Connect with us

Published

on

Santander UK has been approached to revive its financial crisis-era role as a white knight for failing British lenders as regulators seek to secure a quickfire private sector deal to shore up Metro Bank.

Sky News has learnt that the Spanish-owned bank, NatWest Group and Lloyds Banking Group are among those approached by banking regulators this weekend about mounting a takeover of the 13 year-old high street branch network.

City sources said that Santander UK, Britain’s fifth-biggest retail bank, had engaged Robey Warshaw – the advisory firm where former chancellor George Osborne is a partner – to work on a potential offer.

There was no certainty on Sunday afternoon that any of the banks approached would make an offer for Metro Bank given the truncated timetable and the limited opportunity to conduct due diligence.

Some of the banks which have been approached are more interested in taking on the bulk of Metro Bank’s assets and liabilities – potentially without its expensive branch leases – rather than the entire company.

A number of them are thought to be unwilling to acquire the business without a government funding backstop given the implications of so-called fair value mortgage accounting rules.

Former chancellor George Osborne has told Sky News It would be a "great tragedy" to cancel the northern leg of HS2, as it is the "biggest levelling-up project the country has got".

By their calculations, Metro Bank needs hundreds of millions of pounds – and potentially more than £1bn – of new capital to make the numbers on a deal work.

More from Business

NatWest, itself still partly owned by British taxpayers, and Santander UK are both undertaking work on a potential deal, although some of that work is believed to be focused on acquiring assets if Metro Bank is placed into a resolution process by regulators.

It was unclear whether Lloyds was serious about any form of transaction.

The Financial Times reported that both HSBC and JP Morgan had “studied” bids but decided against lodging formal offers.

For Santander UK, any deal would revive memories of its role during the 2008-09 financial crisis, when it stepped in to take over both Bradford & Bingley and Alliance & Leicester when both stood on the brink of nationalisation.

Metro Bank has been running a parallel process over the weekend to thrash out a capital-raising solution with bondholders that would place it on a more sustainable financial footing.

Its board has drawn up a complex combination of plans, including asset sales and an equity-raise, to provide it with more than £500m of new funding.

However, the sharp fall in the company’s shares last week has made a share sale much harder to pull off.

Sky News revealed last week that Metro Bank had hired Morgan Stanley to explore capital-raising options weeks after it had been dealt a blow by regulators to its hopes of adopting a more capital-efficient model.

This channel subsequently revealed that Metro Bank had kicked off talks about a sale of a £3bn chunk of its mortgage book, and that Shawrook, another mid-sized lender, had had a string of takeover approaches rebuffed, including one in the second half of September.

Both Metro Bank and the Prudential Regulation Authority are keen for a deal to be struck before markets open on Monday morning.

It was unclear what the options for regulators and the bank’s board would be if a private funding solution fails to materialise before that point.

While there has so far been no sign of deposit flight, and Metro Bank has sought to reassure shareholders that it is operating in accordance with its minimum capital requirements, the absence of a funding solution has significant risks attached to it, banking experts believe.

The so-called challenger bank endured a torrid week, with its share price crashing nearly 30% on Thursday in the wake of a Sky News report that it is working with investment bankers on asset disposals, the sale of new shares and the refinancing of a £350m bond due next year.

On Friday, the stock rallied 20% to close at 45.25p, giving it a market capitalisation of less than £80m.

Metro Bank is being advised by Morgan Stanley, Moelis and Royal Bank of Canada.

At one point in 2018, the lender – which promised to revolutionise retail banking when it opened its first branch in London in 2010 – had a market capitalisation of £3.5bn.

Metro Bank became the first new lender to open on Britain’s high streets in over 100 years when it launched in 2010, soon after the last financial crisis.

It has 2.7 million customer accounts, making it one of the ten largest banks in Britain, and offers current accounts, business accounts, personal loans and insurance products.

The company employs about 4,000 people, operating from about 75 branches across the country.

Rumours have circulated for years about its finances.

In 2019, customers formed sizeable queues at some of its branches after suggestions circulated on social media that it was in financial distress.

Days later, it unveiled a £350m share placing in a move designed to allay such concerns.

Metro Bank has had a chequered history with City regulators, despite its relatively brief existence.

Last December, it was fined £10m by the Financial Conduct Authority for publishing incorrect information to investors, while the PRA slapped it with a £5.4m penalty for similar infringements a year earlier.

