Connect with us

Published

on

Cher has denied allegations that she hired four men to kidnap her 47-year-old son from a New York City hotel room.

The singer, 77, told People Magazine “that rumour is not true” and declined to comment further when asked about the incident.

The publication reported last month that her son Elijah Blue Allman’s estranged wife made the accusation in their ongoing divorce proceedings.

July 18, 2001: Santa Monica, CA Cher and son Elijah Blue Allman Stuff Magazine presents 'STUFFLAND', a night of living dangerously. The event takes place at the Santa Monica Pier and will have traditional theme park rides and games with a Stuff Magazine Twist! Photo®Berliner Studio/BEI
Image:
Cher and her son Elijah Blue Allman in 2001

Marie King, 36, said one of the four men who took Mr Allman said the Believe singer had hired them. The attempted kidnapping in November 2022 happened on the couple’s wedding anniversary when they were trying to “reconcile” their marriage.

Cher said the incident was connected to her son’s addiction issues.

“I’m not suffering from any problem that millions of people in the United States aren’t,” she told People.

“I’m a mother. This is my job – one way or another, to try to help my children. You do anything for your children. Whenever you can help them, you just do it because that’s what being a mother is.

More on Cher

“But it’s joy, even with heartache – mostly, when you think of your children, you just smile and you love them, and you try to be there for them.”

Read more in entertainment news:
Beyonce joins Taylor Swift at Eras film premiere
Will Smith and Jada Pinkett Smith have been separated since 2016
Billy Connolly says life has changed ‘radically’ since diagnosis

Mr Allman’s father is the late Greg Allman of The Allman Brothers Band. Cher and the late musician were married in 1975 and divorced in 1979.

Cher also has an older son, 54-year-old Chaz Bono, who she had with her first husband Sonny Bono.

Continue Reading

US

President Trump signs travel ban targeting 12 countries with ‘hostile attitudes’ to the US

Published

on

By

President Trump signs travel ban targeting 12 countries with 'hostile attitudes' to the US

President Trump has signed an order banning people from 12 countries from entering the US.

He said Sunday’s attack in Colorado had shown “the extreme dangers” of “foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come as temporary visitors and overstay their visas”.

“We will not allow people to enter our country who wish to do us harm,” the president said.

The countries affected are: Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen.

The White House said some had a “significant terrorist presence” and accused others of poor screening for dangerous individuals, as well as not accepting deported citizens.

People from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela will face partial restrictions.

Mr Trump’s proclamation said America must ensure people entering don’t have “hostile attitudes toward its citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles” – and don’t support terror groups.

More on Donald Trump

Travel ban protesters at Washington Dulles airport in 2017
Image:
Protests took place when Mr Trump announced his first travel ban in 2017. Pic: Reuters

The move echoes a controversial and chaotic order enacted eight years ago during his first term, when he banned people from predominately Muslim countries.

The countries initially targeted then were Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen.

President Trump said on Thursday that policy was a “key part of preventing major foreign terror attacks on American soil”.

His new list notably removes Syria after Mr Trump met the country’s leader recently on a trip to the Middle East.

Athletes competing in the 2026 World Cup and the 2028 Olympics will also be exempt, as will others such as permanent US residents and Afghans with special immigrant visas.

Trump cites ‘what happened in Europe’ to justify new ban

President Trump hailed travel restrictions imposed during his first term as “one of our most successful policies”.

It was also one of the most controversial, with what became known as “the Muslim ban” sparking widespread protest. Thousands gathered at US airports to oppose the detainment of travellers arriving from affected countries.

The then German chancellor, Angela Merkel, said the fight against terrorism didn’t justify suspicion of people based on their faith. Her French counterpart at the time, President Hollande, warned against the dangers of isolationism.

Still smarting perhaps from that criticism, Trump announced his new ban with a commitment to “not let what happened in Europe happen to America”.

In addition to restrictions on 12 countries and partial restrictions on another seven, he warned others could be added as “threats emerge around the world”.

In a second proclamation, the US president escalated his war with Harvard University, suspending international visas for new students and authorising the secretary of state to consider revoking existing ones.

Having blamed Joe Biden for “millions and millions” of “illegals” in America, he issued a third proclamation ordering an investigation into the use of autopen during Biden’s presidency.

In a memorandum, President Trump claimed his predecessor’s aides used autopen to sign bills in a bid to cover up his cognitive decline.

If we didn’t know what the Trump administration meant when they talked about “flooding the zone”, we know now.

The list was put together after the president asked homeland security officials and the director of national intelligence to compile a report on countries whose citizens could pose a threat.

The ban takes effect from 9 June – but countries could be removed or added.

The proclamation states it will be reviewed within 90 days, and every 180 days after, to decide if it should be “continued, terminated, modified, or supplemented”.

Follow the World
Follow the World

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

Tap to follow

President Trump’s first travel restrictions in 2017 were criticised by opponents and human rights groups as a “Muslim ban”.

It led to some chaotic scenes, including tourists, students and business travellers prevented from boarding planes – or held at US airports when they landed.

Mr Trump denied it was Islamophobic despite calling for a ban on Muslims entering America in his first presidential campaign.

It faced legal challenges and was modified until the Supreme Court upheld a third version in June 2018, calling it “squarely within the scope of presidential authority”.

