NEW YORK — Two days after making his auspicious introduction to tennis fans, Carlos Alcaraz took the court in front of a capacity crowd of more than 8,000 in Grandstand stadium for his fourth-round match at the US Open on Sunday. Even with the looming threat of rain, there was an audible buzz about the 18-year-old sensation.
“Vamos, Carlos!” yelled one fan.
“I heard he was the next Rafa,” another said to his friends.
Three-and-a-half hours and five sets later, Alcaraz had won yet again — coming back from a set down entering the fourth against Peter Gojowczyk — to become the youngest man to advance to the quarterfinals at the tournament in the Open Era. It was just the third five-set match of Alcaraz’s career and his second one in less than 48 hours. Those in attendance cheered raucously for his every point and frequently chanted for him during breaks.
Alcaraz became the toast of New York on Friday following his upset victory over No. 3 seed Stefanos Tsitsipas on Arthur Ashe Stadium, but tennis insiders have long known about Alcaraz’s powerful game and limitless potential. To them, reaching the second week of a major isn’t a surprise.
It just wasn’t supposed to be this early.
“I didn’t expect to play quarterfinals here,” Alcaraz said Sunday.
Then again, he is no stranger to the “youngest ever” or “youngest since” distinction, as his rapidly growing résumé is full of such accolades. Next, Alcaraz will take on No. 12 seed Felix Auger-Aliassime on Tuesday with a chance to reach the semifinals — and show more people what Tsitsipas discovered for himself.
“He can be a contender for Grand Slam titles,” Tsitsipas said after their match. “He has the game to be there.”
Alcaraz grew up idolizing fellow Spanish countryman Rafael Nadal, and his celebratory on-court mannerisms often show an uncanny resemblance. But it was teaming up with another of Spain’s great tennis stars that helped propel Alcaraz to the sport’s highest of stages.
In 2018, he began working with Juan Carlos Ferrero, the former world No. 1 and 2003 French Open champion, who remains his coach. Alcaraz turned pro the same year. Ferrero immediately recognized his young protégé’s talent but knew he would have to find a way to rein in his power and maximize his aggression.
“Since I met him when he was 14, 15, I knew of his potential, about his level,” Ferrero said on Saturday. “But definitely to be that aggressive, you have to control yourself and be able to manage all the shots that you’ve got about the aggressivity that he has. That it’s not easy, because sometimes, you know, comes to your mind a lot of ideas to hit the ball, and you have to try to not put all those things together to not play as a plan.
“So, Carlos start to manage all these things on the court. Off court, he’s still 18 years old, and he needs to get more mature, to control his emotions in there and to control when he has to go with 100 percent of his potential or when he has to use 80 percent or sometimes play with a lot more spin or more flat. So, he’s on the way to order all these kind of things, but I think he’s in a good way to do it.”
Alcaraz can often be seen looking — or screaming or shaking his fists in jubilation — in Ferrero’s direction while he is on the court. And as Ferrero has helped take Alcaraz’s career from the sport’s lower levels to the present heights, the need for his validation perhaps makes sense.
Alcaraz won his first ITF Futures title as a 16-year-old in July 2019 then opened 2020 with back-to-back titles from the same tour. His early-season success got him a wild card into the Rio Open in February.
In his first ATP tour-level match at the event, he defeated former world No. 17 Albert Ramos-Vinolas in a hard-fought battle lasting 3 hours, 36 minutes. Alcaraz became the youngest player to win a match on tour since 2013 and the first to do so of those born in 2003. Even with the suspension of the tour just weeks later due to the pandemic, Alcaraz found a way to raise his ranking by 350 spots by the end of the year — jumping from No. 491 to No. 136.
He won three Challenger titles following the restart and was named the ATP’s Newcomer of the Year.
Alcaraz faced Nadal in the second round of the Madrid Open in May 2021. Alcaraz lost the match 6-1, 6-2, but impressed the 20-time major champion in their first meeting.
“When you make a salad and you are putting ingredients inside the salad, he has plenty of ingredients to become a great player,” Nadal said. “That’s the main thing. Then, of course, nothing is easy. You’re gonna have big opponents in front. I mean, nothing is easy in this life.
“Be[ing] one of the best players in the world and fight for the most important titles is something very difficult, but I really believe that he’s one of the guys that can do it.”
Alcaraz won his first ATP title at the Croatia Open in July with a 6-2, 6-2 decision over former top-10 player Richard Gasquet in the final. With the victory, he became the youngest titlist on tour since Kei Nishikori in 2008.
