Connect with us

Published

on

Men are more likely than women to think a sexual relationship between a 16-year-old and a partner decades older is acceptable, new polling has found.

It comes in the wake of concerns raised following claims Russell Brand was in a relationship with a 16-year-old schoolgirl when he was a 30-year-old BBC radio presenter.

Almost a third of men who responded to the Ipsos polling said this type of age gap was acceptable, compared to 15% of women who agreed it was okay.

The statistics showed a “grave need” for more conversations with young people on issues such as consent, power imbalance within relationships and gender equality.

Women were slightly more likely to support raising the age of consent than men and to feel that older men in relationships with at least a 10-year age gap hold more power, according to the exclusive Ipsos polling for the PA news agency.

The survey of 1,077 adults across Great Britain came a week after the allegations against Brand first surfaced.

Alice (not her real name) said she had a sexual relationship with the comedian when she was a teenager, and he would send BBC cars to her school to collect her from lessons so they could have sex at his home.

He became increasingly controlling during the relationship, Alice said, and encouraged her to lie to family and friends about the relationship.

What men and women think about this age gap

According to the PA polling, more than two-thirds (68%) of women said this type of age gap would be unacceptable, just over half (54%) of men felt this way.

More than a quarter (27%) of men said it was either somewhat or completely acceptable for a 16-year-old boy to have a sexual relationship with a woman aged up to 30.

This compares with just 9% of women thinking this is acceptable.

The trend continued with bigger age gaps – as almost a fifth (17%) of men said it was somewhat or completely acceptable for a 16-year-old girl to have sex with a man up to 40 years old, compared to just 4% of women feeling this way.

When it comes to a 16-year-old girl being in a sexual relationship with a man aged 50 or older, more than one in 10 men (13%) thought this was acceptable compared to 3% of women.

Overall, 48% of people said they either tended to or strongly supported the idea of raising the age of consent from 16 to 18, while 40% said they supported the idea of staggered consent, in findings similar to those from a YouGov poll earlier this week.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Woman ‘felt trapped’ by Brand relationship

Staggered consent

Women were slightly more likely to support the idea of staggered consent – where it is only legal for a 16 or 17-year-old to have sex with someone up to the age of 20 or 21 – than men, with a 41% and 38% split, according to the Ipsos polling.

Speaking to BBC Radio Women’s Hour earlier this week, Alice said her mother had breakdowns because “there was nothing that she could do to protect me from being in that relationship” due to the fact the teenager was the legal age to consent to sex at the time.

Alice said: “People say ‘well, just call the police’. And then what? I was legally allowed to be there.”

Read more:
All the companies that have cut ties with Brand
Why are the allegations only coming out now?
The allegations in full

Click to subscribe to the Sky News Daily wherever you get your podcasts

Alice added: “He was 30. Now that I’m in my 30s looking at 16-year-olds, I can’t imagine finding them sexually attractive. I can’t imagine thinking of them as a potential mate in any way.”

Anna Edmundson, head of policy and public affairs at the NSPCC, said: “While 16 and 17-year-olds are above the legal age of consent, we know from young people that reach out to Childline that they can still be vulnerable to grooming, exploitation and other forms of abuse, particularly from adults.”

Continue Reading

UK

The father of Jihad al Shamie has called for unity, one week on from deadly attack

Published

on

By

The father of Jihad al Shamie has called for unity, one week on from deadly attack

The father of the Manchester synagogue attacker has called for unity, as the community marked one week on from the assault which claimed the lives of two men.

People gathered outside the Heaton Park Hebrew Congregation in Crumpsall at 9.30am, the time of the attack last Thursday, to pray and mourn the victims.

Pic: PA
Image:
Pic: PA

Pic: PA
Image:
Pic: PA

Jihad al Shamie was shot dead by police after launching his car and knife attack as worshippers gathered on Yom Kippur, the holiest day in the Jewish calendar.

In a statement posted on Facebook, al Shamie’s father Faraj wrote: “The recent tragic act of terror has brought deep pain – to our family and to the families of the victims. Our hearts and prayers are with them.

“No one should ever experience such suffering again. We must all stand together – united, vigilant and compassionate – to prevent such acts and protect the peace of our communities.”

Adrian Daulby, 53, is believed to have been shot dead by police while attempting to prevent al Shamie from entering the synagogue.

Mervyn Cravitz, 66, also died while trying to keep the attacker from entering the building. Three other people remain in hospital.

More on Manchester

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Manchester synagogue terrorist: what we know now

Rabbi Daniel Walker told the congregation that “evil will not prevail” and called for “deep resolve” from the community.

There was applause from the crowd for Greater Manchester Police, with a large presence of officers at the event, for their response on the day of the attack.

Raphi Bloom, a board member of the Jewish Representative Council, said there was a feeling of anger in the community as “we were screaming this would happen and no one listened”.

He told Sky News: “Our feelings are still of mourning, of fear and of isolation. We feel very alone. We’re very, very angry that this was allowed to happen and fearful that it will happen again.

“But we won’t be cowed and we won’t be beaten.”

Read more:
Attacker was ‘monster’ who ‘tried every door’
Ex-wife of man injured in attack says he ‘no longer wants to live in UK’

All six people who were arrested and questioned by police on suspicion of terrorism offences have now been released without charge.

