Connect with us

Published

on

A parliamentary committee looking into the Greensill saga has found that lobbying rules were “insufficient” and need to be strengthened

The Commons Treasury committee, which looked into David Cameron’s involvement in trying to secure finance firm Greensill Capital access to a government coronavirus support scheme, said the rules should be tightened to prevent any more scandals from occurring.

Mr Cameron sent many calls, texts and emails to ministers in an attempt to gain financial assistance for the bank which has since collapsed.

FILE PHOTO: The logo of Greensill Bank is pictured in downtown Bremen, Germany, July 3, 2019. REUTERS/Fabian Bimmer/File Photo
Image:
Greensill Bank filed for insolvency in March

His actions were deemed lawful under the current rules regarding lobbying which the committee said has created the “strong case” for them to be hardened.

MPs on the committee added that the Treasury was right to reject Greensill’s offer, but were critical of the department’s failure to encourage Mr Cameron to “more formal methods of communication”.

They add that his use of calls and texts “showed a significant lack of judgement on his part, especially as his ability to use an informal approach was aided by his previous position of prime minister”.

“We accept that Mr Cameron did not break the rules governing lobbying by former ministers, but that reflects on the insufficient strength of the rules, and there is a strong case for strengthening them,” said their Lessons from Greensill Capital report published on Tuesday.

More on Coronavirus

MPs also called on the Treasury to reflect on the “number of lessons” that have arisen from the incident.

Formal processes to deal with lobbying attempt by ex-prime ministers or minister should be put in place and published in the future, they add.

Chancellor of the Exchequer Rishi Sunak after delivering his 'Mansion House' speech at the Financial and Professional Services Address, previously known as the Bankers dinner, at Mansion House in the City of London. Picture date: Thursday July 1, 2021.
Image:
The Treasury Committee report says the department should have encouraged Mr Cameron to use more ‘formal’ methods of communication

“We are very surprised about this, given that Mr Cameron was an ex-prime minister, who had worked with those he was lobbying, had access to their mobile phone numbers, and appears to have been able to negotiate who should attend meetings,” the committee’s report said.

“The Treasury’s unwillingness to accept that it could have made any better choices at all in how it engaged in this case is a missed opportunity for reflection.”

Conservative Chairman of the Treasury Select Committee Mel Stride said: “Our report sets out important lessons for the Treasury and our financial system resulting from both Greensill Capital’s collapse and David Cameron’s lobbying.

“The Treasury should have encouraged David Cameron into more formal lines of communication as soon as it had identified his personal financial incentives.

“However, the Treasury took the right decision to reject the objectives of his lobbying, and the committee found that Treasury ministers and officials behaved with complete and absolute integrity.

“We look forward to the conclusions of the other inquiries on the collapse of Greensill Capital, and will continue to follow developments closely.”

In a statement, Mr Cameron said he “always acted in good faith” but that he accepts communications should be done “through only the most formal of channels”.

‘While I am pleased that the report confirms I broke no rules, I very much take on board its wider points,” he said.

“I always acted in good faith, and had no idea until the end of last year that Greensill Capital was in danger of failure.

“However, I have been clear all along that there are lessons to be learnt. As I said to the committee, I accept that communications of this nature should be done in future through only the most formal of channels.

“I agree that the guidance on how former ministers engage with government could be updated and was pleased to provide some suggestions on this to the committee.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Rachel Reeves is about to make huge spending decisions – these could be the winners and losers

Published

on

By

Rachel Reeves is about to make huge spending decisions - these could be the winners and losers

A week today, Rachel Reeves presents the spending review; how the budget is divided between government departments between 2026 and 2029 – the bulk of this parliament. 

It’s a foundational moment for this government – and a key to determining the success of this administration.

UK exempt from Trump’s latest tariff hike: politics latest

So, what’s going to happen?

The chancellor did boost spending significantly in her first year, and this year there was a modest rise.

For 0600 Coates piece

However, the uplift to day-to-day spending in the years ahead is more modest – and pared back further in March’s spring statement because of adverse financial conditions.

Plus, where will the £113bn of capital – project – spending go?

So, we’ve done a novel experiment.

We’ve taken Treasury documents, ministerial statements and reports from the Institute for Fiscal Studies.

We put them all into AI – into the deep research function of ChatGPT – and asked it to write the spending review, calculate the winners and losers and work out what goes where, and why.

