after post-Bybit shutdown
EXch operators also used THORChain to allegedly obfuscate trails. Source: Tanuki42

EXch stated that its partners would retain access to its API for a limited time, but future operations would depend on the “new management team.” The old team recommended setting up new liquidity pools to maintain seamless functionality and said it would provide consultations.

It signed off with a defiant message: “Privacy is not a crime.”

German authorities reported that $1.9 billion in crypto flowed into eXch since its inception. Its operators are suspected of commercial money laundering and running a criminal trading platform.

Magazine: ChatGPT a ‘schizophrenia-seeking missile,’ AI scientists prep for 50% deaths: AI Eye

Continue Reading

Trending