Connect with us

Published

on

After the debacle of Liz Truss’s September mini-budget, with all its mega ramifications, and an autumn statement eight weeks later that performed an about-turn so big that the country’s tax burden hit a 70-year-high, Wednesday’s budget will be all about stability and sticking to the plan.

“No big bangs in this budget,” is how one senior government insider put it to me last week. “It’s got to be a growth budget.

“We’re fighting to be competitive again with Labour. If we can get to next summer and the economy is ticking up, and we can narrow the gap to five to eight points behind in the polls, there’s a chance in an election campaign we can shift the dial.”

Tax cuts, I’m told, will have to wait.

Politics live: Date confirmed for Johnson to face partygate inquiry

What the chancellor and prime minister want to project this week is the sense that they are getting the economy back on track, and working towards Rishi Sunak’s pledges to halve inflation, get debt down and get the UK economy growing again.

Do that, argue his allies, and the tax cuts will come – just in time for a general election.

More on Budget

But there is pressure, and lots of it, from voters and from the Tory backbenchers to do more on tax cuts and cost-of-living now, not tomorrow.

And that pressure is all the more palpable after the chancellor received a £30bn windfall in the public finances last month, after it emerged that in the year to January, the public sector had borrowed less than forecast in November by the UK’s official fiscal watchdog.

Budget promo tomorrow

Floating voters we spoke to in a focus group in one Tory shire seat last week told us that struggling with the cost-of-living and a buckling NHS were top of their concerns, and they expressed scepticism that the government was up to the job.

One voter in the Wycombe constituency in Buckinghamshire described the government as “stale”, with another telling us: “The current crisis emphasises that our government is fairly broken.”

On the cost-of-living, our group of floating voters spoke of their anxiety around energy bills, food prices and childcare.

Charlotte, a working mum, told us she had to change her working hours because she couldn’t afford childcare costs.

“I can’t afford to work full time anymore,” she told us. “It’s not feasible for our family, so I’ve had to rope my mum in to do childcare.

“I wouldn’t say we’re a low earning family. That’s just the way it is now.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Voters talk about their priorities with our political editor Beth Rigby.

Food bills were also a concern, with voters saying they’d switched to cheaper supermarkets and cut back in the face of galloping food price inflation.

Ashley, who in the past has voted Conservative but is now undecided, told us he’d switched his weekly shop from Tesco and M&S to Aldi, while energy bills were a problem all round.

“I’ve voted Conservative a long time,” the father-of-two told us. “And then I got a bit tired of, you know, Boris and the promises.

“We need to have some results and I want to see some improvement, not the deflection bit around immigration, [but] some real positive on the cost of living. For me, that’s the most key…it’s what’s important to people.”

Short and long term plans

The Treasury is alive to the pressure, with insiders telling me there will be two parts to Mr Hunt’s budget on Wednesday: a short-term support plan to provide immediate relief on the cost-of-living crisis and then the long-term plan for growth.

On the first part of that, the government is expected to extend the £2,500 energy price guarantee for another three months from April (where there had been a planned rise to £3,000) to give people support on their bills.

The chancellor is also under pressure to again freeze fuel taxes in this budget, at a cost of £6bn.

When it comes to childcare, the chancellor is expected to change rules so that parents on Universal Credit are given more money for childcare and given the funding upfront.

The Treasury is also believed to be planning a cash injection of hundreds of millions into increasing the availability of the 30 hours of free childcare to three to four-year-olds.

Mr Hunt also plans to loosen staff-to-child ratios for two-year-olds, which could make the cost of childcare a little cheaper.

But anything really big bang on childcare, such as extending 30 hours of free childcare to one-and two-year-olds, is unlikely – that policy would cost around £6bn.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

These are some predictions for the budget.

And when it comes to the most obvious way of helping people manage their bills – wage packets – the government is standing firm, with Treasury insiders insisting there will be no above inflation pay sector awards.

