Survival 101: What to expect when bartering after SHTF

Published

2 years ago

October 13, 2023

admin

Some people are curious about prepping because they want to be more self-sufficient, while others may be considering this lifestyle to ensure their survival during more difficult times.

If you are worried about where to get supplies after your stockpile runs out when SHTF, you can try to learn more about bartering and the basics of trading in a post-collapse world.(h/t toTheOrganicPrepper.com)

The tips and information below come fromSelco Begovic, a man who survived one year inBosnia when his city was blockaded.

Begovic hails fromthe Balkan region, where residents struggled with harsh living conditions from 1992 to 1995. He lived there and survived for a yearin a city without running water, food distribution,electricity, fuel or supply of any goods.

The area also did not have any organized law or government.

While the information below is from an interview conducted in 2018,the topics discussed are still relevant for preppers or those who want to start prepping in 2023. Bartering after city lockdowns

According to Begovic, people started bartering weeks after the city was locked down. He added that ordinary folks only started bartering after several weeks went by because they did not immediately realize the severity of their situation.

As he tried to remember more about that time in his life,Begovic added thatthere were people who did not want to take money for goods. Instead, they asked for valuables like gold, jewelry or weapons for the items that they had wanted to trade with.

Some of these peoplewere smart enough to realize that money was going to become worthless soon.

Even valuables, such as gold and jewelry, were only good in the first period, and you would only benefit from themif you had a connection to the outside world to exchange them for something useful.

Ordinary people needed several weeks to get used to their situation, said Begovic. The process went from buying goods with money to buying goods from people who still accepted money but at outrageous prices, to the moment when money was worthless and people only accepted goods for other items.

While rare,Begovic said you could sometimes find someone who would sell you something for foreign money, but with at least 20 to 50 times higher prices. To illustrate,if a pack of cigarettes costs around 1.50 German Marks outside the war region,Begovic could buy that pack for 40 German Marks.

US dollars and Canadian dollars had even worse value. Thepeople who would accept that money had connections to the outside world, and some of them became millionaires because of that, said Begovic.

The same ratio was for precious metals and jewelry.For small and quick trades, the usual currency people used was cigarettes because of the large percentage of smokers in the area.

Sometimes, people would trade bullets.(Related: SHTF bartering must-haves: 13 Things that will be in demand after an EMP attack.) How to determine the value of trade items and setting terms

Begovic said nothing was fixed. During the lockdown,the value of goods went up and down based on different factors.

If aUnited Nations (UN) food convoy was able to enter the city and a local warlord took it all, which Begovic said happened often, and the majority of the food was canned fish, within that month those types of canned food would be cheaper than the month before.

In other cases, if U.S. airplanes managed to “hit” with airdrops in their area, then meals, ready-to-eat (MREs) were going to be cheaper.

Begovic also said once a rumor was planted by rival groups, such as rumors about “poisoned” cans of cookies, people did not value such items highly anymore.

However, some things did not change value too much during the whole period, such as alcohol, because it was available. The value of other things was a matter of the situation.

If your child was sick andyou needed antibiotics, once you spread the word, you can expect high prices because you gave out that information.Begovic added that usually, peopleknew the value of goods for that week, at least approximately.

The value of things and trading rules “on the ground” were similar to trade rules at normal life flea markets, said Begovic.

Some of those rules on the ground during trading were: If you need something, the price is going to increase. Begovic advised that it’s best not to look like you desperately need something to avoid this. You shouldn’t offer everything you have in “one hand” or on one try. Don’tgo to trade with your best items altogether because you will seem desperate, and you are losing the advantage. Don’t give someone a reason to take the risk of attacking you because you have too many desirable items or too many things with you. Before meeting up with someone,Begovic advised that you should only bring a set amount of food or ammo. If you need more items, do another trade at another time with more of your items. Always remember that people will take chances if they calculate it is a risk worth taking. Do not volunteer information abouthow much of the goods you actually have at home to avoid any incidents. Do nottrade at home, unless you trust the other person completely. This is important, especially if you are trading with someone you don’t know that well. Agreeing to trade at another person’s home might mean that you are at his “playground,” or he is stupid, and you are losing the advantage. Do not take the risk of trading on unknown terrain. Try to choose neutral ground where you can control the situation and give the other person the chance to feel safe, but not safer than you.

Begovic said the mostimportant thing to do is to understand that when SHTF, the only thing that protects you from losing everything is you.

