Connect with us

Published

on

Share on Pinterest A recent survey found that a surprising number of healthcare professionals mistakenly believe people living with obesity can reach a healthy weight if they simply try hard enough. Dima Berlin/Getty ImagesNew research finds that bias about the root cause of obesity affects how healthcare professionals recommend treatment for people who are living with this chronic disease.Results from a survey showed that 58% of providers believe that obesity is mainly due to lifestyle choices, and 43% believe that those living with obesity can reach a healthy weight if they only try hard enough.Health experts say these biases are dangerous as they discount the fact that causes for obesity can vary widely and treatment needs to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis to ensure the best results.

When it comes to treating obesity, our growing medical understanding of the condition has shifted approaches to treatment as well as the larger cultural understanding of what it means to be living with obesity.

For the more than 2 in 5 American adults who live with the condition, this also involves pushing against stigma and misinformation that can accompany discussions about the chronic disease.

Now, new data released by Eli Lilly and Company that looks at prevailing barriers that might stand in the way of normalizing and prescribing anti-obesity medications, speaks to larger issues of how many providers might discount genetics and factors that remain out of peoples control when they diagnose and treat the condition.

Often, cultural biases that often infuse our understanding of obesity can paint the condition as one that results mainly from lifestyle factors more than anything else.

How might this affect the treatment that people receive for obesity?

Healthline spoke with experts who put all of this in context and explained how issues around the treatment for obesity are nuanced and vary case by case, person by person. What the data highlights about attitudes toward obesity

The data from Eli Lilly comes from the OBSERVE study, conducted in collaboration between the pharmaceutical company, Cerner Enviza, and leading opinion leaders and researchers in the field.

It aimed to look at the factors that might illustrate where we are today in the prescription and adoption of medications to treat obesity. It also sheds a brighter light on current attitudes and provides a look at how the condition is often approached in medical settings.

Among those included in the study were people living with obesity, healthcare providers, and even employers.

The latest data from this study focused on healthcare providers perceptions. It was presented in May at the 2023 AACE (American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Meeting in Seattle.

The findings revealed a striking snapshot of provider attitudes toward treating the condition.

The survey showed that 58% of surveyed providers believe that obesity is mainly due to lifestyle choices, 43% believe that those living with obesity can reach a healthy weight if they only try hard enough, 24% reported they believed most patients with obesity are metabolically healthy even though they are carrying extra weight, and 67% think people with obesity should be required to demonstrate motivation to make lifestyle changes before medical treatment is offered.

Study co-author Dr. Rekha Kumar, chief medical officer at medically-assisted weight care program, Found, and practicing endocrinologist in New York City, said the figure that shows 43% of providers believe patients with obesity can generally achieve and maintain a healthy weight if they only tried enough was particularly surprising to her.

The science has been clear for a long time that biology plays a critical role in someones ability to lose and maintain weight loss, and for many people struggling with overweight and obesity, lifestyle changes are often not enough, Kumar told Healthline. The belief that someone cant achieve a healthy weight, it means they are a failure or lack willpower is what continues to stigmatize patients with obesity, and prevent them from seeking and getting the medical care they deserve and need.

When asked just how big of a challenge it is for people living with obesity to simply lose weight and then maintain that weight loss, Dr. Diana Thiara, medical director of UCSF Weight Management Clinic and UCSF assistant clinical professor, told Healthline that its important to note that obesity is a chronic disease that requires long-term management.

Its incredibly hard to lose weight and keep it off in the long run. We know that some people are able to sustain large amounts of weight loss for many years things like the national weight control registry have examined this these participants had lower rates of adverse behavior change, said Thiara, who is unaffiliated with the study. We need to work with our patients, continuously, for the long term, to help them achieve and maintain weight loss.

The other thing is that we need to accept and be okay with the fact that people with obesity will have moments of hardship and relapse throughout their lives. We should help them through these times, she added.