For 0600 Coates piece

It comes with a health warning. We’re using experimental technology that is sometimes wrong, and while ChatGPT can access up-to-date data from across the web, it’s only trained on information up to October 2023.

There are no answers because discussions are still going on. Think of it like a polling projection – clues about the big picture as things move underneath.

But, critically, the story it tells tallies with the narrative I’m hearing from inside government too.

The winners? Defence, health and transport, with Angela Rayner’s housing department up as well.

Everywhere else is down, compared with this year’s spending settlement.

For 0600 Coates piece

The Home Office, justice, culture, and business – facing real terms squeezes from here on in.

The aid budget from the Foreign Office, slashed – the Ministry of Defence the beneficiary. You heard about that this week.

Health – a Labour priority. I heard from sources a settlement of around 3%. This AI model puts it just above.

Transport – a surprise winner. Rachel Reeves thinks this is where her capital budget should go. Projects in the north to help hold voters who live there.

But, could this spell trouble?

More from Sky News:
Who is the public’s favourite minister?

Chancellor threatens to sue Abramovich

Bridget Phillipson leaves 10 Downing Street.
Pic: PA
Image:
Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson will not be happy with ChatGPT’s suggestion for her department. Pic: PA

Education – down overall. Now this government will protect the schools budget. It will say ‘per pupil’ funding is up. But adult education is at risk. Is this where they find the savings?

So much else – Home Office down, but is that because asylum costs are going down.

Energy – they’re haggling over solar panels versus home insulation.

Justice should get what it wants, I am told. This isn’t about exact percentages. But you can see across lots of departments – things are tight.

Even though Rachel Reeves has already set the budgets for last year and this, and only needs to decide spending allocations from 2026 onwards, the graphs the Treasury will produce next week compare what will be spent to the last set of Tory plans.

This means their graphs will include the big spending increases they made last year – and flatter them more.

They’ll say that’s fair enough, others will disagree. But in the end, will it be enough for public services?

Continue Reading

Politics

Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election: Who are the candidates?

Published

on

By

Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election: Who are the candidates?

Voters in South Lanarkshire will go to the polls on Thursday to elect a new MSP for Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse.

The by-election comes following the death of SNP government minister Christina McKelvie.

The contest takes place less than a year before the Scottish parliament election, with the result potentially offering a snapshot of how the political landscape north of the border will look in 2026.

The SNP will be seeking to hold on to the seat, given the heavy losses to Labour at last year’s UK general election.

However, all eyes are on Reform UK and whether it will enjoy a “tartan bounce” following the party’s recent slew of local election wins in England.

Campaigning has been heated, with Reform UK accused of running a “racist” ad on Facebook against Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar.

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has continued to double down, accusing his rival of “sectarian politics”.

More on Conservatives

In response, the Scottish Labour MSP has branded Mr Farage a “poisonous little man” and “chief clown”, while SNP leader and First Minister John Swinney said: “He poses a threat to our values and must be stopped.”

But who will come out on top following Thursday’s vote?

Here are the candidates vying for support:

Collette Bradley, Scottish Socialist Party

Collette Bradley, Scottish Socialist Party. Pic: Scottish Socialist Party
Image:
Collette Bradley, Scottish Socialist Party. Pic: Scottish Socialist Party

Scottish Socialist Party candidate Collette Bradley told Sky News that locals she has met while out campaigning have been angry about “poverty, inequality and Labour’s attacks on welfare, our NHS and services”.

She added: “They have little faith in Labour or the SNP delivering change.

“We’ve offered hope with our unique policy of a socialist MSP who’ll remain on the average worker’s wage, keeping us firmly in step with constituents’ living conditions – we alone reject the corrupting influence of the £75,000 MSP salary.

“We’re offering concrete socialist alternatives to the miserable status quo – redistribution of wealth from the millionaires to the millions via progressive taxation.”

Ms Bradley said the party stands for a society built around the “needs of people, not profit”.

She added: “Ordinary lives can be transformed with measures like a £15-an-hour minimum wage; free public transport; and investment in jobs, wages, quality council housing, NHS, education, welfare and pensions.

“We urge voters to reject the continued failure of the political mainstream and be bolder in their demands by voting Scottish Socialist.”

Andy Brady, Scottish Family Party

Andy Brady, Scottish Family Party. Pic: Scottish Family Party
Image:
Andy Brady, Scottish Family Party. Pic: Scottish Family Party

Candidate Andy Brady told Sky News that Scottish Family Party policies and principles are “built upon honesty, integrity and a passion to see real change in our nation”.

