Connect with us

Published

on

Professional football club-owners in England will be overseen by a new licensing regime forcing them to demonstrate fully-funded three-year business plans under proposals to be set out by a former sports minister this week.

Sky News has learnt that a review of football’s governance led by Tracey Crouch, the Conservative MP, will outline the new structure as one option to avert future financial collapses of the kind seen at Bury in 2019.

It was unclear whether the new regime would apply to existing owners or only to those seeking to take control of clubs in future.

Image:
The report by Tracey Crouch is due to be released on Thursday

Ms Crouch is expected to make roughly 50 recommendations in her review, which runs to approximately 150 pages and will be published on Thursday.

Some of the recommendations will require legislation to ensure their implementation, a process that could take several years depending upon the availability of parliamentary time.

The government is expected to formally respond to Ms Crouch’s review in the next few months.

Under the proposals, clubs could be required to set up ‘shadow boards’ for fans, which would allow them to influence non-football matters such as plans to relocate from their existing stadium or alter their badge or the colour of their home kit.

More from Business

These would form a series of “protected rights” that an owner or board would not be able to override without fans’ endorsement.

Ms Crouch floated the idea earlier this year of creating a ‘golden share’ that would give “veto powers over reserved items, to…a democratic legally constituted fan group”.

Her Independent Fan-Led Review of Football Governance is understood to raise a number of alternatives for promoting fan engagement.

General view of an official winter Nike Premier league match ball on the grass
Image:
Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool, Manchester City, Manchester United and Tottenham Hotspur were involved in the ESL plan

Oversight of club-owners and directors, which is currently handled by the Premier League and English Football League (EFL), would pass to a new industry-funded Independent Regulator for English Football (IREF) under her proposals.

In her interim findings, published in July, Ms Crouch said IREF would “address issues that are most relevant to the risks to the game and already at least partially a matter of English law – particularly financial regulation, corporate governance and ownership”.

“The related requirements are likely to include cost controls, real time financial monitoring, minimum governance requirements (including a requirement for independent non-executive directors on club boards) and revised separate tests for owners and directors of clubs on an initial and ongoing basis,” she wrote in a letter to Mr Dowden in the summer.

One Whitehall source said the report would be a “powerful fulfilment” of the mandate given to Ms Crouch by Boris Johnson and Oliver Dowden, the then culture secretary, when they commissioned the review in April.

It was triggered by the outcry over plans by six Premier League clubs – Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool, Manchester City, Manchester United and Tottenham Hotspur – to join a new European Super League that would have earned the participants hundreds of millions of pounds, widening the financial gulf between them and the rest of English football.

The ESL was abandoned by the English clubs within 48 hours following interventions by public figures including Mr Johnson and the Duke of Cambridge, who is also president of the Football Association, but the project’s collapse failed to allay concerns about risks to the long-term health of the national game.

Some of the likely recommendations in Ms Crouch’s review, such as a requirement for the Premier League to commit additional funding to the rest of the English football pyramid, have already been partially addressed.

The Premier League announced last week that it would allocate a further £25m to the EFL – the three divisions below the top flight – and the National League, which have been hit hard by the pandemic.

Clubs from the top tier down have been forced to take on substantial new debts in order to continue funding themselves, raising fears that more may face going out of business.

Derby County, which fell into administration last month, was this week hit by an additional nine-point deduction after acknowledging breaches of the EFL’s profitability and sustainability rules.

Last week, the Daily Mail reported that the EFL chairman Rick Parry had expressed support for the principle of an independent football regulator, although the idea has been rejected by the Premier League’s chief executive, Richard Masters.

Earlier this week, Sky News revealed that Gary Hoffman, the Premier League chairman, was to resign amid pressure from clubs over its handling of the controversial Saudi-led takeover of Newcastle United.

A spokesman for the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) declined to comment on Tuesday.

Continue Reading

Business

Santander warns car finance redress scheme a threat to UK jobs, growth and economy

Published

on

By

Santander warns car finance redress scheme a threat to UK jobs, growth and economy

High street bank Santander has launched a scathing criticism of the car finance compensation scheme and delayed the release of its financial results “in light of uncertainties” it has caused.

The Spanish-owned lender called for government intervention – warning it sees the scheme as posing a wider threat to the economy, jobs and consumers.

Money blog: Tesco increases price of carrier bag

The scheme was set up by financial regulator, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), to compensate people mis-sold car loans.

Under FCA proposals, up to 14.2 million people could each receive an average of £700, as lenders broke the law by failing to disclose they paid commission to brokers. It meant customers lost out on better deals and sometimes paid more.

The proposal differs, Santander said, “in important respects” from the Supreme Court ruling that paved the way for the redress plan.

Mr Regnier said: “We believe that the level of concern in the industry and market is such that material changes to the proposed FCA redress scheme should be an active consideration for the UK government.

“Without such change, the unintended consequences for the car finance market, the supply of credit and the resulting negative impact on the automotive industry and its supply chain could significantly impact jobs, growth and the broader UK economy.

“This could also cause significant detriment to the consumer.

“What is at stake is the supply of credit that customers need and that supports a very important sector for the economy.”

Deferred results

Santander was due to publish its latest financial figures on Wednesday morning, but has held back until it says it gets “greater clarity” on the scheme and its impact on the bank and the wider market.

No new date to report results was given. Release of the same third-quarter results last year was also deferred due to uncertainty over the impact of car loan mis-selling.

The hit to Santander, however, is not expected to impact its operations or financial position, even in a worst-case scenario for the bank where it has to allocate more funds for compensation, it said.

It had already set aside £295m to deal with the mis-selling.

The FCA said, “We believe a compensation scheme is the best way to settle, for both lenders and consumers, liabilities that exist no matter what.

