Connect with us

Published

on

HOUSTON — DANA HOLGORSEN is putting his Houston football team through its paces during a spring practice at the school’s indoor facility.

On one end of the field, Houston‘s 11 conference championship seasons are posted in red letters against the wall. At the other end, Houston’s 30 bowl appearances are listed. While the accomplishments of the past are never out of view, there is an eagerness in the air to capture an even brighter future, a sense that bigger and better things are ahead.

When the doors swing open and practice moves outside, it’s a surprisingly sunny day with some light clouds and a nice breeze in the city’s Third Ward, and the energy ramps up.

At the center of it are quarterbacks Lucas Coley, who worked his way up to No. 2 on the depth chart last season, and Donovan Smith, a transfer from Texas Tech. They’re in competition to replace Clayton Tune, who was a force the past two seasons for Holgorsen’s offense.

Smith, who led Tech to a double-overtime comeback win over Houston in Week 2 last season, looks the part; he’s listed at a sturdy 6-foot-5 and 241 pounds. At one point, he throws a 60-yard dime to sophomore wide receiver CJ Nelson that draws some ooh and aahs as Future’s “I’m So Groovy” plays in the background.

As Holgorsen wraps up practice, he gathers the team near midfield. He gives the players words of encouragement and tells them they need to have more practices like the one they just had.

Hovering around throughout the practice, in a white tee, camo pants and Space Jam Air Jordan 11s, has been former Texas star and Houston native Vince Young, who drops wisdom on the quarterbacks after Holgorsen breaks the huddle.

This is the type of day many around the program, and in the city of Houston in general, have longed for since 1996, when they believe the Cougars got the short end of the stick in conference realignment. With the Southwest Conference dissolving, Baylor, Texas, Texas A&M and Texas Tech bolted for what had been the Big Eight, making it the Big 12, while Houston wound up in the newly formed Conference USA. But things will come full circle for the Cougars on July 1, when they officially — and finally — become members of the Big 12.

“This is that moment,” Houston athletic director Chris Pezman said. “Probably in the early 2010s, Clemson had a ‘What are we going to be? We’re going to go f—ing win at football’ moment. And this is kind of a moment where we have the opportunity to have that.

“What are we going to be when we grow up?”


OUTSIDE OF HOUSTON’S Alumni Center athletics facility, on a wall of windows about 20 feet high, is a huge “UH” logo next to an equally sized “XII” Big 12 logo. It’s a new pairing, but the emblems look natural together.

Dozens of men’s and women’s athletes from all sports funnel in and out of the building, buzzing throughout the lobby. Meanwhile, in the football section of the building, upstairs and to the right, a mockup of Houston’s planned football-only facility sits on a table in the reception area shared by Holgorsen and his right-hand man, Ryan Dorchester. It’s a reminder of the work still to be done in the transition to the Big 12.

Just down the hall from his office, Holgorsen is in the team room getting ready for a meeting, drinking out of a styrofoam cup that reads in red lettering “HOUSTON” with the “US” in black.

Holgorsen made an uncommon move after the 2018 season, leaving a Power 5 school in West Virginia for a Group of 5 school in Houston after helping the Mountaineers transition from the Big East to the Big 12. But Holgorsen has had a vision of what Houston football could be since 2008, when he was the Cougars’ up-and-coming offensive coordinator for quarterback Case Keenum and a unit that was second in the nation with 562.8 yards per game.

“In 2008, this was — I loved it,” Holgorsen said. “It felt Group of 5, it felt commuter school, it felt Third Ward.

“Someone was here the other day and I go, ‘What do you think the difference is between here now and here then?’ He goes, ‘Well, other than everything?'” Holgorsen said with a laugh.

Holgorsen said it wasn’t hard to leave Morgantown after eight years at the helm, but added, “I loved it there. I mean, I would have stayed there forever, but they were more committed here than they were there. And [Houston] promised me that it would be run like a Power 5 place, and it is, which is another reason why we got into the Big 12, because we’re already acting like we’re in the Big 12.”

The changes that Holgorsen had to oversee at West Virginia when it moved to the Big 12 — including adding to his staff and restructuring recruiting — essentially had to happen on the fly, as the school accepted an invitation to join the conference in late October 2011 and played in the Big 12 the following season.

Houston has been preparing for its step up for more than 21 months, accepting an invitation to join the Big 12 in September 2021. And while this isn’t Holgorsen’s first rodeo in the Big 12, it’s not the same bull he’s grabbing by the horns.

“Just because I’ve made that transition doesn’t guarantee any kind of success whatsoever,” Holgorsen said. “Now there’s familiarity, and I kind of know now the one advantage that we have here at Houston: It was a two-year plan, not a two-month plan [like it was at West Virginia].”

Still, Holgorsen said his role has changed since he first took the Houston job because of the Big 12 transition.

“For me it’s less X’s and O’s and more CEO. You know, more fundraising,” he said. Holgorsen was asked if he thought he was good at that. After a brief pause, he replied, “I talked myself out of $1 million.”

In June 2022, Houston announced a $150 million fundraising campaign titled “HOUSTON RISE” in preparation for the move. During the presentation, Holgorsen pledged $1 million of his $4.2 million salary to show his commitment.

Holgorsen said he is comfortable with the shift in his role and in delegating some duties because of the continuity of his staff and the trust he has in them.

