The ferocity of the fires in Turkey is quite something to behold.
We watched, along with the residents of the pretty seaside town of Cokertme on the Aegean coast, as the crackling dry forests around the community were devoured within minutes.
The village appeared to be surrounded. We watched as fire engines reversed and screeched away – as firefighters used loudspeakers to bellow at the residents to run. Behind them was a huge sheet of flames heading their way.
Tackling the fires which have broken out across nearly 40 (of the 81) provinces has proved to be a much harder task than anticipated.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Sky reporter at edge of Turkey wildfires
The firefighters and authorities have had to contend with searingly high temperatures – peaking at more than 40C (104F) for most of the week.
Advertisement
On 20 July, the temperature reached a staggering 49.1C (120.38F) in Gizre in the southeast of the country. And the high temperatures are forecast to continue for at least another week.
The fires are thought to be the worst in at least a decade – with some forestry managers we spoke to describing them as the most devastating since the 1940s.
More on Turkey
There has been particularly low humidity which has contributed to the dryness as well as strong sea winds which have exacerbated the fire hazards.
A number of scientists blame these extremes on climate change but on top of these environmental factors, there’s been heavy criticism of the Turkish leader, President Erdogan, for not having sufficient firefighting aircraft to cope.
And exactly what started them is not yet clear although arsonists are being blamed for some.
But once the fires started, it’s been a monumental battle to try to bring them under control with even Mr Erdogan admitting the country did not have an adequate firefighting air fleet.
These contributing factors are no comfort at all to the terrified citizens battling to save their homes, livestock, pets, businesses and farmland.
“My house is burning, my house, my house…oh my God,” was all one woman could say to us when we came across her in Cokertme. Minutes earlier she’d been screaming at the firefighters, cursing them for not arriving soon enough.
Villagers have been fighting the fires themselves, any way they can…. sometimes resorting to pouring bottles of water around the perimeter of their homes – or drawing buckets of water from private wells to try to keep the ground cool.
One woman, Tugce Ulualan told us: “The state isn’t helping us. If the villagers weren’t here, it would be even worse. There aren’t enough firefighters. There are no planes. There are no helicopters.”
In fact, the forestry ministry has outlined on its website that it has 13 planes, 45 helicopters, 9 drones and 828 firefighting vehicles. International help has arrived in the form of air support from first Russia as well as Ukraine, Azerbaijan and Iran.
Only later as the fires continued unabated has help been accepted from European countries such as Spain and Croatia.
We saw a Russian helicopter repeatedly drop buckets of water over fires in the village as the fires gained in strength and momentum.
Residents ran in columns carrying fire hoses under their arms and up the hill near the village’s graveyard to try to beat back the flames lapping at the edge of their back gardens.
“Hadi! Hadi!” (Hurry! Hurry!) one man shouted at his neighbours. A woman near him sobbed audibly as she heaved a curled-up fire hose over a barbed fence.
“We were not prepared (as a country)….we were not prepared at all,” a young man who gave his name as Cem Akin told us. “I feel very tired and helpless. We can’t do anything. Our houses are burning. Our forests are burning – and there’s nothing we can do.”
There’s a collective anger and despair running through the country as fast as the fires which seem to be eating up the nation’s forest.
Around a staggering 95,000 hectares of forest have been devastated so far this year. And as soon as they seem to get the fires under control, more break out.
Turkey has already been badly hit economically because of coronavirus and a slump in its tourism industry. Its citizens are going to suffer even more now.
Other credits: Cameraman Kevin Sheppard, and producers Chris Cunningham and Guldenay Sonumut.
Donald Trump and Kamala Harris have clashed over issues including abortion, the economy and illegal immigration in their first – and possibly only – debate before the US election.
Ms Harris’s attacks appeared to get under her rival’s skin at times, claiming people left his rallies out of “boredom” and Russian President Vladimir Putin “would eat him for lunch”.
