Connect with us

Published

on

There has been more glory for Great Britain in the Tokyo Aquatics Centre, with gold in the men’s 200m freestyle relay.

Fresh off their one-two on Tuesday, Tom Dean led the way with Duncan Scott swimming the anchor leg.

James Guy and Matthew Richards completed the line-up – and the quartet finished 0.03 seconds off the world record.

James Guy (right) was visibly emotional at the end as he won his first Olympic gold after winning silver in Rio
Image:
James Guy (right) was visibly emotional at the end as he won his first Olympic gold after winning silver in Rio

Dean got Team GB off to a solid, if unspectacular, start, swimming just behind the United States before Guy closed the gap.

It was 18-year-old Richards’ leg that was the standout – with the teenager storming into the lead leaving Scott with what turned into the simple task of confirming the gold.

In the end, Team GB claimed an emphatic victory – 3.32 seconds clear of the Russian Olympic Committee in second.

The United States dropped to fourth after a good start, with Australia finishing third.

More on Tokyo Olympics

The victory means Dean is the first British male swimmer to win two golds at the same Olympic Games since 1908.

Team GB have won four medals in swimming event, three of which were golds
Image:
Team GB have won four medals in swimming event, three of which were golds

Earlier in the day, Abbie Wood just missed out on a medal in the 200m individual medley despite swimming a lifetime best, with Kate Douglas of the USA just beating her to the bronze medal.

James Wilby’s excellent Games continued as he qualified for the men’s 200m breaststroke as the second-best swimmer, but Ross Murdoch missed out on a place in the final.

Team GB won silver in the men's quadruple sculls after a disappointing morning
Image:
Team GB won silver in the men’s quadruple sculls after a disappointing morning

It was a disappointing and frustrating morning on the Sea Forest Waterway for the British rowers, who finished fourth in three races.

Team GB had an outside medal chance in the men’s double sculls and women’s four, but they just missed out on the podium in both events – finishing fourth.

The biggest disappointment came in the third race – the men’s four cox – where Team GB were bidding for a sixth straight gold but missed out on a medal altogether.

Debutants Sholto Carnegie, Oliver Cook, Matthew Rossiter and Rory Gibbs tried to push eventual winners Australia all the way, but the Brits were chased down by Romania and Italy, with the Team GB boat almost crashing into Italy in the closing stages after swerving out of their lane.

Great Britain did get its first rowing medal at the Games, finishing second in the men’s quadruple sculls.

Going into the race, Team GB had an outside chance of a podium and were ranked as the fifth-best team.

The British sevens team will have to play for bronze after a convincing loss to New Zealand
Image:
The British sevens team will have to play for bronze after a convincing loss to New Zealand

But they held off Australia and Poland to take silver, behind the Netherlands – who won four rowing medals on day five of the Tokyo Olympics.

Jack Beaumont, 27, from Maidenhead, said: “It was wild out there. The conditions are rough, with a tailwind, but it’s what we’re used to back at home so we’ve trained in this so many times, it did not shake us.

“We decided that, as we were in lane one with an outside chance of a medal, we were going to take it to them and we really did it.”

Follow the Daily podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker

Harry Leask, 25, from Edinburgh, added: “I knew basically the whole way where we were, I had a pretty good view from where I was sitting of the whole race.

There could be more medals in rowing, after Emily Craig and Imogen Grant qualified for the final in the lightweight women’s double sculls.

In the rugby sevens, Team GB were hoping to qualify for their second final in consecutive Games but were well beaten by New Zealand in the semi-final.

They will play Argentina in the bronze medal match at 8am.

Continue Reading

UK

Post Office scandal: At least 8 convictions may be linked to second IT system used by Post Office

Published

on

By

Post Office scandal: At least 8 convictions may be linked to second IT system used by Post Office

At least eight convictions predating the Horizon Post Office scandal are being looked at by the body investigating potential miscarriages of justice, Sky News has learned.

The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) has confirmed it is examining multiple cases of former sub-postmasters affected by Capture software.

The computer accounting system was used in the early 1990s, prior to Horizon being introduced to Post Office branches from 1999 onwards.

Horizon was at the centre of the Post Office scandal and saw hundreds of sub-postmasters wrongly convicted of stealing from their branches.

The Kroll report, commissioned by the government earlier this year, found that Capture had bugs and glitches and there was a reasonable likelihood it had caused cash shortfalls too.