Officially the assistant athletic director for football operations, Dorchester (better known as “Dor”) had been at West Virginia prior to Holgorsen’s arrival in 2011 but has stayed with him ever since. The same is true of Darl Bauer, Houston’s director of strength and performance, and less formally, the program’s “culture setter.” Doug Belk, Houston’s associate head coach, defensive coordinator and one of college football’s rising stars in the coaching ranks, has been with Holgorsen since 2017. Casey Smithson, Houston’s director of player personnel, has been with Holgorsen since 2014, with a brief gap in 2019 when Holgorsen initially arrived in Houston.

In speaking with Dor, it quickly becomes clear why he and so many others have stuck with Holgorsen.

“If he sees it, he’s got to say something about it. But I think the biggest thing about him is he’s not ego driven. It’s never been about him. It’s never about his idea,” Dorchester said. “He’s never been so egotistical that it’s like, ‘This is how we’re going to do this and I’m refusing to listen to anybody give me any sort of advice, or have an idea on something else.'”

Holgorsen still describes himself as a ball coach, somebody who is in the meetings and setting schedules. He turned over playcalling duties a year ago, and said he has been happy with how that has worked out. He also trusts Belk to get the defense closer to its 2021 form after an injury-filled 2022.

“So where we’re at from that is functional,” Holgorsen said. “As long as that’s functional, then I can do other things. Any of that becomes unfunctional, then I’ve got to put everything else on hold because that’s the most important thing.”


ULTIMATELY, WHETHER A program’s move up from the Group of 5 to the Power 5 is a success or a failure comes down to the roster. In the spring, 37 players on Houston’s 85-man roster were new via recruiting and the transfer portal, after Holgorsen brought in what he estimated was 30-32 new players last year.

“Now, are all 37 of those Big 12 football players? I hope. But in recruiting, you’re always going to have misses,” he said. “Now from a high school perspective, we’re landing — and this is two years in a row — some that we wouldn’t have landed. Clearly. We’re getting some back that we didn’t get out of high school. Is it at the rate that it needs to be to be able to compete with TCU, West Virginia, Texas, Kansas State, Baylor, Cincinnati, Oklahoma State? I don’t know. I hope. I think it’s trending in that direction.”

Belk, who plays a big role in Houston’s recruiting, said the transition also is paying dividends in that area.

“People are very prideful about not only the state of Texas, but being from the city of Houston,” he said. “Growing up, you see ‘Friday Night Lights,’ and you see all these different things. And I think a lot of those guys that are venturing out away from the state of Texas and the city of Houston and surrounding areas, they really want to be at home.

“But the opportunity for them to play at the highest level hasn’t been there, and we can all understand that, as much as we would like to have them here. Now we have an opportunity to get in the fight and battle with everybody that’s coming in and out of the state and in and out of the city to compete to get those guys on campus. And the first step to that has been really, really good for us.”

Smithson, who came to Houston in 2020 from West Virginia, said the recruiting staff was made up of three people and some interns when he arrived. He says it’s now on par with where they need to be at the Power 5 level with seven full-time people.

Their strategy in recruiting hasn’t necessarily changed, though. “You’re always looking for the best player possible,” Smithson said. “But the question always is, are they good enough to win your conference? And that player changes between the American and Big 12.”

Once the players get in the building, Bauer assumes the development role and helps get new players up to speed while maintaining a standard among the entire team.

“We need to build a program that can sustain success,” Bauer said. “And the culture piece, he puts the majority of that on me. We’re going to bring these guys in, whether they’re transfers or jucos or whoever, installment of the culture. If a guy’s a hard worker, if guys are not hard workers, if their punctuality is not good, if their discipline is not good, I take all those things personally because I take it on myself as a strength coach to utilize our environment to install that software into their brains. Their brain’s a computer, you got to install it, you get them thinking a certain way and get them talking a certain way.”

With the move up to the Power 5, Holgorsen said one of the most important changes in terms of building the roster is the increased importance not just of quality, but also of quantity.

“It goes back to, you know, we got some top-level guys that I know can play in the Big 12,” Holgorsen said. “We had top-level guys that I know could have played the Big 12 last year. It’s more 44 instead of 22.

“The point is, you better have two to three at each position so that when [someone] goes down, you’re not putting a Group of 5 player in there.”


CHRIS PEZMAN’S DESK is lathered in papers. The former Houston football letterman (1989-1992) and captain has been the university’s athletic director since December 2017. He has seen up close what the program has been and has a vision of what it can be.

“There’s a lot to get done, but it’s all good. I ain’t complaining,” he said. “You’re just like, ‘Got to get this done, got to get that done.’ And have this one chance to make this transition. You kind of gotta nail it.

“Trying to find the balance of what matters and helps them win, and helps give us a chance is … it’s a lot. But I’ll take it. I mean, being on the other side, getting left out and having been there, I’d much rather be on this side of it.”

Part of the intrigue in hiring Holgorsen back in 2019 was for this exact opportunity. After a 70-14 Armed Forces Bowl loss to Army in 2018, Houston wanted to make sure its next coach would make that drubbing a distant memory, while also propelling the team into a future they believe they’ve deserved for decades.

“When we hired him, we were still two years away from the opportunity to move into the Big 12,” Pezman said. “And so you’d hope that it would happen, but I certainly didn’t expect it to happen so quickly.”

It’s sometimes still a shock for Pezman. “I’m telling you, man, I walk into meetings, I’m looking around like, ‘Am I in the right spot?’ It’s almost like imposter syndrome,” he said.