Meanwhile, Mr Trumpfrequently resorted to accusing her of allowing massive illegal immigration, as well as being a dangerous “Marxist” and the worst vice president ever.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
The debate in Philadelphia began with Ms Harris approaching Mr Trump for a handshake – an awkward pleasantry in the 100-minute face-off.
Ms Harris addressed voters directly into the camera several times as she made promises including cutting the cost of living and restoring abortion rights.
The ex-president, however, focussed on the two moderators throughout as the debate took place without a live studio audience.
More on Donald Trump
Related Topics:
In the opening duels, Mr Trump claimed Ms Harris had no plan for the economy and – as part of the Biden administration – had presided over high inflation and a flood of illegal immigrants taking jobs.
The vice president, in turn, accused the Republican of planning “a tax cut for billionaires and big corporations”.
Advertisement
During one of Mr Trump’s frequent references to a “dangerous” immigrant influx, he made a bizarre claim there were cases of them eating people’s pets.
“In Springfield, they’re eating the dogs. The people that came in. They’re eating the cats. They’re eating the pets of the people that live there,” he said.
The debate moderator interjected to clarify that officials in Springfield, Ohio, had reported no credible reports of such incidents.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:35
Trump called out over ‘abortion lies’
Abortion rights were another key moment of the evening.
Ms Harris hit out at “Trump abortion bans” and said it was “unconscionable” that government should dictate what women do with their bodies.
During his presidency, Mr Trump installed three Supreme Court justices who helped overturn the constitutional right to abortion in 2022.
The 78-year-old defended the move, saying the issue had been “tearing the country apart” and that he had led on IVF rights.
“Each individual state is voting. It’s the vote of the people now. It’s not tied up in the federal government. I did a great service in doing it,” said Mr Trump.
Ms Harris said his claim her vice presidential pick, Tim Walz, supported abortion in the ninth month was a “bunch of lies” as she painted a sobering picture of what some women now go through.
“Now in over 20 states there are Trump abortion bans which make it criminal for a doctor or nurse to provide health care,” she said.
“In one state it provides prison for life. Trump abortion bans that make no exception even for rape and incest.”
‘Love letters to Kim Jong-un’
The former president, who’s looking to return to the White House despite his numerous legal troubles, looked rattled early on when Kamala Harris claimed people left his rallies “out of exhaustion and boredom”.
Mr Trump hit back that his events were “the most incredible rallies in the history of politics” and said Ms Harris was “bussing” people to her events and “paying them”.
Among other subjects, the two nominees were questioned on Ukraine, Gaza and Afghanistan.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:35
Sky correspondent challenges Trump over dogs claim
Mr Trump suggested a win for the Democrats would end up with World War 3 and painted Ms Harris as a “horrible negotiator” who wouldn’t be able to stand up for America.
She hit back that Putin “would eat you for lunch”, claiming he “exchanged love letters” with Kim Jong-un and “admires dictators”.
Ms Harris said America’s top military commanders viewed him as a liability who is easily manipulated.
“It is absolutely well known that these dictators and autocrats are rooting for you to be president again, because they’re so clear they can manipulate you with flattery and favours,” said Ms Harris.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:59
How the US election works in 2 mins
Mr Trump repeated his belief the Ukraine invasion wouldn’t have happened if he were in charge and claimed he would end it within days if he wins the election.
On Gaza, Ms Harris insisted Israel had a right to defend itself but that a ceasefire and a path towards a two-state solution was vital. Mr Trump claimed she “hated” Israel and had refused to meet President Netanyahu.
‘Not even close’
Ms Harris’s performance was praised by the man who she replaced as a candidate following his own debate debacle.
Joe Biden posted on X that the debate “wasn’t even close” – but the 59-year-old told supporters afterwards there remained “a lot of work to do”.
