Connect with us

Published

on

Rishi Sunak has sounded a cautious note about the prospects of signing Britain’s biggest post-Brexit trade deal, saying it is “not a given”.

Speaking to reporters as he travelled to the G20 in Delhi, the prime minister said he would “check in” with Narendra Modi about the progress towards a free trade agreement.

But he played down the prospects of an imminent agreement, with hopes of signing it off on this – his first trip to India in office – seeming to have faded.

There are now hopes that after twelve rounds of negotiations, the two leaders may be able to reach agreement on another visit to India which is being discussed for later this year.

Mr Sunak said: “Without question, India is going to be one of the most significant countries geopolitically over the next years and decades and it’s vitally important for the UK to deepen our ties, particularly economically and more broadly, with India.

“So that’s why we’ve been working towards an ambitious and comprehensive free trade deal, but it’s not a given.

“These things are a lot of work and a lot of time. That’s why I’ve never put an artificial deadline on these trade deals, I’ve always said we shouldn’t sacrifice quality for speed. And we need to end up with something that works genuinely for both sides.

More on India

PM confirms RAF planes will fly over the Black Sea – politics latest

“Of course, every time I see Prime Minister Modi, it’s something we check in at, but that’s not the main purpose of this trip. There are lots of other things we’re going to be discussing.”

Back at home, Foreign Secretary James Cleverly defended the speed of trade deal negotiations with India, saying they were progressing “quicker” than talks with the EU.

“Our trade negotiations with India have actually progressed quicker than other trade negotiations, including the EU’s trade negotiations with India,” he said.

“We’ve always said we want to get the right trade deal with India because it’s an incredibly important partner, not just rush it through.

“We’ve got to recognise that influence… takes time.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

James Cleverly on India trade deal 

He also told Sky News’s Niall Paterson the UK needs to “remind the world” that the war in Ukraine is an issue for those outside Europe. India has historic ties with Russia and has so far refused to denounce its invasion of Ukraine.

Mr Sunak will have a one-on-one meeting with Mr Modi on Saturday. He told reporters travelling with him that visiting India is “special” and “near and dear” to him, adding that he had been described by commentators as “India’s son-in-law.”

But a government source told Sky News that the “trickiest” issues in the deal are yet to be agreed. One of the issues is understood to be visas for Indian workers to come to the UK.

Trade deals typically include provisions for short-term business visas, but Mr Sunak has been clear that the UK’s points-based immigration policy will not change.

The prime minister said yesterday that “immigration is a separate issue” from trade and business, and that he believes net migration is “too high”.

A youth mobility scheme for 3,000 Indian workers per year to come to the UK was announced last year, but ministers have also announced plans to tighten rules for foreign students and their dependents, for which Indians are now the largest group.

Trade talks are understood to have focused on India lowering tariffs for British exports, including cars and Scotch whisky – for which India is the world’s biggest market.

But Mr Sunak has rejected the approach of his predecessor Boris Johnson and Liz Truss who set a deadline for a deal by Diwali in October last year.

He and Trade Secretary Kemi Badenoch have told cabinet colleagues they do not want a simple deal on goods, but a comprehensive deal which tackles issues around services.

The UK is said to be pushing for greater intellectual property rights for companies trading in India, where pharmaceutical companies produce cheap, generic drugs.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Why is an India-UK deal important?

It would be the first free trade deal India has done with a European country, and a coup for both leaders, who are facing elections next year.

Trade with India, Britain’s twelfth biggest trading partner, is worth £36bn a year, and supporters of a deal say it could open a big new market for British firms.

But key questions surround how it would work. Sam Lowe of Flint Global, who served on the UK’s trade advisory group, said high-level compromises were needed.

He said: “The negotiations are in a holding pattern at the moment, and what’s probably required now is senior political intervention from Sunak and Modi to change the red lines.

Read more:
A trade deal between the UK and India isn’t guaranteed any time soon – and this is why
India: Sectarian violence between Hindus and Muslims on the rise

“Intuitively, they should be able to reach an agreement. India has done trade deals with Australia and the UAE and it’s negotiating with the EU and Canada, at the moment.

“But only on term it deems acceptable, and that comes with challenges for UK firms, they may not get everything they want in terms of access to India.”

How firms would qualify for lower tariffs – the “rules of origin” regulations about how much of the product needs to be produced in the UK, and what paperwork firms will need – are yet to be finalised. These decisions will “matter hugely for businesses in terms of whether the benefits of the trade deal are real or not”, Mr Lowe said.

