Connect with us

Published

on

Share on Pinterest A recent survey found that a surprising number of healthcare professionals mistakenly believe people living with obesity can reach a healthy weight if they simply try hard enough. Dima Berlin/Getty ImagesNew research finds that bias about the root cause of obesity affects how healthcare professionals recommend treatment for people who are living with this chronic disease.Results from a survey showed that 58% of providers believe that obesity is mainly due to lifestyle choices, and 43% believe that those living with obesity can reach a healthy weight if they only try hard enough.Health experts say these biases are dangerous as they discount the fact that causes for obesity can vary widely and treatment needs to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis to ensure the best results.

When it comes to treating obesity, our growing medical understanding of the condition has shifted approaches to treatment as well as the larger cultural understanding of what it means to be living with obesity.

For the more than 2 in 5 American adults who live with the condition, this also involves pushing against stigma and misinformation that can accompany discussions about the chronic disease.

Now, new data released by Eli Lilly and Company that looks at prevailing barriers that might stand in the way of normalizing and prescribing anti-obesity medications, speaks to larger issues of how many providers might discount genetics and factors that remain out of peoples control when they diagnose and treat the condition.

Often, cultural biases that often infuse our understanding of obesity can paint the condition as one that results mainly from lifestyle factors more than anything else.

How might this affect the treatment that people receive for obesity?

Healthline spoke with experts who put all of this in context and explained how issues around the treatment for obesity are nuanced and vary case by case, person by person. What the data highlights about attitudes toward obesity

The data from Eli Lilly comes from the OBSERVE study, conducted in collaboration between the pharmaceutical company, Cerner Enviza, and leading opinion leaders and researchers in the field.

It aimed to look at the factors that might illustrate where we are today in the prescription and adoption of medications to treat obesity. It also sheds a brighter light on current attitudes and provides a look at how the condition is often approached in medical settings.

Among those included in the study were people living with obesity, healthcare providers, and even employers.

The latest data from this study focused on healthcare providers perceptions. It was presented in May at the 2023 AACE (American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Meeting in Seattle.

The findings revealed a striking snapshot of provider attitudes toward treating the condition.

The survey showed that 58% of surveyed providers believe that obesity is mainly due to lifestyle choices, 43% believe that those living with obesity can reach a healthy weight if they only try hard enough, 24% reported they believed most patients with obesity are metabolically healthy even though they are carrying extra weight, and 67% think people with obesity should be required to demonstrate motivation to make lifestyle changes before medical treatment is offered.

Study co-author Dr. Rekha Kumar, chief medical officer at medically-assisted weight care program, Found, and practicing endocrinologist in New York City, said the figure that shows 43% of providers believe patients with obesity can generally achieve and maintain a healthy weight if they only tried enough was particularly surprising to her.

The science has been clear for a long time that biology plays a critical role in someones ability to lose and maintain weight loss, and for many people struggling with overweight and obesity, lifestyle changes are often not enough, Kumar told Healthline. The belief that someone cant achieve a healthy weight, it means they are a failure or lack willpower is what continues to stigmatize patients with obesity, and prevent them from seeking and getting the medical care they deserve and need.

When asked just how big of a challenge it is for people living with obesity to simply lose weight and then maintain that weight loss, Dr. Diana Thiara, medical director of UCSF Weight Management Clinic and UCSF assistant clinical professor, told Healthline that its important to note that obesity is a chronic disease that requires long-term management.

Its incredibly hard to lose weight and keep it off in the long run. We know that some people are able to sustain large amounts of weight loss for many years things like the national weight control registry have examined this these participants had lower rates of adverse behavior change, said Thiara, who is unaffiliated with the study. We need to work with our patients, continuously, for the long term, to help them achieve and maintain weight loss.

The other thing is that we need to accept and be okay with the fact that people with obesity will have moments of hardship and relapse throughout their lives. We should help them through these times, she added.

In examining the fact that 58% of these respondents think obesity is due to lifestyle choices, Thiara added that this is an overly simplistic view of the chronic disease. She stressed that this is a complex condition, and we dont fully understand etiology.

We do know that there are certain genes that are more prevalent in individuals with obesity. The thought, however, is more that its a combination of having those genes plus living in an obesogenic environment or calorie-dense/unhealthy foods in combination with sedentary lifestyles, Thiara explained. Additionally, there is data suggesting there is correlation between obesity and infection with certain viruses, specifically a few strains of adenovirus.

Thiara added that our evolving understanding of the gut microbiome at least in studies of animals reveals that it plays a role in lean versus obese phenotypes in mice, for example.

