Connect with us

Published

on

Tomorrow is the first real test of how bold Labour are prepared to go in this conference season – possibly the last before the general election.

Two hundred miles north of Westminster in Liverpool, the party’s deputy leader Angela Rayner will tell the Trades Union Congress about plans to strengthen workers’ rights and union rights, which in the past has been one of the most kinetic and controversial parts of Labour’s policy agenda.

The tone she takes, the content she emphasises and the measures she includes – and leaves out – will reveal much about whether, behind the scenes, Labour is really as confident as it wants to project.

Should Labour choose, this could be one of the most fundamental diving lines of the next election and a key part of Labour’s template for change – opening clear red water between them and the Tories and nudging the national consensus towards workers and away from employers after 13 years of drift in the other direction under Tory rule.

It includes the first steps in the return to mass collective bargaining and a new right to ignore bosses at weekends.

Yet the spin from the top is reassurance, not revolution.

“We want a return to a New Labour settlement on trade union laws. This is about a new working partnership with the unions,” a Labour source told Sky News.

“The New Labour settlement – which had near zero strikes – is our aim,” they added – language designed to appeal to business leaders not appease union barons.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Unite union boss Sharon Graham defends her ’90s tribute act’ criticism of Labour

Others worry some parts of Sir Keir Starmer’s regime appear more than happy to form an alliance with the most truculent left wing Labour union, Unite, to imply this whole agenda was watered down just before the summer at the National Policy Forum discussions between party figures and trade unions.

Anything that jeopardises the headline priority – growth – and impedes improving relations with the unions, is not a priority, they believe.

Yet this all comes at a cost.

“I do worry we’re not prepared to be exciting enough,” said one member of the shadow cabinet wanting the party to go big on the rights agenda.

While some changes to water down the agenda were indeed made pre-summer, and a couple of policy details softened, the vast swathe obtained by Sky News suggests a more meaty agenda than many realise – including a bill promised in the first 100 days of government.

Sky News understands the overall package includes:

• Gradual return of collective bargaining through ‘Fair Pay Agreements’

This is potentially the most far reaching and controversial change, with Labour naming social care – a sector it believes is in massive crisis – as the first sector it intends to target for a new system.

New bodies would negotiate minimum terms and conditions binding on all employees in a sector. This could mean some sectors could have a higher minimum level of pay than the minimum wage. The agreements could cover pay, pensions, working time, holidays, health and safety and training.

Labour concedes this will take time – “we need to get the architecture right” – and that this will not be right for many bits of the economy.

• Ban fire and rehire

At the moment businesses are meant to make contractual changes to employees’ working conditions through agreement but they currently have the right to do so unilaterally by terminating their contracts and re-hiring them on new ones.

This is designed to be used only in “exceptional” circumstances only but Labour says it’s being abused. Labour has committed to outlawing this practice by “adapting unfair dismissal and redundancy legislation to prevent workers being dismissed for failing to agree to a worse contract”.

• ‘Day 1’ employment rights

At the moment, the law leaves workers waiting up to two years to access some of their rights. Labour says it will end this “arbitrary” system and scrap qualifying time for basic rights, such as unfair dismissal, sick pay, and parental leave.

Labour is keen to stress this is not a two-year ban on dismissal and would not impact anyone being given a probationary period by their employer.

• Ban on ‘exploitative’ zero hours contracts

This will give employees the right to request a contract reflecting the hours they work after they have been there for 12 weeks. Workers will have a right to decline to use this right. Labour says some details still need to be worked through on how to do this, and this is one of the areas where the provisions have been watered down before the summer.

• Repeal of 2016 Cameron and 2022 Sunak anti-union legislation

Labour says this will rewind the clock to the 2010 settlement on trade union laws. The 2016 Trade Union Act introduced a new requirement of 50% of union members to vote in a ballot for strike action.

It would also change the laws to allow strikes by electronic ballot rather than on paper, which the party argues brings it in line with how the Conservative Party elects its leader.

Click to subscribe to the Sky News Daily wherever you get your podcasts

• Right to switch off

Labour said last year it would bring in a “right to switch off” so working from home does not become homes turning into 24/7 offices.

Labour says it is looking at Belgium, where from April companies with 20+ employees must have a written document setting out a policy on the right to disconnect. It’s looking at Italy too, where “smart workers” whose job takes place partially off premises must have a written agreement where bosses “specify technical and organisational measures” so workers have a “right to disconnect from company devices”. And Ireland also has a new code of practice.

However, Labour is clear this does not mean you can “never” speak to employees outside working hours, and points to evidence that overseas, these new rights are not a regular feature of tribunals. In Ireland, for instance, the code has meant employees are adding disclaimers to their emails explaining they don’t expect an urgent response.

Read more:
Starmer’s vision ‘not bold enough’
Labour issues attack ad over school concrete scandal

• Minimum wage

Last year Labour called for the minimum wage to be a minimum of £10 per hour. However, the government raised the rate from April to £10.42 for over 23s from £9.50 so Labour may up the ante this conference season. Labour has previously said it would ban unpaid internships except when they are part of an education or training course.