The teen told ESPN in December his goals for the new season were to make the main draw in all of the majors and crack the top 50. He has done both of those — and then some.
He reached the second round at the Australian Open and Wimbledon and made the round of 32 at Roland Garros. Currently ranked No. 55, his win over Tsitsipas pushed Alcaraz to a projected ranking of No. 50, and he is expected to rise to No. 38 after Sunday’s victory.
A win in the quarterfinals would put Alcaraz in the top 30.
While Brad Gilbert, the former world No. 4 and an ESPN analyst, was very familiar with Alcaraz’s game entering the US Open, even he was shocked by what he saw in the third-round upset over Tsitsipas.
“I had no idea he could hit that big,” Gilbert said. “I think what surprised me most was how he was crushing the ball off of both sides during the first four games of that match. He just absolutely crushes the ball.
“I didn’t think he could serve above 126, 127 [mph], but he was popping 134. He was hitting many forehands over 100 miles an hour. I had no idea he could do that. It was great to witness live.”
Alcaraz was in the unfamiliar position of being the favorite on Sunday against Gojowczyk, the 32-year-old qualifier from Germany. Alcaraz said it didn’t change the way he prepared for the match, but he struggled at times — he served for the first set at 5-4 but was broken and then lost four consecutive games — and he was wildly inconsistent throughout. But when it mattered most, in the final set, he was dominant. He didn’t lose a game in the decider and took the match 5-7, 6-1, 5-7, 6-2, 6-0.
While he had thrown his racket and fallen to the ground — where he lay outstretched with his hands over his face — after defeating Tsitsipas, this time Alcaraz was more poised, more prepared, for the moment. He bent down slightly and joyously shook his arms, and he later blew kisses to the crowd and posed for selfies with fans. He said afterward he was just happy to have advanced.
“I’m super excited to be in my first second week in [a] Grand Slam,” Alcaraz said. “It’s amazing for me. It’s a dream come true.”
On Tuesday, he’ll return to the underdog role, albeit much less so now than in the third round for the clash with Auger-Aliassime. Alcaraz has never competed against the 21-year-old Canadian player, who also is seeking his first major semifinal appearance.
Alcaraz was the second of two teenagers to advance on Sunday to the final eight, after Leylah Fernandez, 19, defeated Angelique Kerber in the women’s draw, with Emma Raducanu, 18, playing for a spot on Monday. With their success — and that of a number of other young players such as Auger-Aliassime and previous major champions Bianca Andreescu, 21, and Iga Swiatek, 20, who both remain in the women’s draw — it seems as if tennis’ future has arrived.
And no matter what happens in the quarterfinals or beyond, Alcaraz has made a believer out of many during his remarkable run at the US Open.
“He’s coming in like a freight train,” Gilbert said. “I don’t want to say, ‘Oh, he’s going to win this or that,’ but I will say this: If he was a stock, I would put a ‘buy’ rating on him.
“The great thing is he’s got a really good coach, and it’s all about getting better. Keep improving his game and his movement, keep getting stronger. There’s no doubt he has the potential to be a top-5 player and could obviously be even better.”
NASHVILLE, Tenn. — Vanderbilt coach Clark Lea has promoted Steve Gregory to defensive coordinator and Nick Lezynski to co-defensive coordinator, the school announced Monday.
Lea served as his own defensive coordinator last season after he demoted the previous coordinator, Nick Howell, following the 2023 season.
Gregory was associate defensive coordinator and secondary coach. He joined Vanderbilt following five seasons as an NFL assistant.
Lezynski is entering his fourth season at Vanderbilt. He was hired as linebackers coach and was promoted to defensive run game coordinator in 2023.
Under Lea’s direction, Gregory and Lezynski helped the Vanderbilt defense show marked improvement. The scoring defense rose from 126th in 2023 to 50th in 2024 and rushing defense from 104th to 52nd. Vanderbilt held consecutive opponents under 100 rushing yards (Virginia Tech and Alcorn State) for the first time since 2017, and a 17-7 win over Auburn marked the lowest point total by an SEC opponent since 2015.
The Commodores were 7-6, their first winning record since 2013.
College football reporter; joined ESPN in 2008. Graduate of Northwestern University.
Texas is targeting former West Virginia and Troy coach Neal Brown for a role on its 2025 coaching staff, a source confirmed to ESPN.
The role is still to be determined, and a deal is not finalized but could be soon, the source said. Brown spent the past six seasons coaching West Virginia and went 37-35 before being fired in December. He went 35-16 at Troy with a Sun Belt championship in 2017.
