The Premier Hockey Federation’s Isobel Cup Final will be a clash between one first-time championship contender, and one former title holder looking to add another.
It took a sensational overtime win in the semifinals for the Toronto Six to eventually punch their ticket to a Final. Toronto’s opponent — the Minnesota Whitecaps — had to top the league’s defending back-to-back champions to make their third Final appearance in four seasons.
Now the plucky upstarts and wily veterans will meet in Sunday’s finale at Mullet Arena in Arizona. When they do, it’ll mark the first Isobel Cup Final to feature two teams led by female coaches, in Toronto’s Geraldine Heaney and Minnesota’s Ronda Engelhardt.
Puck drop is 6 p.m. MDT/9 p.m. EST with coverage airing on ESPN2 and TSN.
Given the road both clubs took to the Final there’s no doubt it’ll be dramatic. Get ready with the names, news and notes to know before Toronto and Minnesota take to the ice.
How the (Mid)west won
It was one thing for Minnesota to defeat the two-time defending champion Boston Pride.
It’s quite another that the Whitecaps swept Boston out of the postseason with two straight wins in their best-of-three semifinal series. Talk about a turnaround.
Minnesota was 0-4 in their previous meetings against the Pride and stumbled their way into the playoffs with eight consecutive losses. The Whitecaps had an underwhelming regular season overall, grabbing a fourth-place finish with just 33 points.
The postseason, of course, is its own beast. Minnesota wasn’t rattled by it’s previous results, and jettisoned Boston by a combined score of 9-3 in their postseason matches. The Pride hadn’t previously lost two straight games all year.
The Whitecaps feat sent them back to the franchise’s third Final in four seasons. Minnesota hasn’t won it all since 2019, when they topped the Buffalo Beauts 2-1 in overtime. The Whitecaps followed that up with a 4-3 loss to Boston in the 2021 Final. Those two sides were meant to square off in a Final the season before as well, but the PHF cancelled that tilt amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
The Whitecaps have another chance to be the PHF’s reigning champions — if they can hold off a surging Six team.
Northern Exposure
This won’t just be Toronto’s first Final opportunity. It’s also the first time a Canadian PHF team has reached the championship bout.
And it nearly didn’t happen at all.
The Six were already down 1-0 to the Connecticut Whale in their best-of-three semifinal series and facing elimination in Game 2 before rallying from a two-goal deficit to force overtime. That’s where Emma Woods scored the most important goal in Six franchise history to not only keep Toronto’s championship hopes alive in a 3-2 victory but mark the franchise’s first-ever postseason win (the Six were previously 0-3 in the playoffs).
That momentum carried Toronto into a decisive 3-0 win in Game 3 to set the stage for Sunday’s appearance.
It’s the next chapter in what’s been a strong season for the Six. They finished second in league standings with 51 points, just three back of the top-seeded Pride. But don’t let the 18-point gap separating Toronto and Minnesota fool you — it’s winner-take-all in Tempe. And there’s firepower on either side capable of carrying their team towards hosting a Cup.
Who to watch: Whitecaps
Minnesota might have avoided so many regular season struggles if goaltender Amanda Leveille had been available.
The Whitecaps netminder — who produced a .923 save percentage and 2.43 goals-against average, both ranked second in the league — was sidelined by injury for six of their final eight games. Leveille looked better than ever making 47 stops in Game 2 to send Boston packing. Minnesota’s 4-1 win was just the second time all season the Pride were held to a single goal, more testament to Leveille’s game-changing ability that the Whitecaps will lean on again in the Final.
The team’s attack up front has been led by forward Jonna Albers. She had four goals — including two shorthanded — and five points in Minnesota’s victories over Boston, prompting Pride coach Paul Mara to admit Albers was “all-world … she beat us almost single-handedly; she was incredible.”
Keep an eye out too for forward Natalie Snodgrass, who tied for the third-most regular season game-winning goals and notched another marker in Game 2 against Boston.
Who to watch: Six
The Isobel Cup Final might boil down to a battle between great goaltenders.
Toronto’s response to the excellent play of Minnesota’s Leveille will be its own powerhouse netminder, Elaine Chuli. The Six’s 3-0 win in Game 3 over Connecticut was Chuli’s first-ever playoff shutout and should give Toronto plenty of confidence their goalie — who had a .917 SV% and 2.61 GAA in the regular season — can go save-for-save with Leveille on Sunday.
The Six are no one-trick pony, though. Toronto received contributions across the board throughout its semifinal stint. Forward Brittany Howard collected two goals and four points, while Michela Cava’s three goals and four points are both tied for second-most among postseason skaters.
And the Six have strong support from the back end, as Kati Tabin lead the playoff field with three assists.
If there’s one thing Sunday’s Final shouldn’t lack, it’s fireworks. Whether through big-time stops or jaw-dropping goals, the semifinals proved Minnesota and Toronto are stacked with potential difference-makers across the board.
