Connect with us

Published

on

Thousands of women every year have an endometrial ablation on the NHS.

It’s a treatment for heavy periods – and for a lot of women, the 90-second procedure brings relief from the sapping cycle of heavy bleeding.

But the procedure to destroy the womb lining fails in up to a fifth of cases, often leaving women with no treatment options left but a hysterectomy.

People whose ablations have failed describe debilitating, long-lasting pain that fractures mental health, relationships and careers – and doctors who seem to have little idea what’s wrong with them.

Karen Ramage knew immediately after her endometrial ablation in 2021 that something wasn’t right.

The pain only got worse. The month prior, she had run 100 miles. By two weeks after the procedure, she couldn’t walk properly. She couldn’t drive, she couldn’t work, she could barely eat. And she couldn’t find a doctor who would agree the endometrial ablation might be to blame.

“My personal belief is that they just don’t expect anything to go wrong,” she told Sky News.

The discussion of risks beforehand was limited to being warned of adhesions between the womb and bladder or bowel, she says. She was told the worst outcome would be no improvement in her bleeding.

But constant pain set in down her right side, intensifying to “labour-like contraction pains” around the time of her period.

As months passed, she relied on daily doses of Tramadol. Talking to a counsellor, she tried to reckon with how she could live like this: “I felt that everything had been taken away from me.”

Supplied pic of Karen Ramage for feature on endometrial ablation
Image:
Karen Ramage had to pay for a hysterectomy privately after her ablation failed

It took going private for a doctor to tell her definitively her ablation had failed.

“I was probably more relieved that actually somebody would believe in me, because it was this whole thing that nobody would believe that this procedure had caused all of this.”

Facing up to a two-year wait on the NHS for a hysterectomy, she took out a loan to cover the £7,500 cost of having it privately. After months not working, it was a tough financial call – one that meant relying on food banks.

How ablations work – and fail

About one in four women suffer from heavy periods and more than 30,000 women in England had an endometrial ablation on the NHS between 2017 and 2022.

Most were radiofrequency ablations, where electromagnetic energy is used to burn away the lining of the womb.

The womb lining is what grows and sheds each month so the idea is that no lining means no – or lighter – periods.

But if not all the lining is destroyed, it still grows and sheds – but scar tissue can mean the blood gets trapped. It builds up in pockets behind the tissue, sometimes behind a scarred-shut cervix, causing intense pain until it disperses back into the body.

Endometrial ablation

In women who have been sterilised the blood can back up into the fallopian tubes – this is known as PATSS (post-ablation tubal sterilisation syndrome).

In cases of late-onset failure, the lining regrows in the months and years after an ablation.

Some women experience pain cyclically each month, while for others post-ablation pain is constant or just during sex.

Women who spoke to Sky News describe agony worse than labour. One woman would put herself in the recovery position when the pain started because she knew she would blackout. Another came close to losing her job because she needed drugs so strong they made her a “zombie”.

‘Ablation ruined 10 years of my life’

Amanda Connor was told an ablation would “solve all my problems”, but three years later her womb had “completely grown back”. She decided to try the procedure a second time in 2010.

The pattern of monthly pain only intensified over time. It would start in her feet, a tingling fiery burn. By the time it reached her legs, she would be doubled over. Then it raged through her abdomen.

“I couldn’t stand up, I was on the floor writhing about and screaming for hours,” she told Sky News.

Her husband could only watch for so long before he would call an ambulance – just like he did the month prior, and the one before that.

At the hospital they would do the same checks for appendicitis, then pelvic inflammatory disease. But Amanda was sure they were looking for the wrong thing: “It’s not pelvic inflammatory disease, it’s happening every single month.”

Reports of not being believed or “gaslighting” were common among women who spoke to Sky News. One was told her pain must be a bladder infection. Two women were told it was IBS.

Nobody told Amanda it could be a failed ablation. She was the one who brought it up with her gynaecologist.

A scan revealed her womb was a “lump of scar tissue”. The only way to fix it was to remove her womb entirely.

She was shocked when her doctor told her: “Not only have I been totally misled about ablation and how amazing it is – I am now facing a major operation in order to fix it.

“If I could go back I would never have it done.

“Ablation ruined about 10 years of my life. The effect on my marriage, my work life and home life was huge.”

Taking legal action

Experiences like this are familiar to Dr Victoria Handley, a lawyer specialising in gynaecological medical negligence cases.

She estimates she’s handled about 1,000 cases relating to endometrial ablation since 2015. Every week she will hear from one or two women who have had complications from ablations.

They report adhesions of the uterus to the bladder or bowel, perforation of the uterus, infertility they weren’t warned about and ultimately needing further surgery.

Women are going to the doctor with heavy periods and ending up needing a hysterectomy, “the most radical thing you can have”, Dr Handley says. A hysterectomy carries risks including incontinence, sexual dysfunction, prolapse and early menopause.

“You’re swapping one problem for another without realising that the problem you’re swapping is actually worse than the problem you’ve got,” she told Sky News.