Continue Reading

US

Putin ‘very strongly’ vowed revenge against Ukraine for drone strike on airbases, Donald Trump says

Published

on

By

Putin 'very strongly' vowed revenge against Ukraine for drone strike on airbases, Donald Trump says

Donald Trump has said Vladimir Putin “very stongly” told him he “will have to respond” to Ukraine’s drone strikes on Russia’s airfields.

More than a hundred Ukrainian drones were deployed inside Russia over the weekend, destroying more than 40 warplanes in an attack Volodymyr Zelenskyy said “will undoubtedly be in history books”.

Posting on Truth Social on Wednesday, the US president said that he discussed the attack with Mr Putin during an hour and 15 minute long phone call.

“It was a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate Peace,” he wrote after their first call since 19 May.

“President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields.”

Read our Q&A: Would Putin go nuclear after Ukraine’s daring attacks?

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Will Putin go nuclear?

The Russian president’s foreign affairs adviser added Mr Trump told Mr Putin that the US did not have advance notice of the operation.

More on Russia

Analysis: Putin is playing the victim to get the US back onside

An aide to Mr Putin also told reporters that they vowed to stay in constant contact, with the Russian president telling Mr Trump that recent talks between Russian and Ukrainian officials in Istanbul were useful.

The US president added that he and Mr Putin also discussed “the fact that time is running out on Iran’s decision pertaining to nuclear weapons, which must be made quickly,” before accusing Tehran of “slow-walking their decision”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

New Ukraine drone attack video analysed

Russia ‘giving the finger’ – Zelenskyy

Later, Mr Zelenskyy, in a social media post, called for more pressure on Russia to end the war, saying: “Many have spoken with Russia at various levels.

“But none of these talks have brought a reliable peace, or even stopped the war. Unfortunately, Putin feels impunity.”

The Ukrainian leader added that “with every new strike, with every delay of diplomacy, Russia is giving the finger to the entire world – to all those who still hesitate to increase pressure on it”.

👉Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim on your podcast app👈

It comes after Russia’s foreign minister claimed that Mr Zelenskyy refused a proposal for a pause lasting two to three days to pick up the bodies of dead servicemen.

Follow The World
Follow The World

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

Tap to follow

Earlier this week, the Ukrainian president said the proposal was not “a real ceasefire”.

He added: “I think they’re idiots because a ceasefire is meant to prevent people from being killed.”

Continue Reading

US

Elon Musk calls Donald Trump-backed tax bill a ‘disgusting abomination’

Published

on

By

Elon Musk calls Donald Trump-backed tax bill a 'disgusting abomination'

Elon Musk has criticised US President Donald Trump’s tax and spending bill, calling it “outrageous” and a “disgusting abomination”.

The bill, which includes multi-trillion-dollar tax breaks, was passed by the House Republicans in May, and has been described by the president as a “big, beautiful bill”.

The tech billionaire hit out at the tax cuts on his platform X, writing: “I’m sorry, but I just can’t stand it anymore.

“This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination.

“Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.”

President Donald Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk talk with to reporters near Tesla vehicles on the South Lawn of the White House Tuesday, March 11, 2025, in Washington. (Pool via AP)
Image:
Elon Musk left his ‘special government employee’ role last week. Pic: AP.

In American politics, “pork” is a political metaphor used when government spending is allocated to local projects, usually to benefit politicians’ constituencies.

Musk left the administration abruptly last week after working to cut costs with his team, the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency – known as DOGE – with the ambition of sacking federal workers and cutting red tape.

More on Donald Trump

The White House brushed Musk’s comments aside, claiming they did not surprise the president.

In a press conference on Tuesday, press secretary Karoline Leavitt said that “the president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill”.

She added: “This is one, big, beautiful bill.

“And he’s sticking to it.”

The White House on Tuesday asked Congress to cut back $9.4bn in already approved spending, taking money away from DOGE.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What did Musk achieve at DOGE?

The billionaire tweeted: “It will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!!) and burden American citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt.”

He also suggested voting out politicians who advanced the president’s tax bill.

“In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people,” Musk wrote in another X post.

👉 Follow Trump100 on your podcast app 👈

How Musk’s mission to cut government spending fell flat

Last Thursday, Musk revealed on X that his scheduled time as a “special government employee” was coming to an end.

Before the news broke, Musk’s father told Sky News his son was “not a very good politician”.

But speaking to Gillian Joseph on The World, Errol Musk insisted there was “no rift between Elon and Donald Trump”.

Musk’s time at DOGE was controversial, with drastic cuts to America’s humanitarian efforts sparking particular criticism.

Questions have also been raised about whether the department has actually saved taxpayers as much money as suggested.

Musk initially had ambitions to slash government spending by $2trn (£1.5trn) – but this was dramatically reduced to $1trn (£750bn) and then to just $150bn (£111bn).

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks as Elon Musk carries X Æ A-12 on his shoulders in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., February 11, 2025.   REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque     TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY
Image:
Elon Musk brought his son X Æ A-12 to the Oval Office during a press conference earlier this year. Pic: Reuters.

The 53-year-old, who famously brought his son X Æ A-12 to the Oval Office, also expressed frustration about resistance to his ideas and clashed with other senior members of the Trump administration.

He recently told The Washington Post: “The federal bureaucracy situation is much worse than I realised. I thought there were problems, but it sure is an uphill battle trying to improve things in DC to say the least.”

By law, status as a “special government employee” means he could only serve for a maximum of 130 days, which would have ended around 30 May.

Continue Reading

Trending