Connect with us

Published

on

A parliamentary committee looking into the Greensill saga has found that lobbying rules were “insufficient” and need to be strengthened

The Commons Treasury committee, which looked into David Cameron’s involvement in trying to secure finance firm Greensill Capital access to a government coronavirus support scheme, said the rules should be tightened to prevent any more scandals from occurring.

Mr Cameron sent many calls, texts and emails to ministers in an attempt to gain financial assistance for the bank which has since collapsed.

FILE PHOTO: The logo of Greensill Bank is pictured in downtown Bremen, Germany, July 3, 2019. REUTERS/Fabian Bimmer/File Photo
Image:
Greensill Bank filed for insolvency in March

His actions were deemed lawful under the current rules regarding lobbying which the committee said has created the “strong case” for them to be hardened.

MPs on the committee added that the Treasury was right to reject Greensill’s offer, but were critical of the department’s failure to encourage Mr Cameron to “more formal methods of communication”.

They add that his use of calls and texts “showed a significant lack of judgement on his part, especially as his ability to use an informal approach was aided by his previous position of prime minister”.

“We accept that Mr Cameron did not break the rules governing lobbying by former ministers, but that reflects on the insufficient strength of the rules, and there is a strong case for strengthening them,” said their Lessons from Greensill Capital report published on Tuesday.

More on Coronavirus

MPs also called on the Treasury to reflect on the “number of lessons” that have arisen from the incident.

Formal processes to deal with lobbying attempt by ex-prime ministers or minister should be put in place and published in the future, they add.

Chancellor of the Exchequer Rishi Sunak after delivering his 'Mansion House' speech at the Financial and Professional Services Address, previously known as the Bankers dinner, at Mansion House in the City of London. Picture date: Thursday July 1, 2021.
Image:
The Treasury Committee report says the department should have encouraged Mr Cameron to use more ‘formal’ methods of communication

“We are very surprised about this, given that Mr Cameron was an ex-prime minister, who had worked with those he was lobbying, had access to their mobile phone numbers, and appears to have been able to negotiate who should attend meetings,” the committee’s report said.

“The Treasury’s unwillingness to accept that it could have made any better choices at all in how it engaged in this case is a missed opportunity for reflection.”

Conservative Chairman of the Treasury Select Committee Mel Stride said: “Our report sets out important lessons for the Treasury and our financial system resulting from both Greensill Capital’s collapse and David Cameron’s lobbying.

“The Treasury should have encouraged David Cameron into more formal lines of communication as soon as it had identified his personal financial incentives.

“However, the Treasury took the right decision to reject the objectives of his lobbying, and the committee found that Treasury ministers and officials behaved with complete and absolute integrity.

“We look forward to the conclusions of the other inquiries on the collapse of Greensill Capital, and will continue to follow developments closely.”

In a statement, Mr Cameron said he “always acted in good faith” but that he accepts communications should be done “through only the most formal of channels”.

‘While I am pleased that the report confirms I broke no rules, I very much take on board its wider points,” he said.

“I always acted in good faith, and had no idea until the end of last year that Greensill Capital was in danger of failure.

“However, I have been clear all along that there are lessons to be learnt. As I said to the committee, I accept that communications of this nature should be done in future through only the most formal of channels.

“I agree that the guidance on how former ministers engage with government could be updated and was pleased to provide some suggestions on this to the committee.”

Continue Reading

Politics

US Senate Finance Committee to discuss crypto tax matters next week

Published

on

By

US Senate Finance Committee to discuss crypto tax matters next week

US Senate Finance Committee to discuss crypto tax matters next week

A Coinbase executive and three other crypto tax and policy specialists will meet with the Senate Finance Committee next Wednesday to discuss digital asset tax matters.

Continue Reading

Politics

Andy Burnham says Labour MPs want him to oust Starmer

Published

on

By

Andy Burnham says Labour MPs want him to oust Starmer

Andy Burnham has claimed Labour MPs are privately urging him to challenge the prime minister, as he unveiled his “plan to turn the country around”.

The mayor of Greater Manchester, who served in Gordon Brown’s cabinet, has been tipped to make a return to Westminster.

Speculation has ramped up amid a rough start to the new parliamentary term for the government, with Sir Keir Starmer forced into a cabinet reshuffle and the sacking of his ambassador to the US.

Speaking to The Telegraph and the New Statesman, Mr Burnham has further fuelled rumours that he is plotting another leadership challenge. He lost to Ed Miliband in 2010 and Jeremy Corbyn in 2015.

“People have contacted me throughout the summer – yeah,” the former minister told The Telegraph when asked if Labour MPs had encouraged him to try again.

“I’m not going to say to you that that hasn’t happened.

“But as I say, it’s more a decision for those people than it is for me.”

He added: “I stood twice to be leader of the Labour Party. And I think that tells you, doesn’t it?”

Burnham says he hasn't spoken to the PM since May. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Burnham says he hasn’t spoken to the PM since May. Pic: Reuters

‘Climate of fear’

He refused to rule out making a challenge before May 2026, widely seen as the point at which some Labour MPs feel Sir Keir’s time could be up – if the party does badly in the next set of local elections.

They include London, while the Scottish and Welsh parliaments are also up for grabs.

In a direct criticism of Sir Keir, Mr Burnham said Number 10 had created a “climate of fear” among MPs and created “alienation and demoralisation” within the party.

The government has already run up against its own backbenchers over issues including welfare cuts, the winter fuel payment changes, and the two-child benefit cap.

A debate continues to rage on tax ahead of the budget, with the chancellor being told significant increases are needed.