247 Sports first reported Texas targeting Brown.
The 44-year-old Brown spent time in the state as offensive coordinator at Texas Tech from 2010 to 2012. He also held coordinator roles at Troy and Kentucky.
After back-to-back College Football Playoff appearances, Texas is set to open spring practice March 17.
Florida State and Clemson will vote Tuesday on an agreement that would ultimately result in the settlement of four ongoing lawsuits between the schools and the ACC and a new revenue-distribution strategy that would solidify the conference’s membership for the near future, sources told ESPN on Monday.
The ACC board of directors is scheduled to hold a call Tuesday to go over the settlement terms. In addition, Florida State and Clemson have both called board meetings to present the terms at noon ET Tuesday. All three boards must agree to the settlement for it to move forward, but sources throughout the league expect a deal to be reached.
According to sources, the settlement includes two key objectives: establishing a new revenue-distribution model based on viewership and a change in the financial penalties for exiting the league’s grant of rights before its conclusion in June 2036.
This new revenue-distribution model — or “brand initiative” — is based on a five-year rolling average of TV ratings, though some logistics of this formula remain tricky, including how to properly average games on the unrated ACC Network or other subscription channels. The brand initiative will be funded through a split in the league’s TV revenue, with 40% distributed evenly among the 14 longstanding members and 60% going toward the brand initiative and distributed based on TV ratings.
Top earners are expected to net an additional $15 million or more, according to sources, while some schools will see a net reduction in annual payout of up to about $7 million annually, an acceptable loss, according to several administrators at schools likely to be impacted, in exchange for some near-term stability.
The brand initiative is expected to begin for the coming fiscal year.
The brand fund, combined with the separate “success initiatives” fund approved in 2023 and enacted last year that rewards schools for postseason appearances, would allow teams that hit necessary benchmarks in each to close the revenue gap with the SEC and Big Ten, possibly adding in the neighborhood of $30 million or more annually should a school make a deep run in the College Football Playoff or NCAA basketball tournament and lead the way in TV ratings.
The success initiatives are funded largely through money generated by the new expanded College Football Playoff and additional revenue generated by the additions of Stanford, Cal and SMU, each of which is taking a reduced portion of TV money over the next six to eight years, while the new brand initiative will involve some schools in the conference receiving less TV revenue than before.
As a result of their inclusion in the College Football Playoff this past season, SMU athletic director Rick Hart said, the Mustangs and Tigers each earned $4 million through the success initiatives.
Sources have suggested Clemson and Florida State would be among the biggest winners of this brand-based distribution, though North Carolina and Miami are others expected to come out with a higher payout. Georgia Tech was actually the ACC’s highest-rated program in 2024, based in part on a Week 0 game against Florida State and a seven-overtime thriller against Georgia on the final Friday of the regular season.
Basketball ratings will be included in the brand initiative, too, but at a smaller rate than football, which is responsible for about 75% of the league’s TV revenue.
If ACC commissioner Jim Phillips is able to get this to the finish line Tuesday, it would be a big win for him and for the conference during a time of unprecedented change in collegiate athletics — particularly for a league that many speculated would break apart when litigation between the ACC and Florida State and Clemson began in 2023.
Both schools would consider it a win as well after they decided to file lawsuits in their home states in hopes of extricating themselves from a grant of rights agreement that, according to Florida State’s attorneys, could have meant paying as much as $700 million to leave the conference. The ACC countersued both schools to preserve the grant of rights agreement through 2036.
Although the settlement will not make substantive changes to the grant of rights, it is expected that there will be declining financial penalties for schools that exit before 2036, with the steepest decreases coming after 2030 — something that would apply to any ACC school, not just Clemson and Florida State.
The specific financial figures for schools to get released from the grant of rights were not readily available. But the total cost to exit the league after the 2029-30 season is expected to drop below $100 million, sources said.
The current language would require any school exiting before June 2036 to pay three times the operating budget — a figure that would be about $120 million — plus control of that team’s media rights through the conclusion of the grant of rights.
This was seen as a critical piece to the settlement, allowing flexibility for ACC schools amid a shifting college football landscape, particularly beyond the 2030 season, when TV deals for the Big Ten (2029-30), Big 12 (2030) and the next iteration of the College Football Playoff (2031) come up for renewal — a figure Florida State’s attorneys valued at more than $500 million over 10 years.
Sources told ESPN that there’d just be one number to exit the league, not the combination estimated by FSU of a traditional exit fee and the loss of media from the grant of rights.
In addition to securing the success and brand initiatives, viewed within the league as progressive ideas to help incentivize winning, Phillips also guided the recently announced ESPN option pickup to continue broadcasting the ACC through 2036.