Neither is the chancellor expected to offer voters any cuts to personal taxes.

“We haven’t got £30bn to cut taxes,” is how one government insider put it to me, in a nod to the boost from revised public finances.

“What we’ve got to do is get people back into work, be that through better childcare support or incentives to get those in their 50s back into work.

“That is where we have to focus policy, and that could amount to say £5bn and that comes out of the [£30bn] headroom.”

Because beyond the short-term support measures, the focus for this budget will be on trying to get the economy moving and getting people back to work post-pandemic, with a package of measures to try to shift parents, the sick, disabled and older workers back into jobs.

To that end, the chancellor is expected to raise the lifetime allowance for pension savings from £1m to an expected £1.8m – a record level – in order to try to incentivise doctors and other professionals out of retirement and back into work.

He could also lift the annual tax-free allowance for pensions from £40,000 to £60,000.

It’s a package that could cost £2bn a year and would be much welcomed by higher earners, but also opens the chancellor up to criticism that he is giving a tax break to the rich while offering nothing to basic rate taxpayers.

Read more:
What to look out for in Hunt’s first budget

And when it comes to the other group of voters the chancellor and PM need to placate, his backbenchers, there is disquiet over the high level of tax burden, with many Tory MPs keen for tax cuts.

One former cabinet minister told me last week that they wanted to see the £30bn windfall in the public finances used to reverse the planned increase in corporation tax from 19p to 25p in April.

It is a pretty popular refrain.

But Treasury insiders insist the tax hike will go ahead and instead the chancellor will offer business tax breaks to try to encourage growth.

When Mr Sunak was chancellor back in March 2021, he created the £25bn “super-deduction” tax allowance for capital investment – a two-year measure offering 130% tax relief on companies’ purchases of equipment – in order to try to boost investment and growth.

Mr Hunt is coming up with a new set of plans to try to support business and could give firms much more generous capital allowances to incentivise investment.

Watch too for policies and reforms targeting certain industries and sectors, from artificial intelligence to green energy and advanced manufacturing: all of it will be framed as the government’s long-term plan for growth.

 Prime Minister Rishi Sunak (left) and Chancellor of the Exchequer Jeremy Hunt during Prime Minister's Questions in the House of Commons
Image:
Rishi Sunak and Jeremy Hunt will be hoping to reassure people they are making the right choices for the UK economy.

Wednesday will be, if you like, the third act of the prime minister’s performance over the past few weeks to try and win a jaded public back around by trying to convince them he will stick to his plan and deliver on promises.

On the international stage, he has rehabilitated the UK with allies after the bumpy years of Prime Minister Johnson and then Prime Minister Truss, symbolised most strongly in a deal with the EU over post-Brexit trading arrangements in Northern Ireland – where even his foes conceded Mr Sunak had got more than they expected.

At home, the PM has put forward his plan to “stop the boats” – a key priority of many of the voters he needs to keep onside or win back in 2024.

Whether the plan, surrounded in legal and practical controversies, will come off remains to be seen.

But Mr Sunak will at least be able, to quote one of his allies, “build a narrative” that blames the failure of the policy around France and the EU refusing to grant the UK a returns agreement and the international courts blocking his plans.

“At least he can then make the argument it wasn’t his fault,” they said.

Narrow path back

On Wednesday, the focus will be on the PM’s three economic targets – halving inflation, cutting debt and growing the economy – as the chancellor tries to lay down the best conditions he can for the Conservatives’ run into the general election in 2024.

Mr Sunak’s allies tell me they think there is a way back to victory for this government at the ballot box once again, but the “path is very narrow”.

A budget then building the foundations rather than lighting the fireworks, all of this the groundwork for the pre-election showstopper next year.

But with the cost-of-living squeeze so acute, the promise of jam tomorrow is unlikely to satisfy the public, particularly if those being given some of the spoils this time around look to be business and the wealthy.