But he quickly reroutes the direction of the sentiment. “There’s nothing we haven’t done, and that was without anything — support or infrastructure or money. So we’re going to be all right. I know we’re going to be good.”

The urgency for a new football facility is not lost on Pezman, and he insisted that despite being more than a year removed from the announcement of the project without breaking ground, the $140 million complex is happening.

Pezman said the timeline for completion is 24 to 30 months from when ground is broken, which is scheduled for the end of the 2023 season. “We’re trying to do it in phases,” he said. “That’s what we’re working through right now.

“I need to get football right. You’ve been downstairs, you know what we’re working with, and [Holgorsen’s] right. Day to day is not good enough. Especially when you see what basketball has, what baseball has. We’ve got to get football … their own space and a chance to operate like everybody else is.”

The biggest obstacle through Pezman’s lens is the financials.

“Our revenues are going to go up at like a 45-degree angle, our expenses are going up at a 90-degree angle,” he said. “And so you’re trying to figure out a way to balance what you know you’ve got to do to give your coaches and your program a chance to be successful, but also afford it.”

One way affording it becomes easier is if fans show up to games, which is something Pezman has been optimistic about. The program had set a goal of 5,100 new season tickets and surpassed that, with more than 6,000 new season-ticket orders and 23,500 overall, a TDECU Stadium record.

Along with the season tickets, Houston is adding 10 new suites to their stadium for the fall. “They were gone in a day,” Pezman said. “Literally one day. If you just told me that five years ago, I feel like it’d take me two months to do that. And those are not cheap, they’re like 50 grand a pop.

“So I know the revenues are coming, they’re going to be there. Now we got to hit on our per-game revenue and our mini packages and things like that. But I would tell you, big picture it’s just getting everybody in the mindset of what we were isn’t what we are and what we’re going to be, and that means a lot of different things.”

One of those things — if not the main thing — is the product on the field. In that regard, Pezman said he is “cautiously optimistic.”

He said he believes that considering the Cougars’ schedule — which includes 10 teams that made bowls last season — if they finish with a seven- or eight-win season, “[Holgorsen] could be coach of the year.”

“Figure out a way to get to a bowl game, figure out a way to continue to build the roster, the depth that you have to have to have a chance to be consistently successful, and then build up off of that. Hopefully by — maybe I’m being too ambitious — but by Year 3, you’re hopefully starting to edge up and people are like, ‘Hey, if the stars align, they could be playing for a conference championship.'”


HOUSTON KICKS OFF the 2023 season at home against UTSA, which has won 23 games in the past two seasons under Jeff Traylor, including last season’s thrilling triple-overtime season opener between the teams. The following week, the Cougars go down the road to Rice, then begin their first Big 12 conference slate at home Sept. 16 against 2022 College Football Playoff finalist TCU.

The conference schedule includes an October visit from former Southwest Conference rival Texas for the teams’ first meeting since 2002. While Houston fans have waited two decades for a chance to knock off the Longhorns, this might be their lone shot for the foreseeable future as Texas moves on to the SEC next season.

For the historical record, Houston officially becomes a member of the Big 12 on July 1. For Holgorsen and his staff, it’s just another day on the calendar.

“What’s the difference in now and July? Nothing.” Holgorsen said in March. “Now what’s the difference in now, and next July, and the next July? A lot. This July our budget’s going to be the same as it was last July. … I’ve been very happy with the budget and all that stuff. I mean, we’re gonna be all right.

“Now, it needs to grow the next year once we get more money from the Big 12 and it needs to grow the next year once we get more money from the Big 12. But we’re gonna be two Julys and three Julys away from where it’s like being anywhere close to being on par with the other people that have been in the Big 12, not counting BYU, Cincinnati and UCF.”

Holgorsen also said that the season ticket sales, plus money from concessions and other revenue streams will be great for the school’s athletic department starting this summer.

“That stuff’s extremely exciting,” he said. “But it ain’t happening overnight, we all know that.

“But a couple years down the road when we’re fully vested, and our facilities are up to par, that’s when it’s like, ‘OK, now we’re here.’

“What’s kind of cool is I think we’ve all got the same mindset about legacy. What Kelvin [Sampson] is doing in basketball, he ain’t doing anything else for the rest of his career. He’s going to keep doing this and build it and leave a legacy. What [university president Renu Khator has] done and is doing, she’s going to do it for another however many years and get it to where it’s as good as it can possibly be, which is her legacy and then she’s going to be done.

“I’d like to do the same thing in football. I don’t want any other job. This one is going to be hard enough and extremely challenging. And that’s why we do what we do, is to build it when it’s challenging. And so it’s going to be challenging, so let’s just keep building it and get it to where I feel like it can be in the next five years, which, what is that?

“I think it can be the best place in the Big 12.”

Continue Reading

Sports

What to know about MLB lifting ban on Pete Rose, ‘Shoeless’ Joe Jackson

Published

on

By

What to know about MLB lifting ban on Pete Rose, 'Shoeless' Joe Jackson

Pete Rose, Joe Jackson, seven other members of the 1919 Chicago “Black Sox”, six other former players, one coach and one former owner are now eligible to be voted on for the Hall of Fame after commissioner Rob Manfred removed them from Major League Baseball’s permanently ineligible list.

Hall of Fame chairwoman Jane Forbes Clark said in a statement: “The National Baseball Hall of Fame has always maintained that anyone removed from Baseball’s permanently ineligible list will become eligible for Hall of Fame consideration. Major League Baseball’s decision to remove deceased individuals from the permanently ineligible list will allow for the Hall of Fame candidacy of such individuals to now be considered.”

