The King was booed by protesters as he left parliament after outlining Rishi Sunak’s agenda for the year ahead.
Tougher sentences for the country’s most serious offenders and a crackdown on grooming took centre stage in the first King’s Speech in decades.
The monarchstruck a personal note when he began his speech – the first by a king in more than 70 years – by acknowledging the “legacy of service and devotion to this country” shown by his “beloved mother, the late Queen”.
Reading out Prime Minister Sunak’s agenda for the upcoming year, the King said the Sentencing Bill would be brought forward to “increase the confidence of victims”.
Further measures would also be introduced to give police more powers to “prevent new and complex crimes” and child sexual abuse, he added.
Image: The King and Queen on their way to parliament
Image: The chamber of the House of Lords fills up ahead of the King’s Speech
Despite the emphasis on crime, there was no mention of the recent pro-Palestinian protests that have been taking place across the UK, and which Ms Braverman has described as “hate marches”.
Image: The King and Queen travel past anti-monarchy protesters
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:33
‘Not My King!’ protest
At 1,223 words, the King’s Speech was the longest by a monarch at a State Opening of Parliament since 2005.
It began when the King noted that the COVID pandemic and the war in Ukraine had created “significant long-term challenges for the United Kingdom”.
He said Mr Sunak’s government was focused on “increasing economic growth and safeguarding the health and security of the British people for generations to come”.
The King repeated the prime minister’s key pledge to bring down inflation, which currently stands at 6.7%, and said the government would support the Bank of England “in that goal” by taking “responsible decisions on spending and borrowing”.
Previously announced ambitions to create a “smoke-free generation”were raised, as the monarch said the government would restrict the sale of tobacco so that children currently aged 14 or younger can never be sold cigarettes.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
11:31
King’s Speech: In full
The King – a lifelong environmental campaigner – also confirmed Mr Sunak’s plans to grant new oil and gas licences “helping the country to transition to net zero by 2050 without adding undue burdens on households” in the Offshore Petroleum and Licensing Bill.
Elsewhere, he reaffirmed the prime minister’s plans to introduce an Advanced British Standard, a “new Baccalaureate-style qualification”for 16 to 19-year-olds that will combine and replace A-Levels and T-Levels, while also carrying out a crackdown on “poor quality” university degrees in favour of more young people taking high quality apprenticeships.
Turning to housing, the government will bring forward the Leasehold and Freehold Bill to make it easier and cheaper for leaseholders to purchase their freehold and, it is hoped, tackle the issue of punitive service charges.
The long-awaited Renters Reform Bill, under which no-fault evictions are set to be banned, is designed to increase security for renters – but it has come under criticism after Levelling Up Secretary Michael Gove said he would not enact the policy until courts have been reformed.
Concluding the speech, the King said: “My government will, in all respects, seek to make long-term decisions in the interests of future generations.
“My ministers will address inflation and the drivers of low growth over demands for greater spending or borrowing.
“My ministers will put the security of communities and the nation ahead of the rights of those who endanger it.
“By taking these long-term decisions, my government will change this country and build a better future.”
“Division and hate are on the rise. Discontent and disillusionment widespread.” What she meant: The Labour government has been a huge disappointment.
“The desire for change is impatient and palpable.” What she meant: You’ve had 16 months to deliver change – voters are saying, “Get on with it”.
“We have to offer hope, to offer the big change the country’s crying out for.” What she meant: Stop tinkering. Get more radical. You’ve got a huge Commons majority, after all.
“We must give a stronger sense of purpose, whose side we’re on and of our Labour values and beliefs.” What she meant: We’re not doing enough for working people or tackling inequality.
“People feel that this government is not being bold enough in delivering the kind of change we promised.” What she meant: Our voters are deserting us because they don’t see change.
“I’ll be a champion for all Labour values and boldness in everything we do.” What she meant: Watch out! I’m going to hound you and hold your feet to the fire!
“We won’t win by trying to out-Reform Reform, but by building a broad progressive consensus.” What she meant: Stop the lurch to the Right on immigration. We’re better than that.
“It starts with wrestling back the political megaphone and setting the agenda more strongly.” What she meant: We need to sharpen up our communication and selling our message.
“We’ve let Farage and his ilk run away with it.” What she meant: The Reform UK leader is running rings round us in communicating and campaigning. We’re too sluggish and flat-footed.
“For too long the country and the economy has worked in the interests of the few and not the many.” What she meant: Winter fuel payment cuts were a disaster and the two-child benefit cap has to go.
“Trickle down economics hasn’t worked.” What she meant: No more tax cuts for the rich. It’s time for a wealth tax, for example, to redistribute wealth.
“Life has just got harder and harder, less and less secure in work, in housing, in making ends meet.” What she meant: We’re failing to tackle the cost of living crisis and housing shortages.
