Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) and his deputies are steering clear of defending former President Trump from felony charges brought by the Justice Department, signaling a deep split within the GOP over how to handle the former president’s legal problems.
While House Republican leaders and the leading Republican candidates for president have rallied behind Trump and attacked the Justice Department for targeting him unfairly, key Republican senators are reluctant to shield the former president from charges that he willfully mishandled top-secret documents and risked national security.
GOP senators say the 37-count indictment brought against Trump by special counsel Jack Smith is more serious and more credible than the 34 felony charges Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg (D) brought against Trump in March.
“There are very serious allegations in the indictment, and I think the Justice Department — as they attempt to prove their case — they’ve got a high burden of proof to convince people that they’re handling this fairly and as they would for any other elected official,” Senate Republican Whip John Thune (S.D.) said.
Asked if he viewed the special prosecutor’s case as more credible than the charges brought forth by the Manhattan attorney general, Thune replied: “Oh yeah.”
“That one was clearly, in my view, politically motivated, and the facts were pretty thin and the law was actually pretty thin in that case,” he said.
By contrast, he said the special prosecutor’s indictment is “serious” and “very detailed.”
“You’re talking about national security secrets, classified information,” he said.
Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), an adviser to the Senate leadership team, offered a blunt assessment when asked about the charges that Trump violated the Espionage Act and conspired to obstruct justice.
“It’s not good,” he told reporters.
The details and photographic evidence included in the indictment have added to the discomfort of Republican senators, especially those like McConnell, who view safeguarding the nation’s military capabilities as among their most important responsibilities.
The Justice Department included photos of boxes of secret documents stored haphazardly around Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence, including the image of boxes stacked up in a bathroom, another of documents scattered across a storage room floor and a third of boxes stacked in a ballroom, where potentially hundreds or even thousands of people could have had access to them.
Republican senators worry the constant controversies swirling around Trump, and his pugnacious response to his critics, will make it very difficult for him to win a general election if he clinches the GOP presidential nomination next year.
“I think his unwillingness to appeal to voters beyond his base makes it unlikely that he could win a general election,” Cornyn said.
McConnell made no mention of the indictment when he spoke on the Senate floor Monday afternoon, and he did not respond to reporters’ questions as he walked to and from the Senate floor for his opening speech.
Several GOP senators are warning that the move by other Republicans to rush to Trump’s side may be a mistake.
“The charges in this case are quite serious and cannot be casually dismissed,” Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) said in a statement. “Mishandling classified documents is a federal crime because it can expose national secrets, as well as the sources and methods they were obtained through.”
Murkowski told reporters Monday that the federal charges appear stronger than the case against Trump in New York and warned that having a nominee for president under indictment could spell disaster for the GOP in 2024.
“I don’t think that it is good for the Republican Party to have a nominee and …. the frontrunner under a series of indictments,” she said.
Murkowski declined to comment on Republicans who have rallied behind Trump but explained her own position: “I looked at what’s been laid out there and I think it’s serious stuff.”
Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) said the “allegations are serious and, if proven, would be consistent with his other actions offensive to the national interest, such as withholding defensive weapons from Ukraine for political reasons and failing to defend the Capitol from violent attack and insurrection,” referring to incidents that led to Trump getting twice impeached.
Romney expressed exasperation over the situation Monday.
“I’m increasingly angry as I think about it. The country is going to go through angst and turmoil and that could have been avoided if President Trump would have just turned the documents in when he was asked to do so. All he had to do when the subpoena came was give the documents back and he wouldn’t have been indicted and the country wouldn’t have gone through what it’s going through. This was entirely avoidable if he just turned in the documents. Why didn’t he?” he said.
Both Murkowski and Romney have voted to convict Trump on impeachment charges, though Romney was the only Republican to vote to convict Trump over his actions related to Ukraine.
Other senior Senate Republicans are also keeping their distance from Trump.
“I’m late for this meeting and I’m just going to run to the meeting,” Sen. Roger Wicker (Miss.), the senior Republican on the Armed Services Committees, told reporters as he walked quickly through the Capitol when asked about the national security implications laid out by the indictment.
Senate Republican Policy Committee Chairwoman Joni Ernst (Iowa) told a Washington Post reporter: “Let’s talk about ‘Roast and Ride’ and how wonderful it was,” referring to the fundraising event she held with Republican presidential hopefuls earlier this month in Des Moines.
Ernst said too much classified information is leaking out of secure confines but also criticized the Justice Department for indicting Trump but not high-profile Democrats such as former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and President Biden.
“I think across the board, we’ve seen many instances of classified documents getting out into areas where they shouldn’t be, but it seems there are two systems of justice here, one for President Trump and one for everybody else who’s had classified documents,” she said.
The indictment gives political ammunition to Democrats who say Trump’s alleged crimes go to “the heart and soul” of the nation’s defense.