Due to Hall of Fame voting procedures, Rose and Jackson won’t be eligible to be voted on until the Classic Era Baseball committee, which votes on individuals who made their biggest impact prior to 1980, meets in December of 2027.

Let’s dig into what all this means.


Why were these players banned?

All individuals on the banned list who were reinstated had been permanently ineligible due to accusations related to gambling related to baseball — either throwing games, accepting bribes, or like Rose, betting on baseball games.

Most of the banned players, including Jackson and his seven Chicago White Sox teammates who threw the 1919 World Series, played in the 1910s, when gambling in baseball was widespread. As historian Bill James once wrote, “Few simplifications of memory are as bizarre as the notion that the Black Sox scandal hit baseball out of the blue. … In fact, of course, the Black Sox scandal was merely the largest wart of a disease that had infested baseball at least a dozen years earlier and had grown, unchecked, to ravage the features of a generation.”

The most famous player, of course, was Jackson, one of baseball’s biggest stars alongside Ty Cobb and Tris Speaker in the 1910s. While many have tried to exonerate Jackson through the years, pointing out that he hit .375 in the 1919 World Series, baseball historians agree that Jackson was a willing participant in throwing the World Series and accepted money from the gambling ring that paid off the White Sox players.

While the White Sox players were acquitted in a criminal trial in 1921, commissioner Kenesaw Mountain Landis banned the eight players in a statement that began with the words “Regardless of the verdict of juries …”

If there was an innocent member in the group, it was third baseman Buck Weaver, not Jackson. Weaver had participated in meetings where the fixing of the World Series was discussed, and Landis banned him for life for guilty knowledge.

As for Rose, he was banned in 1989 by commissioner A. Bartlett Giamatti for betting on games while he was manager of the Cincinnati Reds, including those involving his own team. While Rose denied the accusations for years, he eventually confessed. He died last September at age 83.


Who else is impacted?

Phillies owner William Cox was banned in 1943 and forced to sell the team for betting on games. Cox had just purchased the team earlier that season. None of the other non-White Sox players are of major significance, although Benny Kauff was the big star of the Federal League in 1914-15, winning the batting title both seasons. The Federal League was a breakoff league that attempted to challenge the National and American leagues.


When is the soonest Rose and Jackson could go into the Hall of Fame?

The Hall of Fame voting process for players not considered by the Baseball Writers’ Association of America — such as Rose and Jackson, who never appeared on the ballot due to their banned status — includes two eras: the Contemporary Baseball Era (1980 to present) and the Classic Baseball Era (pre-1980). The voting periods are already set:

December 2025: Player ballot for the Contemporary Era.

December 2026: Contemporary Era ballot for managers, executives and umpires.

December 2027: Classic Era ballot for players, managers, executives and umpires.

Each committee has an initial screening to place eight candidates on the ballot, so Rose and Jackson will first have to make the ballot. While it’s unclear how a future screening committee will proceed, it’s possible that both will make the ballot. While comparisons to players with PED allegations aren’t exactly apples to apples — since they were never placed on the ineligible list — it’s worth noting that Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens and Rafael Palmeiro were included on the eight-player Contemporary Era ballot in 2023.

Once the ballot is determined — a 16-person committee consisting of Hall of Fame players, longtime executives and media members or historians — convenes and votes. A candidate must receive 12 votes to get selected. In the most recent election in December, Dave Parker and Dick Allen were on the Classic Era ballot.


Which players have the best HOF cases?

Obviously, Rose would have been a slam-dunk Hall of Famer had he never bet on baseball and had he appeared on the BBWAA ballot after his career ended. The all-time MLB leader with 4,256 hits, Rose won three batting titles and was the 1973 NL MVP. And while he’s overrated in a sense — his 79.6 career WAR is more in line with the likes of Jeff Bagwell, Brooks Robinson and Robin Yount than all-time elite superstars — and hung on well past his prime to break Ty Cobb’s hits record, his popularity and fame would have made him an inner-circle Hall of Famer.

Whether he’ll get support now is complicated. Bonds and Clemens both received fewer than four votes in 2023. The committee usually consists of eight former players, and they may not support Rose given the one hard and fast rule that every player knows: You can’t bet on the game.

Jackson, meanwhile, was a star of the deadball era, hitting .408 in 1911 and .356 in his career, an average that ranks fourth all time behind only Cobb, Negro Leagues star Oscar Charleston and Rogers Hornsby. He finished with 62.2 WAR and 1,772 hits in a career that ended at age 32 due to the ban. Those figures would be low for a Hall of Fame selection, although the era committees did recently elect Allen and Tony Oliva, both of whom finished with fewer than 2,000 hits. And again, it is hard to say how the committee will view Jackson’s connection to gambling on the sport.

The only other reinstated player with a semblance of a chance to get on a ballot is pitcher Eddie Cicotte, who won 209 games and finished with 59.7 WAR. While his final season came at 36, the knuckleballer was still going strong, having won 29 games for the White Sox in 1919 and 21 in 1920 before Landis banned him.

For what it’s worth, the top position players in career WAR who made their mark prior to 1980 and aren’t in the Hall of Fame are Rose, Bill Dahlen (75.3), Bobby Grich (71.0), Graig Nettles (67.6), Reggie Smith (64.6), Ken Boyer (62.8), Jackson and Sal Bando (61.5).