Trade will require careful planning. Start with information about a person who has something you need, then check and double-check that information.

Communicate with him, then send information to let him know that you want to trade. Clearly set the terms about the place and number of people where you’re going to do the trade.

Usually, there would be rumors or information about who was safe to trade with. Begovic said there was also information about people who like to scam others during a trade.

If you completed a beneficial and fair trade with someone, remember him as a safe trader for future trade. The restis a matter of trust and your skills.

If you live in a nice town,Begovic said you might have access toa market where people can freely exchange their goods.

However, he never witnessed anything like that in Bosnia because a market like that requires an efficientsystem to back it. Bartering when SHTF is a high-risk situation because it is about resources, and there is no law or system in place to protect you and others. Skills vs. items

In the long run, Begovic said skills were more valuable because you can not “spend” your skills.

If you had medical skills, you could expect that over time, people would know about them through the word on the street. After SHTF, you will have different opportunities to get something for that skill.

After an SHTF event, skills for repairing would be valuable, along with technical skills. Begovic added that skills were safer to trade because if someone attacks or kills you, they still can’t take away your skills.

If you raise animalson your homestead, you can trade eggs, dairy or meat for other items that you need. With a home garden, you can trade fruits and vegetables for other pantry staples like flour or cooking oil.

Before SHTF, learn the basics of bartering so you can find more supplies before your stockpile runs out.

Watch the video below for tips on how to color-coordinate your pantry.

This video is fromThe Urban Prepper channel on Brighteon.com. More related stories:

Prepping for collapse, famine and nuclear war: 12 Tips that will help you be more resilient when SHTF.

Staying under the radar: Tips for efficient stealth prepping.

Prepper skills: How to barter effectively after SHTF.

Surces include:

TheOrganicPrepper.com

SHTFSchool.com

SurvivalFrog.com

Brighteon.com
Submit a correction >>

Entertainment

What did Jimmy Kimmel say about Charlie Kirk – and why was his show suspended?

Published

1 hour ago

September 18, 2025

admin

What did Jimmy Kimmel say about Charlie Kirk - and why was his show suspended?

Jimmy Kimmel’s talk show has been suspended after comments he made about Charlie Kirk’s death during an opening monologue.

The veteran late-night host used his show on Monday night to accuse Donald Trump and his allies of capitalising on the conservative influencer’s assassination last week, causing backlash from right-wing politicians and influencers.

Disney-owned ABC said on Wednesday it would be taken off-air indefinitely – and with immediate effect – sparking strong responses from both Republicans and Democrats.

But what did Kimmel say, what reasons have been given for the suspension – and what has the reaction been?

What did Kimmel say about Charlie Kirk’s death?

Delivering his opening monologue, the host said the “MAGA gang” was “desperately trying to characterise this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it”.

He also accused them of “working very hard to capitalise on the murder”.

He then played a clip of Mr Trump being asked about how he was “holding up” by a reporter two days after Kirk’s shooting, in which the president said he was doing “very good” before pivoting to the subject of construction being done nearby for the White House’s new ballroom.

Kimmel then quipped: “He’s at the fourth stage of grief: construction.

“This is not how an adult grieves the murder of someone he calls a friend. This is how a four-year-old mourns a goldfish,” he added.

He highlighted supposed hypocrisy in how Republicans have responded to Kirk’s death, suggesting Vice President JD Vance’s unfounded claims that “most of the lunatics in American politics today are proud members of the far left” were “complete bull****”.

Mr Kimmel drew attention to Capitol rioters who, on 6 January 2021, “wanted to hang” Mr Trump’s first term vice president, Mike Pence, for certifying Joe Biden’s 2020 election win.

He said: “Was that the liberal left? Or the toothless army who stormed the Capitol on January 6?”

The MAGA movement, led by the president, has been critical of the left as a whole since Mr Kirk’s shooting – even before suspect Tyler Robinson was arrested and charged.

In his Oval Office address on the night of the shooting, Mr Trump said the “radical left” had “compared wonderful Americans like Charlie to Nazis and the world’s worst mass murderers and criminals” for years, and that “this kind of rhetoric is directly responsible” for the shooting.

Show suspended after pressure mounted on Disney and ABC

On Wednesday, an ABC spokesperson said Jimmy Kimmel Live would “be pre-empted indefinitely”, without elaborating on the decision. It is not known when or if it will return.

Before the announcement, the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Brendan Carr, an independent US government agency that regulates television and radio, threatened to “take action” against Disney and ABC.