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer and deputy Labour Party leader Angela Rayner board a train to Selby, North Yorkshire at Kings Cross station in London to meet with newly elected MP Keir Mather after his success in the Selby and Ainsty by-election. Picture date: Friday July 21, 2023.

The Tories are desperate to give this agenda the highest profile possible, and expected to go further tightening strike laws in the coming days. It wants to implement anti-strike laws passed last year making unions responsible for minimum levels of workforce in certain sectors, and need to pass secondary legislation to make this work. This is a fight that it wants. Will Labour let the Tories have it by leaning into the issue from tomorrow?

Continue Reading

Politics

Harriet Harman calls for ‘mini inquiry’ into race issues raised by grooming gangs scandal

Published

on

By

Harriet Harman calls for 'mini inquiry' into race issues raised by grooming gangs scandal

Harriet Harman has suggested a “mini inquiry” into issues raised by the grooming gangs scandal and called on Sir Keir Starmer and Kemi Badenoch to discuss “terms of reference”.

The Labour peer told Sky’s political editor Beth Rigby on the Electoral Dysfunction podcast that there should “openness” to a future probe as long it does not repeat the previous investigations.

In particular, she said people need to be “trained and confident” that they can take on matters “which are in particular communities” without being accused of being racist.

“I think that whether it’s a task force, whether it’s more action plans, whether it’s a a mini inquiry on this, this is something that we need to develop resilience in,” Ms Harman said.

The grooming gangs scandal is back in the spotlight after Elon Musk hit out at the Labour government for rejecting a new national inquiry into child sexual exploitation in Oldham, saying this should be done at a local level instead.

The Tories also previously said an Oldham inquiry should be done locally and in 2015 commissioned a seven-year national inquiry into child sex abuse, led by Professor Alexis Jay, which looked at grooming gangs.

However, they didn’t implement any of its recommendations while in office – and Sir Keir has vowed to do so instead of launching a fresh investigation into the subject.

More on Electoral Dysfunction

Ms Harman said she agreed with ministers that there is “no point” in a rerun of the £200m Jay Review, which came on top of a number of locally-led inquiries.

👉 Click here to follow Electoral Dysfunction wherever you get your podcasts 👈

Read More:
Grooming gangs are ‘in every single part of our country’, Jess Phillips says

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Grooming gangs: What happened?

However, she said there’s “always got to be an openness to further analysis, further consideration of what proposals would move things forward”.

She called on the Conservative Party to start “sensibly discussing with the government what should be the parameters of a future inquiry”, as they “can’t really be arguing they want an absolute repeat of the seven years and £200 million of the Jay inquiry”.

She said the Tories should set out their “terms of reference”, so “the government and everybody can discuss whether or not they’ve already got that sorted”.

Girls as young as 11 were groomed and raped across a number of towns in England – including Oldham, Rochdale, Rotherham and Telford – over a decade ago in a national scandal that was exposed in 2013.

In many cases the victims were white and the perpetrators of south Asian descent – with the local inquiry into Telford finding that exploitation was ignored because of unease about race.

The Jay review did not assess whether ethnicity was a factor in grooming gangs due to poor data, and recommended the compilation of a national core data base on child sex abuse which records the ethnicity of the victim and alleged perpetrator.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

PM: People ‘spreading lies’ are ‘not interested in victims’

Ms Harman’s comments come after the Labour Metro Mayor of Greater Manchester, Andy Burnham, said he believed there was a case for a new “limited national inquiry”.

He told the BBC that a defeated Tory vote on the matter was “opportunism”, but a new probe could “compel people to give evidence who then may have charges to answer and be held to account”.

Jess Phillips, the safeguarding minister who has born the brunt of Mr Musk’s attacks, has told Sky News “nothing is off the table” when it comes to a new inquiry – but she will “listen to victims” and not the world’s richest man.

Sir Keir has said he spoke to victims this week and they do not want another inquiry as it would delay the implementations of the Jay review – though his spokesman later indicated one could take place if those affected call for it.

Tory leader Ms Badenoch has argued that the public will start to “worry about a cover-up” if the prime minister resists calls for a national inquiry, and said no one has yet “joined up the dots” on grooming.

Continue Reading

Politics

Pro-crypto CFTC boss, subcommittee rumored as Trump inauguration nears

Published

on

By

Pro-crypto CFTC boss, subcommittee rumored as Trump inauguration nears

New reports suggest the US Senate Banking Committee is looking to create its first crypto subcommittee, while Trump is reportedly eyeing a pro-crypto CFTC Commissioner to take the agency’s helm.

Continue Reading

Politics

UK order clarifies crypto staking is not a collective investment scheme

Published

on

By

UK order clarifies crypto staking is not a collective investment scheme

The UK Treasury has amended finance laws to clarify that crypto staking isn’t a collective investment scheme, which a lawyer says is “heavily regulated.”

Continue Reading

Trending