He said: “My time spent speaking to the locals over the past several weeks has revealed a common response – people are fed up being let down.”

Mr Brady said there had been “failed promises” to help local businesses, to repair the roads, and to bring life to the town centres and high streets.

He said: “The general feeling is that communities are feeling jaded and frustrated.”

Urging voters to back the Scottish Family Party, he added: “We value the families, businesses and the education of our local communities and if we can support them, communities will flourish.”

Ross Lambie, Reform UK

Ross Lambie, Reform UK. Pic: Reform UK
Image:
Ross Lambie, Reform UK. Pic: Reform UK

South Lanarkshire councillor Ross Lambie is hoping to bring Reform UK’s “turquoise tide” to Scotland.

If Mr Farage’s party wins, it will put Scotland’s first minister on notice ahead of Holyrood 2026.

Mr Lambie, who defected from the Scottish Conservatives, told Sky News: “It’s been refreshing spending the past five or so weeks out on the doors in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse.

“What’s been very clear is that people everywhere are fed up, angry and scunnered with the entire Scottish political establishment.

“They’re fed up with SNP, Tory and Labour lies and are looking for hope.

Reform UK is offering people a chance of real and radical change by cutting tax, scrapping net zero, ending wokery and fighting for common sense.

“This is now a clear fight between the SNP and Reform – it’s that simple.”

Katy Loudon, Scottish National Party

Katy Loudon, Scottish National Party. Pic: SNP
Image:
Katy Loudon, Scottish National Party. Pic: SNP

South Lanarkshire councillor Katy Loudon is hoping to retain the seat for the SNP.

The former teacher told Sky News she had been speaking to people across the region “about what matters to them”.

She said: “People understandably feel let down by Labour.”

Ms Loudon highlighted the UK government’s axing of the universal winter fuel payment, which led to the Scottish government following suit before a partial U-turn.

Scottish Labour-run South Lanarkshire Council also intends to reduce its school transport provision, which Ms Loudon said will affect thousands of children.

SNP leader and First Minister John Swinney and SNP candidate Katy Loudon with Grace Ure, aged 2, during a visit to Juniors Charity in Hamilt
Image:
Ms Loudon and SNP leader John Swinney on the campaign trail in Hamilton. Pic: PA

She added: “The Labour Party has lost its way, Farage is on the rise as a result. With an invisible candidate, they’ve totally given up in this by-election.

“Meanwhile, the SNP is focusing on what matters to people and taking action to make things better – with record investment in our NHS, bringing back the winter fuel payment, scrapping peak rail fares and ending Labour’s two-child cap.

“Labour know they can’t win. Only the SNP can beat Farage on 5 June.”

Janice MacKay, UK Independence Party

Janice MacKay, UK Independence Party. Pic: UKIP
Image:
Janice MacKay, UK Independence Party. Pic: UKIP

UKIP candidate Janice MacKay told Sky News that her party would abolish the Scottish parliament if given the opportunity.

Speaking of “widespread disillusionment” amongst voters, she added: “UKIP offer something different.

“We wish to radically reduce the number of inadequate politicians in Scotland by abolishing altogether the Holyrood parliament.

“It is merely a glorified and expensive form of local authority. To that end, it is unnecessary.”

Ms MacKay believes the nation’s 32 local authorities should be given “strengthened powers”, with Westminster making the “main decisions” affecting the UK.

Ms MacKay added: “Were UKIP to win any seats in the Holyrood talking shop, we should donate 40% of our MSP salary to a Scottish veterans charity.”

Ann McGuinness, Scottish Green Party

Ann McGuinness, Scottish Green Party. Pic: Scottish Green Party
Image:
Ann McGuinness, Scottish Green Party. Pic: Scottish Green Party

Scottish Green Party candidate Ann McGuinness is the director of a charity which promotes rural connections and champions rural diversity.

The mother-of-two says her own lived experiences of poverty and disability provide her with “valuable insight” into the challenges faced by many whose voices are often unheard in the public discourse.

She has been described by her party as a “dedicated feminist and environmental justice campaigner”.

As well as promoting climate education, Ms McGuinness is also said to have a “strong track record of working across party lines to support women in politics”.

Ms McGuinness said: “Every vote for the Scottish Greens will be a positive vote for a fairer and greener Scotland and a brighter future for Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse.

