Labour’s conference is opening in Brighton after Sir Keir Starmer was forced into a humiliating retreat over his attempt to re-write the party’s rulebook.
He had to put his reforms on hold after a backlash from unions and party activists, in what left-wing MPs said was an own goal that had weakened his authority.
The Labour leader is now attempting to salvage his proposals in talks with those trade unions he hopes will back them, though he may have to make significant concessions to win their support.
The conference opens with a speech by Angela Rayner, Labour’s deputy leader, who will commit the party to introduce a new deal for working people – including pay rises and new employment rights – if it wins the next election.
Ahead of her speech, Ms Rayner features in a glossy photoshoot in The Times’ Saturday magazine, accompanied by an interview in which she says she “definitely wouldn’t say no” to standing for party leader.
“If I felt it was the right thing to do for the party and the right thing for the country, then I would step up and do it,” she told The Times, in comments that will annoy Sir Keir and his inner circle at a time when his critics are questioning his leadership.
More on Labour
Related Topics:
The Labour leader was forced to abandon his plans to put his reforms – which include scrapping ‘one member, one vote’ for electing the party leader and returning to an electoral college of MPs, unions and activists – to a vote on the ruling national executive after opposition from unions.
But ahead of another meeting of the executive shortly before the conference opens, Sir Keir is to hold talks with three major unions, Unison, Usdaw and the GMB, which he hopes to persuade to back his proposals.
It is thought that to win their support, however, the beleaguered Labour leader may have to drop some of his proposals, including his plans to bring back the electoral college, which was replaced with one member, one vote by former leader Ed Miliband in 2014.
Speaking to Sky News after Sir Keir withdrew his proposals, at least temporarily, former party chair and leading Jeremy Corbyn supporter Ian Lavery said the Labour leader had scored an own goal and his position as leader had been weakened.
“Had the consultation taken place with the unions, with the CLPs, things might have been different,” said Mr Lavery.
“It’s a huge lesson to be learned by Keir Starmer tonight, and that is everybody counts in the Labour Party, not just the few in the leader’s room.”
The left-wing pressure group Momentum said it celebrated the delay, declaring: “Starmer’s attack on democracy is floundering.
“This delay has been won by the grassroots members who have taken action to organise their delegates, lobby their unions and mobilise ahead of conference.
“But it is not over yet. We have to keep up the pressure to make sure this rule change and all the other regressive changes concocted by the leadership get comprehensively rejected.”
Just hours before the start of the conference, Sir Keir also came under attack from Mr Corbyn, his predecessor, who said: “Our movement has the answers to the big questions of the age – inequality, the climate crisis and the pandemic – but our leaders are failing to listen and put these solutions front and centre.
“At conference, I hope to hear how Labour will bring in a wealth tax to fund a National Care Service like the NHS, will take the radical action needed to decarbonise by 2030, stand against the drumbeat of a new Cold War, and will rein in the runaway wealth and power of a tiny elite.
“I know our trade unions and members have developed these policies. But the signs are that the party leadership wants to try to shut down debate, side-line the members and trade unions with the end result that Labour props up rather than challenges our broken political and economic system.”
In her speech pledging a new deal for workers, Ms Rayner will say: “It will be the driving mission of the next Labour government to end the poverty wages and insecure work that blights millions of lives and is holding back our economy. Labour will make Britain work for working people.
“Work should provide not just a proper wage that people can raise a family on, but dignity, flexibility and security. Better pay and more secure work is good for workers, good for businesses and good for the economy.
“Labour will deliver a new deal for working people so they get a fair share of the wealth they create, and within the first 100 days of the next Labour government we will sign this new deal for working people into law.”
“Working people don’t want a handout from a minister sat in Whitehall – workers want the power to stand up for themselves and demand their fair share and a better deal.”
She will add: “The best way to improve the lot of working people is collectively, achieving more by the strength of our common endeavour than we achieve alone.
“So the next Labour government will bring together representatives of workers and employers to agree fair pay agreements that will apply to every worker in each sector, starting in social care.
“Fair pay agreements will drive up pay, improve conditions in the workplace and stop bad bosses from exploiting their workers and driving down pay and standards for everyone.
“When Labour is in government there won’t just be a former social care worker and shop steward in the office of deputy prime minister, working people will have a seat at the cabinet table and their voices will be heard. The next Labour government will end poverty wages and insecure work for good.”
Concerns were raised after a Bloomberg article reported Kraken was “actively reviewing” which tokens it could continue to list under the European Union’s upcoming MiCA framework.
The conviction of Tornado Cash developer Alexey Pertsev reinforces a very broad interpretation of criminal liability, which has major repercussions for blockchain.
The defence secretary has said he is “angry inside” over the infected blood scandal ahead of a long-waited report into the decades-long injustice.
Grant Shapps told Sky News he agreed it had been one of the most “shameful failures” of government and said he was dismayed by the “lack of anybody taking responsibility”.
The findings of a public inquiry into the scandal, chaired by Sir Brian Langstaff, are due to be published on Monday.
From 1970 to the 1990s, tens of thousands of people were infected with contaminated blood through blood products or blood transfusions given via the NHS. People were infected with hepatitis or HIV – in some cases with both.
Mr Shapps told Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips that the scandal was a “massive injustice which needs to be put right” and said the government would act on the report.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
13:43
Thousands of people died after being given infected blood
He said that while he was yet to see the report, he hoped it would finally allow families’ pain and loss to be acknowledged and for the government to properly respond.
Mr Shapps said he had spoken to relatives of several victims, including a couple who had lost their son, and said their stories made feel him “angry inside”.
Advertisement
He added: “It just made me angry to know they had lost their son without anyone ever taking responsibility, so I think this is why this report tomorrow is very important.”
Successive governments have been blamed for failing to take responsibility and the current government has been accused of trying to delay compensation to victims after an inquiry was first set up by Theresa May in 2017.
It is estimated that the compensation bill could now exceed £10m.
The defence secretary admitted the process of delivering payouts to victims had gone on for “so long”.
He added: “This is a massive injustice which needs to be put right.
“And I know the government said we will. The report tomorrow, I think, will be the day for that family and others and I know the government will want to respond quickly.”
Asked whether Prime Minister Rishi Sunak would apologise to the victims, Mr Shapps said: “I don’t want to mislead because I don’t have special insight into that.”
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.