In examining the fact that 58% of these respondents think obesity is due to lifestyle choices, Thiara added that this is an overly simplistic view of the chronic disease. She stressed that this is a complex condition, and we dont fully understand etiology.

We do know that there are certain genes that are more prevalent in individuals with obesity. The thought, however, is more that its a combination of having those genes plus living in an obesogenic environment or calorie-dense/unhealthy foods in combination with sedentary lifestyles, Thiara explained. Additionally, there is data suggesting there is correlation between obesity and infection with certain viruses, specifically a few strains of adenovirus.

Thiara added that our evolving understanding of the gut microbiome at least in studies of animals reveals that it plays a role in lean versus obese phenotypes in mice, for example.

We are still trying to understand the role of the microbiome and weight in humans, and I hope we learn more from scientists who are actively studying this. Now, why is this a pervasive view? Obesity bias is incredibly prevalent in society, and medical providers are included here, she said. Studies have shown this repeatedly, and this includes all types of providers from nurses to doctors. Obesity bias is a big problem in the medical field. I think this bias makes us blame patients for having excess weight.How to combat entrenched biases going forward

Pushing against some of these entrenched views of obesity can be hard.

Kumar said the idea that lifestyle choices above all else are the main factor affecting obesity obscures the very nuanced reality of all of the factors and moving parts that are coming into play with this health issue.

It fails to take into account that the presence of this disease varies widely between individuals.

For some people, lifestyle changes may very well be effective at both losing weight and then maintaining a healthy weight. Seeing this work in some people can sometimes paint a very incomplete picture that providers then take as the norm.

The truth is that weight loss is only successful long term for a very select amount of people and does not accurately reflect what most people experience a daily struggle to lose weight or keep it off after losing it, Kumar said. As providers, we have been trained to focus on chronic diseases like high blood pressure, diabetes, heart disease. Being overweight or obese is still being viewed as [a] lifestyle/wellness issue, even though the American Medical Association recognized obesity as a chronic disease 10 years ago.

This means data like this can result in a call to action of sorts.

Its time we start treating obesity like every other chronic disease. That starts with acknowledging that there are biological factors working against most people on their journey to lose weight, and until those biologcal factors are addressed, long-term weight loss is not likely to be successful, Kumar added. Why doctors might overlook obesity as a major concern

Obesity advocacy groups think a lot about ways to fight against these biases.

The Obestiy Action Coalition (OAC) is a nonprofit that offers a voice and platform to Americans nationwide who are affected by the condition.

Former OAC board member Ted Kyle, RPh, MBA, founded ConscienHealth in 2009 in order to assist organizations and experts to move toward evidence-based approaches to obesity and achieving overall health.

Kyle, who is unaffiliated with the OBSERVE study, told Healthline that the scientific understanding of obesity has changed a great deal over the past decade.

For people who devote their careers to the study and clinical care for obesity, this new knowledge is no big deal. But for average clinicians, its mind-boggling because they did not learn about this in medical school, he said.

In pushing against those medical biases that suggest all one needs to do is just exercise more or adopt a new diet of some kind and it will be very easy to do so, Kyle said this is a perspective that is mostly false.

Obesity is the result of genetic susceptibility triggered by a wide range of environmental factors the food supply, barriers to physical activity, stressors, and drugs and chemicals that cause weight gain. Lifestyle choices can help a person cope, but they are not the most common trigger for this disease, Kyle said. The narrative is entrenched because most providers get their understanding of obesity from false narratives prevalent in popular culture, rather than from medical education by people who understand this disease.

For her part, Thiara said that obesity bias can create a negative domino effect that feeds a lack of understanding of the disease, a lack of interest in learning how to treat it, and not enough focus on obesity in medical education.

In medical training, why might obesity be overlooked?

First, there is the prevalence of bias that tells people they should be able to overcome obesity through sheer force of will. Second, there is the longstanding lack of effective options for treatment other than metabolic and bariatric surgery. Third is the exclusion of coverage for science-based obesity care by most health plans, Kyle said. How to find appropriate health care for obesity

When asked what treatments she would prescribe to a person who comes to her who has obesity, Thiara said lifestyle change is certainly foundational to work with weight management. This is because patients need to also be working on lifestyle changes so they are able to maintain weight loss in the long run.