Indian ministers have sounded much more optimistic about a trade deal being done this year.

Finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman told a conference in Delhi last month, shortly after a visit by Ms Badenoch, that “I won’t be wrong in saying a free trade agreement is very close”.

Continue Reading

Politics

Russia seizes $10M in Bitcoin from ex-official in bribery case

Published

on

By

Russia seizes M in Bitcoin from ex-official in bribery case

The Bitcoin seized from former ICRF employee Marat Tambiev will be turned into Russian state revenue.

Continue Reading

Politics

Philippine banks collaborate to launch PHPX stablecoin on Hedera

Published

on

By

Philippine banks collaborate to launch PHPX stablecoin on Hedera

Philippine banks are collaborating to launch the PHPX stablecoin for real-time remittances, leveraging Hedera’s DLT network and cross-border payment solutions.

Continue Reading

Politics

Harriet Harman calls for ‘mini inquiry’ into race issues raised by grooming gangs scandal

Published

on

By

Harriet Harman calls for 'mini inquiry' into race issues raised by grooming gangs scandal

Harriet Harman has suggested a “mini inquiry” into issues raised by the grooming gangs scandal and called on Sir Keir Starmer and Kemi Badenoch to discuss “terms of reference”.

The Labour peer told Sky’s political editor Beth Rigby on the Electoral Dysfunction podcast that there should “openness” to a future probe as long it does not repeat the previous investigations.

In particular, she said people need to be “trained and confident” that they can take on matters “which are in particular communities” without being accused of being racist.

“I think that whether it’s a task force, whether it’s more action plans, whether it’s a a mini inquiry on this, this is something that we need to develop resilience in,” Ms Harman said.

The grooming gangs scandal is back in the spotlight after Elon Musk hit out at the Labour government for rejecting a new national inquiry into child sexual exploitation in Oldham, saying this should be done at a local level instead.

The Tories also previously said an Oldham inquiry should be done locally and in 2015 commissioned a seven-year national inquiry into child sex abuse, led by Professor Alexis Jay, which looked at grooming gangs.

However, they didn’t implement any of its recommendations while in office – and Sir Keir has vowed to do so instead of launching a fresh investigation into the subject.

More on Electoral Dysfunction

Ms Harman said she agreed with ministers that there is “no point” in a rerun of the £200m Jay Review, which came on top of a number of locally-led inquiries.

👉 Click here to follow Electoral Dysfunction wherever you get your podcasts 👈

Read More:
Grooming gangs are ‘in every single part of our country’, Jess Phillips says

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Grooming gangs: What happened?

However, she said there’s “always got to be an openness to further analysis, further consideration of what proposals would move things forward”.

She called on the Conservative Party to start “sensibly discussing with the government what should be the parameters of a future inquiry”, as they “can’t really be arguing they want an absolute repeat of the seven years and £200 million of the Jay inquiry”.

She said the Tories should set out their “terms of reference”, so “the government and everybody can discuss whether or not they’ve already got that sorted”.

Girls as young as 11 were groomed and raped across a number of towns in England – including Oldham, Rochdale, Rotherham and Telford – over a decade ago in a national scandal that was exposed in 2013.

In many cases the victims were white and the perpetrators of south Asian descent – with the local inquiry into Telford finding that exploitation was ignored because of unease about race.

The Jay review did not assess whether ethnicity was a factor in grooming gangs due to poor data, and recommended the compilation of a national core data base on child sex abuse which records the ethnicity of the victim and alleged perpetrator.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

PM: People ‘spreading lies’ are ‘not interested in victims’

Ms Harman’s comments come after the Labour Metro Mayor of Greater Manchester, Andy Burnham, said he believed there was a case for a new “limited national inquiry”.

He told the BBC that a defeated Tory vote on the matter was “opportunism”, but a new probe could “compel people to give evidence who then may have charges to answer and be held to account”.

Jess Phillips, the safeguarding minister who has born the brunt of Mr Musk’s attacks, has told Sky News “nothing is off the table” when it comes to a new inquiry – but she will “listen to victims” and not the world’s richest man.

Sir Keir has said he spoke to victims this week and they do not want another inquiry as it would delay the implementations of the Jay review – though his spokesman later indicated one could take place if those affected call for it.

Tory leader Ms Badenoch has argued that the public will start to “worry about a cover-up” if the prime minister resists calls for a national inquiry, and said no one has yet “joined up the dots” on grooming.

Continue Reading

Trending