Connect with us

Published

on

Critical mass is a tricky thing. You cant make it happen by sheer force of will or by dropping a viral video at just the right moment.

The mad scientists at South Park? The folks behind the Comedy Central series can muster it with one perfectly timed episode.

The enduring creation of Trey Parker and Matt Stone has a knack for sharing thoughts were all having on challenging subjects were too shy to share in public.

Once the shows foul-mouthed lads have a crack at it, suddenly its acceptable to speak on it loud and clear.

Kevin Mazur/Getty Images for Comedy Central

They did just that earlier this year with The World-Wide Privacy Tour, an episode featuring Canadian royalty who looked and sounded just like the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. Cultural voices had struggled to critique Harry and Meghan up until then, fearing a similar backlash to what British pundit Piers Morgan faced for defying the royal couple.

Morgan lost a lucrative gig with Good Morning Britain for suggesting Meghan wasnt telling the whole truth about the alleged racism she faced within the royal family and her suicidal thoughts.

The fiery pundit faced an investigation into the comments as well. It wasnt worth it for other high-profile voices to weigh in on the former Suits star.

Cartman and co. had no such fears. And, after South Parks Privacy Tour, it was open season on the royals. The commentary dam had broken. Suddenly, we began to hear stories about how dismissive Meghan Markle was about her podcast gig, for example.

One brilliantly satirical episode made that happen.

We just saw something similar with the premiere of Joining the Panderverse. The South Parkspecial episode skewered Disney executive Kathleen Kennedy for pushing woke on many Mouse House products, including movie reboots like the short-lived shows National Treasure: Edge of History and Willow, and franchise extensions like Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny.

It also mocked Hollywoods aggressive diversity mandates, where classic characters are routinely race-swapped in the name of progress and equity.

US producer Kathleen Kennedy speaks during a press conference during the Morelia Film Festival in Morelia, Michoacan State, Mexico, on October 26, 2023. (Photo by ENRIQUE CASTRO/AFP via Getty Images)

YouTubers and Right-leaning influencers have said as much repeatedly over the past few years, but the subject was mostly off-limits to mainstream journalists. Or, if the topic came up, journalists would dismiss it as the ravings of right wing trolls.

Suddenly, the hilarious South Park satire had even The Hollywood Reporter weighing in on the topic, exposing it to readers who may not follow the aforementioned YouTube stars. The news site even quoted Gina Carano, the Terror on the Prairie star who was famously fired for sharing opinions that clashed with her far-Left industry, in the process.

The magazine wouldnt share Caranos views on the subject under normal conditions. When South Park brought the issues up, however, it forced the outlet to expand its coverage.

Plus, viewers who never made the connection between inferior Disney content and Kennedy, a veteran Hollywood executive, suddenly did just that.

None of this is new for South Park.

The series, which began in 1997, routinely hits controversial subjects sans fear or regret. The Jeffersons episode skewered pop superstar Michael Jackson all the way back in 2004, offering an unflinching perspective on the icons relationship with young children and plastic surgery overkill.

Even longtime Jackson fans worried about his mental state and accusations of improper behavior with children. South Park shouted it from the Comedy Central rooftop, and the public could now reference the series as a portal into difficult conversations around the King of Pop.

The show introduced its PC Principal character in 2015, several years before the woke mindset took hold in both Hollywood and the culture at large. The characters virtue signaling, combined with an aggressive mien that took no prisoners, captured what many would soon fear about the far-Left movement.

Some South Park fans even embraced that episodes title, Stunning and Brave, to describe woke theatrics meant to inspire applause (or else), such as declaring trans star Caitlyn Jenner in such fawning fashion.

Sometimes the South Park magic doesnt happen overnight.

The prime example is the 2019 Board Girls episode which skewers trans female athletes competing against biological women. The show featured a Randy Macho Man Savage-inspired character who becomes a trans woman and crushes the competition.

Im not here to talk about my transition, Im here to kick some f***ing a**, the character, who transitioned two weeks prior, says.

South Park Board Girls episode. IMDB.

The installment drew some mild media heat at the time, but hardly as much as if it had come out this year or last.

Ironically, a clip from the episode went viral a few months ago, with even The Clay and Buck Show bringing it up on their nationally syndicated radio show.

How does South Park do it? The series carved a unique niche in pop culture, one that gives it leeway in the raging culture wars. Its been outrageous for so long that people no longer judge it like other Hollywood content.

Its just South Park being South Park.

That, plus the crude and cutesy animation, help it steer clear of cancel cultures clutches. It helps that the show hits both sides of the cultural and political aisle, to, leaving no one safe from its satire.

The Panderverse episode poked fun at conservatives who cry woke at every opportunity, for example.

Best of all? Parker and Stone arent interested in apologizing for their past offenses. Why apologize for sharing what the rest of us already think?

Christian Toto is an award-winning journalist, movie critic and editor ofHollywoodInToto.com. He previously served as associate editor with Breitbart News Big Hollywood. Follow him at@HollywoodInToto.