Pitching candidates would include Luis Tiant (65.7), Tommy John (61.6) and Wes Ferrell (60.1). John was on the recent ballot and received seven votes. Others on that ballot included Steve Garvey, Boyer, Negro Leagues pitcher John Donaldson, Negro Leagues manager Vic Harris and Tiant.

Other potential pre-1980 candidates could include Thurman Munson, Bert Campaneris, Dave Concepcion and Stan Hack.

Continue Reading

Sports

Who has won the Preakness Stakes? All-time winners list

Published

on

By

Who has won the Preakness Stakes? All-time winners list

Since its inception in 1873, the Preakness Stakes has become one of the most prestigious horse races in the world. Following the Kentucky Derby and preceding the Belmont Stakes each year, the Preakness Stakes take place on the third Saturday in May at Pimlico Race Course in Baltimore, Maryland.

Check out the all-time winning horses and jockeys in Preakness Stakes history.

  • 2024: Seize The Grey, Jaime Torres

  • 2023: National Treasure, John Velazquez

  • 2022: Early Voting, Jose Ortiz

  • 2021: Rombauer, Flavien Prat

  • 2020: Swiss Skydiver, Robby Albarado

  • 2019: War of Will, Tyler Gaffalione

  • 2018: Justify, Mike Smith

  • 2017: Cloud Computing, Javier Castellano

  • 2016: Exaggerator, Kent Desormeaux

  • 2015: American Pharoah, Victor Espinoza

  • 2014: California Chrome, Victor Espinoza

  • 2013: Oxbow, Gary Stevens

  • 2012: I’ll Have Another, Mario Gutierrez

  • 2011: Shackleford, Jesus Castenon

  • 2010: Lookin at Lucky, Martin Garcia

  • 2009: Rachel Alexandra, Calvin Borel

  • 2008: Big Brown, Kent Desormeaux

  • 2007: Curlin, Robby Albarado

  • 2006: Bernadini, Tom Albertrani

  • 2005: Afleet Alex, Jeremy Rose

  • 2004: Smarty Jones, Stewart Elliott

  • 2003: Funny Cide, José Santos

  • 2002: War Emblem, Victor Espinoza

  • 2001: Point Given, Gary Stevens

  • 2000: Red Bullet, Jerry Bailey

  • 1999: Charismatic, Chris Antley

  • 1998: Real Quiet, Kent Desormeaux

  • 1997: Silver Charm, Gary Stevens

  • 1996: Louis Quatorze, Pat Day

  • 1995: Timber Country, Pat Day

  • 1994: Tabasco Cat, Pat Day

  • 1993: Prairie Bayou, Matt Smith

  • 1992: Pine Bluff, Chris McCarron

  • 1991: Hansel, Jerry Bailey

  • 1990: Summer Squall, Pat Day

  • 1989: Sunday Silence, Pat Valenzuela

  • 1988: Risen Star, Eddie Delahoussaye

  • 1987: Alysheba, Chris McCarron

  • 1986: Snow Chief, Alex Solis

  • 1985: Tank’s Prospect, Pat Day

  • 1984: Gate Dancer, Angel Cordero Jr.

  • 1983: Deputed Testamony, Donald Miller Jr.

  • 1982: Aloma’s Ruler, Jack Kaenel

  • 1981: Pleasant Colony, Jorge Velásquez

  • 1980: Codex, Angel Cordero Jr.