Beyond lifestyle change, more intensive options like medications or surgery really depend on the individuals comorbidities and health status, their overall goals, and their personal preferences, Thiara added. We know that medications for weight loss and surgical options will achieve, on average, more weight loss than lifestyle intervention. However, they also have side effects. We need to have conversations with our patients to decide together what are the best steps for patients.

She also said that if you have obesity and are looking for health care that makes the most sense for you, the first step is to possibly find a team a primary care provider, yes, but also potentially a nutritionist or a behavioralist.

For some patients, this is an adequate combination. In an ideal world, patients with obesity would be referred to specialty weight management programs and get comprehensive inter-professional care and/or bariatric surgery programs depending on a patients interest in procedural intervention, Thiara said.

Kumar said that whether you should be focusing on lifestyle modifications, new medications, surgery, or other forms of treatment, it all depends on what a provider who specializes in obesity determines makes the most sense for you. There is no one-size-fits-all approach.

Its also important to note that while medispas and certain physicians may liberally prescribe medications like Ozempic these days to people who dont meet the criteria for it. Thats not only irresponsible, but it also may not be the safest, most effective option. Thats something you should keep in mind before requesting it from your doctor, Kumar stressed.

She pointed to Found, where she serves as chief medical officer. This is a weight management program that combines biology and behavioral change as an example of an integrated, personalized approach.

What if you are seeking care, but come in contact with a provider who exhibits some of the aforementioned toxic views on obesity the study highlighted?

Kyle said it can be a challenge to find a provider who is well-versed in obesity and the kind of treatment that might be right for you.

Yes this can be a challenge, he said. The best bet is to look for a provider who is board-certified in obesity medicine.

He pointed to the American Board of Obesity Medicine as one option here.

Kumar said if you come across a provider who is giving outdated guidance for weight loss, you should seek another who specializes in treating obesity as a chronic disease.

As with seeking care for any chronic condition, do your research, and look for a provider who specializes in a field that best applies to you.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Rappers Bob Vylan sue Irish broadcaster RTE over claim lead singer led ‘antisemitic chants’ at Glastonbury gig

Published

on

By

Rappers Bob Vylan sue Irish broadcaster RTE over claim lead singer led 'antisemitic chants' at Glastonbury gig

Punk-rap duo Bob Vylan are suing Irish national broadcaster RTE for defamation, claiming it misrepresented chants led by the band when they played this year’s Glastonbury festival.

The group, which performed at Dublin’s Vicar Street last month, claim they were defamed in a report by RTE News that said the lead singer led antisemitic chants when they played the Somerset festival in June.

During their performance, singer Pascal Robinson-Foster, whose stage name is Bobby Vylan, led a chant of “death, death, to the IDF [Israel Defence Forces]”.

File pic: PA
Image:
File pic: PA

Pic: PA
Image:
Pic: PA

It provoked widespread criticism of the artist, including from Glastonbury organiser Emily Eavis, and the BBC, which live streamed their show.

Phoenix Law launched legal action on behalf of Robinson-Foster and drummer Wade Laurence George at Ireland’s High Court on Monday, according to court records.

The firm said: “The proceedings arise from a broadcast aired by RTE News following Bob Vylan’s performance at Glastonbury Festival on 28 June 2025.

“During this broadcast, comments were made alleging that the lead singer of Bob Vylan led antisemitic chants. These allegations are categorically denied by our clients and are entirely untrue.”

More on Glastonbury

Phoenix Law said Bob Vylan had made statements expressing support for Palestinian self-determination and criticising military actions by the IDF (Israel Defence Forces).

His comments did not target Jewish people or express hatred towards any group, the firm said, suggesting they were “politically charged but not antisemitic in nature”.

