Justice Secretary Alex Chalk has declined to repeat Suella Braverman’s claim that rough sleeping is a “lifestyle choice”, saying he would take a “different approach”.
Mr Chalk was asked if he would reiterate her claim, and he said: “No I wouldn’t, I would take a different approach.”
It comes after Energy Secretary Claire Coutinho said she would not use the same “language” as Ms Braverman, while Rishi Sunak declined to repeat the phrase when asked by reporters yesterday.
The home secretary has sparked a backlash after she claimed that living on the streets was for many a “lifestyle choice”.
Ms Braverman said many of those who sleep in tents are “from abroad” and insisted there was no need given the alternatives and support available to rough sleepers.
She also suggested the UK will follow the likes of San Francisco and Los Angeles in the US, where “weak policies have led to an explosion of crime, drug taking, and squalor” if action is not taken.
The crackdown would reportedly target “nuisance” tents, such as those blocking shop doorways, and include charities that hand out camping equipment being fined.
Image: Suella Braverman’s comments about rough sleeping have attracted criticism
Speaking to Sky’s Kay Burley, Mr Chalk said there was often a “very significant context” to rough sleeping, including mental health, addiction issues and job loss.
Advertisement
However, he said the “central point” Ms Braverman was making was about the use of tents.
“It is absolutely correct that we shouldn’t do anything that entrenches people’s rough sleeping, condemning and consigning people to poorer health outcomes,” he said.
“I’m afraid sometimes to be kind you have to be robust, you have to be really quite firm about it.
“I do think when we are talking about choices, it is important to understand the context of those choices.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:36
Minister rejects Braverman comments
Writing on X, formerly known as Twitter, on 4 November, Ms Braverman said: “The British people are compassionate. We will always support those who are genuinely homeless. But we cannot allow our streets to be taken over by rows of tents occupied by people, many of them from abroad, living on the streets as a lifestyle choice.
“Nobody in Britain should be living in a tent on our streets. There are options for people who don’t want to be sleeping rough, and the government is working with local authorities to strengthen wraparound support including treatment for those with drug and alcohol addiction.
“What I want to stop, and what the law-abiding majority wants us to stop, is those who cause nuisance and distress to other people by pitching tents in public spaces, aggressively begging, stealing, taking drugs, littering, and blighting our communities.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:57
Labour: Home sec comments are ‘despicable’
Labour’s shadow leader of the Commons Lucy Powell said it was “despicable” of Ms Braverman to describe homelessness as a lifestyle choice and that the government was seeking to divide people.
She told Sky News: “I think the comments of the home secretary are despicable, really.
“And they speak to what this government’s whole meaning now seems to be about, which is creating more division, where division isn’t needed, by trying to inflame and sort of false wedge political issues.”
The TON Foundation distanced itself from initial Golden Visa claims, saying the move is an independent initiative with no official backing from the United Arab Emirates government.
Building society chiefs will this week intensify their protests against the chancellor’s plans to cut cash ISA limits by warning that it will push up borrowing costs for homeowners and businesses.
Sky News has obtained the draft of a letter being circulated by the Building Societies Association (BSA) among its members which will demand that Rachel Reeves abandons a proposed move to slash savers’ annual cash ISA allowance from the existing £20,000 threshold.
The draft letter, which is expected to be published this week, warns the chancellor that her decision would deter savers, disrupt Labour’s housebuilding ambitions and potentially present an obstacle to economic growth by triggering higher funding costs.
“Cash ISAs are a cornerstone of personal savings for millions across the UK, helping people from all walks of life to build financial resilience and achieve their savings goals,” the draft letter said.
“Beyond their personal benefits, Cash ISAs play a vital role in the broader economy.
“The funds deposited in these accounts support lending, helping to keep mortgages and loans affordable and accessible.
More on Rachel Reeves
Related Topics:
“Cutting Cash ISA limits would make this funding more scarce which would have the knock-on effect of making loans to households and businesses more expensive and harder to come by.
“This would undermine efforts to stimulate economic growth, including the government’s commitment to delivering 1.5 million new homes.
“Cutting the Cash ISA limit would send a discouraging message to savers, who are sensibly trying to plan for the future and undermine a product that has stood the test of time.”
The chancellor is reportedly preparing to announce a review of cash ISA limits as part of her Mansion House speech next week.
While individual building society bosses have come out publicly to express their opposition to the move, the BSA letter is likely to be viewed with concern by Treasury officials.
The Nationwide is by far Britain’s biggest building society, with the likes of the Coventry, Yorkshire and Skipton also ranking among the sector’s largest players.
In the draft letter, which is likely to be signed by dozens of building society bosses, the BSA said the chancellor’s proposals “would make the whole ISA regime more complex and make it harder for people to transfer money between cash and investments”.
“Restricting Cash ISAs won’t encourage people to invest, as it won’t suddenly change their appetite to take on risk,” it said.
“We know that barriers to investing are primarily behavioural, therefore building confidence and awareness are far more important.”
The BSA called on Ms Reeves to back “a long-term consumer awareness and information campaign to educate people about the benefits of investing, alongside maintaining strong support for saving”.
“We therefore urge you to affirm your support for Cash ISAs by maintaining the current £20,000 limit.
“Preserving this threshold will enable households to continue building financial security while supporting broader economic stability and growth.”
The BSA declined to comment on Monday on the leaked letter, although one source said the final version was subject to revision.
The Treasury has so far refused to comment on its plans.