We are still trying to understand the role of the microbiome and weight in humans, and I hope we learn more from scientists who are actively studying this. Now, why is this a pervasive view? Obesity bias is incredibly prevalent in society, and medical providers are included here, she said. Studies have shown this repeatedly, and this includes all types of providers from nurses to doctors. Obesity bias is a big problem in the medical field. I think this bias makes us blame patients for having excess weight.How to combat entrenched biases going forward

Pushing against some of these entrenched views of obesity can be hard.

Kumar said the idea that lifestyle choices above all else are the main factor affecting obesity obscures the very nuanced reality of all of the factors and moving parts that are coming into play with this health issue.

It fails to take into account that the presence of this disease varies widely between individuals.

For some people, lifestyle changes may very well be effective at both losing weight and then maintaining a healthy weight. Seeing this work in some people can sometimes paint a very incomplete picture that providers then take as the norm.

The truth is that weight loss is only successful long term for a very select amount of people and does not accurately reflect what most people experience a daily struggle to lose weight or keep it off after losing it, Kumar said. As providers, we have been trained to focus on chronic diseases like high blood pressure, diabetes, heart disease. Being overweight or obese is still being viewed as [a] lifestyle/wellness issue, even though the American Medical Association recognized obesity as a chronic disease 10 years ago.

This means data like this can result in a call to action of sorts.

Its time we start treating obesity like every other chronic disease. That starts with acknowledging that there are biological factors working against most people on their journey to lose weight, and until those biologcal factors are addressed, long-term weight loss is not likely to be successful, Kumar added. Why doctors might overlook obesity as a major concern

Obesity advocacy groups think a lot about ways to fight against these biases.

The Obestiy Action Coalition (OAC) is a nonprofit that offers a voice and platform to Americans nationwide who are affected by the condition.

Former OAC board member Ted Kyle, RPh, MBA, founded ConscienHealth in 2009 in order to assist organizations and experts to move toward evidence-based approaches to obesity and achieving overall health.

Kyle, who is unaffiliated with the OBSERVE study, told Healthline that the scientific understanding of obesity has changed a great deal over the past decade.

For people who devote their careers to the study and clinical care for obesity, this new knowledge is no big deal. But for average clinicians, its mind-boggling because they did not learn about this in medical school, he said.

In pushing against those medical biases that suggest all one needs to do is just exercise more or adopt a new diet of some kind and it will be very easy to do so, Kyle said this is a perspective that is mostly false.

Obesity is the result of genetic susceptibility triggered by a wide range of environmental factors the food supply, barriers to physical activity, stressors, and drugs and chemicals that cause weight gain. Lifestyle choices can help a person cope, but they are not the most common trigger for this disease, Kyle said. The narrative is entrenched because most providers get their understanding of obesity from false narratives prevalent in popular culture, rather than from medical education by people who understand this disease.

For her part, Thiara said that obesity bias can create a negative domino effect that feeds a lack of understanding of the disease, a lack of interest in learning how to treat it, and not enough focus on obesity in medical education.

In medical training, why might obesity be overlooked?

First, there is the prevalence of bias that tells people they should be able to overcome obesity through sheer force of will. Second, there is the longstanding lack of effective options for treatment other than metabolic and bariatric surgery. Third is the exclusion of coverage for science-based obesity care by most health plans, Kyle said. How to find appropriate health care for obesity

When asked what treatments she would prescribe to a person who comes to her who has obesity, Thiara said lifestyle change is certainly foundational to work with weight management. This is because patients need to also be working on lifestyle changes so they are able to maintain weight loss in the long run.

Beyond lifestyle change, more intensive options like medications or surgery really depend on the individuals comorbidities and health status, their overall goals, and their personal preferences, Thiara added. We know that medications for weight loss and surgical options will achieve, on average, more weight loss than lifestyle intervention. However, they also have side effects. We need to have conversations with our patients to decide together what are the best steps for patients.

She also said that if you have obesity and are looking for health care that makes the most sense for you, the first step is to possibly find a team a primary care provider, yes, but also potentially a nutritionist or a behavioralist.

For some patients, this is an adequate combination. In an ideal world, patients with obesity would be referred to specialty weight management programs and get comprehensive inter-professional care and/or bariatric surgery programs depending on a patients interest in procedural intervention, Thiara said.

Kumar said that whether you should be focusing on lifestyle modifications, new medications, surgery, or other forms of treatment, it all depends on what a provider who specializes in obesity determines makes the most sense for you. There is no one-size-fits-all approach.