“The indictment makes it clear that the information involved here was not casual, it went to the heart and soul of our defense of the United States, in terms of nuclear confrontations, maps, prepared invasion plans,” said Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), who also serves on the Appropriations Defense Subcommittee. Acid poured on slides at Massachusetts park, children report injuries Garth Brooks speaks about decision to sell Bud Light at his Nashville bar
Durbin said he was “concerned” that Aileen Cannon, a federal district judge who was nominated by Trump, may have a role in presiding over Trump’s case in Southern District of Florida.
“I am concerned. She was a Trump appointee, she was overruled by the appellate court … she’s back in charge of this case again. This is an historic case,” he said.
“I still hope that she really does her very best to be neutral and a good judge,” he added.
Nissan is set to announce a leap in its cost-cutting plans that will see 20,000 jobs go globally, according to reports in Japan.
The carmaker, which employs around 6,000 workers at its sprawling manufacturing operations in Sunderland, had already let it be known last November that 9,000 roles would be going amid weak sales and rising costs.
But Japanese broadcaster NHK said on Monday it expected that total to more than double.
Nissan, which was yet to comment on the claim, is due to reveal full year results covering the 12 months to March on Tuesday morning.
They are expected to show a net loss of up to £3.8bn due to a series of writedowns on the value of its operations.
They will be the first results Nissan has declared since the appointment of a new chief executive last month.
More on Nissan
Related Topics:
Ivan Espinosa issued a “significant” downgrade to Nissan’s outlook just three weeks ago.
If the job cuts report is true, it would amount to a 15% reduction in the company’s worldwide workforce.
Image: New models of the Nissan Juke being assembled at the Sunderland plant. Pic:PA
It is not known if the Sunderland production facilities form part of any planned job cuts or production reductions, of up to 20%, that were reported.
Nissan has, on several occasions since Brexit, called the plant’s future into question before proceeding with investment plans.
It has invested £2bn in Sunderland since 2023 alone.
The company secured UK government money this year for a new electric powertrain manufacturing facility in Sunderland.
But a senior Nissan executive, Alan Johnson, warned more aid was needed just last month, arguing that the UK was “not a competitive place” to build cars.
Nissan, like rivals, is facing challenges on many fronts.
Sir Keir Starmer has promised to bring down migration numbers by tightening up the rules on those allowed to come to the UK.
The prime minister promised his new plan will reduce net migration – the difference between immigration and emigration – by the end of this parliament in 2029.
Details of the plans have been published in a white paper, a government document that outlines policy proposals before being introduced as legislation.
Sky News has combed through the white paper to bring you the details.
Language requirements
All visa routes will require people to have a certain level of English proficiency.
More from Politics
People coming with the main visa holders – dependents – will also have to have a basic understanding of English, which they currently do not.
The level of proficiency needed depends on the visa, with a skilled worker visa requiring at least upper intermediate level. Currently, it requires just an “intermediate” level.
To extend visas, people will have to show progression in their English.
Image: Keir Starmer announced the changes at a podium with ‘securing Britain’s future’ on the front. Pic: PA
Settled status
Currently, people have to live in the UK for five years before they can gain settled status.
Under the new plan, they will have to live in the UK for 10 years.
However, “high-contributing” individuals such as doctors and nurses could be allowed to apply for settled status after five years.
A new bereaved parent visa will be created so those in the UK who have a British or settled child that dies can get settled status immediately.
Settled status gives people the right to work and live in the UK for as long as they like, and provides them with the same rights as citizens, such as healthcare and welfare and the right to bring family members to live in the UK.
People with settled status can then choose to apply for British citizenship.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:51
Sky’s Sam Coates questions PM on migration
British citizenship
People can qualify sooner for citizenship by contributing to UK society and the economy, like settled status.
The Life in the UK test will be reformed.
Social care visa
This visa, which allowed care workers to come to the UK due to a shortage, will not exist anymore.
There will be a transition period until 2028 when visa extensions and switching to the visa for those already here will be allowed.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:09
‘We risk becoming an island of strangers’
Skilled worker visa
People wanting to come to the UK on a skilled worker visa must now have at least an undergraduate university degree. The minimum was previously A-levels.
There will also be tighter restrictions on recruitment from overseas for jobs with “critical” skills shortages, as well as strategies to incentivise employers to increase training and participation rates in the UK.
Very highly skilled people, in areas the government identifies, will be given preferential access to come to the UK legally by increasing the number of people allowed to come through the “high talent” routes such as the global talent visa, the innovator founder visa and high potential individual route.
A limited pool of refugees will be allowed to apply for employment through the skilled worker route.
Image: Skilled worker visas will now require at least a university degree, with preferential access for highly skilled people. Pic: PA
Study visas
People on graduate visas will only be allowed to remain in the UK for 18 months after they finish their studies.
Currently, students finishing degrees can stay for two years if they apply for the graduate visa, or those finishing PhDs can stay for three.
