Connect with us

Published

on

Witness Adam Yedidia answers questions during Sam Bankman-Fried fraud trial over the collapse of FTX, the bankrupt cryptocurrency exchange, at Federal Court in New York City, October 5, 2023, in this courtroom sketch.

Jane Rosenberg | Reuters

Two of Sam Bankman-Fried’s former friends from MIT, who also worked at crypto exchange FTX while living with the company’s founder in the Bahamas, took the stand in a Manhattan courtroom this week to testify against their former classmate, confidant, and boss — a man who allegedly ran a crypto empire that defrauded thousands of customers out of billions of dollars.

Gary Wang, the lesser-known co-founder of FTX, was asked by Assistant U.S. Attorney Nicolas Roos on Thursday, “Did you commit financial crimes while working at FTX?”

“Yes,” responded Wang. He said that his crimes, including wire and commodities fraud, were carried out with the help of Bankman-Fried, FTX ex-engineering head Nishad Singh and Caroline Ellison, who ran sister hedge fund Alameda Research and had been Bankman-Fried’s girlfriend.

“Mr. Wang, do you see any of the people you committed those crimes with in the courtroom today?” Roos continued.

Wang, dressed in an oversized and wrinkled suit with a red tie and glasses, awkwardly stood up and looked around the courtroom before responding, “Yes.”

“Who do you see?” asked Roos.

“Sam Bankman-Fried,” he said.

The trial, set to last six weeks, will resume on Tuesday with key testimony expected from Ellison, who is considered the prosecution’s star witness, having already pleaded guilty to multiple charges. Bankman-Fried faces seven federal charges, including wire fraud, securities fraud and money laundering, that could put him in prison for the rest of his life.

Thus far, Bankman-Fried, 31, has remained mostly quiet in court intently listening to witnesses and at times writing notes to his attorneys. But as Wang testified against him, Bankman-Fried looked visibility upset, shifting his gaze from his former friend to the ground, and at one point putting his head in his hands.

Sam Bankman-Fried listens as Assistant U.S. Attorney Nicolas Roos questions Gary Wang during Bankman-Fried’s fraud trial over the collapse of FTX, the bankrupt cryptocurrency exchange, at Federal Court in New York City, U.S., October 6, 2023, in this courtroom sketch. 

Jane Rosenberg | Reuters

Wang, 30, was technology chief for FTX, which spiraled into bankruptcy in November. He spoke so fast that U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan and the prosecutor both stopped him at points to ask that he slow his pace.

Much of Wang’s testimony on Friday focused on the final days at FTX before the entire operation imploded, including reports in the media detailing Alameda’s business practices and its troubling ties to FTX.

Wang said that in response to the reporting an emergency meeting was called between Bankman-Fried, Wang and Singh, to discuss shutting down Alameda. He said they ultimately decided against such a move, because he and Bankman-Fried were aware that Alameda had no way to repay the roughly $14 billion hole in its books.

Prosecutors took the jury through a series of tweets, beginning on Nov. 7. Posts came from the company blaming bank hours for slow withdrawals, while Bankman-Fried tweeted from his personal account, assuring customers that all was fine.

“FTX was not fine and assets were not fine,” Wang testified.

On Nov. 12, after FTX declared bankruptcy, Bankman-Fried asked Wang to drive with him to the Bahamas Securities Commission for a meeting. On the drive, Bankman-Fried told Wang to transfer assets to Bahamian liquidators because he believed they would allow him to maintain control of the company. Wang said he wasn’t in the meeting with the securities authority, though Bankman-Fried’s dad was present.

Wang said he returned to the U.S. and met with prosecutors the next day. He faces up to 50 years in prison when he faces a judge for sentencing following this trial. He told jurors he signed a six-page cooperation agreement that requires him to meet with prosecutors, answer their questions truthfully and turn over evidence.

Sam Bankman-Fried, the founder of bankrupt cryptocurrency exchange FTX, is seen during a hearing as a U.S judge revoked his bail, at a courthouse in New York, U.S., August 11, 2023 in this courtroom sketch.

