Connect with us

Published

on

inflated air — Review: Apples 15-inch MacBook Air says what it is and is what it says Like the M2 Pro Mac mini, it’s a bridge between Apple’s low- and high-end Macs.

Andrew Cunningham – Jun 12, 2023 1:00 pm UTC Enlarge / Apple’s 15-inch M2 MacBook Air.Andrew Cunningham reader comments 0 with

It’s a credit to Apple’s chips that when I’m using my 13-inch MacBook Air, I feel much more constrained by the screen size than I do by the performance.

That wasn’t always the case. The Intel MacBook Airs of years past were perfectly fine for basic computing, but you could feel the difference between an Air and an iMac or MacBook Pro as soon as you tried to edit something in Photoshop or Lightroom or export something with iMovie. The M1 and M2 Macs also feel slower than their Pro, Max, and Ultra counterparts, but for the kinds of light-to-medium-duty work that I spend most of my time doing, I rarely find myself waiting around for things to happen.

That’s why I’ve been looking forward to the 15-inch MacBook Air, which has been rumored for at least a year and is being released to the public this week. Before now, getting a larger Mac laptop meant paying at least $2,000 for the privilege$2,500 for the 16-inch MacBook Probecause getting that bigger screen also came with extra ports, more powerful chips, and fancier screen technology.

Those things are all perfectly nice to have, but they add extra weight, and they’re overkill for many people who might otherwise be interested in a larger-than-13-inch screen. The 15-inch MacBook Air is for those people. Whats different about the 15-inch Air? The 13-inch M1 Air on top of the 15-inch M2 Air design, to give you a general idea of how much bigger it is. Andrew Cunningham Apple’s modern MacBook Designflat top and bottom, big rubber feetis on full display here. Andrew Cunningham The keyboard is the same as the 13-inch Air, but the trackpad has been pulled by its corners and resized for the new palm rest. Andrew Cunningham

The 15-inch MacBook Air isn’ttotally identical to the 13-inch M2 MacBook Air that Apple released nearly a year ago, but it’s pretty close. Like the iPhone 14 and iPhone 14 Plus or the 11- and 12.9-inch iPad Pros, the 15-inch Air shares nearly everything with its smaller sibling except for its size and its price. Advertisement Further Reading2022 MacBook Air review: Apples clean slate

The new MacBook Air’s screen is obviously the biggest departure from the 13.6-inch M2 Air. The 15.3-inch, 28801864 display has the same 224 PPI density as the 13-inch Air, and an aspect ratio of roughly (but not exactly) 3:2. Although the resolution and density are lower than those on either the 14- or 16-inch MacBook Pro, the screen has nearly the same density as every other Retina MacBook Air and Pro that Apple has ever released, so it’s not going to feel like a downgrade for most people.

It also boasts DCI-P3 color gamut coverage and a peak brightness of 520 nits (as measured by our i1 DisplayPro colorimeter). It’s not a mini LED panel, and you don’t get HDR support or the high 120 Hz ProMotion refresh rates you get from a MacBook Pro, but it matches or slightly exceeds the display quality of every other MacBook that Apple has released in the last few years. The 15-inch Air’s keyboard is the same as the one in the 13-inch Air, with more padding on either side.Andrew Cunningham

Per usual for Macs these days, the 15-inch Air ships using a non-native display resolution (in this case, 34202214), leaning on macOS’s scaling technology and the relatively high pixel density to keep things from looking too fuzzy. Things look fine to my eyes no matter which of the display modes you’re using; I normally use the “more space” display option, which renders at 38402486, and all the “larger text” options are great for people who like using bigger screens because they have trouble reading tiny text.

The larger size also adds weightthe 15-inch Air weighs 3.3 pounds, up from 2.7 for the 13-inch M2 Air. That’s still reasonably light for a premium laptop with a 15-inch screen, though, beating the 15-inch Surface Laptop 5 (3.44 pounds) and Dell XPS 15 (4.21 pounds). It’s lighter than either the 14- or 16-inch MacBook Pro (3.5 and 4.7 pounds, respectively). The 15-inch LG Gram, at 2.18 pounds, is one of the few that’s lighter, and it’s got a lower-resolution screen with a less-useful 16:9 aspect ratio. Advertisement