Its also important to note that while medispas and certain physicians may liberally prescribe medications like Ozempic these days to people who dont meet the criteria for it. Thats not only irresponsible, but it also may not be the safest, most effective option. Thats something you should keep in mind before requesting it from your doctor, Kumar stressed.

She pointed to Found, where she serves as chief medical officer. This is a weight management program that combines biology and behavioral change as an example of an integrated, personalized approach.

What if you are seeking care, but come in contact with a provider who exhibits some of the aforementioned toxic views on obesity the study highlighted?

Kyle said it can be a challenge to find a provider who is well-versed in obesity and the kind of treatment that might be right for you.

Yes this can be a challenge, he said. The best bet is to look for a provider who is board-certified in obesity medicine.

He pointed to the American Board of Obesity Medicine as one option here.

Kumar said if you come across a provider who is giving outdated guidance for weight loss, you should seek another who specializes in treating obesity as a chronic disease.

As with seeking care for any chronic condition, do your research, and look for a provider who specializes in a field that best applies to you.

Continue Reading

Environment

Oil prices shed 2% as Iran-Israel ceasefire eases concerns over supply, Strait of Hormuz closure

Published

on

By

Oil prices shed 2% as Iran-Israel ceasefire eases concerns over supply, Strait of Hormuz closure

Brent crude prices pared gains from the previous session and fell nearly $2 on Friday after the White House delayed a decision on U.S. involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict, but they were still poised for a third straight week in the black.

Ilan Rosenberg | Reuters

Oil futures fell sharply on Tuesday as a freshly announced Iran-Israel ceasefire began to allay investor concerns over supply and shipping disruptions in the oil-rich Middle East.

The Ice Brent contract with August expiry was trading at $69.76 per barrel at 09:09 a.m. London time, down 2.41% from the previous session. The front-month August Nymex WTI contract was at $66.85 per barrel, 2.42% lower from the Monday settlement.

Oil prices had added roughly 10% over the mid-June start of Iran-Israel hostilities that were exacerbated in recent days by U.S.’ direct military involvement and Iran’s retaliatory strike against an American base in Qatar. Crude futures eased following U.S. President Donald Trump’s overnight announcement of an Iran-Israel ceasefire despite lingering questions over implementation and the future of Tehran’s nuclear program — the key cause of the recent hostilities cited by Israel and the U.S.

At risk throughout the offensives were supply in both Iran — which produced 3.3 million barrels per day in May, according to OPEC’s monthly oil market report released in June, which cites independent analyst sources — and the broader Middle East region, if the conflict spilled over.

Throughout the hostilities, investors also watched whether Iran would proceed with closing the Strait of Hormuz linking the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman — a key route for Iranian and other Middle Eastern shipments, including those of the world’s largest crude exporter Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates, Iraq, Kuwait and Bahrain.

Iran’s parliament on Sunday approved the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, according to a report from Iran’s state-owned Press TV that CNBC could not independently verify, though a final decision rested with the country’s national security council.

“The potential closure of Strait of Hormuz remains a tail risk in our view, but we maintain that oil prices would race past $100/b in such a scenario, due to limited avenues to bypass the narrow passage and the constraints it would pose to the marketability of spare capacity,” Barclays analysts said in a Tuesday note, just as Trump announced a tentative ceasefire.

They further added that oil prices came under pressure “as the threat of wider regional conflagration did not materialize despite the US action against Iranian nuclear sites.”

Amid risk to supply, the International Energy Agency previously reassured it had 1.2 billion barrels of emergency stockpiles it could resort to. As part of a strategy decided prior to the Iran-Israel escalations, some producers from the influential OPEC+ alliance have also been raising output and have additional spare volumes that could be brought online.

Continue Reading

Environment

Smart new Raleigh ONE e-bike unveiled with GPS, anti-theft, & fast charging

Published

on

By

Smart new Raleigh ONE e-bike unveiled with GPS, anti-theft, & fast charging

Raleigh is rolling out a new chapter in its long legacy of bicycle design with the launch of the Raleigh ONE, a sleek, smart e-bike aimed squarely at the European urban mobility market. Officially unveiled today, the Raleigh ONE combines classic British cycling heritage with modern connected tech, delivering what the company calls “the only e-bike you’ll need in the city.”

Taking a page out of Big Tech’s playbook, Raleigh is also offering a membership program to unlock extra features. But will riders pay up, or will they balk?

While it’s debuting first in Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK, the Raleigh ONE seems clearly designed for global appeal. It’s a one-size, one-speed, minimalist-style urban e-bike built with high-quality components and a suite of smart features accessed via an app and membership system.