Jane Rosenberg | Reuters

$65 billion line of credit

For months, Bankman-Fried has known that Wang and Ellison, who were integral members of his personal and professional inner circles, had turned on him. Both pleaded guilty in December and have since been cooperating with the U.S. attorney’s office in Manhattan.

Wang’s testimony, which stretched into Friday, was given under a cooperation agreement with the government. Ellison is expected to take the stand under a similar arrangement.

U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan presides as Gary Wang testifies during the fraud trial of Sam Bankman-Fried over the collapse of FTX, the bankrupt cryptocurrency exchange, at Federal Court in New York City, U.S., October 6, 2023 in this courtroom sketch.

Jane Rosenberg | Reuters

Born in China, Wang moved to the U.S. at age 7, and grew up in Minnesota before going to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to study math and computer science. He worked at Google after college.

Wang, who first met Bankman-Fried during high school at a summer camp, owned 10% of Alameda, while his boss owned the other 90%. Wang told the court about the advantages that Alameda received by having code baked into FTX’s software that allowed special access to the crypto exchange. Those privileges ultimately resulted in Alameda owing FTX $8 billion worth of customer deposits.

“We gave special privileges on FTX that gave unlimited withdrawals on the platform to Alameda,” Wang said. Alameda was allowed to withdraw and transfer those funds and had a $65 billion line of credit. 

“When customers deposited USD, it went to Alameda,” he said. “It existed in the computer code. Alameda could have negative balances and unlimited withdrawals.”  

That “bug” in the code was written by Nishad Singh, who was FTX’s director of engineering, and reviewed by Wang. Bankman-Fried was calling the shots, Wang said.

Wang also told the court about a $1 million personal loan he received and a $200 million to $300 million loan in his name from Alameda that was never deposited into his account, but rather was used to make investments into other companies on behalf of FTX. That was all done by Bankman-Fried, he testified. 

In early 2020, Wang said he discovered for the first time Alameda’s negative balance exceeded FTX’s revenue, an indication that Alameda was taking customer funds. Wang said he brought this to Bankman-Fried’s attention several times. 

In late 2021, Wang discovered Alameda had withdrawn $3 billion from its $65 billion line of credit.

Wang’s compensation was a base salary of $200,000 per year plus stock. He owned roughly 17% of FTX.

Even though they were co-founders, “ultimately it was Sam’s decision to make” when there were disagreements, he said.

Assistant United States Attorney Nicolas Roos questions Gary Wang during Sam Bankman-Fried’s fraud trial over the collapse of FTX, the bankrupt cryptocurrency exchange, at Federal Court in New York City, U.S., October 6, 2023, in this courtroom sketch. 

Jane Rosenberg | Reuters

An $8 billion bug

Adam Yedidia, who was the prosecution’s second witness on Wednesday, continued his testimony on Thursday. Yedidia met Bankman-Fried in college at MIT, and the pair remained close friends.

Yedidia, assuming a robotic posture on the stand, worked out of FTX’s Hong Kong office from January to October of 2021 and then in the Bahamas until last year’s collapse. In his testimony, he referred to a group Signal thread called “People of the House,” referring to Bankman-Fried’s $35 million penthouse, where many employees lived.

Exhibit from the prosecution shows Signal thread called “People of the House,” referring to Bankman-Fried’s $35 million penthouse, where many employees lived.

Source: SDNY

In terms of who was paying the rent, Yedidia recalled Bankman-Fried saying he “assumed it’s just Alameda paying for it in the end.”

Yedidia said Bankman-Fried had told him, before he began working in the Bahamas in 2019, that he and Ellison had sex. Bankman-Fried asked Yedidia if it was a good idea for them to date, to which Yedidia said no. Bankman-Fried responded by saying he was expecting that answer.

One of Yedidia’s responsibilities was fixing the bug in the code that gave Alameda preferential treatment. In June 2022, he submitted a report to Bankman-Fried on Signal that showed $8 billion in customer money held in an internal database tracking the cash wired to an Alameda account called “fiat at ftx.com” was missing.

