Connect with us

Published

on

A species goes extinct when there are none of its kind left. In other words, extinction is about small numbers, so how does big data help us study extinction? Luckily for us, each individual of a species carries with it signatures of its past, information on how connected/ isolated it is today, and other information on what may predict its future, in its genome. The last fifteen years have witnessed a major change in how we can read genomes, and information from genomes of individuals and species can help better plan their conservation. 

All life on Earth harbours genetic material. Often called the blueprint of life, this genetic material could be DNA or RNA. We all know what DNA is, but another way to think of DNA is as data. All mammals, for example harbour between 2 to 3.5 billion bits of data in every one of their cells. The entire string of DNA data is called the whole genome. Recent changes in technology allow us to read whole genomes. We read short 151 letter long information bits many, many times, and piece together the whole genome by comparing it to a known reference. This helps us figure out where each of these 151 letter long pieces go in the 3 billion letter long word. Once we have read each position on an average of 10 or 20 times, we can be confident about it. If each genome is sequenced even ten times and only ten individuals are sampled, for mammals each dataset would consist of 200 to 350 billion bits of data!

Over time, the genome changes because of mutation, or spelling errors that creep in. Such spelling errors create variation, or differences between individual genomes in a population (a set of animals or plants). Similarly, large populations with many individuals will hold a variety of spellings or high genetic variation. Since DNA is the genetic blueprint, changes in the environment can also get reflected in these DNA spellings, with individuals with certain words in their genome surviving better than others under certain conditions. Changes in population size often changes the variety of letters observed at a specific location in the genome, or variation at a specific genomic position. Migration or movement of animals into a population adds new letters and variation. Taking all these together, the history of a population can be understood by comparing the DNA sequences of individuals. The challenge lies in the fact that every population faces all of these effects: changes in population size, environmental selection, migration and mutation, all at once, and it is difficult to separate the effects of different factors. Here, the big data comes to the rescue.

genome wildlife concept genomics

Photo Credit: Dr Anubhab Khan

Genomic data has allowed us to understand how a population has been affected by changes in climate, and whether it has the necessary genomic variation to survive in the face of ongoing climate change. Or how specific human activities have impacted a population in the past. We can understand more about the origins of a population. How susceptible is a population to certain infections? Or whether the individuals in a population are related to each other. Some of these large datasets have helped identify if certain populations are identical and should be managed together or separately. All of these questions help in the management and conservation of a population.

We have worked on such big genomic datasets for tigers, and our research has helped us identify which populations of tigers have high genomic variation and are more connected to other populations. We have identified populations that are small and have low genomic variation, but also seem to have mis-spelled or badly spelled words, or a propensity of ‘bad’ mutations. We have identified unknown relationships between individuals within populations and have suggested strategies that could allow these isolated populations to recover their genomic variation. It has been amazing to peek into animals lives through these big data approaches, and we hope these types of genomic dataset will contribute to understanding how biodiversity can continue to survive on this Earth.


Uma Ramakrishnan is fascinated by unravelling the mysteries of nature using DNA as tool. Along with her lab colleagues, she has spent the last fifteen years studying endangered species in India.She hopes such understanding will contribute to their conservation. Uma is a professor at the National Centre for Biological Sciences.

Dr. Anubhab Khan is a wildlife genomics expert. He has researching genetics of small isolated populations for past several years and has created and analyzed large scale genome sequencing data of tigers, elephants and small cats among others. He keen about population genetics, wildlife conservation and genome sequencing technologies. He is passionate about ending technology disparity in the world by either making advanced technologies and expertise available or by developing techniques that are affordable and accessible to all.

This series is an initiative by the Nature Conservation Foundation (NCF), under their programme ‘Nature Communications’ to encourage nature content in all Indian languages. To know more about birds and nature, Join The Flock


Interested in cryptocurrency? We discuss all things crypto with WazirX CEO Nischal Shetty and WeekendInvesting founder Alok Jain on Orbital, the Gadgets 360 podcast. Orbital is available on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music and wherever you get your podcasts.

Continue Reading

Science

ESA’s Solar Orbiter Unveils First View of the Sun’s Mysterious South Pole

Published

on

By

ESA’s Solar Orbiter Unveils First View of the Sun’s Mysterious South Pole

The European Space Agency has released an image showing the south pole of the Sun. This image was taken on March 23, 2025, but was revealed yesterday on June 11, 2025. These new images from the Solar Orbiter spacecraft show a view of the Sun that has never been recorded before. Solar Orbiter spent its last months tilting its orbit to 17 degrees underneath the solar equator, bringing the elusive south pole to view, which could never be done before.

Images Found had Visible UV Wavelengths

Carolle Mundell, the director of Science, told Live Science that today, we reveal the first ever views of the Sun’s pole by humankind. The new images caught the solar pole in broader, visible and ultraviolet wavelengths, with the help of three of the Solar Orbiter’s 10 instruments. These caught colourful confetti of the Sun’s data, with fathomable tangles of its magnetic field. It flips with high velocity movement of chemicals and makes up the solar wind.

Flips of the Magnetic Field Due to Solar Activity

According to ESA, these data will provide an understanding of the solar wind, space weather and the 11-year activity of the Sun. Through the measurement of the Solar Orbiter’s Polarimetric and Helioseismic Imager instrument, the Sun can be seen as throwing out flares in overdrive during the period of peak activity.