The views expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

Continue Reading

World

Israel attacks Syrian military HQ – and disrupts live TV broadcast

Published

on

By

Israel attacks Syrian military HQ - and disrupts live TV broadcast

Israeli airstrikes have targeted the Syrian military headquarters in Damascus amid renewed clashes in the country.

The gate of the Ministry of Defence in the Syrian capital was targeted by two warning missiles from an Israeli reconnaissance aircraft.

State-owned Elekhbariya TV said the Israeli strike had wounded two civilians, the Reuters news agency reported.

Smoke rises after strikes on Syria's defence ministry in Damascus, Syria.
Pic: Reuters
Image:
Smoke rises from Syria’s defence ministry building in Damascus. Pic: Reuters

It came as Israeli airstrikes targeted security and army vehicles in the southern city of Sweida, where the Druze faith is one of the major religious groups – marking the third consecutive day Israel has struck Syrian forces.

The Israeli military confirmed it had “struck the entrance gate” in Damascus – and that it would be monitoring “actions being taken against Druze civilians in southern Syria”.

Smoke rises from an Israeli airstrike that hit the Syrian Defence Ministry in Damascus.
Pic: AP
Image:
The Israeli airstrike targeted Syria’s military headquarters. Pic: AP

Why Israel is getting involved in Syria’s internal fighting


Dominic Waghorn

Dominic Waghorn

International affairs editor

@DominicWaghorn

Israel has shown little respect for international borders since becoming the unrivalled military hegemon of the Middle East. Today that meant an Israeli airstrike on a government building in Damascus.

Israel says its attack on a Syrian defence ministry facility was intended as a warning to the new government: stay out of the part of southern Syria we have occupied or else.

Israel has moved into parts of the south of the country, built military bases and declared a line of control.

On Monday, Syrian tanks heading south to try and restore order following an outbreak of factional fighting were attacked by Israeli warplanes.

“The presence of such vehicles in southern Syria could pose a threat to Israel,” stated the Israel Defence Forces.

In reality, Syria’s ageing tanks pose minimal threat to Israel’s state-of-the art military.

Read the full analysis

Local media said Sweida and nearby villages were coming under heavy artillery and mortar fire on Wednesday, according to Reuters.

The clashes marked the collapse of a ceasefire between Syrian government forces and Druze armed groups, with Israel also warning it would increase its involvement.

Syrian security forces walk together along a street in the southern Druze city of Sweida.
Pic: Reuters
Image:
Syria said its forces had responded to being fired upon. Pic: Reuters

Israel said it was acting to protect the Druze groups through its attacks on convoys of Syrian forces.

Syria blamed militias in Sweida for violating a ceasefire agreement which had only been reached on Tuesday.

Read more from Sky News:
‘My family is finished’: Afghan man feels betrayed
Harry follows in Diana’s charity footsteps

A statement from its defence ministry said: “Military forces continue to respond to the source of fire inside the city of Sweida, while adhering to rules of engagement to protect residents, prevent harm, and ensure the safe return of those who left the city back to their homes.”

Israel’s defence minister Israel Katz said the military will continue to strike Syrian forces until they withdraw and should “leave Druze alone”, according to local reports.

Continue Reading

World

Why Israel is getting involved in Syria’s internal fighting

Published

on

By

Why Israel is getting involved in Syria's internal fighting

Israel has shown little respect for international borders since becoming the unrivalled military hegemon of the Middle East.  Today that meant an Israeli airstrike on a government building in Damascus.

Israel says its attack on a Syrian defence ministry facility was intended as a warning to the new government: stay out of the part of southern Syria we have occupied or else.

Israel has moved into parts of the south of the country, built military bases and declared a line of control.

Smoke rises from an Israeli airstrike that hit the Syrian Defence Ministry in Damascus.
Pic: AP
Image:
Smoke rises from an Israeli airstrike that hit the Syrian Defence Ministry in Damascus. Pic: AP

On Monday, Syrian tanks heading south to try and restore order following an outbreak of factional fighting were attacked by Israeli warplanes.

“The presence of such vehicles in southern Syria could pose a threat to Israel,” stated the Israel Defence Forces.

In reality, Syria’s ageing tanks pose minimal threat to Israel’s state-of-the art military.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Syrian presenter interrupted by Israeli airstrike

The Syrian armour was attacked as it entered the area around Sweida in the Druze heartland of southern Syria following factional fighting there.

More on Israel

The flare-up reportedly began with clashes between Bedouin and Druze groups that ended in scores killed.

The background to the escalation is complicated.

At least three Druze militia groups are divided in their loyalties to different religious leaders and differ over how they should respond to calls to assimilate into the new post-revolutionary Syria.

Druze from Syria and Israel protest on the Israeli-Syrian border, in Majdal Shams in the Israeli-controlled Golan Heights.
Pic: AP
Image:
Druze from Syria and Israel protest on the Israeli-Syrian border.
Pic: AP

Read more:
30 dead as armed groups clash in Syria
UK restores diplomatic ties with Syria

Israel is becoming more and more involved in Syria’s internecine war and says it will remain there indefinitely “to protect our communities and thwart any threat”.