Mr Carr, a fervent Trump backer, warned the companies during an interview with conservative podcaster Benny Johnson on Wednesday: “We can do this the easy way or the hard way.”

Further pressure came from network operator NexStar, which operates more than 20 ABC affiliates, after it announced it would be pulling Mr Kimmel’s show from its channels over the comments, which it called “offensive and insensitive”.

Both Disney and NexStar have FCC business ahead of them. Disney is seeking regulatory approval for ESPN’s acquisition of the NFL Network and NexStar needs the Trump administration’s go-ahead to complete its $6.2billion purchase of broadcast rival Tegna.

Fellow ABC affiliate Sinclair, which owns a swathe of local media in the United States, also said it would stop airing Mr Kimmel’s show before ABC suspended it.

What has been the reaction to Kimmel’s ‘cancellation’?

The president – who is in the UK for his state visit – celebrated the move on Truth Social, writing: “The ratings challenged Jimmy Kimmel Show is CANCELLED. Congratulations to ABC for finally having the courage to do what had to be done.”

His sentiments have been echoed widely on the right, while Democrats have shared their outrage at Mr Kimmel’s suspension.

California Governor Gavin Newsom said the Republicans did “not believe in free speech” and that they were “censoring you in real time,” while Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer called for people “across the political spectrum… to stop what’s happening to Jimmy Kimmel”.

Celebrities who have guested on the show joined Democrats in speaking out. Wanda Sykes accused Mr Trump of seeking to end freedom of speech, while Ben Stiller tweeted: “This isn’t right.”

Actress Jean Smart shared a picture of her with Kimmel on Instagram and said she was “horrified” by the show’s cancellation, and comedian Michael Kosta, a rotating host on Comedy Central’s The Daily Show, urged TV networks to “push back”.

Similarly, unions representing writers and actors branded the move as an attack on free speech, and accused ABC of caving to pressure from the White House.

The Writers Guild of America West and Writers Guild of America East said in a joint statement: “Shame on those in government who forget this founding truth. As for our employers, our words have made you rich. Silencing us impoverishes the whole world.”

Kimmel has not commented.

The group Refuse Fascism organised a protest outside the El Capitan Entertainment Centre in Hollywood for Thursday, where the show is usually filmed.

‘A really dangerous moment for democracy’

Fiona O’Brien, UK director of Reporters Without Borders, told Sky News that the show’s suspension represented a “really dangerous moment for democracy”.

“The media is not there to serve politicians,” she said. “The media is there to hold those in power to account, to scrutinise them. The general public, which is who the media serve, have a right to know what those in power are doing.”

She suggested that the tactics the Trump administration is accused of using to “block” freedom of speech, such as threatening to sue media corporations, are used by authoritarian governments around the world.

“It’s a way to try and control the narrative… silence your critics and have have only one side of the story told,” she added. “So any of these kinds of attacks represent a move away from objectivity.”

Writing on social media, former president Barack Obama, once a guest on Kimmel’s show said: “After years of complaining about cancel culture, the current administration has taken it to a new and dangerous level by routinely threatening regulatory action against media companies unless they muzzle or fire reporters and commentators it doesn’t like.”

Trump targets two remaining late show hosts

The president has taken issue with Kimmel – and other late-night hosts – throughout the years, as they often use their shows’ monologues to criticise Mr Trump and other Republicans.

Jimmy Kimmel Live’s demise comes just weeks after Stephen Colbert’s The Late Show was cancelled by CBS.

After 10 years with Mr Colbert at the helm, the show is set to end when its current season ends next May.

While CBS said the move was “purely a financial decision” and “not related in any way to the show’s performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount,” his fans have speculated it was a result of Mr Trump, who he regularly criticises.

The president praised the move at the time, saying “his talent was even worse than his ratings”.

Now Mr Trump is pushing for the axing of the two remaining late night shows belonging to Jimmy Fallon and Seth Myers, who also regularly make him and his aides the butt of their jokes.

“Kimmel has ZERO talent, and worse ratings than even Colbert, if that’s possible,” the president said on Truth Social after Mr Kimmel’s show was cancelled.

“That leaves Jimmy and Seth, two total losers, on Fake News NBC. Their ratings are also horrible. Do it NBC!!! President DJT.”