Think of it as a mix between a timeless European utility bike and a Silicon Valley tech platform.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

We’ll get to that tech, but first let’s dive into what makes it an e-bike. On the powered side of things, the Raleigh ONE sports a 360Wh removable battery that offers up to 80 km (50 mi) of range in eco mode and around 50 km (31 mi) in boost. That battery powers up a 250W Mivice rear hub motor, one of the nicer and more sophisticated hub motors on the market. The maximum assisted speed is 25 km/h (15.5 mph), keeping with European e-bike regulations.

The bike uses a Gates carbon belt drive for low-maintenance, grease-free operation and includes hydraulic disc brakes for confident stopping power.

Lighting is fully integrated and smart-enabled, with wraparound rear lights and a dual front beam. The riser bars, wide tires, and upright geometry give the Raleigh ONE a comfortable ride posture designed for all-day city use, even over rough pavement.

The bike is equipped with an SP Connect mount for the rider’s phone, allowing for hands-free use of Raleigh’s new app, which acts as a digital control hub for both ride data and security features.

Raleigh is leaning heavily into connectivity with the Raleigh ONE. Once registered through the app, users can enable auto-unlocking, journey tracking, alarm features, GPS location, and theft alerts. The system supports wireless updates, and security functions are controlled via handlebar buttons or the app itself.

Joining a growing trend among some connected e-bikes in 2025, the Raleigh ONE introduces a membership model to use some of its more desirable features such as sharing digital unlock access.

  • Base (free) with essential features including Ride dashboard, “basic security,” Bluetooth updates, and manual stolen mode.
  • Core (€7.99/month) with expanded services including automatic stolen mode activation, smart maintenance, and bike sharing access for one additional rider.
  • Icon (€14.99/month) includes all of the above plus over-the-air updates, bike sharing access for up to four other riders, remote arming, and full insurance coverage (provided by Hepster).

Memberships are optional, but the more advanced functionality (especially security and insurance) lives behind a paywall. Just like your friendly neighborhood dealer, Raleigh offers the Icon plan with a free trial (30 days) to help get you hooked. For those ready to jump in with two feet, the paid plans also have lower annual rates.

With a €2,699 / £2,399 price tag, the Raleigh ONE positions itself competitively among other premium urban e-bikes like those recently unveiled by VanMoof, especially considering its inclusion of fast charging (50% in 1 hour, full in just over 2 hours), built-in lights, belt drive, and theft protection ecosystem.

One of the standout value points is Raleigh’s dealer network and after-sales service, a major advantage over many online-only e-bike startups. Add in Raleigh’s 130+ year reputation in the cycling world, and the ONE looks like an interesting option for urban riders who want a worry-free, future-proof ride.

Accessories like front carriers, baskets, and integrated AXA locks round out the ecosystem, with more to come.

Selin Can, EVP of Mobility at Accell Group (Raleigh’s parent company), called the Raleigh ONE “a bold fusion of heritage and innovation.” That seems to be the goal here: take Raleigh’s deep cycling roots and plug them into a modern electric, digital, app-connected future.

With the launch of the ONE, Raleigh isn’t just releasing a new e-bike, it’s making a play to reclaim relevance in a world of smartphones, theft alerts, and mobility-as-a-service. The inclusion of basic tech features for free is important to prevent alienating its customers completely, though many riders may feel frustrated at having to pay extra to access hardware or features already designed into the bike.

What do you think? Is the Raleigh ONE an e-bike of the future, or a warning of what could be coming in a future walled garden? Let’s hear your thoughts in the comment section below.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

CNBC Daily Open: A confusing ceasefire forged by missile attacks

Published

on

By

CNBC Daily Open: A confusing ceasefire forged by missile attacks

Supporters of regime change in Iran rally outside the Wilshire Federal Building on June 23, 2025 in Los Angeles, California, U.S.

Mario Tama | Getty Images News | Getty Images

It’s a strange thought that launching attacks on other countries could lead to peace, but that seems to be the logic behind the abrupt escalation in conflict in the Middle East beginning Saturday. And now there’s a confusing ceasefire.

“Very confusing! Does Israel have 12 more hours to strike based on his [Trump’s] first announcement? Or are they supposed to be in ceasefire now? Even after the deaths in Beersheva and Iran’s barrage after the deadline? No one knows!” Dan Shapiro, former U.S. ambassador to Israel, posted on X.

Here’s a quick recap.  

On Saturday, U.S. President Donald Trump authorized air strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, pushing America into Israel’s war with Tehran.

On Sunday, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Tehran “reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interest, and people.”

On Monday, Iran launched a retaliatory strike against America, targeting a U.S. military base in Qatar. Later that evening stateside, Trump announced a ceasefire.