Its critics say Israel is operating a policy of divide and rule in Syria, weakening the fledgling government and creating a buffer zone to protect the border with the Golan Heights – originally Syrian territory that it has occupied and annexed for almost half a century.

Since the fall of the Assad regime, Israel has used airstrikes to destroy of much of Syria’s military capability weakening its ability to impose control on outlying regions. This makes it more not less likely Israel will have a volatile unstable state on its northern border.

Syrian security forces walk together along a street in the southern Druze city of Sweida.
Pic: Reuters
Image:
Syrian security forces walk along a street in the southern Druze city of Sweida. Pic: Reuters

America and European powers have chosen to normalise relations with the new government in Damascus and lift sanctions.

In contrast Israel has occupied its territory, bombed its military and today hit one of its government buildings in the capital with an airstrike.

Since its crushing military campaigns against Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran, Israel has emerged as the unchallenged military power of the region.

There is however a limit to what blunt force can achieve alone. It requires diplomacy to achieve lasting gains and Israel’s repeated assaults on multiple neighbours combined with its relentless campaign in Gaza are winning it few friends in the region.

Continue Reading

World

Gaza: At least 19 killed in crowd crush near distribution site, says Israel-backed aid group

Published

on

By

Gaza: At least 19 killed in crowd crush near distribution site, says Israel-backed aid group

At least 20 people have been killed in an incident in Khan Younis, according to the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), an Israel and US-backed organisation.

In a statement, it said 19 people were trampled and one was stabbed in a surge “driven by agitators in the crowd”.

“We have credible reason to believe that elements within the crowd – armed and affiliated with Hamas – deliberately fomented the unrest,” it said.

“For the first time since operations began, GHF personnel identified multiple firearms in the crowd, one of which was confiscated. An American worker was also threatened with a firearm by a member of the crowd during the incident.”

It provided no evidence to support the claim.

The Hamas-run Gaza health ministry claimed 21 Palestinians were killed, “including 15 who died of suffocation as a result of tear gas fired at the starving people and the subsequent stampede” at the GHF site.

Read analysis: Deaths go up when aid sites open

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Gaza deaths increase when aid sites open

The statement is unusual for the GHF, as the controversial group, which has been rejected by the United Nations and other aid groups, rarely acknowledges trouble at its distribution sites.

The GHF began distributing food packages in Gaza at the end of May, after Israel eased its 11-week blockade of aid into the territory.

It has four distribution centres, three of which are in the southern Gaza Strip. The sites, kept off-limits to independent media, are guarded by private security contractors and located in zones where the Israeli military operates.

Analysis: Gazans face unbearable choice of risking their lives for supplies or going hungry

by Lisa Holland, Sky News correspondent in Jerusalem

The United Nations has already condemned the aid centres run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation as “death traps” – and that was before the latest loss of life, seemingly mostly from suffocation.

It’s the first and only time we know of people dying in this way, waiting to get food.  Although the Gaza health ministry and the GHF dispute exactly what happened.

But how much longer can this Israeli and American-backed way to supply aid continue when people are dying on a near-daily basis?

However it happened, Gaza’s overcrowded hospitals are once again overwhelmed.

And there are serious questions to answer about the organisation of a system which is supposed to be providing humanitarian aid to desperately hungry people, but instead is a place where there is so much loss of life.

It leaves people with an unbearable choice between risking their lives to get supplies or going hungry.

Palestinian witnesses say Israeli forces have repeatedly opened fire towards crowds of people going to receive aid.

The Israeli military says it has fired warning shots at people who have behaved in what it says is a suspicious manner. It says its forces operate near the aid sites to stop supplies from falling into the hands of militants.

After the deaths of hundreds of Palestinians trying to reach the aid hubs, the UN has called the GHF’s aid model “inherently unsafe” and a violation of humanitarian impartiality standards.

In response, a GHF spokesperson said: “The fact is the most deadly attacks on aid sites have been linked to UN convoys.”

People carry distributed aid supplies in Khan Yunis, southern Gaza, on July 1, 2025. Pic: AP
Image:
People carry distributed aid supplies in Khan Yunis, southern Gaza. File pic: AP

The GHF says it has delivered more than 70 million meals to Gazans in five weeks and claims other humanitarian groups – which refuse to work with the GHF – had “nearly all of their aid looted” by Hamas or criminal gangs.

Read more:
Medical charity warns acute malnutrition at all-time high

UN data on Gaza deaths ‘disinformation’, claims GHF chief

Since the GHF sites began operating, more than 875 people have been killed while receiving aid, both at GHF distribution points or elsewhere, according to the UN human rights office and the Hamas-run Gaza health ministry.

At least 674 of those have been killed in the vicinity of aid distribution sites run by the GHF.

Continue Reading

Trending