“The deep-seated inequalities that have widened in wealth in regions in class in health need fundamentally redressing.” What she meant: We’re failing to look after our “red wall” voters.
“Re-unite our voter coalition and re-unite the country.” What she meant: Start governing for everyone, urban and rural, rich and poor, North and South. Stop neglecting poorer regions.
“We need to step up.” What she meant: For goodness sake, sort out the chaos in 10 Downing. Stop blaming aides and civil servants and sacking them. Get a grip!
Members and affiliates “don’t feel part of the conversation or party of the movement right now. And we have to change that.” What she meant: Stop ignoring and alienating activists, MPs and unions.
“Unity and loyalty comes from collective purpose, not from command and control.” What she meant: Stop the control freakery in parliament and party management. It’ll backfire.
“Debating, listening and hearing is not dissent. It’s all strength.” What she meant: Listen to your backbenchers and stop suspending them when they vote against policies like welfare cuts.
“As your deputy, my commitment is to change the culture.” What she meant: I’m going to stand up for rebels and critics and force you to ditch the control freakery and bad decisions.
“At the election 16 months ago the British people voted for change. I’m here to do everything I can to make that change a reality.” What she meant: Raise your game, or else!
She said it all with a smile, but there was menace there.
As deputy leader, Lucy Powell was always going to be a critical friend. So there you go, prime minister. Here’s 20 things you need to do for her to be more friend than critic.
Lucy Powell has been elected as the deputy leader of the Labour Party.
But who is she and what does she stand for?
Powell began her career in politics working for Labour MPs Glenda Jackson and Beverley Hughes.
She then worked for a pro-EU campaign group.
After that, she ran Ed Miliband’s successful Labour leadership campaign and was his deputy chief of staff until she was elected as the MP for Manchester Central in 2012.
She has been at the forefront of Labour politics for over a decade, serving under Ed Miliband, Jeremy Corbyn and Keir Starmer.
After Labour won the last general election, she was appointed as the leader of the House of Commons in Starmer’s cabinet.
But last month she was sacked in the cabinet reshuffle and came to be seen as the anti-Starmer candidate.
During the deputy leadership campaign, Powell promised to “provide a stronger, more independent voice” for members of the Labour Party.
And in her acceptance speech, she said the government hadn’t been bold enough, and that it needed to step up.
So how much of a problem is she going to be for Keir Starmer?
Her new role – and being outside the cabinet – means she will be free to criticise the government, which could make life more difficult for the prime minister.
Powell has been outspoken about her desire for the government to lift the two child benefit cap – and also called for the country to work for the many and not the few – a Corbyn-era slogan – and that Labour must stop handing the megaphone over to Reform and letting them run away with it.
Starmer will be conscious that an MP he sacked not long ago is now in a powerful role able to speak freely and attack his decisions.
But Powell is not free from her own controversies.
In May, Lucy Powell called grooming gangs a dog whistle issue – something she later had to clarify after it caused outrage among campaigners and opposition parties.
She also vocally defended Labour’s unpopular cut to winter fuel allowance while in cabinet, before the government then U-turned on the policy – she then criticised the proposed welfare cuts after she was sacked from government.
Powell insists she wants to help Keir Starmer, providing constructive criticism and a voice for Labour members.
The UK’s largest supermarkets are calling on the chancellor to exclude stores from a new business rates surtax, warning that shoppers will bear the brunt of higher prices.
Tesco, Sainsbury’s, Marks & Spencer, Waitrose, Morrisons, Asda, Aldi and Lidl are among the stores that have signed a letter addressed to Rachel Reeves, arguing that easing taxes on grocers would help curb food inflation.
Industry group the British Retail Consortium (BRC), which organised the letter, said large shops could face higher business rates if included in the government’s proposed surtax on properties valued at more than £500,000.
Smaller high street firms are expected to benefit from reduced business rates under the government’s plans.
“If the industry faces higher taxes in the coming Budget – such as being included in the new surtax on business rates – our ability to deliver value for our customers will become even more challenging, and it will be households who inevitably feel the impact,” the letter reads.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
4:17
Chancellor faces tough budget choices
“Large retail premises are a tiny proportion of all stores, yet account for a third of retail’s total business rates bill – meaning another significant rise could push food inflation even higher.”
The supermarkets are asking Ms Reeves to “address retail’s disproportionate tax burden”, saying that doing so would “send a strong signal of support for the industry and of the government’s commitment to tackling food inflation”.
More on Rachel Reeves
Related Topics:
The chancellor is widely expected to raise taxes after bleak economic forecasts and a string of reversals on welfare cuts, which have made it harder for her to stick to her borrowing limits.
Helen Dickinson, the BRC’s chief executive, said: “Supermarkets are doing everything possible to keep food prices affordable, but it’s an uphill battle, with over £7 billion in additional costs in 2025 alone.
“From higher national insurance contributions to new packaging taxes, the financial strain on the industry is immense.”