Connect with us

Published

on

The independent review into the closure of Nigel Farage’s Coutts account and the discussion of his banking with a journalist by the head of the bank has found “a number of shortcomings” in the closure process.

But law firm Travers Smith, who were commissioned by the board of NatWest to conduct the review, said the closure of Mr Farage‘s account, “was predominantly a commercial decision”.

“Coutts considered its relationship with Mr Farage to be commercially unviable because it was significantly loss-making.”

In response to the key findings of the report, NatWest chairman, Sir Howard Davies, said “a number of serious failings” were set out in the treatment of Mr Farage.

Shortcomings were also identified in how NatWest, which owns Coutts, communicated with the former UKIP and Brexit Party leader and how it treated his confidential information, according to the review.

The finance watchdog, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) said potential “regulatory breaches and a number of areas for improvement” were identified.

These include NatWest’s processes on how it considers potential accounts closures and customers complaints as well as the effectiveness of governance mechanisms.

More on Banks

NatWest’s share price fell to more than a two year low on Friday morning despite just published results showing £1.33bn in profit over the three months ending in September, 23% higher than at the same point a year before.

On market open a NatWest share cost 173 pence, a low not seen since February 2021.

The share price fall, from 205.2 pence on Thursday evening, was the biggest fall since the 2016 Brexit vote.

Former chief executive, Dame Alison Rose, exited the state-backed lender after she admitted making a “serious error of judgment” by speaking to a journalist about Farage’s banking at Coutts.

After the news piece was published Mr Farage released the content of a subject access request, which suggested the move was taken partly because his views did not align with the firm’s “values”.

Key findings by Travers Smith are:
• The decision to close the account was lawful and was made in accordance with bank policies and processes.
• Dame Alison Rose played no part in the decision to close the account.
• Other factors were considered in the decision-making process: Coutts thought there could be reputational harm from Mr Farage holding an account these factors did not drive the decision.
• Mr Farage’s stated beliefs were not a determining factor in closing the account but they did support the decision.
• The way the closure was communicated to Mr Farage was broke the bank’s policies and processes, especially by giving reasons to customers when non-financial crime was committed. No adequate reasons were given.

In response, Mr Farage has said:
• “The report’s authors claim it was “predominantly a commercial decision” to close my accounts but, crucially, they also noted that evidence given to them by witnesses in relation to this episode was not entirely consistent.”
• “Travers Smith has taken a very mealy-mouthed approach to this complex issue. The law firm argues that my political views “not aligning with those of the bank” was not in itself a political decision. This is laughable.”
• “Travers Smith did not find “any evidence” that my “pro-Brexit stance were factors in the exit decision”. The word Brexit appeared no less than 86 times in my subject access request”.
• “The letters that were sent to me confirming the closures of my accounts without explanation were sent on a paper headed template usually reserved for those suspected of fraud”.

Earlier this week the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) said there were two privacy breaches involved in Dame Alison’s disclosure to BBC News business editor Simon Jack.

A broader FCA review of banks closing accounts on the basis of customers’ political opinion found no evidence of the practice.

However only closures between July 2022 and June 2023 were considered and more work to verify the data supplied by banks was needed as was examination as to why and when they close accounts due to reputational risk.

Continue Reading

Business

Nvidia beats expectations again in defiance of AI bubble fears

Published

on

By

Nvidia beats expectations again in defiance of AI bubble fears

The world’s most valuable company has reported another series of expectation-beating results, heading off fears of the AI bubble bursting for now.

Nvidia’s revenue reached $57bn in the three months to October, higher than Wall Street estimates and the company’s own guidance.

That’s up 62% on the same time last year, and has been described by the business as an “outstanding” quarter.

Money blog: Ryanair flights to EU banned in ‘unprecedented’ decision

A profit measure called earnings per share was also better than expected at $1.30.

It matters as Nvidia has powered the artificial intelligence (AI) boom through its computer chips, which are key parts in AI chatbots such as ChatGPT.

More on Artificial Intelligence

Nvidia has major tech companies as clients and acts as a good proxy for whether the tens of billions of dollars invested in AI is paying off.

Its chief executive, Jensen Huang, has been described as the Godfather of AI and watch parties were organised for those looking to follow the Wednesday evening announcement.

The company has been a massive beneficiary of the push to put money into AI, with its share price reaching stratospheric highs.

In October, it became the first worth $5trn (£3.83trn), about the size of the German economy, Europe’s largest, and double the UK’s benchmark stock index, the FTSE 100.

What’s been announced?

Revenue from data centres reached a record high of $51.2bn, more than £10bn higher than the three months previous.