  • 1979: Spectacular Bid, Ron Franklin

  • 1978: Affirmed, Steve Cauthen

  • 1977: Seattle Slew, Jean Cruguet

  • 1976: Elocutionist, John Lively

  • 1975: Master Derby, Darrell McHargue

  • 1974: Little Current, Miguel Rivera

  • 1973: Secretariat, Ron Turcotte

  • 1972: Bee Bee Bee, Eldon Nelson

  • 1971: Canonero II, Gustavo Avila

  • 1970: Personality, Eddie Belmonte

  • 1969: Majestic Prince, Bill Hartack

  • 1968: Forward Pass, Ismael Valenzuela

  • 1967: Damascus, Bill Shoemaker

  • 1966: Kauai King, Don Brumfield

  • 1965: Tom Rolfe, Bill Shoemaker

  • 1964: Northern Dancer, Bill Hartack

  • 1963: Candy Spots, Bill Shoemaker

  • 1962: Greek Money, John Rotz

  • 1961: Carry Back, John Sellers

  • 1960: Bally Ache, Bob Ussery

  • 1959: Royal Orbit, William Harmatz

  • 1958: Tim Tam, Ismael Valenzuela

  • 1957: Bold Ruler, Eddie Arcaro

  • 1956: Fabius, Bill Hartack

  • 1955: Nashua, Eddie Arcaro

  • 1954: Hasty Road, John Adams

  • 1953: Native Dancer, Eric Guerin

  • 1952: Blue Man, Conn McCreary

  • 1951: Bold, Eddie Arcaro

  • 1950: Hill Prince, Eddie Arcaro

  • 1949: Capot, Ted Atkinson

  • 1948: Citation, Eddie Arcaro

  • 1947: Faultless, Doug Dodson

  • 1946: Assault, Warren Mehrtens

  • 1945: Polynesian, W.D. Wright

  • 1944: Pensive, Conn McCreary

  • 1943: Count Fleet, Johnny Longden

  • 1942: Alsab, Basil James

  • 1941: Whirlaway, Eddie Arcaro

  • 1940: Bimelech, F.A. Smith

  • 1939: Challedon, George Seabo

  • 1938: Dauber, Maurice Peters

  • 1937: War Admiral, Charley Kurtsinger

  • 1936: Bold Venture, George Woolf

  • 1935: Omaha, Willie Saunders

  • 1934: High Quest, Robert Jones

  • 1933: Head Play, Charley Kurtsinger

  • 1932: Burgoo King, Eugene James

  • 1931: Mate, George Ellis

  • 1930: Gallant Fox, Earl Sande

  • 1929: Dr. Freeland, Louis Schaefer

  • 1928: Victorian, Sonny Workman

  • 1927: Bostonian, Whitey Abel

  • 1926: Display, John Maiben

  • 1925: Coventry, Clarence Kummer

  • 1924: Nellie Morse, John Merimee

  • 1923: Vigil, Benny Marinelli

  • 1922: Pillory, L. Morris

  • 1921: Broomspun, Frank Coltiletti

  • 1920: Man o’ War, Clarence Kummer

  • 1919: Sir Barton, Johnny Loftus

  • 1918: Jack Hare Jr., Charles Peak; War Cloud, Johnny Loftus

  • 1917: Kalitan, E. Haynes

  • 1916: Damrosch, Linus McAtee

  • 1915: Rhine Maiden, Douglas Hoffman

  • 1914: Holiday, Andy Shuttinger

  • 1913: Buskin, James Butwell

  • 1912: Colonel Holloway, Clarence Turner

  • 1911: Watervale, Eddie Dugan

  • 1910: Layminster, Roy Estep

  • 1909: Effendi, Willie Doyle

  • 1908: Royal Tourist, Eddie Dugan

  • 1907: Don Enrique, G. Mountain

  • 1906: Whimsical, Walter Miller

  • 1905: Cairngorm, W. Davis

  • 1904: Bryn Mawr, E. Hildebrand

  • 1903: Flocarline, W. Gannon

  • 1902: Old England, L. Jackson

  • 1901: The Parader, F. Landry

  • 1900: Hindus, H. Spencer

  • 1899: Half time, R. Clawson

  • 1898: Sly Fox, Willie Simms

  • 1897: Paul Kauvar, T. Thorpe

  • 1896: Margrave, Henry Griffin

  • 1895: Belmar, Fred Taral

  • 1894: Assignee, Fred Taral

  • 1893: No race

  • 1892: No race

  • 1891: No race

  • 1890: Montague, W. Martin

  • 1889: Buddhist, George B. Anderson

  • 1888: Refund, Fred Littlefield

  • 1887: Dunboyne, William Donohue

  • 1886: The Bard, S. Fisher

  • 1885: Tecumseh, Jim McLaughlin

  • 1884: Knight of Ellerslie, S. Fisher

  • 1883: Jacobus, George Barbee

  • 1882: Vanguard, T. Costello

  • 1881: Saunterer, T. Costello

  • 1880: Grenada, Lloyd Hughes

  • 1879: Harold, Lloyd Hughes

  • 1878: Duke of Magenta, C. Holloway

  • 1877: Cloverbrook, C. Holloway

  • 1876: Shirley, George Barbee

  • 1875: Tom Ochiltree, Lloyd Hughes

  • 1874: Culpepper, William Donohue

  • 1873: Survivor, George Barbee

  • Continue Reading

    Sports

    Rose, ‘Shoeless’ Joe HOF-eligible as MLB lifts ban

    Published

    on

    By

    Rose, 'Shoeless' Joe HOF-eligible as MLB lifts ban

    In a historic, sweeping decision, baseball commissioner Rob Manfred on Tuesday removed Pete Rose, “Shoeless” Joe Jackson and other deceased players from Major League Baseball’s permanently ineligible list.

    The all-time hit king and Jackson — both longtime baseball pariahs stained by gambling, seen by MLB as the game’s mortal sin — are now eligible for election into the Baseball Hall of Fame in Cooperstown, New York.

    Manfred ruled that MLB’s punishment of banned individuals ends upon their deaths.

    “Obviously, a person no longer with us cannot represent a threat to the integrity of the game,” Manfred wrote in a letter to attorney Jeffrey M. Lenkov, who petitioned for Rose’s removal from the list Jan. 8. “Moreover, it is hard to conceive of a penalty that has more deterrent effect than one that lasts a lifetime with no reprieve.

    “Therefore, I have concluded that permanent ineligibility ends upon the passing of the disciplined individual, and Mr. Rose will be removed from the permanently ineligible list.”

    Manfred’s decision ends the ban that Rose accepted from then-Commissioner A. Bartlett Giamatti in August 1989, following an MLB investigation that determined the 17-time All-Star had bet on games while managing the Cincinnati Reds.

    Jackson and seven other Chicago White Sox were banned from playing professional baseball in 1921 by MLB’s first commissioner, Kenesaw Mountain Landis, for fixing the 1919 World Series.

    Based on current rules for players who last played more than 15 years ago, it appears the earliest Rose and Jackson could be enshrined is summer 2028 if they are elected.

    Manfred’s ruling removes a total of 16 deceased players and one deceased owner from MLB’s banned list, a group that includes Jackson’s teammates, ace pitcher Eddie Cicotte and third baseman George “Buck” Weaver. The so-called “Black Sox Scandal” is one of the darkest chapters in baseball history, the subject of books and the 1988 film, “Eight Men Out.”