Institutions sponsoring international students will have their requirements strengthened, with those close to failing their sponsor duties placed on an action plan and limits imposed on the number of new students they can recruit.
Sponsors, who can cover tuition fees and living costs, include overseas governments, UK government scholarships, UK government departments, UK universities, overseas universities, companies and charities.
Humanitarian visa
The Ukraine, Hong Kong and Afghanistan humanitarian visa routes will remain.
However, the government will review the effectiveness of sponsorship arrangements for those schemes so businesses, universities and community groups can “sustainably” sponsor those refugees.
Image: The government will continue to support humanitarian visas, such as the Afghanistan one after the Taliban took over Kabul in 2021. Pic: AP
Domestic worker visa
To help prevent modern slavery, the government will reconsider this visa, which currently allows foreign national domestic workers to visit the UK with their employer for up to six months.
Businesses
Companies wanting to bring people from abroad to work for them in the UK will have to invest in the UK first.
To prevent exploitation of low-skilled workers on temporary visas already in the UK, the government will look at making it easier for workers to move between licensed sponsors for the duration of their visa.
The right to family life
A growing number of asylum seekers have used the “right to family life” – Article 8 of the Human Rights Act – to stop their deportation.
Legislation will be introduced to “make clear it is the government and parliament that decides who should have the right to remain in the UK”.
It will set out how Article 8 should be applied in different immigration routes so “fewer cases are treated as ‘exceptional'”.
Image: A group of migrants was brought into Dover by Border Force as the PM announced immigration changes. Pic: PA
Foreign national offenders
The Home Office will be given powers to more easily take enforcement and removal action, and revoke visas in a much wider range of crimes where people did not serve jail time in other countries.
Deportation thresholds will be reviewed to take into account more than just the length of their sentence, with violence against women and girls taken more seriously.
Enforcement
Sir Keir said the immigration rules – at the border and in the system – will be more strongly enforced than before “because fair rules must be followed”.
People who claim asylum, particularly after arriving in the UK, where conditions in their home country have not materially changed, will face tighter controls, restrictions and requirements where there is evidence of abuse of the system.
Other governments will be made to play their part to stop their nationals coming to the UK, or from being returned.
Sponsors of migrant workers or students abusing the system will have financial penalties or sanctions placed on them, and they will be given more support to ensure compliance.
People on short-term visas who commit an offence will be deported “swiftly”.
Scientific and tech methods will be explored to ensure adults coming to the UK are not wrongly identified as children.
eVisas, which have now replaced physical documents, will help tackle illegal working and support raids on those overstaying their visas or on the wrong visa.
Major banks are legally obligated to refuse current accounts to individuals suspected of being in the UK illegally and to notify the Home Office. This will be extended to other financial institutions.
Hamas has released Edan Alexander, an Israeli soldier who holds American citizenship, as part of ongoing efforts to achieve a permanent ceasefire with Israel.
The 21-year-old was believed to be the last living American hostage in Gaza.
In a statement, Hamas said: ” The Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades released the captured Israeli soldier, Idan Alexander, a US citizen, a short while ago, following contacts with the US administration. This comes as part of the efforts being made by mediators to achieve a ceasefire, open the crossings, and allow aid and relief to reach our people in the Gaza Strip.
Image: Edan Alexander. Pic: Hostages and Missing Families Forum via AP
“This step comes after important contacts in which Hamas demonstrated positivity and high flexibility.
“We affirm that serious and responsible negotiations achieve results in the release of prisoners. However, continuing the aggression prolongs their suffering and may kill them.
“We affirm the movement’s readiness to immediately begin negotiations to reach a comprehensive and sustainable ceasefire agreement, including the withdrawal of the occupation army, the end of the siege, a prisoner exchange, and the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip.
“We urge the Trump administration to continue its efforts to end this brutal war waged by the war criminal Netanyahu against children, women, and defenceless civilians in the Gaza Strip.”
Mr Alexander was transferred to Israel Defence Forces via the Red Cross.
Image: A sign outside a Jewish community centre in Edan Alexander’s home town of Tenafly, New Jersey. File pic: Reuters
An IDF statement said: “The returning hostage is currently being accompanied by IDF special forces on his return to Israeli territory, where he will undergo an initial medical assessment and meet with his family.
“The commanders and soldiers of the Israel Defense Forces salute and embrace the returning hostage as he makes his way home to the State of Israel.
“The IDF Spokesperson’s Unit asks everyone to respect the privacy of the returning hostage and his family.”
Mr Alexander’s parents, who live in the US, made the journey to Israel ahead of the expected release.
The family said they were deeply grateful to US President Donald Trump and his administration for its work to secure the release – and have urged the Israeli government to continue efforts to free all hostages.
Mr Alexander, who is from New Jersey, was 19 when he was taken from his base on the border with Gaza in southern Israel during the Hamas attacks on 7 October 2023.