Before Tuesday night, a summary of opinion polls by FiveThirtyEight put Ms Harris just ahead at 47.2% to 44.4% – it remains to be seen if the TV showdown will significantly shift those numbers.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has been calling on the US and other Western allies to allow Ukraine to use long-range missiles to hit targets in Russia to intensify pressure on Moscow to end the war.
In a sit-down interview with Yalda Hakim for her Sky News show The World, Mr Blinken was asked whether the US president might consider allowing such a move as the conflict rages on.
Mr Blinken said the US has made sure Ukraine has had “what it needed, when it needed it, to be effective in repelling the Russian aggression” since Moscow’s forces invaded in February 2022.
But he added that Washington has also had to consider other factors, such as whether Ukraine’s forces can use the “sophisticated systems” Western allies are providing and whether they can maintain them.
He continued: “All of those things have to go into these decisions. But what I can tell you is we’ve adapted and adjusted every step along the way and we’ll continue – so not ruling out at this stage.
More from World
“We don’t. We never rule out. But when we rule in, we want to make sure it’s done in such a way that it can advance what the Ukrainians are trying to achieve.”
Mr Blinken had earlier told a news conference that “dozens of Russian military personnel” have been trained to use Iran’s Fath-360 close-range ballistic missiles.
Advertisement
He added: “Russia has an array of its own ballistic missile system, but the supply of Iranian missiles enables Russia to use more of its arsenal for targets that are further from the front line.”
The US delivered a small number of ATACMs (Army Tactical Missile Systems) to Ukraine in September last year.
The long-range missiles have a range of about 180 miles.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:21
Drones hit buildings Moscow
US to target Iran’s economy
In his interview, the US secretary of state was also asked about America’s decision to announce further sanctions against Iran and whether they will be effective.
He replied: “We’ve been clear with the Iranians as we saw this brewing that this would have consequences if they went ahead and did it.
“There will be consequences… This is at a time when we know from the new Iranian president that they desperately need and want some economic relief, that there’s a very heavy burden on the country, and that they’re looking for that.
“(Supplying Russia with missiles) is exactly the opposite way to get what they purport to want.”
Blinken says Gaza ceasefire is not guaranteed
Mr Blinken was also asked whether the US is any closer to helping Israel and Hamas to agree a ceasefire to end the nearly year-long war in Gaza.
The US secretary of state said: “In terms of what’s on paper right now, more than 90% of it has been agreed… but almost by definition, the closer you get to the finish line, the harder it gets, because the toughest things usually remain until the end.”
He added: “The challenge, of course, is with every passing day, there’s the risk of an intervening event that sets you back and makes things more difficult.
“But I’m convinced, based on what’s on paper, what’s already been agreed, that we’re close, but does that mean that we’ll get there? No, because there remain hard issues.”
A man accused of inviting at least 50 other men to rape his wife has been taken to hospital on the day he was due to give evidence.
Dominique Pelicot is alleged to have recruited the men on a chat room called “without her knowing” in a case that has shocked France.
The 71-year-old is being tried in the southern French city of Avignon, along with 50 other men on charges of aggravated rape.
His defence lawyer Beatrice Zavarro said her client “is not trying to shirk his responsibility, he will not shirk his responsibility”.
Sources told Sky News the judge ordered the defendant to undergo medical checks in hospital after complaining of stomach pain.
A decision is expected to be made later in the day as to when Dominique Pelicot will testify, and what potential delays this may impose on the trial.
Ms Zavarro added that her client started to show symptoms of what could be a bladder infection or colic on Friday.
More from World
Meanwhile, his now ex-wife Gisele Pelicot was seen outside the court on Tuesday, along with his daughter who has also been attending the trial.
Last Thursday, Ms Pelicot testified that her world collapsed when police uncovered the years of alleged abuse.
Advertisement
Speaking of the moment she discovered her former spouse had allegedly filmed the suspected attacks by dozens of men, she said: “For me, everything collapses. These are scenes of barbarity, of rape.”