Solicitor Darragh Mackin said the pair “are no stranger to utilising their freedom of expression to speak out against the genocide in Gaza“.

Mr Mackin said there was “a fundamental distinction between speaking critically about the role of the Israeli state forces, and being antisemitic”.

“The former is speech within the confines of political expression, whereas the latter is a form of hatred directed towards Jewish people,” he added.

Read more on Sky News:
Who are Bob Vylan?

The BBC apologised, including to the Jewish community, and said it regretted not pulling the live stream of the set and promised not to live stream “high-risk” acts in future.

It partially upheld complaints made over the broadcast, accepting the live stream broke the corporation’s editorial guidelines.

Ofcom’s chief executive, Dame Melanie Dawes, said the BBC needed to “get a grip quicker” on handling such controversies and complete its internal reports and investigations sooner.

Last month, the Metropolitan Police said detectives would take no further action over similar alleged chants made at a Bob Vylan gig in London in May.

The individual was not arrested but an investigation was ongoing, the Met said.

Avon and Somerset Police said a man, in his 30s, understood to be Mr Robinson-Foster, had voluntarily attended an interview in relation to the band’s Glastonbury performance. Enquiries are ongoing, the force said on Tuesday.

The US condemned the act’s “hateful tirade”, revoking their visas, while several festivals cancelled their upcoming appearances.

Speaking to Louis Theroux in October, Bobby Vylan said he had no regrets about the chants and would do it again “tomorrow”.

Sky News has contacted RTE for comment.

Continue Reading

Sports

Do college sports need a CBA? Some ADs are starting to think so

Published

on

By

Do college sports need a CBA? Some ADs are starting to think so

After another week of frustrating setbacks, at the end of a frustrating year trying to bring stability to their industry, a growing number of college athletic directors say they are interested in exploring a once-unthinkable option: collective bargaining with their players.

Dozens of athletic directors will gather in Las Vegas over the next few days for an annual conference. They had hoped to be raising toasts to the U.S. House of Representatives. But for the second time in three months, House members balked last week at voting on a bill that would give the NCAA protection from antitrust lawsuits and employment threats. So instead, they will be greeted by one of the Strip’s specialties: the cold-slap realization of needing a better plan.

“I’m not sure I can sit back today and say I’m really proud of what we’ve become,” Boise State athletic director Jeramiah Dickey told ESPN late last week. “There is a solution. We just have to work together to find it, and maybe collective bargaining is it.”

Athletic directors see only two paths to a future in which the college sports industry can enforce rules and defend them in court: Either Congress grants them an exemption from antitrust laws, or they collectively bargain with athletes. As Dickey said, and others have echoed quietly in the past several days, it has become irresponsible to continue to hope for an antitrust bailout without at least fully kicking the tires on the other option.

“If Congress ends up solving it for us, and it ends up being a healthy solution I’ll be the first one to do cartwheels down the street,” said Tennessee athletic director Danny White when speaking to ESPN about his interest in collective bargaining months ago. “But what are the chances they get it right when the NCAA couldn’t even get it right? We should be solving it ourselves.”

Some athletic directors thought they had solved their era of relative lawlessness back in July. The NCAA and its schools agreed to pay $2.8 billion in the House settlement to purchase a very expensive set of guardrails meant to put a cap on how much teams could spend to acquire players. The schools also agreed to fund the College Sports Commission, a new agency created by the settlement to police those restrictions.

But without an antitrust exemption, any school or player who doesn’t like a punishment they receive for bursting through those guardrails can file a lawsuit and give themselves a pretty good chance of wiggling out of a penalty. The CSC’s plan — crafted largely by leaders of the Power 4 conferences — to enforce those rules without an antitrust exemption was to get all their schools to sign a promise that they wouldn’t file any such lawsuits. On the same day that Congress’ attempt crumbled last week, seven state attorneys general angrily encouraged their schools not to sign the CSC’s proposed agreement.