The other change worth noting is the speaker array, which Apple says “deliver[s] twice the bass depth of the 13-inch MacBook Air with M2 for fuller sound.” They’re definitely nice laptop speakers with distinct-sounding bass, and they get loud enough to fill a large roomthey never distort, but I do think they start to sound a bit muddier once you turn them up past 50 percent or so. Two Thunderbolt ports and a MagSafe port on the left side; there’s still a headphone jack on the right.Andrew Cunningham

The 15-inch Air uses the same design language as Apple’s other post-2020 MacBooks. Tapers and gently rounded edges are out; flat planes and more squared-off edges are in. MagSafe is back, with color-matched cables and connectors depending on the laptop you buy. This effectively adds an extra Thunderbolt port when the laptop is plugged inbut regular old USB-C can still charge the laptop just fine. The keyboard is identical to the one in the smaller Air, with nice travel, an even backlight, and a Touch ID sensor in the power button. The trackpad has been stretched out to take advantage of the extra space, and as with the larger MacBook Pro touchpads, I didn’t have any issues with palm rejection even though my palms were usually resting on it at least a bit any time I was typing.

The one thing I still don’t like about this era of MacBook design is the notch at the top of the screen, ostensibly added to make room for a 1080p webcam without adding the need for a bump or protrusion like some other PC laptops have used.

As we’ve said before, it’s something you get used to quickly, and it’s not a deal-breaker. And if you often use your Mac in full-screen mode, as I do, you don’t see it much because it vanishesthe menu bar disappears, and non-menu-bar things aren’t allowed to use the area to the left and right of the notch to do anything. (I would actually recommend going into the Desktop & Dock area of the Settings and changing “automatically hide and show the Menu Bar’ to “Never” since you don’t actually lose any usable screen space by keeping the menu bar visible in full-screen mode the way you do on a non-notched Mac). Page: 1 2 3 Next → reader comments 0 with Andrew Cunningham Andrew is a Senior Technology Reporter at Ars Technica, with a focus on consumer tech including computer hardware and in-depth reviews of operating systems like Windows and macOS. Andrew lives in Philadelphia and co-hosts a weekly book podcast called Overdue. Advertisement Channel Ars Technica ← Previous story Related Stories Today on Ars

Continue Reading

Politics

Met Police chief ‘frustrated’ at planned protest to support Palestine Action – as government moves to ban the group

Published

on

By

Met Police chief 'frustrated' at planned protest to support Palestine Action - as government moves to ban the group

Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley says he is “shocked and frustrated” at a planned protest in support of Palestine Action.

The demonstration, due to take place in Westminster later, comes as the government moves to ban the group under anti-terror laws.

Activists from Palestine Action hit the headlines last week after targeting RAF Brize Norton and damaging two military aircraft in a significant security breach.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Why did activists target an RAF base?

Home Secretary Yvette Cooper will update MPs on the move to proscribe the organisation, which would make it a criminal offence to belong to or support it.

Sir Mark said that – until this happens – the force has “no power in law” to prevent the protest from taking place, but lawbreakers will be “dealt with robustly”.

He added: “This is an organised extremist criminal group, whose proscription as terrorists is being actively considered.

“Members are alleged to have caused millions of pounds of criminal damage, assaulted a police officer with a sledgehammer and last week claimed responsibility for breaking into an airbase and damaging aircraft.

More from UK

“Multiple members of the group are awaiting trial accused of serious offences.”

He added that – while the right to protest is essential – “actions in support of such a group go beyond what most would see as a legitimate protest”.

Read more UK news:
GPs can prescribe weight loss jabs from today
Starmer: Middle East stability is a ‘priority’

Handout photo issued by Palestine Action of damage to Trump Turnberry, which has been vandalised by activists. Palestine Action described it as a 'direct response to the US administration's stated intent to ethnically cleanse Gaza'. Issue date: Saturday March 8, 2025. The golf course in South Ayrshire, owned by the US president, was targeted overnight, with activists painting Gaza Is Not For Sale in three-metre high letters on the lawn, and damaging the greens including the course's most prestig
Image:
Trump’s golf course in Ayrshire was vandalised by Palestine Action. Pic: PA

Over the weekend, Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said he could not rule out the possibility of a foreign power being behind Palestine Action.

Any move to proscribe the group must be debated and approved by MPs and peers.

Speaking to Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips on Sky News, former justice secretary Lord Charlie Falconer suggested that vandalising aircraft would not solely provide legal justification for such a move.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Plans to ban activist group criticised

Lord Falconer said: “I am not aware of what Palestine Action has done beyond the painting of things on the planes in Brize Norton, they may have done other things I didn’t know.