    In 1991, shortly before Rose’s first year of Hall of Fame eligibility, the Hall’s board decided any player on MLB’s permanently ineligible list would also be ineligible for election. It became known as “the Pete Rose rule.”

    Rose believed his banishment would be lifted after a year or two, but it became a lifetime sentence. For “Shoeless” Joe Jackson, who died in 1951, the ban became an eternal sentence, until Tuesday.

    Jackson was considered for decades by voters, but Pete Rose’s name has never appeared on a Hall of Fame ballot. He died in September at age 83.

    Nearly a decade ago, Lenkov began a campaign to get Rose reinstated. On Dec. 17, Pete Rose’s eldest daughter, Fawn, and Lenkov appealed to Manfred and MLB chief communications officer Pat Courtney during an hourlong meeting at MLB’s midtown Manhattan headquarters.

    “This has been a long journey,” Lenkov said. “On behalf of the family, they are very proud and pleased and know that their father would have been overjoyed at this decision today.”

    Jane Forbes Clark, chairman of the board of the Hall of Fame, said Manfred’s decision will allow Rose, Jackson and others to be considered by the Historical Overview Committee, which will “develop the ballot of eight names for the Classic Baseball Era Committee … to vote on when it meets next in December 2027.”

    Lenkov said he and Rose’s family intend to petition the Hall of Fame for induction as soon as possible.

    “My next step is to respectfully confer with the Hall and discuss … Pete’s induction into the Hall of Fame,” Lenkov said. The attorney said he and Rose’s family will attend Pete Rose Night on Wednesday at Cincinnati’s Great American Ball Park.

    “Reds Nation will not only be able to celebrate Pete’s legacy, but now optimistically be able to look forward to the possibility that Pete will join other baseball immortals,” Lenkov said. “Pete Rose would have for sure been overjoyed at the outpouring of support from all.”

    Rose and Jackson’s candidacies presumably will be decided by the Hall’s 16-member Classic Baseball Era Committee, which considers players whose careers ended more than 15 years ago. The committee isn’t scheduled to meet again until December 2027. Rose and Jackson would need 12 of 16 votes to win induction.

    Jackson had a career batting average of .356, the fourth highest in MLB history. After his death, Jackson’s fans, including state legislators in South Carolina, launched numerous public and petition-writing campaigns arguing that Jackson deserved a plaque in the Hall of Fame. Despite accepting $5,000 in gamblers’ cash to throw the 1919 World Series, Jackson batted .375, didn’t make an error and hit the series’ only home run.

    Across the decades and among millions of baseball fans, especially in Cincinnati where Rose was born and played most of his career, the clamor over the pugnacious, stubborn legend’s banishment from baseball and the Hall became louder, angrier and increasingly impatient.

    Few players in baseball history had more remarkable careers than Pete Rose. He was an exuberant competitor who played the game with sharp-elbowed abandon and relentless hustle. Rose, whose lifetime batting average was .303, is Major League Baseball’s career leader in hits (4,256), games played (3,562), at-bats (14,053), singles (3,215) and outs (10,328). He won the World Series three times — twice with the Reds and once with the Philadelphia Phillies.

    Rose often said — and stat experts agree — that he won more regular-season games (1,972) than any major league baseball player or professional athlete in history. He also won three batting titles, two Gold Glove Awards, the Most Valuable Player Award and the Rookie of the Year Award.

    In 2015, shortly after Manfred succeeded Bud Selig as commissioner, Rose applied for reinstatement with MLB. Manfred met with Rose, who first told the commissioner he had stopped gambling but then admitted he still wagered legally on sports, including baseball, in his adopted hometown of Las Vegas.

    Manfred rejected Rose’s bid for reinstatement after concluding he had failed to “reconfigure his life,” a requirement for reinstatement set by Giamatti. Allowing Rose back into baseball was an “unacceptable risk of a future violation … and thus to the integrity of our sport,” Manfred declared on Dec. 14, 2015.

    Rose often complained that the ban prevented him from working with young hitters in minor league ballparks. On Feb. 5, 2020, Rose’s representatives filed another reinstatement petition, arguing that the commissioner’s decision to level no punishment against the World Series champion Houston Astros players for electronic sign stealing was unfair to Rose. “There cannot be one set of rules for Mr. Rose,” the 20-page petition argued, “and another for everyone else.”

    But Manfred, who did not meet again with Rose, chose not to rule on that second appeal prior to Rose’s death on Sept. 30, 2024.

    Earlier this year, President Donald Trump announced he planned to posthumously pardon Rose. “Over the next few weeks I will be signing a complete PARDON of Pete Rose, who shouldn’t have been gambling on baseball, but only bet on HIS TEAM WINNING,” Trump wrote on social media Feb. 28.

    Trump didn’t say what the pardon would cover. Rose served five months in federal prison for submitting falsified tax returns in 1990.

    During an Oval Office meeting on April 16, Trump and Manfred discussed Rose’s posthumous petition for reinstatement, among other topics. Manfred later declined to discuss details of their conversation.

    On Tuesday, Manfred called Trump, who was on a state trip in Saudi Arabia, and Forbes Clark about his ruling, multiple sources told ESPN.

    John Dowd, the former Justice Department attorney who conducted MLB’s Rose investigation, told ESPN in 2020 that he believes Jackson belongs in the Hall but said he would disagree with Manfred on Rose. “There’s no difference with him being dead — it’s about behavior, conduct and reputation,” Dowd said.