In the wake of the attorneys general’s opposition, a loose deadline to sign the agreement came and went, with many schools declining to participate. So, college football is steamrolling toward another transfer portal season without any sheriff that has the legal backing to police how teams spend money on building their rosters.

That’s why college sports fans have heard head football coaches like Lane Kiffin openly describe how they negotiated for the biggest player payroll possible in a system where all teams are supposed to be capped at the same $20.5 million limit. Right now, the rules aren’t real. The stability promised as part of the House settlement doesn’t appear to be imminent. Meanwhile, the tab for potential damages in future antitrust lawsuits continues to grow larger with each passing day.

Collective bargaining isn’t easy, either. Under the current law, players would need to be employees to negotiate a legally binding deal. The NCAA and most campus leaders are adamantly opposed to turning athletes into employees for several reasons, including the added costs and infrastructure it would require.

The industry would need to make tough decisions about which college athletes should be able to bargain and how to divide them into logical groups. Should the players be divided by conference? Should all football players negotiate together? What entity would sit across from them at the bargaining table?

On Monday, Athletes.Org, a group that has been working for two years to become college sports’ version of a players’ union, published a 35-page proposal for what an agreement might look like. Their goal was to show it is possible to answer the thorny, in-the-weeds questions that have led many leaders in college sports to quickly dismiss collective bargaining as a viable option.

Multiple athletic directors and a sitting university president are taking the proposal seriously — a milestone for one of the several upstart entities working to gain credibility as a representative for college athletes. Syracuse chancellor and president Kent Syverud said Monday that he has long felt the best way forward for college sports is a negotiation where athletes have “a real collective voice in setting the rules.”

“[This template] is an important step toward that kind of partnership-based framework,” he said in a statement released with AO’s plan. “… I’m encouraged to see this conversation happening more openly, so everyone can fully understand what’s at stake.”

White, the Tennessee athletic director, has also spent years working with lawyers to craft a collective bargaining option. In his plan, the top brands in college football would form a single private company, which could then employ players. He says that would provide a solution in states where employees of public institutions are not legally allowed to unionize.

“I don’t understand why everyone’s so afraid of employment status,” White said. “We have kids all over our campus that have jobs. … We have kids in our athletic department that are also students here that work in our equipment room, and they have employee status. How that became a dirty word, I don’t get it.”

White said athletes could be split into groups by sport to negotiate for a percentage of the revenue they help to generate.

The result could be expensive for schools. Then again, paying lawyers and lobbyists isn’t cheap either. The NCAA and the four power conferences combined to spend more than $9 million on lobbyists between 2021 and 2024, the latest year where public data is available. That’s a relatively small figure compared to the fees and penalties they could face if they continue to lose antitrust cases in federal court.

“I’m not smart enough to say [collective bargaining] is the only answer or the best answer,” Dickey said. “But I think the onus is on us to at least curiously question: How do you set something up that can be sustainable? What currently is happening is not.”

Players and coaches are frustrated with the current system, wanting to negotiate salaries and build rosters with a clear idea of what rules will actually be enforced. Dickey says fans are frustrated as they invest energy and money into their favorite teams without understanding what the future holds. And athletic directors, who want to plan a yearly budget and help direct their employees, are frustrated too.

“It has been very difficult on campus. I can’t emphasize that enough,” White said. “It’s been brutal in a lot of ways. It continues to be as we try to navigate these waters without a clear-cut solution.”

This week White and Dickey won’t be alone in their frustration. They’ll be among a growing group of peers who are pushing to explore a new solution.

Continue Reading

Science

Massive Sunspot Complex on the Sun Raises Risk of Strong Solar Storms

Published

on

By

A massive sunspot complex has appeared on the Sun, covering an area comparable to the legendary Carrington Event region. Known as AR 4294-96, the active cluster features highly tangled magnetic fields that could unleash powerful solar flares and geomagnetic storms, potentially disrupting satellites, power grids, and global communications if Earth-directed eruptions oc…

Continue Reading

Trending