What the Whitecaps are saying
Head coach Ronda Engelhardt on what worked vs. Boston: “The big thing was just trying to stay consistent, stay mentally strong, mentally engaged, the entire game. We had to play with discipline, we had to do the little things we had talked about all year long. We just needed the players to commit to that and they did. They exceeded everything we’ve asked of them. Building off that knowing that we can do it, hopefully that gives them confidence going into [the Final], and to start the game with our pace and let us bring the pace to them.”
Goaltender Amanda Leveille on prepping for the Six: “We’re really confident going into the game this week. We played extremely well against Boston; we really suffocated their offense, and we know that we have to continue that against Toronto. They have a lot of really talented players on the offensive side along with their goaltender Elaine Chuli, who’s awesome as well. We’re just going to continue building off [our success] and go into this weekend playing the we [have been].”
What the Six are saying
Head coach Geraldine Heaney on matching up with Minnesota: “I think we just play our game. We’ve always focused on worrying about our team [first], and we can only control what we can do out on the ice. And if we do what we can do [well] and stay out of the box, we’re going to be successful. We really focus a lot on the defensive zone, and we talk about how defense wins championships because we definitely have the offensive power to score goals. So if we can just take care of [ourselves] first, we’ll definitely be successful.”
Forward Shiann Darkangelo on how Toronto grew from its semifinal: “I just learned that this is a resilient group, that’s not going to give up no matter if we’re down a goal or have to come back in a game. I think that showed in the series [with Connecticut]. It was weirdly good that we took the hit [and lost] the first game. It showed that we had to bounce back, and we were able to have each other’s backs to do that. So that was pretty exciting.”
SUNRISE, Fla. — It’s a formula the Florida Panthers keep using in the playoffs: take a lead after two periods, then let Sergei Bobrovsky and the defense do the rest. And it worked again.
Bobrovsky stopped 23 shots for his fifth career playoff shutout, Carter Verhaeghe and Sam Bennett scored and the Panthers defeated the Toronto Maple Leafs2-0 on Sunday night in Game 4 to even the Eastern Conference semifinal series.
Florida has won 25 consecutive playoff games when leading after two periods, a streak that goes back to May 5, 2022. And in helping to tie the series, Bobrovsky officially put a slow start to rest. In Games 1 and 2 last week in Toronto, he allowed nine goals en route to two losses. He returned to Amerant Bank Arena on Friday night for Game 3, and allowed four more.
“It’s a series,” Bobrovsky said. “The bigger games are ahead, so we’re excited about them. The series comes down to a best-of-three, so it’s a big game, next one.”
Home-ice advantage has held, and Toronto will hope that trend continues in Game 5 on Wednesday night. The Leafs won Games 1 and 2 at home, then dropped Games 3 and 4 in Sunrise.
“We had looks,” Toronto coach Craig Berube said. “They’re doing a good job of swarming us with numbers, obviously. … It’s a battle out there. This is what it is. They don’t give you a lot.”
Verhaeghe scored on a power play — Florida’s fourth of the game — in the first period, Bennett added the insurance score with 7:50 left and Bobrovsky did the rest for his second shutout of this postseason.
“He was great,” Berube said of his netminder. “He played an excellent game.”
Verhaeghe’s goal came after Matthew Tkachuk, along the left-wing boards, threaded a pass through the slot and past two defenders. It found Verhaeghe — who slammed a one-timer past Woll.
That was part of an early spree for Florida. The Panthers took 21 of the game’s first 26 shots on net, controlling play for long stretches and keeping all the action in front of Woll. He held firm, time and again, keeping Toronto in it.
Bennett said enough. He came in from Woll’s left, with Verhaeghe opposite him, looking for a passing lane. When none appeared, Bennett went to the front of the net, watched Woll commit, then pushed the puck into the net before punching the air.
“That was more like the type of Panthers playoff hockey that we’re used to,” Bennett said.
It got chippy late, as games this late in a series tend to do. Oliver Ekman-Larsson — part of the Florida team that won the Stanley Cup last season — delivered a shot to the head and neck area of Panthers forward Evan Rodrigues about five minutes into the third period. It was originally called a major, then downgraded to a minor after review.
Rodrigues will need further evaluation Monday, Panthers coach Paul Maurice said.
KANSAS CITY, Kan. — Denny Hamlin said Saturday that he remains “pretty confident” in the case brought by his 23XI Racing, co-owned by the veteran driver and retired NBA great Michael Jordan, and Front Row Motorsports against NASCAR alleging antitrust violations.
Hamlin spoke one day after a three-judge federal appellate panel indicated it might overturn an injunction that allows 23XI and Front Row to race as chartered teams, even as their lawsuit against the stock car series plays out in court.
“You know, they’re telling me kind of what’s going on. I didn’t get to hear it live or anything like that,” Hamlin said after qualifying 14th for Sunday’s race at Kansas Speedway. “But we’re overall pretty confident in our case.”