    Dowd’s inquiry found Rose had wagered on 52 Reds games and hundreds of other baseball games in 1987 while serving as Cincinnati’s manager. Giamatti then banned Rose from baseball permanently on Aug. 23, 1989.

    When asked at a news conference whether Rose’s punishment should keep him out of the Hall of Fame, Giamatti said he’d leave that decision to the baseball writers who vote every year on players eligible for induction.

    “This episode has been about, in many ways … taking responsibility and taking responsibility for one’s acts,” said Giamatti, a Renaissance scholar and former Yale president. “I know I need not point out to the baseball writers of America that it is their responsibility to decide who goes into the Hall of Fame. It is not mine.”

    In his letter Tuesday, Manfred referred to the Giamatti quote and said he agrees “it is not part of my authority or responsibility to express any view concerning Mr. Rose’s … possible election to the Hall of Fame. I agree with Commissioner Giamatti that responsibility for that decision lies with the Hall of Fame.”

    Giamatti had said Rose’s only path back into the game was to “reconfigure his life,” a not-so-subtle hint that if Rose continued to bet on baseball, he had no shot to return.

    Only eight days after announcing the ban, Giamatti died of a heart attack at 51. His deputy and successor, Fay Vincent, adamantly opposed Rose’s reinstatement — both during his tenure as commissioner (until 1992) and until his death three months ago at age 86.

    Rose was his own worst enemy. For nearly 15 years, he denied having placed a single bet on baseball. In the early 2000s, then-commissioner Bud Selig offered Rose a chance, but with conditions, including an admission that he bet on baseball and a requirement that he stop gambling and making casino appearances.

    Rose declined.

    In January 2004, he admitted in his book, “My Prison Without Bars,” that he had gambled on baseball as the Reds manager. But he insisted he only bet on his team to win. In 2015, ESPN reported that a notebook seized from a Rose associate showed Rose had also wagered on baseball while still a player, something he would not acknowledge.

    Rose’s illegal gambling and prison time aren’t the only stains on a legacy that might be weighed by Hall of Fame voters, a group instructed to consider integrity, sportsmanship and character.

    In 2017, a woman’s sworn statement accused Rose of statutory rape; she said they began having sex when she was 14 or 15 and Rose was in his 30s. Rose said he thought she was 16 — the age of consent in Ohio at the time. Two days later, the Philadelphia Phillies announced the cancellation of Rose’s Wall of Fame induction.

    In January 2020, ESPN reported that for all practical purposes, Manfred viewed baseball’s banned list as punishing players during their lifetime but ending upon their death. However, Hall of Fame representatives have said that a player who dies while still on the banned list remains ineligible for consideration. With his 2020 reinstatement application sitting on Manfred’s desk, Rose was granted permission by MLB to be honored at a celebration of the 1980 Philadelphia Phillies World Series championship on Aug. 7, 2022.

    In the dugout before fans gave Rose a lengthy standing ovation, a newspaper reporter asked him about the 2017 allegation and whether his involvement in that day’s celebration sent a negative message to women.

    “No, I’m not here to talk about that,” Rose replied to her. “Sorry about that. It was 55 years ago, babe.”

    The public backlash to Rose’s remarks was swift and severe. MLB sources said his comments derailed his campaign to get off the ineligible list.

    In the past several years, some fans have become more insistent that Rose should be forgiven by MLB and inducted into the Hall of Fame. One reason is America’s love affair with sports betting. As MLB has embraced legalized gambling through sponsorships and partnerships — like all U.S. professional sports — some fans and commentators complained that Rose deserves a second chance, echoing an argument Rose often made.

    “I thought we lived in a country where you’re given a second chance, but not as far as gambling’s concerned,” Rose said in a 2020 interview with ESPN. He estimated the ban cost him at least $80 million in earnings as an MLB manager.

    Rose, who signed baseballs and jerseys for years in memorabilia stores inside Las Vegas casinos and in Cooperstown on Hall of Fame induction weekends, gambled legally on sports nearly every day for the rest of his life.

    Asked how much money his gambling had cost him, Rose said he didn’t know, though he acknowledged he lost far more than he won. “No one wins at gambling,” said Rose.

    “I’m the one that’s lost 30 years,” he told ESPN in the 2020 documentary “Backstory: Banned for Life*.” “Just to take baseball out of my heart penalized me more than you could imagine. You understand what I’m saying? … I don’t think there’s ever been a player, I could be wrong, I don’t think there’s ever been a player that loved the game like I did. You could tell I loved the game, the way I played the game.

    “So then you take that away from somebody. I’m able to hide it on the outside, but it’s ate me up inside, for all those years. Hell, you’d think I was Al Capone. I’m Pete Rose — played more games than anybody, batted more than anybody … OK? Got more hits than anybody. I am the biggest winner in the history of sports.”

    Last September, in his last interview 10 days before his death, Rose told sportscaster John Condit: “I’ve come to the conclusion — I hope I’m wrong — that I’ll make the Hall of Fame after I die. Which I totally disagree with, because the Hall of Fame is for two reasons: your fans and your family. … And it’s for your family if you’re here. It’s for your fans if you’re here. Not if you’re 10 feet under. You understand what I’m saying?”

    “What good is it going to do me or my fans if they put me in the Hall of Fame a couple years after I pass away?” Rose told Condit. “What’s the point? What’s the point? Because they’ll make money over it?”

    ESPN’s William Weinbaum and John Mastroberardino contributed to this report.

    Continue Reading

    Trending