Counter Terrorism Policing North West Assistant Chief Constable Rob Potts said: “This does not mean our investigation has concluded.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Police: Synagogue attacker ‘made 999 call’

Police have confirmed that al Shamie dialled 999 during the attack, claiming responsibility and pledging allegiance to Islamic State.

They have reiterated that he had never been referred to the government’s anti-terror Prevent programme and was not known to counter-terror policing.

“This remains a live counter terrorism investigation,” they said.

Events have been taking place across the country to mark one week on from the attack.

Continue Reading

UK

Phones creating ‘epidemic of disconnection’ in families, says Princess of Wales

Published

on

By

Phones creating 'epidemic of disconnection' in families, says Princess of Wales

The Princess of Wales has said smartphones and computer screens create “an epidemic of disconnection” within families.

Kate’s words – in an essay co-written with a Harvard professor – come ahead of a visit to Oxford to highlight her work on early years education and support.

In the piece, she says that “while new technology has many benefits, we must also acknowledge that it plays a complex and often troubling role in this epidemic of disconnection”.

“While digital devices promise to keep us connected, they frequently do the opposite,” writes the princess.

“Our smartphones, tablets, and computers have become sources of constant distraction, fragmenting our focus and preventing us from giving others the undivided attention that relationships require.”

Emphasising how she believes technology can interfere in family life, she adds: “We sit together in the same room while our minds are scattered across dozens of apps, notifications, and feeds.

“We’re physically present but mentally absent, unable to fully engage with the people right in front of us.

More on Princess Of Wales

“This technological interference strikes at something fundamental: our undivided attention is the most precious gift we can give another person. Yet, increasingly, it’s the most difficult gift to offer.”

The Prince and Princess of Wales have previously spoken about the potentially harmful effects of social media.

Kate says technology is increasingly interfering in family life
Image:
Kate says technology is increasingly interfering in family life

In a recent interview, Prince William revealed that their three children, George, Charlotte and Louis, currently don’t have mobile phones, and that they try to have dinner together.

Kate’s essay, titled The Power of Human Connection in a Distracted World, was released by her Royal Foundation Centre for Early Childhood and written in collaboration with Professor Robert Waldinger.

Read more from Sky News:
William hints at ‘changes’ to come when he is king
William says he misses late Queen and Prince Philip

Kate first met the Harvard academic in 2022 and he’s worked closely with the Royal Foundation ever since.

“We live increasingly lonelier lives, which research shows is toxic to human health, and it’s our young people (aged 16 to 24) that report being the loneliest of all, the very generation that should be forming the relationships that will sustain them throughout life,” write the princess and the professor.

Later today, the princess will visit Home‑Start Oxford to meet volunteers and families, and talk about how they are using resources and films produced by the Centre for Early Childhood to help parents and children.

Continue Reading

UK

Murderer jailed for attacking Glasgow man with ‘napalm cocktail’ before stabbing him in heart

Published

on

By

Murderer jailed for attacking Glasgow man with 'napalm cocktail' before stabbing him in heart

A murderer who threw “prison napalm” over a man before stabbing him in the heart has been jailed for at least 20 years.

Gavin Gallagher, 33, claimed he was acting in self-defence when he launched the boiling water and sugar mix over Stephen Gray, 23, before knifing him.

However, he was convicted of murder and accused of staging the crime scene in an attempt to cover his tracks.

In his sentencing statement, Judge Lord Mulholland told Gallagher: “I was not surprised that the jury rejected self-defence and provocation.

“It seemed to me that your defence of self-defence was staged, and your lies unravelled.”

Stephen Gray. Pic: Police Scotland
Image:
Stephen Gray. Pic: Police Scotland

The fatal attack occurred at a block of flats in Glasgow’s Southcroft Street on 3 November 2023.

Lord Mulholland said Mr Gray was bare chested when Gallagher threw the boiling water and sugar mix over him.

More on Crime

The concoction is often referred to as “prison napalm” due to being used by inmates during assaults.

The judge said the vast majority of burns were to Mr Gray’s back.

Lord Mulholland said: “He was bare chested, and the burns caused by what you did must have been very painful. You can see that from the photographs of his injuries.”

Gallagher then stabbed Mr Gray twice with a large kitchen knife.

The judge said: “One of these blows penetrated his heart and caused massive bleeding which led to his death. This injury was unsurvivable.

“You then did what you could to set up a defence of self-defence in an attempt to cover your tracks.

“You placed a knife alongside his dying body and said to a neighbour that it was the deceased’s knife.

“You told anyone who would listen that you killed him in self-defence.”

Read more from Sky News:
Sentencing of ‘evil Jesus’ postponed
Man arrested over deadly California fire

Gallagher was convicted of murder at the High Court in Glasgow last month.

He returned to the dock for sentencing on Wednesday, when he was handed a life sentence with at least 20 years in jail.

Detective Superintendent Hannah Edward said: “Our thoughts remain with the family and friends of Stephen and while we know nothing can change what has happened, I hope this brings them some degree of closure as they try to move forward.

“This was a shocking attack and Gallagher will now face the consequences of his despicable actions.”

Continue Reading

Trending