Lord Beamish, the former Labour MP Kevan Jones, has been supporting victims and is calling for the government to extend current legislation to automatically quash convictions.

The Post Office (Horizon System) Offences Act was passed in May but does not include Capture victims.

More on Post Office Scandal

Lord Beamish told Sky News he has raised the issue with the Justice Secretary and called for a House of Lords debate.

“The government are going to have to take this seriously,” he said. “We can’t have a situation where we have a two-tier system where people get exonerated from Horizon and the Capture cases are either forgotten or have to go through a very lengthy legal process to get their names cleared.”

Chris Roberts whose mother Liz Roberts who was convicted in 1999 of stealing £46,000 from the Post Office and spent 13 months behind bars. Her conviction relates to the use of Post Office Capture software (precursor to Horizon) which is being investigated in connection with potential miscarriages of justice
Image:
Chris claims his mother was wrongly jailed because of accounting problems with the Post Office software Capture

He added he had “little faith” in the CCRC’s “ability to deal with cases”, after multiple Horizon cases were referred to the body years ago.

“The problem with these cases is the lack of evidence… that has been destroyed or lost so actually proving some of these cases through that process will be very difficult.

“Therefore I think a blanket exoneration like we had with Horizon I think has got to be discussed and considered for these cases.”

The CCRC told Sky News it has five cases under review “in which the Capture IT system could be a factor”.

It also said it is “seeking further information” on eight cases referenced in the Kroll report.

Read more:
Woman who died after conviction may have suffered miscarriage of justice
Former postmaster says compensation offer is ‘insulting’
Post Office chairman ousted amid row with government

The CCRC added that the time taken for a case review to be completed was dependent on the “complexity” of each case “and how readily available information about it is”. In a statement, it admitted: “The availability of information can be a particular hurdle in older cases.”

Chris Roberts and his mother Liz Roberts who was convicted in 1999 of stealing £46,000 from the Post Office and spent 13 months behind bars. Liz was in the advanced stages of Alzheimer’s disease and died in 2024. Her conviction relates to the use of Post Office Capture software (precursor to Horizon) which is being investigated in connection with potential miscarriages of justice
Image:
Chris’s mother died earlier this year following a battle with Alzheimer’s and never got to clear her name

Chris Roberts’ mother, Liz Roberts, was convicted in 1999 of stealing £46,000 from the Post Office and spent 13 months behind bars.

Liz, who was in the advanced stages of Alzheimer’s disease, passed away earlier this year.

Chris said she was jailed four days before he turned 17, and he used to have “nightmares” that she was “going to die in there”.

“There was no evidence of any financial gain because they went through everything. And obviously the money wasn’t in our accounts because it didn’t exist,” he added.

Despite being offered “three deals” by the Post Office to plead guilty, Liz refused and was sent to prison.

Liz Roberts who was convicted in 1999 of stealing £46,000 from the Post Office and spent 13 months behind bars. Liz was in the advanced stages of Alzheimer’s disease and died in 2024. Her conviction relates to the use of Post Office Capture software (precursor to Horizon) which is being investigated in connection with potential miscarriages of justice
Image:
Liz Roberts during happier times before she was jailed for theft – her son insists she was innocent

Chris believes that the 2019 High Court win by Horizon victims was a missed opportunity for the Post Office to look back at Capture cases.

“It would have been worth something then because my mum would have died knowing that everybody else knew she was innocent,” he said.

“My dad would have died knowing that the love of his life wasn’t vilified as a criminal.”

Chris wants his mother exonerated and “those actively responsible” to “stand up in court… and justify themselves”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Sky’s Adele Robinson examines Britain’s biggest miscarriages of justice

A Department for Business and Trade spokesperson said: “We were horrified to learn about the issues with the Capture system and are working closely across government to thoroughly examine Kroll’s independent report and consider what action should be taken.

“We continue to listen to postmasters and others who have been sharing their views on the report’s findings since its publication last month.”

Continue Reading

UK

Hooligans face two years in jail as ‘respect orders’ target anti-social behaviour

Published

on

By

Hooligans face two years in jail as 'respect orders' target anti-social behaviour

Hooligans face two years in jail for breaching newly unveiled “respect orders” designed to crack down on anti-social behaviour.

Courts could also hand out unlimited fines, order unpaid work or impose a curfew on those who break the rules.