Labour remain behind Reform UK in the polls, having seen their popularity plummet since the 2024 general election, while the prime minister is also unpopular with the public.

Despite his previous failed leadership challenges, Mr Burnham has rebuilt his image as a mayor in Manchester.

He notably sparred with Boris Johnson during the pandemic, and became known as the “King in the North”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Trevor’s Takeaway: Burnham one to watch

Burnham’s manifesto

Mr Burnham has set out a raft of policies he said would “turn the country around”, including higher council tax on expensive homes in London and the South East.

He would cut income tax for lower earners, but introduce a 50p rate for the highest earners, and borrow £40bn to boost the building of council houses.

He also called for more public control of energy, water and rail, and signalled a willingness to work with progressive parties – including Jeremy Corbyn’s still-unnamed venture.

Read more politics news:
Trump is ‘racist’, says Sadiq Khan
Royal Parks dismisses Farage’s swans claim

Any attempt to replace the prime minister would require him to secure a parliamentary seat in a possible by-election, though the polls suggest no seat would be a slam-dunk victory for Labour.

Mr Burnham will likely use Labour’s party conference, starting Sunday, to make his pitch to members, though should expect hostile briefings from those inside the government.

Speaking to Politics Hub With Darren McCaffrey on Wednesday, Labour peer Thangam Debbonaire said he should “stop sticking his oar in”. “Keir Starmer is our prime minister,” she said, and he should be allowed to get on with the job.

Continue Reading

Politics

Big Issue founder on the ‘great distraction’ stopping Britain tackling ’emergency’ crisis

Published

on

By

Big Issue founder on the 'great distraction' stopping Britain tackling 'emergency' crisis

“Chauvinistic” debates on immigration are distracting ministers from tackling the child poverty “emergency”, the founder of the Big Issue has told Sky News.

Lord John Bird, a crossbench peer, said there is “no evidence” the government is trying to “stop the growth or the propagation” of generational poverty, and the best thing they can do is admit they “haven’t got this right” and change course.

It comes amid a delay to Labour’s child poverty strategy, which is looking at whether to lift the controversial two-child benefit cap, among other measures.

While not affiliated to any political party, Lord Bird warned Labour will not hold back the rise of Reform UK unless they get a grip on the issue – calling debates on immigration a “great distraction”.

Lord John Bird is a lifelong poverty campaigner
Image:
Lord John Bird is a lifelong poverty campaigner

“They’re largely there because of the problems in the country,” he said of Nigel Farage’s party.

“There’s a kind of rightward move in the country and a lot of that has to do with the way the immigration is going.

“It’s all about, in my opinion, chauvinism – and patriotism has become a new value. I am particularly concerned about that.”

Lord Bird is proposing an amendment to the Children’s Wellbeing and School’s Bill next month that would impose a statutory duty on the government to reduce child poverty in England.

Education minister Baroness Jacqui Smith has previously rejected the idea, saying targets “would not in themselves drive reductions in poverty”.

But according to analysis by the Big Issue, Scotland has seen a 12% drop in relative child poverty since passing legally binding targets in 2018, whereas England and Wales has seen a 15% rise.

Lord Bird’s amendment has the support of Labour peer Ruth Lister, the former director of the Child Poverty Action Group, who argues targets “galvanise” governments and local authorities into action.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Parents struggle to feed children

Manifesto pledge at risk

Labour is under pressure as its manifesto promised an “ambitious strategy” to bring down child poverty, but the taskforce set up to deliver it after the general election missed its deadline in May.

The delay followed cost concerns around lifting the two-child benefit cap, which multiple charities and Labour MPs argue is the most immediate thing the government can do to help the record 4.5 million children living in poverty in the UK.

That figure is projected to rise to 4.8 million children by the end of this parliament without further action – putting the manifesto pledge in jeopardy.

The cap is likely to be a significant issued at Labour’s annual party conference kicking off this weekend, against the backdrop of a deputy leadership contest in which both contenders have pledged to make child poverty a priority.

Education Secretary Bridget Philipson, who is standing in the race and co-chairs the poverty taskforce, said this week that “everything is on the table, including removing the two-child limit”.

Work and Pensions Secretary Pat McFadden, who co-chairs the taskforce, has not ruled out an announcement by the prime minister at the conference, but stressed: “Everything has to be paid for, everything has to be budgeted.”

Read more politics news:
Trump is ‘racist’, says Sadiq Khan
Royal Parks dismisses Farage’s swans claim

Lord Bird said removing the two-child cap, estimated to cost £3.4bn a year, would alleviate an “emergency”.

However, he said a longer-term strategy was needed to prevent poverty, warning it is more entrenched now than during his own “terrible” childhood.

The 79-year-old was born in a Notting Hill slum to a poor Irish family in 1946, becoming homeless at age five and learning to read and write through the prison system as a teen.

Back then “no one was giving you a handout” whereas there is “institutional poverty now”, Lord Bird said, blaming recent governments for “trying to make the poor slightly a bit more comfortable” rather than “turning off the tap”.

Lord John Bird escaped poverty and founded The Big Issue in 1991
Image:
Lord John Bird escaped poverty and founded The Big Issue in 1991

‘Aim for the impossible’

He urged Labour to challenge the radicalism of Nye Bevan, the founder of the NHS, and “aim for the impossible” in eradicating child poverty, with investments in education and social development.

“There’s no evidence that the government is trying to stop the growth or the propagation from one generation to another of poverty,” he said.

“The cheapest but most efficient thing this government could do is stop pretending they’ve got it right, stop pretending they got the answers. The most important thing they could do is say, whatever we’re doing, it’s not working.”

Continue Reading

Trending