The outlook is for continuing strong sales in the final three months of the financial year, as the company forecasts revenue will be roughly $65bn.

Read more:
Nvidia boss defends against claims of bubble by ‘Big Short’ investor
Inflation slows to 3.6%, but food costs shoot upwards

Demand for Nvidia products continues to surpass expectations, while the business is “still in the early innings” of AI transitions, its chief financial officer Colette Kress said.

Mr Huang said sales of its blackwell chips are “off the charts” and its cloud graphics processing chips (GPUs) are “sold out”.

Why it matters

Developing AI infrastructure, like the construction of data centres, has been a significant contributor to US economic growth, as measured by gross domestic product (GDP).

A faltering of AI expansion, therefore, impacts the US economy, the world’s largest, which in turn affects the UK and global economies.

Anxiety around the massive valuations tech companies have accrued, on the hope of AI revolutionising the world, is likely to be staved off by the results announcement.

A fall in these tech company valuations could have meant a drop in the value of pension pots or savings.

Just seven dominant tech companies, many of which have borrowed to invest in AI, make up more than a quarter of major US stock index, the S&P 500.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Could the AI bubble burst?

In the last year alone, Nvidia’s share price has risen more than 230%.

Some, including US trader Michael Burry, famous for being played by Christian Bale in the Hollywood film The Big Short, have effectively bet that Nvidia’s share price would fall.

Addressing the topic of an AI bubble, Nvidia’s founder, Mr Huang, said, “From our vantage point, we see something very different”.

What next?

Regardless of the figures released on Wednesday evening, significant market moves were anticipated, given the attention paid to the results and the significance of the company.

Nvidia shares rose as much as 4% in after-hours trading.

The results also boosted the share price of its chip-making competitors like Broadcom and Advanced Micro Devices.

For now, the AI bubble remains intact.

Continue Reading

Business

Inflation slows to 3.6%, but food costs shoot upwards

Published

on

By

Inflation slows to 3.6%, but food costs shoot upwards

The rate of inflation has eased to 3.6%, according to official figures that make for better reading for the economy and chancellor ahead of the budget.

The Office for National Statistics (ONS) said the slowdown in the consumer prices index (CPI) measure, from the annual 3.8% rate recorded the previous month, was largely down to weaker housing effects, especially from energy bills.

ONS chief economist Grant Fitzner said: “Inflation eased in October, driven mainly by gas and electricity prices, which increased less than this time last year following changes in the Ofgem energy price cap.

Money latest: Delivery not arrived? Here’s what you can do

“The costs of hotels was also a downward driver, with prices falling this month. These were only partially offset by rising food prices, following the dip seen in September. 

“The annual cost of raw materials for businesses continued to increase, while factory gate prices also rose.”

The final part of that statement will be seen as a risk to expectations from economists that the peak pace for price increases is now behind the UK economy after a spike this year that has caused concern among interest rate-setters at the Bank of England.

More from Money

October’s data marked the first decline for the inflation rate since March.

It has been widely believed that the figure will ease gradually in the months ahead, helping to cushion household spending power from a slowdown in wage growth.

But key risks include shocks within the global economy and the impact of potential measures in the budget next week.

The chancellor’s first budget was blamed by business groups and economists for helping push up costs since April.

Then, firms passed on hikes to employer national insurance contributions and minimum pay levels imposed by Rachel Reeves.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Reeves ‘played a bad hand poorly’

That has been reflected in many supermarket prices, for example, as they are among the biggest employers in the country. The ONS data showed that food inflation rose from 4.5% to 4.9%.

Other factors have contributed too such as high global demand for chicken and shrinking UK cattle herds pushing up beef costs.

Poor cocoa and coffee harvests have resulted in prices spiking too this year, with chocolate standing at record levels this summer.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Chancellor reacts to increase in food prices

While food has been a main contributor to inflation, so too has energy, though bills have stabilised this year thanks largely to healthy global supplies of natural gas.

Petrol and diesel costs could become more of a problem for inflation, however.

The AA has blamed global factors for UK fuel prices nearing their highest level for seven months.

The motoring group said that but for the 5p cut in fuel duty under the last Conservative government, pump prices would have returned to pre-COVID levels.

There have been rumours that Ms Reeves could remove that reduction next Wednesday.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Why is the economy flatlining?

She said of the ONS figures: “This fall in inflation is good news for households and businesses across the country, but I’m determined to do more to bring prices down.

“That’s why at the budget next week I will take the fair choices to deliver on the public’s priorities to cut NHS waiting lists, cut national debt and cut the cost of living.”