Sports

NCAA removes spring transfer window for football

Published

1 hour ago

September 18, 2025

admin

NCAA removes spring transfer window for football

Max OlsonSep 17, 2025, 07:09 PM ET
Close
- Covers the Big 12
- Joined ESPN in 2012
- Graduate of the University of Nebraska

College football is officially moving to a single offseason transfer portal window, the NCAA announced Wednesday.

The Division I Administrative Committee voted to approve a legislative change that eliminates the spring transfer window but did not sign off on establishing Jan. 2-11 as the lone portal window for FBS and FCS players.

In response to feedback from student-athletes, the FBS and FCS oversight committees will discuss modifying the dates and length of the proposed January window. The Administrative Committee will consider those adjustments when it meets in October.

FBS head coaches advocated for a January portal window at the AFCA convention in January, and both oversight committees voted to support changing the transfer windows earlier this month. The reform will bring major changes to the timing and duration of the offseason transfer period in college football.

The initial proposal would require college football players to wait until Jan. 2 — the day after the completion of the College Football Playoff quarterfinals — to enter their names in the NCAA transfer portal database and be contacted by prospective schools. Graduate transfers were previously allowed to enter the portal early but now must also wait until the January window.

Players would have 10 days to enter the portal but are under no deadline to make a commitment to their next school once they enter.

Players on teams still competing in the College Football Playoff in January would have five days after their final postseason game to enter the portal. This season’s CFP semifinals — the Vrbo Fiesta Bowl and the Chick-fil-A Peach Bowl — are scheduled for Jan. 8 and 9, respectively.

In previous years, the winter transfer portal window opened in early December on the Monday after bowl game selections. The change is aimed at alleviating some of the stress of the loaded December calendar, during which transfer recruiting, coaching changes, bowl practices, high school signing day, bowl games and the College Football Playoff all were going on simultaneously.

Last year’s winter portal window was Dec. 9-28 with the spring portal window on April 16-25. The total number of FBS scholarship transfers has increased yearly and surpassed 3,200 in 2024-25.

The elimination of the spring transfer period is a move the NCAA has considered in recent years. It was first established as a 15-day window in April 2023 and marked the final deadline for players to transfer and be immediately eligible at their next school. In 2024-25, the spring window was reduced to a 10-day period.

The spring window had become a source of frustration among coaches in recent years. Unexpected post-spring departures are difficult to replace, and the elimination of the one-time transfer rule has given players and agents the leverage to demand more money by threatening to transfer. Coaches have also taken advantage of the spring window to cut underperforming players and bring in additional transfers.

This year, more than 1,100 FBS scholarship players entered the transfer portal in the month of April.

Head coaching changes currently trigger a 30-day window for players who wish to enter the portal and explore a transfer. Football players at UCLA and Virginia Tech are already allowed to transfer early after their head coaches were fired Sunday.

Though many head coaches have expressed support for a January transfer window, Ohio State coach Ryan Day spoke out against it earlier this month, telling reporters it “doesn’t make any sense to me” that coaches must focus on recruiting transfers while their team is still competing for a national championship.

Sports

S. Carolina’s Sellers questionable to face Mizzou

Published

1 hour ago

September 18, 2025

admin

S. Carolina's Sellers questionable to face Mizzou

South Carolina quarterback LaNorris Sellers is listed as questionable on the SEC availability report for Saturday’s game at No. 23 Missouri.

Sellers left the first half of the Gamecocks’ loss to Vanderbilt on Saturday after a hit to the head knocked him to the ground, and coach Shane Beamer said at halftime he wouldn’t return.

Sources told ESPN on Wednesday that Sellers has been in practice, and there’s optimism around his availability for Saturday.

Beamer made clear earlier in the week that there’s a “policy” at South Carolina that players who don’t practice on Tuesday and Wednesday aren’t going to play. Beamer has generally been mum on Sellers’ status this week, pointing to the injury report

Sellers, a redshirt sophomore, is one of the best players in the country and is considered a contender to be the top quarterback selected if he decides to enter the 2026 NFL draft. He accounted for 25 touchdowns last season — 18 passing and seven rushing. He threw for 2,534 yards and ran for an additional 674 in 2024.

Sellers was hit by Vanderbilt linebacker Langston Patterson with less than two minutes left in the second quarter of Saturday’s game. Patterson was ejected for targeting.

Sellers was replaced by sixth-year senior Luke Doty, who was 18-for-27 for 148 yards. He had an interception and didn’t lead the Gamecocks to a touchdown in the 31-7 home loss in Columbia. South Carolina didn’t score in the second half.