Fintech innovations and emerging technologies have swept the world, causing global lawmakers to rush to understand and regulate them.
While some countries like the United States and El Salvador have had a public relationship with adopting new technologies, others have quietly joined the game. Among these is Latvia, a small country located in the Baltics, neighboring Estonia and Lithuania.
Cointelegraph spoke with Marine Krasovska, the head of financial technology at Latvijas Banka (Bank of Latvia) — Latvia’s central bank — to better understand how regulators in the country are dealing with new technologies like cryptocurrencies and artificial intelligence (AI).
Unlike its neighbor Estonia, which was the first European country to provide clear regulations and guidelines for digital currencies, these assets remain unregulated in the Latvian landscape. The Latvian Personal Income Tax Act defines crypto as a capital asset subject to the general capital gains tax of 20%.
Back in 2020, one of the country’s financial regulators, the Financial and Capital Market Commission (FCMC), warned the public about crypto fraud — particularly given that in Latvia, crypto companies “operate in an infrastructure that is currently characterized by lower regulation than in the financial and capital markets.”
An upcoming hub of innovation
Since early warnings from the FCMC, Latvia has not developed new cryptocurrency regulations. However, Krasovska explained that in the last five years, the central bank, which is the primary regulator in Latvia, has been operating its Innovation Hub.
Krasovska said participation by fintech companies is not mandatory; however, the bank advises it as a “first entry point” to the Latvian market. The central bank offers this service free of charge for international companies and those originating from Latvia.
Krasovka speaks at theGlobal Government Fintech Lab 2022 conference. Source: Global Government Fintech
“When businesses come to the Innovation Hub and begin to describe their business model, sometimes we start to understand what companies actually need and don’t need,” she said.
She added that it’s an opportunity for businesses to talk in person with regulators to understand the business licensing needed and get risks assessed.
“We always suggest for companies to bring a lawyer to disclose interpretation risks. Interpretation of legislation is a very high-level responsibility.”
Within the Innovation Hub, the bank has also created a pre-licensing process. According to Krasovska, this was created to help fintech companies — particularly those dealing with digital assets — create a “package of documents” that they can receive feedback on regarding the quality.
“So when the official application goes in,” she said, “the license process will be focusing on the main ideas rather than the quality of the application. This new pre-licensing began last summer.”
“We want to see more innovation on the market. But we also want to see that the risks are managed in a proper way.”
Krasovska said that last year, the Innovation Hub had 72 consultations with around 40% of all participants from Latvia. She commented that the hub’s data reveals increased interest from companies in “crypto and electronic money institutions services.”
Adoption from the inside
Along with helping businesses thrive in the Latvian fintech landscape, Krasovska said that the Latvian central bank itself is adopting new technologies to streamline its processes from the inside.
This includes moving central bank data into the cloud and adopting AI technologies like OpenAI’s popular chatbot ChatGPT.
“We, as a central bank, will also start this year to integrate artificial intelligence and ChatGPT in our work. Not just not just trying to do some kind of studies as everyone is using it, but we’re starting to adapt it in terms of we have identified our needs.”
She said the central bank created an internal lab two years ago, which began experimenting with different kinds of technological solutions.
She highlighted ChatGPT feasibility studies the bank has conducted, which will help it summarize large quantities of documents, such as tax documents that she called “not structured information.”
Krasovska also said the bank employs AI to help with data direction projects and supervise code.
Synthetic data creation
When it comes to data, the fintech executive said the Bank of Latvia is spearheading a new project in relation to synthetic data.
She said that when newcomers or tech companies developing new solutions ask for a data set to train business models, it has nothing it can legally provide.
“This year and also next year, we will be working with the database ideas from which we can create this synthetic data that is like a synthetic lottery or something along those lines,” she said.
“Then companies can come and use these different types of data to understand how their tools work or don’t work before they scale the business and offer their solution to real customers.”
For example, businesses may need access to a large transaction database to understand how related monitoring tools work, “so what we’re doing right now is working on this integrated database,” she said.
Latvia and the current state of crypto
Over the summer, a report from the Latvian central bank said that local investments in crypto assets had declined by 50% over the past year.
“The number of the people purchasing crypto-assets as well as making payments with payment cards to invest in crypto-assets in Latvia declines.
This can be explained by global developments such as the negative sentiment of investors, detected cases of fraud and cases of… pic.twitter.com/uOIbJvIlsi
The report was based on findings from payment card usage, revealing that 4% of the population bought crypto assets in February 2023, compared to 8% in the same month of 2022.
When asked about the sentiment toward cryptocurrencies in Latvia, Krasovska pointed to the crypto market conditions in combination with slumping market trends globally: “Globally, the financial markets are the way they are right now, and of course, this is [excluding] the crypto [market].”
Aside from the rocky conditions for the crypto community brought on by the lingering bear market, regulatory difficulties in major markets have caused investor sentiment to become less optimistic.
However, Krasovska pointed toward the European Union’s adoption and implementation of the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) legislation as something the central bank can lean on.
“With the adoption of MiCA, we can ensure very high standards for financial services.”
Collect this article as an NFT to preserve this moment in history and show your support for independent journalism in the crypto space.
Rachel Reeves has said she is determined to “defy” forecasts that suggest she will face a multibillion-pound black hole in next month’s budget, but has indicated there are some tough choices on the way.