Yedidia said he and Bankman-Fried spoke about it at the pickleball court at the resort in Nassau, Bahamas. He asked his boss if things were OK. He was concerned because it “seemed like a lot of money” from FTX customers was at risk.

“Sam said, we were bulletproof last year. We aren’t bulletproof this year,” Yedidia testified.

Yedidia said he asked when they would be bulletproof again.

Bankman-Fried said he wasn’t sure, but it may be six months to three years. Yedidia said Bankman-Fried appeared “worried or nervous,” which he said was atypical. Still, Yedidia said he trusted Bankman-Fried and Ellison to “handle the situation.”

On cross-examination, Christian Everdell, Bankman-Fried’s attorney, focused on how Yedidia was the one responsible for developing and reviewing the code.

He asked about the long hours employees worked and Yedidia’s concern for Wang being near burnout. That resulted in Yedidia instituting a rule to not wake Wang at night for bug fixes because he needed sleep.

Everdell also drilled Yedidia on his high level of compensation in his less than two years at FTX. His base salary was between $175,000 and $200,000, but he received multiple bonuses of more than $12 million in cash and company equity. 

Yedidia said he’s now teaching math — geometry and algebra — at a high school. He invested most of the millions he earned as bonuses back into FTX, and his equity stake is now worthless.

As FTX was failing, Yedidia said he was by Bankman-Fried’s side. He highlighted a Signal exchange in November 2022, during which he wrote, “I love you Sam. I’m not going anywhere.” He said he wrote the message because so many people had left.

When asked what changed, Yedidia said he learned that FTX customer deposits had been used to pay loans to creditors. He said Alameda’s actions seemed “flagrantly wrong.”

Yedidia’s testimony ended on a fiery note, which was later struck from the record. He was asked why he had lost faith in FTX and resigned.

“FTX defrauded all its customers,” he said. 

Matt Huang, co-founder of Paradigm Operations LP, right, arrives at court in New York, US, on Thursday, Oct. 5, 2023. Former FTX Co-Founder Sam Bankman-Fried is charged with seven counts of fraud and money laundering following the collapse of his cryptocurrency empire last year. Photographer: Yuki Iwamura/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Yuki Iwamura | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Investment to zero

The third witness to take the stand was Matt Huang, co-founder and managing partner of Paradigm, a crypto venture capital firm that invested over $275 million in FTX. That stake was wiped out.

Huang testified about his firm’s due diligence on FTX, and he told the court that Bankman-Fried assured him that funds would be used for FTX and not Alameda. Additionally, he was promised that Alameda had no preferential treatment on the FTX platform, even though the hedge fund was one of its top traders.

Huang said he was concerned about FTX’s lack of a board of directors, but he eventually invested anyway. During cross-examination, Huang said Paradigm pressed Bankman-Fried on the board issue and was told he didn’t want investors as directors but he did plan on having a board with experts.

CNBC’s Dawn Giel contributed to this report.

Sam Bankman-Fried criminal trial begins in New York

Continue Reading

Environment

Chinese quality: BYD launches ‘Zero Defects’ as it crosses 113 GWh in Q3

Published

on

By

Chinese quality: BYD launches 'Zero Defects' as it crosses 113 GWh in Q3

This week, BYD crossed a major manufacturing milestone as its battery production crossed 113 GWh in the first three quarters of 2025 – but instead of celebrating, the company is doubling down with a new “Zero Defects” initiative to bring battery quality to an even higher level.

CarNewsChina reports that the new “Zero Defects” plan at BYD was launched internally at the start of Q3, with a focus on minimizing manufacturing defects across all stages of the battery’s life, from the manufacturing line to the end user.

The initiative coincides with BYD’s growing role as a battery supplier to other automakers and its expanding battery energy storage system (BESS) business, which are giving BYD both an international footprint and global benchmarks.

In its ongoing bid to prove itself even further in the global battery market, BYD will reportedly emphasize operational efficiency, error reduction, and standardization across manufacturing, process control, and customer service, with the end goal believed to be, “management practices comparable to those of Toyota.”