The teams filed the antitrust lawsuit against NASCAR on Oct. 2 in the Western District of North Carolina, arguing that the series bullied teams into signing charter agreements — essentially franchise deals — that make it difficult to compete financially.
Those were the only two holdouts of 15 charter-holding teams that refused to sign the agreements in September.
The most recent extension of the charters lasts until 2031, matching the current media rights deal. Perhaps the biggest benefit of them is that they guarantee 36 of the 40 spots available in each NASCAR race to teams that own them.
Overturning the injunction would leave 23XI and Front Row racing as “open teams,” meaning they would have to qualify at every Cup Series event. But there are only four open spots, and 23XI had four cars at Kansas this week – Bubba Wallace, Riley Herbst, Tyler Reddick and Corey Heim – and Front Row had three with Noah Gragson, Zane Smith and Todd Gilliland.
“You know, the judges haven’t made any kind of ruling,” Hamlin said, “so until they do, then we’re going to stay status quo.”
NASCAR attorney Chris Yates had argued the injunction, granted in December by U.S. District Judge Kenneth Bell, forced the series into an unwanted relationship with unwilling partners, and that it harms other teams because they earn less money. He also said that the teams should not have the benefits of the charter system they are suing to overturn.
“There’s no other place to compete,” countered Jeffrey Kessler, the attorney representing 23XI and Front Row, noting overturning the injunction will cause tremendous damage to the teams, potentially including the loss of drivers and sponsors.
“It will cause havoc to overturn this injunction in the middle of the season,” Kessler said.
There is a trial date set for December, and judge Steven Agee urged the sides to meet for mediation — previously ordered by a lower court — to attempt to resolve the dispute over the injunction. But that seems unlikely.
“We’re not going to rewrite the charter,” Yates told the judges.
RICHMOND, Va. — A three-judge federal appellate panel indicated Friday it might overturn an injunction that allows 23XI Racing, co-owned by retired NBA great Michael Jordan and veteran driver Denny Hamlin, and Front Row Motorsports to race as chartered teams in NASCAR this season while the two teams sue the stock car series over alleged antitrust violations.
NASCAR attorney Chris Yates argued the injunction, granted in December by U.S. District Judge Kenneth Bell of the Western District of North Carolina, forced the series into an unwanted relationship with unwilling partners, and that it harms other teams because they earn less money.
Yates said the district court broke precedent by granting the injunction, saying the “release” clause in the charter contracts forbidding the teams from suing is “common.” He argued, essentially, that the teams should not have the benefits of the charter system they are suing to overturn.
Overturning the injunction would leave the two organizations able to race but without any of the perks of being chartered, including guaranteed weekly revenue. They would also have to qualify at every Cup Series event to make the field, which currently has only four open spots each week; 23XI and Front Row are each running three cars in Cup this season.
Judges Steven Agee, Paul Niemeyer and Stephanie Thacker, at multiple points during the 50-minute hearing at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth District, pushed back on the argument made by plaintiff’s attorney Jeffrey Kessler, who accused NASCAR of being a monopoly.
“There’s no other place to compete,” Kessler told the judges, later noting that overturning the injunction would cause tremendous damage to the two teams, which could lose drivers and sponsors. “It will cause havoc to overturn this injunction in the middle of the season.”
The teams filed the antitrust lawsuit against NASCAR on Oct. 2 in the Western District of North Carolina, arguing that the series bullied teams into signing new charters that make it difficult to compete financially. That came after two years of failed negotiations on new charter agreements, which is NASCAR’s equivalent of franchise deals.
23XI – co-owned by Jordan, Hamlin and Curtis Polk, a longtime Jordan business partner – and Front Row Motorsports, were the only two out of 15 charter-holding teams that refused to sign new agreements in September.
The charters, which teams originally signed before the 2016 season, have twice been extended. The most recent extension runs until 2031, matching the current media rights deal. It guarantees that 36 of the 40 available spots in weekly races will go to teams holding charters.
The judges expressed agreement with Yates’s argument that the district court had erred in issuing the injunction allowing the teams to race, because it mandated they sign the NASCAR charter but eliminated the contract’s release.
“It seems you want to have your cake and eat it, too,” Niemeyer told Kessler.
At another point, the judge pointedly told Kessler that if the teams want to race, they should sign the charter.
Yates contended that forcing an unwanted relationship between NASCAR and the two teams “harms NASCAR and other racing teams.” He said that more chartered teams would earn more money if not for the injunction and noted that the two teams are being “given the benefits of a contract they rejected.”
Kessler argued that even if the district court’s reasoning was flawed, other evidence should lead the circuit court to uphold the injunction. Niemayer disagreed.
“The court wanted you to be able to race but without a contract,” he said.
A trial date is set for December and Agee strongly urged the sides to meet for mediation – previously ordered by a lower court – to attempt to resolve the dispute over the injunction.
“It’ll be a very interesting trial,” Agee said with a wry smile.
The prospect of successful mediation seems unlikely. Yates told the judges: “We’re not going to rewrite the charter.”