When asked if she recognised a contribution to rising inflation from her first budget, she responded: “Food prices fell last month and they have risen this month.

“But I do recognise that there’s more that we need to do to tackle the cost of living challenges. And that’s why one of the three priorities in my budget next week is to tackle the cost of living, as well as to cut NHS waiting lists and cut government debt.”

The Bank of England’s most recent forecasts see its 2% inflation target not being met until the early part of 2027.

Stubborn inflation in the UK has threatened the pace of interest rate cuts but policymakers are expected, by financial markets at least, to agree a further quarter point reduction next month on the back of weakness in economic growth and the labour market.

Official figures last week showed the UK’s unemployment rate rising to 5% from 4.8% and the pace of wage growth continuing its gradual decline.

Economic output during the third quarter of the year also slowed further to stand at just 0.1%.

The Bank’s rate-setting committee voted 5-4 earlier this month to maintain Bank rate at 4%.

That decision allowed for more data to come in – such as the employment and growth numbers – and, crucially, for the budget to have taken place, ahead of its next meeting.

Continue Reading

Business

AI bubble fears take hold of stock markets and bitcoin

Published

on

By

AI bubble fears take hold of stock markets and bitcoin

Global stock markets are seeing sharp declines and bitcoin has lost this year’s gains as worries intensify that the AI (artificial intelligence) boom has become a bubble fit to burst.

A small tear has certainly appeared in US tech stocks over the past week, with the tech-heavy Nasdaq closing below a key technical indicator for the first time since late April on Monday.

Key worries include not only high valuations but also vast investment spending in the AI space harming and delaying investor returns.

Money latest: Backlash over £195 beef wellington from M&S

Sharp stock market falls were seen across large parts of Asia and Europe following the retreat on Wall Street.

Japan’s Nikkei 225 shed more than 3% while the Hang Seng in Hong Kong lost 1.7%.

In Europe, the FTSE 100 was down by just over 1% while Germany’s DAX and the CAC in Paris were 1.2% and 1.3% lower in early afternoon dealing.

More on Artificial Intelligence

Nerves are jangling over tech as the market awaits financial results from Nvidia on Wednesday night.

The stock market wobble began on Wall Street and many analysts say it's a healthy move. Pic: AP
Image:
The stock market wobble began on Wall Street and many analysts say it’s a healthy move. Pic: AP

They are likely to be crucial in determining the path for shares ahead.

The world’s largest company by market value is the beating heart of Wall Street’s artificial intelligence boom and any sign of slowdowns, for both revenues and profits, will be catalysts for further sell-offs.

Fears have been growing for months that record values are overdone.

Stocks linked to AI suffered particularly on Monday, building on declines seen last week, and futures indicated more pain to come when trading begins in the US, though drops were expected to be limited.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Could the AI bubble burst?

Financial analysts said baskets of top AI-linked stocks had now entered so-called correction territory, falling more than 10% in short order this month.

Others pointed to an impact on confidence in the crypto market.

Bitcoin, which hit a $125,000 spot rate level only last month, stood at $91,000 on Tuesday.

It had begun the year around the $94,000 level.

Victoria Scholar, head of investment for Interactive Investor, said: “This year was meant to be the year of the bitcoin bulls supported by a highly crypto-friendly administration in the White House and Trump’s ‘less is more’ approach towards regulation.

“However, fears of an AI bubble and concerns about the market’s heavy dependence on a handful of tech giants have caused investors to dial back their exposure to speculative assets such as bitcoin.

“There’s a general sense of nervousness that has captured the market mood lately and bitcoin appears to be in the firing line.”

Wider sentiment has also been harmed by weaker bets on the prospects for a further interest rate cut by the US central bank next month.

Many financial analysts described the stock market shifts as a healthy correction, given all the uncertainties which include the possibility of a US court ruling against Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariffs regime ahead.

Mike Gallagher, director of research at Continuum Economics, told Sky’s US partner CNBC that the market action implies equities could fall about 5% from recent highs – or “a bit more”.

“There’s some things coming over the horizon that make you want to take a bit of risk off the table,” he told the channel’s Squawk Box Europe show.

“So, part of it is just natural pocket taking, part of it is thinking, ‘well, is the macro story going to be perfect? No, it’s not.”

He concluded: “To get a major sell-off, you may need major bad news, and that we haven’t actually got to that point yet.”

In the hour after Wall Street opened, the tech company-heavy Nasdaq Composite had dropped nearly 1.8%.

The S&P 500 US index of companies relied on to be stable and profitable, lost more than 1% and the index of 30 major companies listed on US stock exchanges, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA), dropped 1.3%.

Continue Reading

Trending