Advertisement – scroll for more content

BYD on a charge


BYD-EV-growth
Sealion 7 midsize electric SUV; by BYD.

The Chinese automaker seems to be going from strength to strength in 2025, having overtaken EV sales leader Tesla in China back in June and repeating the trick again by overtaking Tesla sales in Europe in August.

Combine those EV sales with the fact that its domestic traction battery production reached 113.42 GWh in just the first three quarters of the year (with 23.65 GWh, or ~20%, being supplied to outside customers – including Tesla), and you might agree that betting against BYD seems to be a bad idea.

Note that BYD has not released official details regarding performance metrics or milestones for its new Zero Defects goal, but the message is clear: BYD plans to keep getting better.

SOURCE: CarNewsChina; images via BYD.


If you’re considering going solar, it’s always a good idea to get quotes from a few installers. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them. 

Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

DOT opens public comment on plan to hike fuel costs during affordability crisis

Published

on

By

DOT opens public comment on plan to hike fuel costs during affordability crisis

This week, the US Environmental Protection Agency proposed a plan to make cars less efficient when Americans are already paying record-high energy bills during an affordability crisis fueled by tariff-driven inflation. That plan is now up for public comment.

Since the beginning of this year, the occupants of the White House have been on a mission to raise costs for Americans.

This mission has encompassed many different moves, most notably through unwise tariffs.

But another effort has focused on changing policy in a way that will raise fuel costs for Americans, adding to already-high energy prices.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

This specific rollback focuses on a rule passed under President Biden which would save Americans $23 billion in fuel costs by requiring higher fuel economy from auto manufacturers. By making cars use less fuel on average, Americans would not only save money on fuel, but reduce fuel demand which means that prices would go down overall.

The effort to roll back this rule was initially announced on the first day that Sean Duffy started squatting in the head office of the Department of Transportation. Duffy notably earned his transportation expertise by being a contestant on Road Rules: All Stars, a reality TV travel game show.

Then in June, Duffy formally reinterpreted the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standard, claiming falsely that his department does not have authority to regulate fuel economy.

Republicans in Congress even got into effort to raise your fuel costs, as part of their ~$4 trillion giveaway to wealthy elites included a measure to make CAFE rules irrelevant by setting penalties for violating them to $0. In addition, it eliminated a number of other energy efficiency and domestic advanced manufacturing incentives.

Duffy’s department then told automakers that they would not face any fines retroactively to 2022, which saved the automakers (mostly Stellantis) a few hundred million dollars and cost American consumers billions in fuel costs.

Then, finally, earlier this week, Duffy formally announced the proposed changes to the CAFE rules, lowering the required fuel economy for 2022-2031 model year vehicles, even despite all of the other changes in trying to make the rules unenforceable.

The theory behind this would be to make it harder to later enforce the rules, and to allow automakers to get off with more pollution, and to increase fuel demand and fuel prices for longer until a real government returns to power and starts doing its job to regulate pollution.

Specifically, the announcement changes the planned 2031 50.5 mpg target to 34.5 mpg, cutting vehicle efficiency by nearly a third, which will lead to a commensurate increase in your fuel costs (note: CAFE numbers are calculated differently, and tend to look higher than actual mpg numbers).

The regulation even explicitly describes ballooning vehicle sizes in a positive light, which is ironic given that at the same event, Mr. Donald Trump, the convicted felon who directed this change to begin with, also quipped that he wants to bring tiny Japanese kei cars to the US, displaying his lack of knowledge of why he was even in the room to begin with.

If President Biden’s regulations were retained through 2031, average fuel economy would have tripled since the 1970s, when CAFE targets were first put in place. In the last two decades, CAFE targets helped drive a 30% improvement in average fuel economy, saving an average of $7,000 over the lifetime of an average vehicle – and they did this without increasing vehicle prices.