The lender was founded in 2009 by Anthony Thompson, a financial services entrepreneur, and Vernon Hill, an American who eventually left in controversial circumstances in 2019.

Metro Bank has been forced to sell assets in the past, announcing a deal in December 2020 to sell a portfolio of owner-occupied residential mortgages to NatWest Group for up to £3.1bn.

Lloyds, NatWest and Santander UK declined to comment, while Metro Bank did not respond to enquiries on Sunday afternoon.

Continue Reading

Business

US chipmaker Qualcomm agrees takeover of UK’s Alphawave

Published

on

By

US chipmaker Qualcomm agrees takeover of UK's Alphawave

US chipmaker Qualcomm has agreed a $2.4bn (£1.8bn) takeover of Alphawave – a deal set to result in another UK tech firm falling into foreign hands.

Shareholders in the UK firm, which designs semiconductors attractive in artificial intelligence (AI) development, will receive 183p per share under the terms.

The price represents a 95% premium to that seen before Qualcomm disclosed its interest.

Money latest: Why you probably should not book a hotel on your laptop

News of the agreement was announced as the annual London Tech Week got under way in the capital, with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer speaking of tech’s importance to the UK’s prospects.

Softbank-owned chipmaker ARM – previously a London-listed firm before it was snapped up under a £32bn deal in 2016 – had also been chasing Alphawave but has since walked away.

The UK company’s “serdes” technology is said to be the main prize within the deal.

More on Artificial Intelligence

It underpins the speed at which data is processed by chips – crucial for AI development.

Qualcomm said the deal would bolster its enhancement of AI. Its chips have been widely used by Apple and Samsung though its interest in iPhones has recently been curtailed through the development of Apple’s own chip components.

Alphawave said it considered the terms of the cash offer to be fair and reasonable and that it intended to unanimously recommend it to its shareholders.

In his speech marking the start of London Tech Week, the PM said tech and AI were “absolutely central” to the UK.

Cheap valuations and a weak pound have made UK firms attractive to US investors in recent years, while a number of UK listed firms have shifted primary listings to the United States in a bid to attract greater investment.

The government has moved to make UK listings more attractive as part of its growth agenda.

The prime minister launched a new free government partnership with industry, including Nvidia, Amazon, Google and BT, to train 7.5 million UK workers in essential skills to use AI by 2030.

A separate “TechFirst” initiative will roll out AI training to every secondary school over three years.

Read more from Sky News:
US-China hold trade war talks in London
River Island owners draw up rescue plan

Sir Keir told the audience in central London: “AI and tech makes us more human, which sounds an odd thing to say, but it’s true.

“We need to say it because… some people out there are sceptical. They do worry about AI taking their job.”

He said: “For people listening to us, they worry about will it make their lives more complicated? Even for businesses who get it, the pace of change can feel relentless.”

Sir Keir added: “I believe the way that we work through this together is critical.”

Continue Reading

Business

The winners and losers in Rachel Reeves’s spending review

Published

on

By

The winners and losers in Rachel Reeves's spending review

“It’s a big deal for this government,” says Simon Case.

“It’s the clearest indication yet of what they plan to do between now and the general election, a translation of their manifesto.

“This is where you should expect the chancellor to say, on behalf of the government: ‘This is what we’re about’.”

As the former cabinet secretary, Mr Case was the man in charge of the civil service during the last spending review, in 2021.

On Wednesday, Rachel Reeves will unveil the Labour government’s priorities for the next three years. But it’s unclear whether it will provide all that much of an answer about what it’s really about.

Unlike the Autumn budget, when the chancellor announced her plans on where to tax and borrow to fund overall levels of spending, the spending review will set out exactly how that money is divided up between the different government departments.

Since the start of the process in December those departments have been bidding for their share of the cash – setting out their proposed budgets in a negotiation which looks set to continue right up to the wire.

This review is being conducted in an usual level of detail, with every single line of spending assessed, according to the chancellor, on whether it represents value for money and meets the government’s priorities. Budget proposals have been scrutinised by so called “challenge panels” of independent experts.

It’s clear that health and defence will be winners in this process given pre-existing commitments to prioritise the NHS – with a boost of up to £30bn expected – and to increase defence spending.