Writing in The Guardian, the chancellor argued the “foundations of Britain’s economy remain strong” – and rejected claims the country is in a permanent state of decline.
Reports have suggested the Office for Budget Responsibility is expected to downgrade its productivity growth forecast by about 0.3 percentage points.
Image: Rachel Reeves. PA file pic
That means the Treasury will take in less tax than expected over the coming years – and this could leave a gap of up to £40bn in the country’s finances.
Ms Reeves wrote she would not “pre-empt” these forecasts, and her job “is not to relitigate the past or let past mistakes determine our future”.
“I am determined that we don’t simply accept the forecasts, but we defy them, as we already have this year. To do so means taking necessary choices today, including at the budget next month,” the chancellor added.
She also pointed to five interest rate cuts, three trade deals with major economies and wages outpacing inflation as evidence Labour has made progress since the election.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
4:17
Chancellor faces tough budget choices
Budget decisions ‘don’t come for free’
Although her article didn’t address this, she admitted “our country and our economy continue to face challenges”.
Her opinion piece said: “The decisions I will take at the budget don’t come for free, and they are not easy – but they are the right, fair and necessary choices.”
Yesterday, Sky’s deputy political editor Sam Coates reported that Ms Reeves is unlikely to raise the basic rates of income tax or national insurance, to avoid breaking a promise to protect “working people” in the budget.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
This, in theory, means those on higher salaries could be the ones to face a squeeze in the budget – with the Treasury stating that it does not comment on tax measures.
In other developments, some top economists have warned Ms Reeves that increasing income tax or reducing public spending is her only option for balancing the books.
Experts from the Institute for Fiscal Studies have cautioned the chancellor against opting to hike alternative taxes instead, telling The Independent this would “cause unnecessary amounts of economic damage”.
Although such an approach would help the chancellor avoid breaking Labour’s manifesto pledge, it is feared a series of smaller changes would make the tax system “ever more complicated and less efficient”.
Here are my rolling assumptions for the shape of the budget on 26 November, which I will update as the date draws closer.
It sets out why there is a black hole – and what might fill it, with greater confidence about the former. Note the Treasury has not yet received the final forecasts.
Some of the suggestions and assumptions have been drawn up with the help of the Resolution Foundation, but the judgements are mine.
The size of the black hole
£10bn – Forecast downgrade, comprising of lower future productivity offset by upgrade to wage growth
£2bn-£4bn – Debt interest costs, depending on the window picked by the Office for Budget Responsibility
Captivate
This content is provided by Captivate, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Captivate cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Captivate cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Captivate cookies for this session only.
£5bn – Reducing unallocated departmental spending in 2029/30
£8bn – Freezing personal allowance
£4bn – Close capital gains tax loopholes on people moving abroad and after death
£2bn – Higher rate council tax band
£2bn – Get Limited Liability Partnerships to pay national insurance
£1-£2bn – Higher gambling taxes
£1bn – Raise higher rate income tax
Total: £23bn
How to fill the rest?
One big measure or lots of little measures. The Resolution Foundation has explored putting up income tax and simultaneously reducing national insurance.
This means for most employees their tax bill doesn’t change. But the self employed are paying more and pensioners pay more, along with landlords who pay more because income tax is paid on rental income not national insurance. This raises £6bn.
Parliament’s spending watchdog has asked the Crown Estate to explain the rationale behind Prince Andrew’s “peppercorn” rent at Royal Lodge.
The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has written to the Treasury and the Crown Estate after raising concerns over the value for money of the prince’s living arrangements.
The King‘s team is said to be in talks with his brother about leaving the property voluntarily following renewed controversy over his links to the late paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein.
Andrew signed a 75-year lease in 2003 after paying an initial down payment of £1m and spent £7.5m on renovations as part of the agreement. He lives there with his ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson.
Image: Prince Andrew lives at Royal Lodge with his ex-wife
“Peppercorn rent” is a legal term used in leases to show that rent technically exists, so the lease is valid, but it’s nominal, often literally £1 a year or just a symbolic amount. In practice, it means the tenant pays no rent.
In a letter published on Wednesday, PAC chairman and Tory MP Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, said: “There is considerable and understandable public interest in the spending of public money in relation to Prince Andrew, which in part stems from the fact that he is no longer a working Royal and from serious and disturbing allegations made against him.”
He asked “that you write to us providing an update on the status of, and rationale for, the lease”.
More on Prince Andrew
Related Topics:
Prince Andrew gave up his titles ahead of the publication of the posthumous memoirs of Virginia Giuffre, who accused the prince of sexually abusing her as a 17-year-old. He has strenuously denied the allegations.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:01
Calls for Prince Andrew to leave Royal Lodge: Is it that simple?
Criticism has now turned to the 30-room mansion in Windsor he has lived in effectively rent-free since 2003.
Sir Geoffrey said the Crown Estate has a duty to manage its land “according to the best consideration of money or money’s worth which in their opinion can be reasonably obtained”.
He went on: “We are therefore concerned as to whether the lease arrangements for Royal Lodge are, in light of recent developments and changes in the responsibilities of Prince Andrew, achieving the best value for money.
“They must also be justifiable in comparison to other options for the use or disposal of the property.
“It is also a matter of concern to the committee that the terms of the lease, including those relating to maintenance, are being effectively enforced to maintain the value and character of this nationally important royal residence.”
He has requested a response on or before 28 November, and said the committee will then decide if a public evidence session should be held.