Despite that the dictatorial regime proposing such braindead rule changes would rather just push its oil company funders’ demands through without having to consult the people it will harm, these rulemaking procedures are still governed by the Administrative Procedures Act. This law requires the government to accept public comments and to take into account and respond to substantive comments posted to the docket related to the rulemaking procedure.

And so, you can now leave your own comments on whether or not you think this plan to make cars larger, more dangerous and less efficient, thus raising your fuel costs, is a good one or not.

Comments can be submitted through this link. Information for the docket can be found at docket number NHTSA-2025-0491. The comment period ends on Jan 20 at 2026 at 11:59 PM EST (yes, that superfluous “at” is from the NHTSA’s docket, wonderful attention to detail from the fake lawyers running the place).

Another of the administration’s recent plans to raise your fuel costs, the EPA’s plan to increase gas prices by $.76/gallon by deleting climate science, was recently posted and received 568,326 comments, the vast majority of which opposed the plan. Public comment on that plan is closed now and the EPA is sifting through the mountain of comments made, trying to figure out a way to kill people and raise energy costs in service of their oil masters despite massive public opposition in a country that is supposed to be a democracy.

That plan also received a virtual public hearing where commenters could call in with their thoughts, held over a few days, during which a vast majority opposed the plan. We’re not aware of a similar hearing for this plan yet, but we’ll let you know if we hear about one.

And despite many readers’ probable initial reaction that the unqualified dictator pushing these plans won’t be interested in hearing your comments, it should be noted that improper rulemaking has and will continue to result in certain rules being thrown out in court. There is a legally required method to how the government makes rules, and courts can throw out regulations that do not follow the proper method. Part of that method includes seeking public feedback, and this is your chance to enter your thoughts into the official government record on this regulation specifically.

Public comments on this ridiculous plan are open through Jan 20, 2026 at 11:59 PM EST, 8:59PM PDT. Comments can be submitted here. In case you get lost, the docket code is NHTSA-2025-0491. DOT/NHTSA has to respond to legitimate concerns made during public comment periods or else the rule could be voided (as was the case for 90% of the cases the NRDC challenged last go around), so the more substantive your comment, the better.


The 30% federal solar tax credit is ending this year. If you’ve ever considered going solar, now’s the time to act. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.

Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

I got a 5-ton electric tractor from China. Here’s what showed up

Published

on

By

I got a 5-ton electric tractor from China. Here’s what showed up

When a 40-foot container rolled up to my property and the doors swung open, I finally got to meet a machine I’d only last seen half-finished on a factory floor in China. Sitting up front, nose practically pressed against the container doors, was my new 10,000-plus-pound (4,700 kg) electric tractor: the NESHER L3000 wheel loader.

Technically, it’s part of a class known as articulating front loaders, a subset of the broader tractor family, and not a farm tractor like you may have seen before (though I’m working on a farm tractor!).

But if you need to lift, pull, drag, grapple, dump, drill, or dig things around your property, this is what these types of machines were made for.

And as wild as it was to see that giant electric machine roll down the ramps, it turns out that wasn’t the only “new toy” I got.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

Soon after the arrival of the big guy, I had a second surprise to unload: a slightly smaller, much more approachable NESHER L2500, tipping the scales at a more manageable 6,400 lb (2,900 kg).

NESHER L3000 with the pallet fork attachment mounted

Meet the 5-ton lb NESHER L3000

Unloading these things and getting to know them well has been an incredibly fun process, and one that I love getting the chance to share in videos and articles like this one.

The L3000 is the biggest machine I’ve ever brought into the NESHER lineup, and it’s very much a “because we can” kind of loader. It’s rated for a 3,000 lb (1,360 kg) lift capacity (and it’s underrated), but that stat doesn’t really hit home until you see what that looks like in real life.

Right away I put it to work moving all sorts of heavy equipment around the property, from lifting a wooden shipping crate with an entire mini-excavator inside, to carrying around a full-size golf cart in a steel shipping crate as if it was a grocery bag, to even pushing shipping containers around the property and into position (I’ve been welding on roof structures between them to create some nice covered parking).