“But generally, that sort of demonstration wouldn’t justify proscription so there must be something else that I don’t know about.”

Palestine Action has staged a series of protests in recent months – spraying the offices of Allianz Insurance in London, and vandalising Donald Trump’s golf course in Ayrshire.

Continue Reading

US

Regime change: Is Trump about to ‘Make Iran Great Again’?

Published

on

By

Regime change: Is Trump about to 'Make Iran Great Again'?

👉 Follow Trump100 on your podcast app 👈

The US bombs Iran. Three nuclear sites heavily hit. Cue condemnation from Iran – and promises of retribution.

As the Iranian foreign minister heads to Moscow to meet Vladimir Putin and discuss what to do next, we ask: what has happened, why did the Trump administration decide to take action, what’s the response domestically and internationally – and what on earth could happen next.

If you’ve got a question you’d like the Trump100 team to answer, you can email it to trump100@sky.uk.

Don’t forget, you can also watch all episodes on our YouTube channel.

Continue Reading

US

The Americans want the attack on Iran’s nuclear sites to be a ‘one-and-done’

Published

on

By

The Americans want the attack on Iran's nuclear sites to be a 'one-and-done'

The Pentagon briefing was big on what happened but short on detail of what happens next.

Neither defence secretary Pete Hegseth nor General Dan “Raisin” Caine, chair of the joint chiefs of staff, can answer that.

Mr Hegseth called the bombing an “incredible and overwhelming success” with “focused and clear” instructions from President Trump.

The focus now is on what follows and that’s not so clear.

The briefing laid out the details of the military deception plan behind Operation Midnight Hammer.

B-2 stealth aircraft were flown west towards the Pacific on Saturday as a decoy, while the B-2s with bunker-busting bombs on board flew east towards Iran.

Israel-Iran live: World continues to react to US attack on nuclear facilities

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What is Operation ‘Midnight Hammer’?

Mr Hegseth called it a plan that took months and weeks of positioning and came down, in the end, to “precision, misdirection and operational security”.

Gen Caine, Mr Trump’s top military man, offered a measured assessment. While Mr Trump had spoken of Iran’s nuclear sites being “obliterated”, Gen Caine revised that downwards when he spoke of “extremely severe damage”.

Full battle damage assessment will reveal the complete picture – only then can the mission’s success be measured in full, mindful that Iran had shifted at least some of its enriched uranium in the days before the strike.

On the politics of it, Mr Hegseth said this wasn’t about regime change in Iran. It might offer precious little reassurance to Tehran, particularly as he also said part of the operation was to defend Israel and the ongoing defence of Israel.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What next after US-Iran strikes?

If the US is tethered to Israel’s interests to the extent of an unprecedented attack on Iran, where does its influence end?

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu appeared almost giddy in response to the US attack. He is a PM strengthened by Mr Trump’s spectacular response to his rhetoric around Iran.

Suspicions weren’t softened around Netanyahu’s influence over Mr Trump when Mr Hegseth was asked about the basis for the attack. He has long lobbied the US president on Iran being close to building a nuclear bomb, contrary to American intelligence which indicates otherwise.

Mr Hegseth was asked what was the new intelligence, was it American or from other countries? He avoided a direct answer, saying only that Mr Trump had looked at all the intelligence information and concluded Iran was a threat.

There were a number of questions about what comes next, with an assortment of non-answers in response from Mr Hegseth.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Starmer reacts to US strikes on Iran

Read more:
Iran may not have lost its ability to make a nuclear bomb
Iran may decide that killing Americans is the best way to retaliate

A consistent line was that the US wanted Iran to negotiate peace, coupled with the threat of further aggression if it doesn’t.

The US defence secretary said Washington was in touch with Tehran privately and publicly, giving it every opportunity to come to the table, every opportunity for peace.

He made the point that America hadn’t targeted Iranian troops or civilians – clearly, a measure by the US to limit response and leave open a door.

The Americans want this attack to have been a “one-and-done”.

The scenario it’s left with, however, is an Iran talking of a diplomatic door closed and sending its foreign minister travelling to Moscow to meet Vladimir Putin.

Iran is wounded, no doubt. Combined attacks have left it degraded and, without a network of support in the Middle East, its ability to strike back is limited. For now, if not necessarily forever.

Donald Trump clearly enjoyed the sugar rush of military success but he will be wary of the come-down and all of its uncertainties.

In circumstances with world implications, he won’t be alone.

Continue Reading

Trending