This party conference is, in the words of one former minister I spoke to, “the survival conference” – a year on from Liz Truss announcing a series of unfunded tax cuts which saw the bond markets tank and her premiership unravel.
Accordingly, Rishi Sunak has staunchly refused to commit to any tax cuts at this stage, saying the best tax cut he can give people is getting inflation under control.
The chancellor has gone further, telling a newspaper it will be “virtually impossible” to deliver tax cuts until the economic outlook improves.
More on Conservatives
Related Topics:
But this is where economic realities collide with politics – an election year in which the Conservatives are well behind and the party restive for a positive message.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Senior figures on the right went further, with Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg telling Sky News the time for signalling was over, calling for action in the autumn statement in November.
“We don’t need signals, we need action,” he said. “I think the autumn statement is a time to say, this is what we are doing on this particular tax. I would be in favour of reversing the increasing corporation tax, as Liz Truss is.
“I’d be in favour of abolishing death duties, which I think is eminently affordable. But we need to do things, not promise them.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Speculation has been rife that the prime minister is planning a pre-election giveaway on inheritance tax.
Tory sources point out it is widely unpopular even though only 4% of estates are liable for it.
There are also spending cuts under consideration, with the High Speed 2 rail line, winter fuel payments for richer pensioners and some benefits being looked at for potential savings.
But after a decade of austerity, and the realities of an ageing populations and pressures on the health service, savings will not be easy or popular.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:14:17
Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips
Jeremy Hunt will today insist sunlit uplands are within reach, saying the British economy has grown faster since 2010 than others in Europe.
The party will also confirm it will accept recommendations to raise the national living wage to at least £11 an hour in 2024 – meeting a manifesto commitment to raise the wages of the lowest paid to two-thirds of the median earnings.
Whether this will make up for increases in rent, energy bills, food and childcare costs will be one of the questions voters weigh up at the next election.
Ms Truss will be appearing in Manchester, at a rally for economic growth in which she will call for corporation tax to be cut back – an aim Mr Hunt used to strongly support. How much support she receives there from activists will be closely watched.
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
The license came eight months after the regulator granted the company in-principle approval, and a few weeks after Bybit secured a non-operational license for Dubai.
Sir Keir Starmer has denied any ministers were involved in the collapse of the trial of alleged Chinese spies.
Christopher Cash, 30, a former parliamentary researcher, and teacher Christopher Berry, 33, were accused of spying for China, but weeks before their trial was due to begin, it was dropped.
Berry, of Witney, Oxfordshire, and Cash, of Whitechapel, east London denied the allegations.
Sir Keir, his ministers and national security adviser Jonathan Powell have faced accusations they were involved in the trial being dropped.
The prime minister has maintained that because the last Conservative government had not designated China as a threat to national security, his government could not provide evidence to that effect, which the director of public prosecutions Stephen Parkinson said was required to meet the threshold for prosecution.
Mr Parkinson had blamed ministers for failing to provide the crucial evidence needed to proceed.
More on China
Related Topics:
During a trade visit to India, the prime minister was asked whether any minister, or Mr Powell, were involved in the decision not to provide the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) with evidence that, at the time of the alleged offences, China represented a threat to national security.
He replied: “I can be absolutely clear no ministers were involved in any of the decisions since this government’s been in in relation to the evidence that’s put before the court on this issue.”
Sir Keir reiterated his line that the case could only rely on evidence from the period the pair were accused of spying, from 2021 to 2023, when the Conservatives were in government.
He said: “The evidence in this case was drawn up at the time and reflected the position as it was at the time,” the PM said in India.
“And that has remained the situation from start to finish.
“That is inevitably the case because in the United Kingdom, you can only try people on the basis of the situation as it was at the time.
“You can’t try people on the basis of the situation, as it now is or might be in the future, and therefore, the only evidence that a court would ever admit on this would be evidence of what the situation was at the time.
“It’s not a party political point. It’s a matter of law.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:40
Is China an enemy to the UK?
Sir Keir’s assertion has been called into question by former top civil servants and legal experts.
Mark Elliott, professor of public law at the University of Cambridge, told Sky News there is no legal requirement for a country to be declared an enemy for someone to be tried for breaching the Official Secrets Act.
He said the current government was “cherry picking” what the previous government had said about China to claim they did not regard them as a threat to national security.
However, there are several examples of the Tory government saying China was a national security threat during the time Berry and Cash were accused of spying.