NESHER L3000 moving my solar shipping container into position around the pasture

That last one is the moment you really feel the mass working in your favor. A 10,000 lb electric machine has the kind of traction and grunt where you barely notice the load. A tiny press on the accelerator and heavy objects just start moving.

I used a set of EZYwheels on one end of a shipping container and simply lifted the other end using the L3000’s pallet forks, allowing me to push and pull a roughly 5,000 lb (2,250 kg) solar shipping container that I built last year around a grassy pasture as if I were playing with toy cars in a sandbox.

We even used it to right a tree that had blown over in the last hurricane, but was still alive and lying on its side. Without the slightest protest, the L3000 pulled it vertically and let us get some bracing under it so the root structure could regrow and anchor it back the way nature intended.

NESHER L2500 with a bucket full of logs

Under the floorboards is a 40 kWh AGM battery pack, good for around 6 hours of typical use on a charge. This isn’t meant for 12-hour highway construction shifts… it’s designed for landowners, homesteaders, small businesses, and anyone with a list of jobs that can be knocked out in a few focused hours.

Charging is fairly straightforward and designed to be done anywhere: it uses standard North American 120VAC outlets, with twin onboard chargers to feed that big pack from a pair of household circuits overnight. The onboard chargers can accept 240V, but the 120V option allows for Level 1 charging anywhere a typical electrical outlet can be found.

I get a lot of questions about batteries, and one reason I liked the AGMs over lithium iron phosphate batteries is the ease of future work. While not rivaling LFP charge cycles, these should last for many years (my oldest NESHER tractors are around 2.5 years old and showing very minimal battery degradation), but when the batteries do eventually need to be replaced, AGM modules can be found much more easily and from local suppliers, even big box stores like Tractor Supply or Home Depot. They can also be removed one pack at a time by a single (strong) individual. Other advantages include better cold-weather performance without needing battery heaters, extra weight that serves as ballast and increases the lifting capacity of the machine, and lower total vehicle cost. Of course there are different unique advantages to LFP batteries, and like everything in life, there are tradeoffs, but this seems to be a good balance so far in our experience.

NESHER L2500 with the excavator attachment mounted

But wait… there’s a “smaller” one too

As fun as a 10,000 lb loader is, it’s honestly more machine than a lot of people want to maneuver around their property. That’s where my second new arrival comes in.

This smaller beast, my NESHER L2500, is rated for a 2,500 lb (1,140 kg) lift but weighs in at roughly 6,400 lb (2,900 kg). On paper, that sounds like a small step down from the L3000. In practice, it feels like a different category: more compact, more nimble, and more approachable for someone who doesn’t want their “yard tool” to weigh nearly as much as a school bus. It’s also even quieter than the L3000, as it uses a dedicated electric motor on each axle instead of a larger mid-mounted motor with dual drive shafts like the L3000.

Between the two, I actually prefer it. The machine has nearly as much capability, but is around 1/3 lighter and thus easier to maneuver and operate.

We’ve already used the L2500 for some creative jobs around the place. At one point, my dad and I basically turned it into a freight elevator, raising an old couch more than 10 feet up to a mezzanine of his shop. Another day, we used it to drag a massive tree trunk out of a pond after a hurricane turned that long-leaning tree into a floating navigation hazard. The loader treated that water-logged tree trunk like a toothpick.

The L2500 shares the same concept as the bigger machine: enclosed cab and heater, around 6 hours of use from a 25 kWh battery, easy residential charging, and enough lift and pull to make most homesteader and small farm tasks feel trivial. For a lot of people, this is the sweet spot. And in fact, I actually prefer it at this size. The L3000 is fun but more machine than most people need. The L2500 seems like the best balance of power, size, and value.

Left to right: NESHER L3000, NESHER L2500, NESHER L1400, and NESHER L880

Attachments turn them into Swiss Army tractors

All of the loaders use quick-hitch front attachments, which is where things get fun. From the operator’s seat, you can drive up to a bucket, drop it, roll right into a pallet fork, and latch it without climbing down every time.

