Connect with us

Published

on

Migrants who file asylum cases in New York or California are three times more likely to get their cases approved than if they pursue them in Republican-led Texas or Florida, new data shows.

Analyzing the outcomes of asylum cases in the two liberal states the top two destinations for new migrants entering the US shows 61% of cases in New York and 66% of cases in California being approved from January to August.

That presents a stark comparison to conservative Texas where 19% of cases have been granted and Florida, which approved just 23% of cases in the same time period, according to the data obtained by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse at Syracuse University.

The average approval rate in asylum cases averaged 49% between 2013 and 2017 under Obama, 32% under Donald Trump and rose to 40% during the first months of Joe Bidens presidency, according to previous TRAC data. 5 Migrants who file asylum cases in New York or California are three times more likely to get their cases approved than if they pursue them in Republican-led Texas or Florida, new data shows.AP

The courts in Democrat governed New York and California also oversee the majority of asylum cases in the country, the number of which have exploded during the current migrant crisis, which began in in 2021.

Thousands of migrants still pour into the country daily due to the Biden administration failing to get tough and tighten the rules on immigration, mostly from Venezuela, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico and Colombia, according to CBP data.

New York Citys leaders have repeatedly said they have run out of shelter space after opening 200 facilities and that they have nowhere to put newly arriving migrants after 160,000 have come to the city since Spring 2022 all asking for shelter, food and services, which New York Gov. Kathy Hochul estimates will cost $2 billion.  

Similarly, San Diego, California, has no room for new arrivals and has released over 13,000 asylum seekers onto the streets in recent weeks with officials saying many have been smuggled into the country and dont even know where they are. 5 Data shows California and New York are granting asylum in up to 66% of cases.

There are ways into America that we never envisioned. Congress has got to get its act together, Michael Wildes, managing partner of law firm Wildes & Weinberg, P.C. told The Post.

Its the Wild West. [Immigration courts] are understaffed, and they keep putting people into Manhattan hotels and similar facilities around the nation. Its compounding and turning into one of the biggest traffic jams Ive ever seen, he added.

Nationally, Customs and Border Protection admitted during their financial year, which ended September 30, over 900,000 people had been allowed into the country on humanitarian parole and were eligible to apply for asylum.

When a migrants are admitted to the US they are asked which destination they headed and given a Notice To Appear [NTA] at a court in that county, often years in the future as immigration courts are so backed up and oversubscribed. 5 New York Citys leaders have repeatedly said they have run out of shelter space after opening 200 facilities and that they have nowhere to put newly arriving migrants after 160,000 have come to the city since Spring 2022.NYPJ

The Post witnessed firsthand as migrants were handed court dates five years in the future in May.

Previous figures analyzing where migrants were heading overwhelmingly show the top destinations to be New York City, Los Angeles, Houston, Miami and Chicago some of the most expensive metropolitan areas on the planet.

Less than 10% of migrants stay in border towns, and most head to areas where there are established migrant populations from their home countries.

Due to the lengthy nature of asylum proceedings, courts are only expected to get more overwhelmed, meaning asylum seekers are legally allowed to be in the country and in many cases allowed to work, for years before their case is even initially heard by a judge. 5 Nationally, Customs and Border Protection admitted during their financial year, which ended September 30, over 900,000 people had been allowed into the country on humanitarian parole and were eligible to apply for asylum.ALLISON DINNER/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock

In the first eight months of 2023 New York and California courts adjudicated over 13,200 cases each, both more than in the entire previous year. The next busiest courts are Texas, where judges adjudicated 7,000 cases, and Florida, where judges made 4,000 asylum decisions in the year to August.

The figures also show approval ratings have been increasing during the Biden administration, with California approvals rocketing from 34% of cases in 2020 to the current figure of two thirds. Once asylum is grated, an applicant can apply for citizenship.

In addition to all that, even asylum cases which are rejected can be appealed and transferred to a different court.

The culture is very different from one office to the next, Wildes stated. Clients will often move to different venues based on those generalities. 5 Due to the lengthy nature of asylum proceedings asylum seekers are legally allowed to be in the country and in many cases allowed to work, for years before their case is even initially heard by a judge.NYPJ

Wildes also noted judges can vary wildly in their rulings and even in some of the most liberal New York courts there are judges who do not approve over 80% of applications they adjudicate.

The Biden administration has come under attack for not reacting to problems on the border with even Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas referring to the broken immigration system, this week.

Meanwhile a 7,000 strong migrant caravan left from the border between Mexico and Guatemala this week, led by a US citizen, Irineo Mujica, who claims the countries of Latin America are taking advantage of Bidens soft touch.

He said: Joe Bidens administration had lost the ball, does not know what to do with immigration, adding Mexico was ganging up with other countries in the region to make sure all this immigration goes straight into the United States.

Continue Reading

Politics

5 countries where crypto is (surprisingly) tax-free in 2025

Published

on

By

5 countries where crypto is (surprisingly) tax-free in 2025

5 countries where crypto is (surprisingly) tax-free in 2025

Looking to live tax-free with crypto in 2025? These five countries, including the Cayman Islands, UAE and Germany, still offer legal, zero-tax treatment for cryptocurrencies.