“If we are to build a truly just and green future, we need to empower every town and village and ensure that no one is left behind.”

Aisha Mir, Scottish Liberal Democrats

Aisha Mir, Scottish Liberal Democrats. Pic: Scottish Liberal Democrats
Image:
Aisha Mir, Scottish Liberal Democrats. Pic: Scottish Liberal Democrats

Scottish Liberal Democrats candidate Aisha Mir told Sky News she has entered politics to “get things done”.

She added: “For too many people, it feels like nothing works anymore.

“The SNP have failed Scotland for 18 years. The Conservatives are lurching to extremes. Labour are already letting people down. Reform have no real solutions.

“I want to be a hard-working local champion who will put your priorities first.”

Ms Mir said her party offers a vision of Scotland “that is back to its best”.

She added: “A Scotland where people can see a GP and an NHS dentist in good time. A Scotland that once again gives our children a world-class education.

“A Scotland with a growing economy and growing businesses, where the government looks after your money and works with our neighbours.

“Vote Scottish Liberal Democrats for a candidate who is focused on what really matters to you.”

Richard Nelson, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party

Richard Nelson, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party. Pic: Scottish Conservatives
Image:
Richard Nelson, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party. Pic: Scottish Conservatives

Scottish Conservatives candidate Richard Nelson told Sky News he got into politics “to make a difference”.

The South Lanarkshire councillor and NHS worker said: “People across this constituency want politicians to be focused on what really matters to them rather than left-wing politicians focusing on their fringe obsessions.”

Richard Nelson, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party, and leader Russell Findlay. Pic: Scottish Conservatives
Image:
Mr Nelson with Scottish Tory leader Russell Findlay. Pic: Scottish Conservatives

Mr Nelson said he has seen “first-hand as an NHS employee the damage the SNP have done to the health service during their 18 years in power”.

He added: “My wife disgracefully had to spend 50 hours on a trolley in A&E recently due to the SNP’s neglect of frontline care.

“If people in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse want to have an MSP who will stand up for those who just want politicians to show some common sense for a change, then you should vote for myself and the Scottish Conservatives on Thursday.”

Davy Russell, Scottish Labour Party

Davy Russell, Scottish Labour Party. Pic: Scottish Labour Party
Image:
Davy Russell, Scottish Labour Party. Pic: Scottish Labour Party

Scottish Labour candidate Davy Russell told Sky News he has seen “first-hand the damage the SNP has done” to the community after almost two decades in power.

He said: “Throughout this campaign, I have been speaking to people who are feeling abandoned by this SNP government.

“People are languishing on long NHS waiting lists, worried about the state of our schools, and sick of seeing our high streets decline – but this is not as good as it gets.

“The SNP don’t deserve to win here, and the divisive politics of Reform cannot win. This by-election is a straight choice between more of the same SNP failure or a new direction with Scottish Labour.”

Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar (left) and candidate Davy Russell, during a visit to Larkhall while on the campaign trail ahead of the up
Image:
Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar, left, with Mr Russell. Pic: PA

Mr Russell vowed to “fight tirelessly for the community I love” if he wins.

He added: “I will stand firmly against the downgrading of the Wishaw Neonatal Unit, campaign for an end to SNP cuts to our local services, and demand real action to tackle the crisis in our NHS.

“This is a chance to not only select a local champion for Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse, but to begin to chart a new direction for the whole of Scotland.”

Marc Wilkinson, Independent

Marc Wilkinson, Independent. Pic: Marc Wilkinson
Image:
Marc Wilkinson, Independent. Pic: Marc Wilkinson

Marc Wilkinson, a pizza shop owner from the Scottish capital, is the leader of the Edinburgh People party.

The businessman is also behind the South Scotland People party, which is part of a bid to establish regional parties across the nation for the Holyrood list vote next year.

Mr Wilkinson’s aim is for “the people of Scotland to choose to vote for themselves”.

Pledging to take instruction directly from the constituents if he were to win the upcoming by-election, he added: “Elect me and you will be my boss. Don’t choose protest. Choose progress.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Crypto policy trends to watch in 2025: Privacy, development and adoption

Published

on

By

Crypto policy trends to watch in 2025: Privacy, development and adoption

Crypto policy trends to watch in 2025: Privacy, development and adoption

As crypto goes mainstream, regulation is no longer a distant threat or bureaucratic detail — it’s the new foundation.

Continue Reading

Trending