For attachments with their own hydraulics, like augers, grapples, and the excavator-style digging attachment, you do still have to hop out to connect hoses, but the tradeoff is big. With the excavator attachment on the larger loaders, you can dig down around 6 feet (nearly 2 meters). That’s a major upgrade compared to my smaller NESHER machines that give closer to about 3.5 feet (around 1 meter) of digging depth from their excavator attachments. That covers a surprising amount of real-world work: laying pipe, planting trees, digging drainage, and shaping land.

That’s the real magic with these: you don’t need separate dedicated machines for every task. One electric loader, a handful of attachments, and suddenly you’re lifting shipping containers, pulling trees upright, digging trenches, moving mountains of dirt or mulch, and doing oddball jobs you never expected to do with a conventional tractor.

Adjusting the width of the heavy forks is sometimes helped with a kick or two

Why go electric for heavy equipment?

Regular Electrek readers will already know the big advantages of going electric, and our own Jo Borràs has often covered some of the most interesting new additions to the world of electric heavy equipment from trucking to tractors to tools, but electrification is still a niche part of the industry.

And while I’ve talked a lot about what these machines can do, a question I still often get from curious neighbors and onlookers is, “Why electric?”

Part of it is maintenance. A diesel loader has a lot of ways to ruin your day: fuel system, injectors, emissions equipment, warm-ups, oil changes, filters, and so on. An electric drivetrain is basically a cordless drill scaled up: battery, motor, controller. The maintenance you do have – hydraulic oil, greasing the joints – is for the mechanical bits, not the engine. The powertrain, historically the worst part of owning any vehicle, just quietly works.

Then there’s sound. When you’re walking around an electric loader, you hear your own footsteps in the dirt as much as you hear the machine. You can talk to someone standing nearby without shouting over a clattering diesel engine. As the operator, you can talk to your crew or your family members in the yard without needing walkie-talkies. The reduced noise means you can even work around animals and livestock without spooking them. I can work right alongside the cows in my family’s pasture without bothering them. It’s just a calmer experience.

Health is another big one. If you spend hours a day sitting a few feet from a diesel tailpipe, that exhaust is going into your lungs. Diesel particulates are not something you want to marinate in for years. Electric loaders eliminate that constant stream of fumes.

And of course, there’s the environmental angle too. If you’re working the land because you love it and want to live with it, not just from it, then it feels a little odd to be coating it in exhaust and oil. Electric loaders don’t drip fuel, don’t belch smoke, and don’t add to greenhouse emissions the same way, especially if you’re charging from clean energy.

Towing out my dad’s currently-not-running diesel farm tractor

Final thoughts

I’ve talked at length about this process before, but for those who may be new around here, allow me to provide full disclosure: these are my machines. I helped design them, I walk the factory floor where I build them in China, I import them, I maintain the local spare parts warehouse, I wrote the operator’s manual, and I spend a ridiculous amount of time thinking about how to make electric machinery like this more accessible to average folks who want to manage their land instead of just for large contractors and businesses who can afford the six-figure machines from the big guys.

I’m proud of the work that has gone into getting them to this point, and of the fact that they are starting to become available in more countries (the first NESHER dealer in Canada just opened recently and a few other countries are in the works).

As a society, even a well-intentioned one looking for electric alternatives to replace our polluting legacy machines, we often spend so much time focusing on flashier vehicles, such as electric cars, trucks, and even bikes and scooters, that it’s easy to forget how much diesel is idling away on farms, work sites, and homesteads. Machines like these show that electric isn’t just possible in this space, but that it can actually be better, quieter, cleaner, and easier to live with.

Sure, that big NESHER L3000 loader isn’t for everyone. Most people would probably be better served by the L2500 or even the smaller L1400 or L880. And if you’re running round-the-clock road crews, you’ll still have a diesel fleet for a while, as there aren’t many electric machines that can do 16 or 20-hour shifts yet.

But for the growing number of landowners, small contractors, and homesteaders who want serious capability without the headaches and fumes of diesel, electric loaders are finally becoming a real option.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Trending