This mess of magnetic fields is temporary and flips after every 11 years. This signifies the end of the maximum solar activity and the beginning of the transition towards the relative calm of the next solar minimum. Further, after five to six years, when the solar minimum begins, the Sun’s poles show only one type of magnetic polarity.

First Step towards the Sun

With the coming years, there will be many stances for the Solar Orbiter to test further. Through the little help of the gravitational pull of Venus, it will tilt its orbit again from the solar equator to 24 degrees in December 2026, 33 degrees in June 2029. This will help us know the Sun from different regions and, in turn, know about the magnetic field, solar wind and activity.

For the latest tech news and reviews, follow Gadgets 360 on X, Facebook, WhatsApp, Threads and Google News. For the latest videos on gadgets and tech, subscribe to our YouTube channel. If you want to know everything about top influencers, follow our in-house Who’sThat360 on Instagram and YouTube.


Realme Narzo 80 Lite 5G India Launch Date Set for June 16



Poco F7 With Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SoC Surfaces on Geekbench After Company Hints at Imminent Launch

Continue Reading

Science

Hubble Finds Cosmic Dust Coating Uranus’ Moons, Not Radiation Scars

Published

on

By

Hubble Finds Cosmic Dust Coating Uranus’ Moons, Not Radiation Scars

The latest Hubble Space Telescope observations reveal a twist in the story of Uranus’s moons. Rather than the expected radiation “sunburn,” the moons Ariel, Umbriel, Titania and Oberon seem to be literally gathering cosmic dust. It turns out the planet’s odd tilt isn’t scorching their backsides as predicted, but coating the front ends of the two outer moons in a kind of space-grime instead. This result has astronomers scratching their heads, because it’s just the opposite of what they expected under Uranus’s warped magnetic field.

Dust, Not Radiation

According to the data from NASA’s Voyager 2 flyby in 1986 and decades of modelling, scientists assumed Uranus’s sideways spin meant its magnetic field blasted each moon’s trailing side (the “back window”) with charged particles, darkening it. The rear halves were expected to look dull and dark. Instead, Hubble’s ultraviolet data tell a different story: Titania and Oberon (the distant pair) are actually darker on their leading faces – the opposite of what that radiation hypothesis predicted. In other words, the effect isn’t radiation damage at all. Instead, it looks like Uranus’s magnetosphere largely misses these moons.

A Cosmic Windshield Effect

Space dust kicked up by Uranus’s far-flung irregular moons. Micrometeorites constantly pummel those distant satellites, flinging tiny grit inward over millions of years. Titania and Oberon plow through this dust cloud, collecting debris on their forward sides just like bugs on a car’s windshield. This cosmic “bug splatter” coats their leading faces with a slightly darker, reddish tint.

Meanwhile, Ariel and Umbriel ride in the dust shadows of their bigger siblings and look about the same brightness on both sides. Uranus’s big moons have gone through a slow-motion cosmic car wash, dusting their fronts instead of catching a UV burn. In other words, a dusty windshield — not radiation — is painting these moons. It’s a reminder that space can surprise us, sometimes with nothing more exotic than plain old dust.

Continue Reading

Science

New Theory Challenges Black Hole Singularities, But Critics Raise Red Flags

Published

on

By

New Theory Challenges Black Hole Singularities, But Critics Raise Red Flags

A recent effort to do away with singularities — the infinitely dense points believed to be at the heart of black holes — has reignited debate among physicists. Now, a team led by Robie Hennigar of Durham University suggests a new model that has gravity undergoing a different type of behaviour at the extreme limits and replaces the singularity of the black hole with a small, compact core that always remains static and very strongly curved. The modified Einstein’s equations, representing general relativity, have been generalised, and higher-dimensional effects are incorporated. Although the discoveries garnered attention for perhaps explaining a fundamental cosmic paradox, critics have mentioned that the model has no experimental underpinning and is based on overly speculative mathematical concepts.

Critics Challenge 5D Gravity Theory Aimed at Replacing Black Hole Singularities Without Evidence

As per a Space.com report, Hennigar’s theory introduces modified gravity in five dimensions, which some scientists argue goes beyond what current observations allow. Nikodem Poplawski, a physicist at the University of New Haven in Connecticut, pointed out three things that stood out to him: there is no experimental evidence for extra dimensions, the current study only assumes a static black hole interior, and the model uses an infinite series of mathematical terms that don’t have any physical justification.

Poplawski stressed that changing general relativity without experimental evidence makes the model more of a theoretical curiosity than a real physical theory. He also highlighted the fact that black hole interiors, according to conventional field equations, should not be static. He further stated that just changing equations to get rid of singularities doesn’t fix the physics behind them; it can only hide it behind complicated mathematics.

Hennigar’s team used modified gravity to deal with the singularity, but scientists say that general relativity and quantum mechanics should be combined. The problems with string theory, however, include features such as dimensions that have never been fixed and supersymmetric particles that have never been detected.

Poplawski concurs that investigating mathematics may be fruitful and also hopes that bold ideas, such as the notion that black holes spawn new universes, may prove profitable in the future.

Continue Reading

Trending