“Alternatives would cost more and take longer. It’s vital we draw a line under the issue so a trusted motor finance market can continue to serve millions of families every year.”

Read more from Sky News:
Compensation scheme launched for postmasters affected by Capture scandal
‘Close eye’ will be kept on OpenAI’s for-profit conversion

Santander said it was committed to “ensuring fair outcomes” for its customers and will continue engaging constructively with the FCA, HM Treasury and other stakeholders.

Santander UK shares were up 0.5% following the news.

Continue Reading

Business

Budget 2025: Reeves vows to ‘defy’ gloomy forecasts – but faces income tax warning

Published

on

By

Budget 2025: Reeves vows to 'defy' gloomy forecasts - but faces income tax warning

Rachel Reeves has said she is determined to “defy” forecasts that suggest she will face a multibillion-pound black hole in next month’s budget.

Writing in The Guardian, the chancellor argued the “foundations of Britain’s economy remain strong” – and rejected claims the country is in a permanent state of decline.

Reports have suggested the Office for Budget Responsibility is expected to downgrade its productivity growth forecast by about 0.3 percentage points.

Rachel Reeves. PA file pic
Image:
Rachel Reeves. PA file pic

That means the Treasury will take in less tax than expected over the coming years – and this could leave a gap of up to £40bn in the country’s finances.

Ms Reeves wrote she would not “pre-empt” these forecasts, and her job “is not to relitigate the past or let past mistakes determine our future”.

“I am determined that we don’t simply accept the forecasts, but we defy them, as we already have this year. To do so means taking necessary choices today, including at the budget next month,” the chancellor added.

She also pointed to five interest rate cuts, three trade deals with major economies and wages outpacing inflation as evidence Labour has made progress since the election.

Speculation is growing that Ms Reeves may break a key manifesto pledge by raising income tax or national insurance during the budget on 26 November.

Read more from Sky News:
What tax rises and spending cuts could Reeves announce?
Start-ups warn the chancellor over budget tax bombshell

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Chancellor faces tough budget choices

Although her article didn’t address this, she admitted “our country and our economy continue to face challenges”.

Her opinion piece said: “The decisions I will take at the budget don’t come for free, and they are not easy – but they are the right, fair and necessary choices.”

Yesterday, Sky’s deputy political editor Sam Coates reported that Ms Reeves is unlikely to raise the basic rates of income tax or national insurance, to avoid breaking a promise to protect “working people” in the budget.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Tax hikes possible, Reeves tells Sky News

Sky News has also obtained an internal definition of “working people” used by the Treasury, which relates to Britons who earn less than £45,000 a year.

This, in theory, means those on higher salaries could be the ones to face a squeeze in the budget – with the Treasury stating that it does not comment on tax measures.

Read more: The taxes Reeves could raise

In other developments, some top economists have warned Ms Reeves that increasing income tax or reducing public spending is her only option for balancing the books.

Experts from the Institute for Fiscal Studies have cautioned the chancellor against opting to hike alternative taxes instead, telling The Independent this would “cause unnecessary amounts of economic damage”.

Although such an approach would help the chancellor avoid breaking Labour’s manifesto pledge, it is feared a series of smaller changes would make the tax system “ever more complicated and less efficient”.

Continue Reading

Business

Uncertainty for UK workers as Amazon to cut 14,000 jobs globally

Published

on

By

Uncertainty for UK workers as Amazon to cut 14,000 jobs globally

Roughly 14,000 corporate jobs are to go at tech giant Amazon, the company announced.

The impact on the 75,000-strong UK workforce is not immediately clear from the announcement, which said impacted people and teams would hear from leadership on Tuesday.

Money blog: ‘We’ve assets worth £1m – how much inheritance tax will we owe?’

A loss of 30,000 jobs had been anticipated based on reporting from Reuters and The Wall Street Journal.

Amazon workers’ union in the UK, GMB, had said, based on those numbers, that “it is almost inevitable that many UK workers will lose their jobs”.

“The fact that companies can accrue such astronomical profits to the point where its [founder, Jeff Bezos] can holiday in space and hire out entire cities for his vulgar wedding prior to casting aside loyal workers without a thought just underlines everything that’s wrong with a system that many feel is beyond repair,” the union said.

Why?

More on Amazon

The growth of artificial intelligence (AI) has been blamed for the cuts.

In a message sent to staff, Amazon’s senior vice president of people experience and technology, Beth Galetti, alluded to the criticism that the company is cutting jobs while profiting £19.2bn in results published in July.

“Some may ask why we’re reducing roles when the company is performing well,” she wrote.

“What we need to remember is that the world is changing quickly. This generation of AI is the most transformative technology we’ve seen since the Internet, and it’s enabling companies to innovate much faster than ever before.”

Amazon is also continuing to unravel some of the hiring it made during the COVID-19 pandemic and has warned about reducing headcount and bureaucracy.

In May 2021, for example, the business said it was hiring more than 10,000 UK jobs.

The largest ever cut of 18,000 Amazon roles was announced in January 2023 when the consumer retail part of the business, including Amazon Fresh and Amazon Go, were scaled back.

It plans to replace more than half a million jobs with robots, automating 75% of its operations, according to the New York Times.

What next?

Those who lose their job will be prioritised for openings within Amazon to help “as many people as possible” find new roles, she said.

Hiring will continue, despite the latest cull, in “key strategic areas” while the online retail behemoth finds additional places we can “remove layers, increase ownership, and realise efficiency gains”.

Amazon said it is “shifting resources to ensure we’re investing in our biggest bets and what matters most to our customers’ current and future needs”.

In the UK, GMB said, “We will be supporting our members across Amazon as they face this uncertain future.”

It is to announce financial results for the third quarter of this year on Thursday evening, UK time.

Amazon UK has been contacted for comment.

Continue Reading

Trending