The measures – set out in Labour’s election manifesto as part of a bid to “return law and order to our streets” – aim to nip the worst behaviour in the bud, the Home Office said.

Too many neighbourhoods are “plagued by anti-social behaviour”, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said, which “can have a devastating impact on victims”.

“This cannot be allowed to continue,” she added.

If the plans – part of a Crime and Policing Bill – pass, councils and police will have the power to ban persistent offenders from town centres, with officers free to arrest anyone breaching their order.

To address the root causes of their behaviour, perpetrators could also be told to attend anger management classes or receive drug and alcohol treatment.

Officers would not need to give a warning before seizing vehicles, a move the Home Office said will help police tackle the “scourge” of off-road bikes in parks and e-scooters on pavements.

The measures will be trialled if the bill passes, before the rules are enforced across England and Wales.

Read more from Sky News:
The bizarre story of a fake carer
King’s coronation cost revealed

Harvinder Saimbhi, chief executive of victim support charity ASB Help, said the group welcomes “the approach of addressing the root causes of the anti-social behaviour”.

“We are keen to see how the respect orders will be implemented,” he added.

In the year to September 2023, about a million anti-social behaviour incidents were reported to police.

Deputy Chief Constable Andy Prophet, who leads the National Police Chiefs’ Council’s work on anti-social behaviour, said respect orders will “give the police and councils the ability to crack down on those who persistently make our streets and public spaces feel unsafe”.

Continue Reading

UK

King’s coronation cost to taxpayer revealed in new report

Published

on

By

King's coronation cost to taxpayer revealed in new report

Official accounts have revealed for the first time how much the King’s 2023 coronation cost UK taxpayers.

According to the accounts, the government spent £72m on the coronation – the first in Britain since Queen Elizabeth II’s in 1953.

The figure includes £50.3m of costs attributed to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS), which coordinated the coronation, and £21.7m in costs for the Home Office for the policing of the event.

By comparison, Queen Elizabeth II’s funeral and events during the period of national mourning cost the government an estimated £162m – £74m for the Home Office and £57m for the DCMS as well as costs to the devolved governments.

The figures come from the culture department’s recently released annual report and accounts.

The department said it had “successfully delivered on the central weekend of His Majesty King Charles III’s Coronation, enjoyed by many millions both in the UK and across the globe”.

People walk past a souvenir shop following Britain's King Charles' coronation, in Windsor, Britain, May 8, 2023. REUTERS/Hannah McKay
Image:
People walk past a souvenir shop during the coronation. Pic: Reuters

It described the event as a “once-in-a-generation moment” which provided an occasion for the “entire country to come together in celebration”.

Both the King and Queen were crowned at Westminster Abbey in May last year, in a ceremony attended by dignitaries from around the world.

A star-studded concert at Windsor Castle, featuring Take That and stars such as Olly Murs, Katy Perry and Lionel Richie, took place the following night.

It had been described ahead of the event as being a “slimmed-down affair” – with the country still in the grips of the cost-of-living crisis – and accounts show an “underspend” related to the coronation of around £2.8m.

Olly Murs performing at the Coronation Concert held in the grounds of Windsor Castle, Berkshire, to celebrate the coronation of King Charles III and Queen Camilla. Picture date: Sunday May 7, 2023. Yui Mok/Pool via REUTERS
Image:
Olly Murs performing at the Coronation Concert. Pic: Reuters

Did coronation boost the economy?

Despite talk of a coronation boost, the UK’s economy actually contracted in the month of May 2023.

However, experts said that was mostly due to the cost of the additional public holiday for the event, which weighed on output.

Read more from Sky News:
British tourist dies in Laos
Storm Bert to bring snow to UK

Each bank holiday costs the UK economy around £2.3bn, with the extra bank holiday for the late Queen’s funeral estimated to have cost around £2.4bn, according to government figures.

With the extra coronation bank holiday, data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) showed negative growth of 0.1% during May 2023.

However, that was slightly better than economists had predicted ahead of the event.

Prior to the event, economic forecasters, the Centre for Economics and Business Research (CEBR), had predicted a boost of £337m for the UK’s economy due to the coronation – including £104m in extra pub spending and an estimated £223m spend from tourism to the UK during the period.

Hotel revenue was also said to be up by 54% compared to the same point in the previous year, while bookings for UK-bound flights for the coronation weekend jumped by 149% within 24 hours of the day being announced, according to TravelPort.

Continue Reading

Trending