On Tuesday, Iran’s Foreign Minister Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi denied that the country had agreed to a ceasefire — but said Iran was open to halting its military operations if Israel, which has yet to respond publicly to Trump’s statement, stopped its “aggression against the Iranian people.”

Trump, on Tuesday morning stateside, declared the ceasefire was in effect.

While Iran continued striking Israel on Tuesday morning local time, Tehran’s state-aligned media reported them as “the last round of Iranian missile attacks … before the ceasefire began.” CNBC, however, was unable to independently verify the claim.

Iran also gave the U.S. “early notice” of its attack on the military base in Qatar, according to Trump. It was a “retaliation that was expected,” Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson said. Qatar also received advanced warning from Iran, according to The New York Times, which cited three Iranian officials familiar with the matter.

This, essentially, is “the peace through strength strategy,” Helima Croft, head of global commodity strategy at RBC Capital Markets, told CNBC.

In other words, there’s a small chance tensions in the Middle East might truly cool down following a carefully calibrated and symbolic exchange of strikes that projects strength from all parties, while also providing Iran an off-ramp to de-escalate tension.

Judging by stock markets worldwide and oil prices — which rose and fell, respectively — investors are indeed hopeful this missiles-led peace will likely stay.

What you need to know today

Iran says it’s prepared to stop attacks
Trump
said early Tuesday morning stateside that the ceasefire between Israel and Iran — which he had announced Monday evening — was “now in effect.” Iran’s Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi had earlier said there was “NO ‘agreement’ on any ceasefire or cessation of military operations,” but signaled that Tehran had “no intention” to continue armed conflict. Israel has not publicly confirmed that they have accepted Trump’s ceasefire timeline.

Iran strikes Israel and U.S. military base in Qatar
Iran on Tuesday fired a “final round” of missiles at Israel before the 12 a.m. ET ceasefire with Israel came into effect, Iranian state-aligned media announced Tuesday. CNBC was unable to independently verify the claim. On Monday, Iran launched an airstrike on United States’ Al-Udeid military base in Qatar, the largest American military installation in the Middle East, with around 10,000 service members.

Prices of oil post a huge drop
Oil prices fell sharply Tuesday during Asia hours on news that Iran was prepared to halt military operations. As of 1:30 p.m. Singapore time, U.S. crude oil was down 3.04% at $66.43 per barrel, while Brent had shed 2.99% to $69.34, with both benchmarks adding to the previous day’s losses of more than 7%. Trump on Monday demanded that “everyone” keep oil prices down or they would play “into the hands of the enemy.” Trump didn’t specify who he was referring to, but he seemed to be addressing U.S. oil producers.

Markets in U.S. rise on de-escalation hopes
U.S. stocks rose Monday as investors seemed hopeful of de-escalation in the Israel-Iran war. The S&P 500 climbed 0.96%, the Dow Jones Industrial Average added 0.89% and the Nasdaq Composite gained 0.94%. Tesla shares popped 8.2% after the company launched its robotaxis in Austin, Texas, on Sunday — but regulators are looking into reports of robotaxis driving erratically. Asia-Pacific markets climbed Tuesday, with South Korea’s Kospi index jumping 2.73% at 2:40 p.m. local time.

[PRO] Wall Street’s thoughts on robotaxis
Wall Street closely watched Tesla’s robotaxi launch in Texas over the weekend. Analyst outlooks on the event vary widely. While Wedbush’s Dan Ives, who rode in the robotaxis over the weekend, said it “exceeded our expectations,” Guggenheim’s Ronald Jewsikow called the event “baby steps.” Here’s what analysts think about what the robotaxis mean for Tesla’s stock.

And finally…

An Airbus A350-941 commercial jet, operated by Emirates Airline, at the Paris Air Show in Paris, France, on Monday, June 16, 2025.

Matthieu Rondel | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Airlines divert, cancel more Middle East flights after Iran attacks U.S. military base

Airlines diverted more Middle East flights on Monday after Iran’s armed forces said the country launched a missile strike on a U.S. military base in Qatar, as the region’s military conflict continued to disrupt airlines’ operations.

Dubai-based Emirates said that some of its aircraft rerouted on Monday and told customers that delays or longer flights were possible as it would take “flight paths well distanced from conflict areas,” while operating its schedule as planned.

Air India said it had halted all flights in and out of the region and to and from the east coast of North America and Europe “until further notice.”

Earlier, major international airlines including Air France, Iberia, Finnair and others announced they would pause or further postpone a resumption of service to some destinations in the Middle East.

Continue Reading

Trending