Dr Victoria Handley, a lawyer specialising in gynaecological medical negligence cases
Image:
Dr Victoria Handley says she has handled about 1,000 cases

Exactly how many women suffer post-ablation complications is hard to pinpoint as research tends to only capture patients who have resorted to further surgery.

A study of more than 110,000 women in England who had an endometrial ablation between 2000 and 2011 found 16.7% had further surgery within five years. Other studies put the number at more than 20%.

Up to one in five ablation patients may have abnormal bleeding or period pain, or both, according to Professor Justin Clark, consultant gynaecologist and spokesperson for the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

NICE guidelines set out treatment pathways for heavy bleeding. This includes taking a patient’s full history, investigating the cause of the bleeding and exploring conservative options like the coil and pill before an ablation.

A spokesperson for NHS England told Sky News staff should be following this guidance and “should make clear the benefits and potential risks of any recommended treatment so patients can make informed decisions”.

But Dr Handley says in her experience, “a lot of what’s in this guideline is ignored by the medical profession because they’ll go, ‘oh, I know what’s wrong with you’, and I’ll go straight to the surgery, and they don’t actually carry out the investigation and then send them down the correct route”.

Medical negligence cases need to establish a breach of duty; for endometrial ablation this is normally failure to warn of the risk of complications or failure to offer alternatives.

The claimant needs to prove they were injured, and the injury was caused by the breach. They also need to be able to show logically that had they been informed of the risks or alternatives, they would not have gone ahead with the ablation. If those four things don’t align, the case will fail, Dr Handley says.

The majority of cases are settled by NHS trusts out of court, she says, and women tend to receive upwards of £20,000, depending on the injury they have suffered.

Despite the number of cases she has dealt with, she says she has seen no attempt to solve the issue.

“The NHS response is woeful. There’s no joined up thinking at all. There’s no recognition that there’s an overarching problem, and there’s no desire to fix it.”

NHS England and NHS Scotland did not address questions from Sky News about how they are responding to this at an organisation-wide level.

‘It makes me sick to know my womb is burned’

Emma Burchell says she does not believe the risks were discussed in full when she had an ablation – which she calls “the worst decision I ever made”.

“You trust these doctors to do the right thing for you, and then you feel like they’ve not,” she says.

The months since the procedure in May 2022 have been “horrendous”. Constant sharp pain through her back, stomach and legs drove her to the doctor again and again, but she says she wasn’t given pain relief.

Instead she was offered antidepressants. She declined, worried she would be told the pain was “all in her head” if she accepted.

Now she’s considering a hysterectomy. “Do I need my womb?” she questions. “It makes me sick to know my womb is all burned, and it’s sat inside my stomach.”

But getting more surgery isn’t a quick fix. Gynaecological waiting lists in England have more than doubled since the start of the pandemic.

Emma has been put on injections to create a chemical menopause, a process which can help diagnose the cause of gynaecological symptoms, before doctors will consider a hysterectomy. In the meantime, each day is a “battle”.

Supplied pic of Emma Burchell for feature about endometrial ablation
Image:
Emma Burchell says getting an ablation was the ‘worst decision’ she’s ever made

Unsuitable candidates for ablation

A number of factors make an ablation more likely to fail: a younger age, fibroids, previous C-sections, polyps, a retroverted uterus (where the womb tips backwards) and adenomyosis (where the womb lining grows in the muscle of the womb).

According to Professor Clark, “endometrial ablation works best for women above 40 years old with relatively normal sized wombs without significant fibroids”.

Studies stress the importance of making sure women are good candidates for the procedure. A medical device alert from the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency said the same.

Still, Sky News spoke to women who between them had all the contraindications above and had been given an ablation.

Karen Ramage found out after her ablation that she had a retroverted uterus – increasing the chance of ablation failure sixfold – as well as fibroids.

Ablations can be done where women have small fibroids, but she was told in her case it was like trying to “wallpaper over air bubbles and lumps, so it doesn’t cover the whole surface”.

When ablations work

Endometrial ablation support groups have sprung up on Facebook; the largest has more than 14,000 members, mostly in the US.

Women share stories of nerve damage, sepsis, infections, bloating, continued heavy bleeding. It’s nerve wracking reading for people considering the procedure – or who had it done before finding the group.

Samantha Williams hovers in the group, popping up in the comments to share her experience and reassure people. She had an ablation after 18 months of non-stop bleeding and it made a “massive difference” to her quality of life. It stopped the bleeding and hasn’t caused pain.

Read more on Sky News:
New workplace standards for menopause and menstruation support
Women more likely to suffer migraines during menstrual cycle

If you think of treatments for heavy bleeding as the alphabet, she says, a hysterectomy is Z. With her NHS gynaecologist they worked through until they got to Y, an ablation.

The risks were explained, the patient information leaflet was detailed and she was confident it was right for her.

Still, her advice is the same as women who had bad experiences: “Do your homework. But also try everything else first. It shouldn’t ever be the first thing that you do. There’s lots of other options.”

What the NHS says

Sky News contacted NHS England and Scotland, as well as the NHS trusts that treated Karen, Amanda and Emma.

NHS England said endometrial ablation is “one of a number of treatments” for heavy bleeding that is given “when clinically appropriate”.