On Sunday morning, the government press release trumpeted an impressive-sounding “£86bn boost” to research and development (R&D), with the Science and Technology Secretary Peter Kyle sent out on the morning media round to celebrate as record levels of investment.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What will be in spending review?

We’re told this increased spending on the life sciences, advanced manufacturing and defence will lead to jobs and growth across the country, with every £1 in investment set to lead to a £7 economic return.

But the headline figure is misleading. It’s not £86bn in new funding. That £86bn has been calculated by adding together all R&D investment across government for the next three years, which will reach an annual figure of £22.5bn by 2029-30. The figure for this year was already set to be £20.4bn; so while it’s a definite uplift, much of that money was already allocated.

Read More:
Reeves turning around UK finances ‘like Steve Jobs did for Apple’

Government struggles to slash foreign aid spent on asylum hotels

Peter Kyle also highlighted plans for “the most we’ve ever spent per pupil in our school system”.

I understand the schools budget is to be boosted by £4.5bn. Again, this is clearly an uplift – but over a three-year period, that equates to just £1.5bn a year (compared with an existing budget of £63.7bn). It also has to cover the cost of extending free school meals, and the promised uplift in teachers’ pay.

In any process of prioritisation there are losers as well as winners.

We already know about planned cuts to the Department of Work and Pensions – but other unprotected departments like the Home Office and the Department of Communities and Local Government are braced for a real spending squeeze.

We’ve heard dire warnings about austerity 2.0, and the impact that would have on the government’s crime and policing priorities, its promises around housing and immigration, and on the budgets for cash-strapped local councils.

The chancellor wants to make it clear to the markets she’s sticking to her fiscal rules on balancing the books for day-to-day spending.

👉 Click here to listen to Electoral Dysfunction on your podcast app 👈

But the decision to loosen the rules around borrowing to fund capital investment have given her greater room to manoeuvre in funding long-term infrastructure projects.

That’s why we’ve seen her travelling around the country this week to promote the £15.6bn she’s spending on regional transport projects.

The Treasury team clearly wants to focus on promoting the generosity of these kind of investments, and we’ll hear more in the coming days.

But there’s a real risk the story of this spending review will be about the departments which have lost out – and the promises which could slip as a result.

Continue Reading

Business

Farage to pledge to reopen blast furnaces in Port Talbot

Published

on

By

Farage to pledge to reopen blast furnaces in Port Talbot

Nigel Farage will pledge to reopen Port Talbot’s steel blast furnaces if in power in Wales, as his Reform UK party sets its sights on being the government in the Senedd next year.

In a speech in Port Talbot later, Mr Farage will outline how next year’s Welsh parliament elections will be the primary focus of his party.

The MP for Clacton has already ruled out standing at the Senedd elections next year. It is unclear who will lead the Reform party in Wales.

Reindustrialising Wales will be at the centre of his speech. Acknowledging the task at hand won’t be quick or easy, Mr Farage is also expected to suggest a return to coal mining, if suitable, as part of Reform’s “long-term ambition to reopen Port Talbot steel”.

Tata Steel's Port Talbot steelworks in South Wales. File pic: PA
Image:
The steelworks in Port Talbot. File pic: PA

A Reform source told Sky News: “We have said and say again that we think it’s better to use British coal for British steel than imported coal.”

Port Talbot was the largest steelmaking plant in the UK until the two blast furnaces were switched off in September 2024, which saw the loss of 2,800 jobs as part of the transition to greener production methods. Electric arc furnaces are replacing both blast furnaces and are set to be operational by early 2028.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Farage could ‘definitely’ become next PM, says Dominic Cummings

Read more:
How the end of coal and closure of Port Talbot steelworks are related
UK becomes first G7 nation to exit coal-fired power

More on Nigel Farage

Wales is set to head to the polls in May next year and Reform hopes to end the 26-year Labour government reign in Wales.

The Reform source said Mr Farage’s speech “will tap into the hearts and minds of a deeply patriotic nation that feels betrayed and forgotten about by Labour”.

Recent polling by Barn Cymru saw the Labour vote share in Wales collapse to 18%, with Reform second in the polls on 25% behind Plaid Cymru on 30%, whereas the Conservatives who are currently the opposition in the Senedd are on 13%.

Reform believes the performance of their party in Scotland confirms they can win in Wales next year. The source told Sky News: “We are the main challenger to Labour in Wales. A vote for the Conservatives is a vote for Labour.”

Continue Reading

Trending