Mr Hunt may be charged with steadying the ship, but he’ll have to be skilful on Wednesday not to lose more ground.

Continue Reading

World

Inside one of Syria’s most feared places – where scale of Assad regime’s brutality is revealed

Published

on

By

Continue Reading

World

Israeli PM says Gaza ceasefire ‘will be terminated’ if hostages are not returned by Hamas on Saturday

Published

on

By

Israeli PM says Gaza ceasefire 'will be terminated' if hostages are not returned by Hamas on Saturday

The Gaza ceasefire will end if Hamas does not return Israeli hostages by midday on Saturday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said. 

He warned of a return to “intense fighting” if the hostages are not released.

Hamas said on Monday it would postpone the scheduled release of Israeli hostages, accusing Israel of violating the terms of the ceasefire agreement.

Mr Netanyahu made the announcement after an “in-depth four-hour discussion in the political-security cabinet”.

He said the cabinet “all expressed outrage at the shocking situation of our three hostages who were released last Saturday”.

Mr Netanyahu said they passed a unanimous agreement: “If Hamas does not return our hostages by Saturday noon – the ceasefire will be terminated, and the IDF will return to intense fighting until Hamas is finally defeated.”

Donald Trump has emboldened Israel to call for the release of remaining hostages, rather than the three scheduled to be freed in the next exchange.

Mr Netanyahu said the cabinet “welcomed” Mr Trump’s demand for hostages to be released by midday Saturday, “and we all also welcomed the president’s revolutionary vision for the future of Gaza”.

This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.

Please refresh the page for the fullest version.

You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow us on WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.

Continue Reading

World

Russian oil under attack as Ukraine targets fuel used by Vladimir Putin’s military

Published

on

By

Russian oil under attack as Ukraine targets fuel used by Vladimir Putin's military

Ukraine has ramped up long-range drone strikes into Russia, targeting oil facilities that fuel warplanes, ships and military vehicles as well as oil refineries that help power the economy.

An increase in the intensity of the attacks appears to have started in December, continued through the whole of January and is still being maintained into February, according to analysis of drone strikes confirmed by the Ukrainian armed forces and security services.

Other attacks have also been reported but not officially acknowledged by Kyiv.

A Ukrainian intelligence source said Ukraine has “significantly increased” the production of drones to attack Russia as well as improving their accuracy and range. “This increase will continue,” they said.

War latest: Trump says Ukraine ‘may be Russian someday’

Preventing Russian oil from powering Vladimir Putin‘s war machine was an important goal, according to the source, who asked to speak anonymously for security reasons.

“If this oil has not reached the combat zone, it is definitely a successful operation, and we will continue to strike,” the source said.

A Western security source said that the strikes were also aimed at reducing Russia’s ability to export oil, amplifying the impact of Western sanctions against Russian energy and increasing the cost for the Russian president of conducting his war against Ukraine.

Asked about the drone strikes, Andriy Yermak, the head of Volodymyr Zelenskyy‘s presidential office, told Sky News: “The only way to force Russia into peace is through strength. And that is crucial for the safety of people everywhere.

“For this reason, Ukraine will continue increasing strikes on Russian military targets – warehouses, factories, and airfields.”

Image:
One of Ukraine’s tactics has been to hit the same oil facility twice in a short space of time

Tracking the tempo of drone strikes

Sky News’ Data and Forensic Unit tracked the tempo of Ukrainian drone strikes against Russian oil depots and other facilities linked to oil production over the past three months.

The analysis shows a clear rise in the number of strikes and an apparent increase in Ukraine’s drone capability, with unmanned aircraft – operated by a combination of specialist units – hitting targets hundreds of miles into Russian territory in defiance of air defences.

Images released by the Ukrainian General Staff to accompany various announcements purport to show fires blazing into the night sky in the wake of the different strikes.