Continue Reading

Politics

Children with special needs will ‘always’ have ‘legal right’ to support, education secretary says

Published

on

By

Children with special needs will 'always' have 'legal right' to support, education secretary says

The education secretary has said children with special needs will “always” have a legal right to additional support as she sought to quell a looming row over potential cuts.

The government is facing a potential repeat of the debacle over welfare reform due to suggestions it could scrap tailored plans for children and young people with special needs in the classroom.

Politics latest: Minister says ‘those with broadest shoulders should pay more tax’

Speaking in the Commons on Monday, Bridget Phillipson failed to rule out abolishing education, health and care plans (EHCPs) – legally-binding plans to ensure children and young people receive bespoke support in either mainstream or specialist schools.

Laura Trott, the shadow education secretary, said parents’ anxiety was “through the roof” following reports over the weekend that EHCPs could be scrapped.

She said parents “need and deserve answers” and asked: “Can she confirm that no parent or child will have their right to support reduced, replaced or removed as a result of her planned changes?”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Sophy’s thought on whether to scrap EHCPs

Ms Phillipson said SEND provision was a “serious and complex area” and that the government’s plans would be set out in a white paper that would be published later in the year.

More on Education

“I would say to all parents of children with SEND, there is no responsibility I take more seriously than our responsibility to some of the most vulnerable children in our country,” she said.

“We will ensure, as a government, that children get better access to more support, strengthened support, with a much sharper focus on early intervention.”

ECHPs are drawn up by local councils and are available to children and young people aged up to 25 who need more support than is provided by the Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) budget.

They identify educational, health and social needs and set out the additional support to meet those needs.

In total, there were 638,745 EHCPs in place in January 2025 – up 10.8% on the same point last year.

‘Rebel ready’

One Labour MP said they were concerned the government risked making the “same mistakes” over ECHPs as it did with the row over welfare, when it was eventually forced into a humiliating climbdown in the face of opposition by Labour MPs.

“The political risk is much higher even than with welfare, and I’m worried it’s being driven by a need to save money which it shouldn’t be,” they told Sky News.

“Some colleagues are rebel ready.”

The MP said the government should be “charting a transition from where we are now to where we need to be”, adding: “That may well be a future without ECHPs, because there is mainstream capacity – but that cannot be a removal of current provision.”

Later in the debate, Ms Phillipson said children with special educational needs and disabilities would “always” have a “legal right” to additional support as she accused a Conservative MP of attempting to “scare” parents.

“The guiding principle of any reform to the SEND system that we will set out will be about better support for children, strengthened support for children and improved support for children, both inside and outside of special schools,” she said.

Read more:
Government to ban ‘appalling’ non-disclosure agreements
Government declines to rule out wealth tax

“Improved inclusivity in mainstream schools, more specialist provision in mainstream schools, and absolutely drawing on the expertise of the specialist sector in creating the places where we need them, there will always be a legal right … to the additional support… that children with SEND need.”

Her words were echoed by schools minister Catherine McKinnell, who also did not rule out changing ECHPs.

She told the Politics Hub With Sophy Ridge that the government was “focused on reforming the whole system”.

“Children and families have been left in a system where they’ve had to fight for their child’s education, and that has to change,” she said.

She added that EHCPs have not necessarily “fixed the situation” for some children – but for others it’s “really important”.

Continue Reading

Politics

Government to ban ‘appalling’ non-disclosure agreements that silence victims of abuse at work

Published

on

By

Government to ban 'appalling' non-disclosure agreements that silence victims of abuse at work

Victims will no longer have to “suffer in silence”, the government has said, as it pledges to ban non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) designed to silence staff who’ve suffered harassment or discrimination.

Accusers of Harvey Weinstein, the former film producer and convicted sex offender, are among many in recent years who had to breach such agreements in order to speak out.

Labour has suggested an extra section in the Employment Rights Bill that would void NDAs that are intended to stop employees going public about harassment or discrimination.

The government said this would allow victims to come forward about their situation rather than remain “stuck in unwanted situations, through fear or desperation”.

Zelda Perkins, former assistant to Harvey Weinstein, led the calls for wrongful NDAs to be banned. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Zelda Perkins, former assistant to Harvey Weinstein, led the calls for wrongful NDAs to be banned. Pic: Reuters

Zelda Perkins, Weinstein’s former assistant and founder of Can’t Buy My Silence UK, said the changes would mark a “huge milestone” in combatting the “abuse of power”.

She added: “This victory belongs to the people who broke their NDAs, who risked everything to speak the truth when they were told they couldn’t. Without their courage, none of this would be happening.”

Deputy prime minister Angela Rayner said the government had “heard the calls from victims of harassment and discrimination” and was taking action to prevent people from having to “suffer in silence”.

More from UK

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Weinstein found guilty of sex crime in retrial

An NDA is a broad term that describes any agreement that restricts what a signatory can say about something and was originally intended to protect commercially sensitive information.

Currently, a business can take an employee to court and seek compensation if they think a NDA has been broken – even if that person is a victim or witness of harassment or discrimination.

“Many high profile cases” have revealed NDAs are being manipulated to prevent people “speaking out about horrific experiences in the workplace”, the government said.

Announcing the amendments, employment minister Justin Madders said: “The misuse of NDAs to silence victims of harassment or discrimination is an appalling practice that this government has been determined to end.”

The bill is currently in the House of Lords, where it will be debated on 14 July, before going on to be discussed by MPs as well.

Continue Reading

Trending