In November, the Ukrainian armed forces publicly claimed to have carried out just two attacks linked to oil sites and two more against military targets, all inside Russia. The following month, that number rose to four confirmed drone operations against oil-related targets and a fifth against a military facility.

In January, however, the Ukrainian military publicly claimed responsibility for 13 strikes against oil-linked facilities across Russia and another attack against a microelectronics plant.

There have already been another four strikes on Russian oil facilities so far this month – including an oil depot in Krasnodar Krai seen on fire last week.

Three of January’s oil targets were each hit twice – seemingly a tactic to inflict greater damage.

Ryazan attack

One of the most significant double attacks was against an oil refinery in the central Russian region of Ryazan – more than 300 miles from the Ukrainian border.

It is one of the four largest refineries in Russia and produces fuel for military equipment, including jet fuel, diesel fuel and other petroleum products for tanks, aircraft, and ships.

Ukraine said its drones struck the site on the night of 24 January and again overnight on 25 January. The video below shows the plant on fire after the first attack.

“Combat work on… important objects involved in securing the army of Russian aggressors will continue,” the Ukrainian military said in a Facebook post at the time. The attacks reportedly forced the refinery – which accounts for about 5% of Russia’s total refining output – to suspend operations.

Kristall attack

Another target deemed important enough to strike twice was the Kristall oil depot. It provides fuel to the airbase where Russia’s strategic bomber fleet is located in the city of Engels, almost 400 miles from the Ukrainian border.

Ukrainian drones first struck the site on 8 January, triggering a fire that burnt for five days – at which point the depot was hit again.

Satellite imagery from before and after the operations reveal what appears to be damage to a number of white storage tanks, with some quite heavily impacted and others partially burnt.

Damage against oil facilities creates “serious logistical problems for Russian occupiers’ strategic aviation and significantly reduces their ability to strike peaceful Ukrainian cities and civilian objects”, Ukraine’s military said in a Facebook post.

Liskinska attack

The third double strike in January occurred against the Liskinska oil depot in the Voronezh region of western Russia, which the Ukrainian military said is also used to provide fuel for Russian military operations.

The first attack happened overnight on 16 January. “A large-scale fire broke out at the facility. It is known that the oil base stored fuel, which, in particular, was used to provide the needs of the Russian occupation army,” Ukraine’s military said in another Facebook post.

The military’s General Staff also posts about its attacks on the social media site X, previously known as Twitter. The depot was hit again on 21 January. Before and after satellite imagery shows clear fire damage to oil infrastructure.

There has been no let up in the tempo of Ukrainian strikes on Russian oil targets into February – with a fourth location also hit twice.

Volgograd attack

The initial strike happened at the end of January, with drones targeting the Lukoil-Volgograd oil refinery in Russia’s Volgograd region – one of the country’s 10 largest refineries, which is also a key supplier to the Russian armed forces.

Volgograd is in southwestern Russia, more than 200 miles from the Ukrainian border.

“Flashes and explosions have been recorded in the area of this plant that is important to occupants,” Ukraine’s General Staff said in a Facebook post. The military reported a second strike on the site on 3 February.

Read more from Sky News:
Trump issues Gaza ultimatum to Hamas
Post-mortem results reveal injuries of Britons found dead in France

Despite Ukraine’s success at striking deep into Russia, analysts appear divided for now about the impact of the operation.

Russian aviation sector ‘struggling’

Isaac Levy, an analyst at the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air, said the Ukrainian attacks were pushing up domestic fuel prices and affecting the armed forces.

“The Russian aviation sector is struggling to attain enough of its oil products used to fly those bomber jets that drop missiles back on Ukraine, so that is creating an issue for the Russian military,” he said.

However, Clay Seigle, a senior fellow at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, said the overall economic effect has so far been muted.

“The Ukrainian, drone systems have a very long range, and they also have very impressive precision guidance,” he said. “The thing that they’re lacking, though, is the military-grade explosive power that would put real damage to those refinery units.”

Continue Reading

Trending