“While most women do not experience significant pain after this procedure, we strongly encourage any woman with concerns to speak to their clinician or GP,” it said.

A Scottish government spokesperson said “person-centred care” was a priority and involved working in partnership with patients to understand what they need, and how their desired outcomes can be achieved.

“An essential component of this approach involves providing tailored, understandable information so that people are fully informed and involved in decision-making about their care as much as they choose.”

A spokesperson for Bolton NHS Foundation Trust said: “We welcome the opportunity to speak with any patient directly if they had concerns about their care or treatment, so we can fully understand their experience and make improvements where possible.”

NHS Forth Valley again said it followed guidelines and best practice, adding that treatment options may be discussed at multidisciplinary team meetings to identify the most suitable options.

Follow up investigations would be carried out where there is ongoing pain or other symptoms, which could identify unrelated medical conditions as the source of pain, the spokesperson said.

Continue Reading

UK

‘Britain’s strictest headteacher’ Katharine Birbalsingh criticises Education Secretary over ‘appalling’ schools bill

Published

on

By

'Britain's strictest headteacher' Katharine Birbalsingh criticises Education Secretary over 'appalling' schools bill

Educators are split over the government’s proposed Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill, with some saying the move will improve fairness and accountability and others warning it could limit innovation in academy schools.

Pushed by the Department for Education (DfE) as a means to reform the education system, the bill seeks to improve school standards, strengthen attendance policies, and ensure that children receive a well-rounded education that prioritises their wellbeing.

The legislation also includes measures to increase school accountability, particularly for academies, by giving more oversight to the DfE.

Katharine Birbalsingh, headteacher of Michaela School in Wembley, north London, called it “absolutely appalling”.

“I’m just really concerned because, at the moment, school leaders have the freedom to do various things that are right for their intake,” she told Sky News.

“This bill will take those freedoms away.”

Ms Birbalsingh, also known as ‘Britain’s strictest headteacher’, added: “We got unlucky because we could have had Wes Streeting as education secretary, which would have been fine. Unfortunately, we got her [Bridget Phillipson].

More on Education

“She [Ms Phillipson] is so arrogant. She’s just marched in there and gone, ‘I know what I’m doing, I’ll just do what I want’.”

But some argue that academies are left to their own devices and have a lack of accountability when it comes to things like parental complaints.

The bill will require all schools to follow the national curriculum and employ teachers who have Qualified Teacher Status (QTS) or are working towards it.

The founder of the Oasis Academies, Steve Chalke
Image:
Steve Chalke, founder of Oasis Academies

The founder of Oasis Academies, Steve Chalke, told Sky News: “We’re excited about the changes because we feel that education has been in a very, very poor place for the last decade or more.

“Schools have been stripped of resources and there have been giant problems about the recruitment and retention of teachers.

“We feel that this important bill is beginning to address all of those issues.”

The bill plans to provide all primary school children with breakfast, alongside uniform limits.

This would prevent schools from having more than three items of branded uniform clothing, potentially addressing concerns parents have about the cost of uniforms.

Mr Chalke said: “I am a fan of working hard collaboratively to create the best opportunities for any and every young person and their family.

“Because behind every struggling child is normally a parent who’s struggling with that.”

He added: “We at Oasis are excited about all of this, but that doesn’t mean we don’t have questions.

“It doesn’t mean that we’re being led blindly down the road, but our job is to be engaged in the discussion about how academies work more widely with their local authorities.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

February: Govt’s overhauling of Ofsted inspections

Read more:
More children than ever are not in school

Teaching unions gear up for fight over AI job-loss fears
Headteachers ‘receive murder threats’ by pupils’ parents

The bill will also give local authorities greater control over the pupil admission process.

Ms Birbalsingh said: “Any council could decide to reduce the number of children in one school and therefore reduce the money at that school and give more pupils to another school that’s struggling.”

Mr Chalke said: “Educational academy boards, academy groups, need to be accountable in strong partnership with others. And if this bill delivers everything it promises, wow. I think [it] will be an extraordinary outcome.”

Empty classroom chairs TOP
Image:
The bill will give local authorities greater control over the pupil admission process

The bill is set to be debated further in the coming weeks as it moves through parliament.

A DfE spokesperson said: “This government is determined to drive high and rising standards for every child through our Plan for Change, to ensure every family has a good local school for their child.

“Our landmark Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill delivers on this mission, getting high-quality teachers into every classroom, and ensuring there is a floor on pay and no ceiling.

“These measures will make sure we are giving every child an education as good as the best.”

Continue Reading

UK

Labour MPs Yuan Yang and Abtisam Mohamed denied entry and deported from Israel

Published

on

By

Labour MPs Yuan Yang and Abtisam Mohamed denied entry and deported from Israel

Two Labour MPs have been denied entry to Israel and deported.

Yuan Yang and Abtisam Mohamed were rejected because they were suspected of plans to “document the activities of security forces and spread anti-Israel hatred”, according to a statement from the Israeli immigration ministry.

Ms Yang, who represents Earley and Woodley, and Ms Mohamed, the MP for Sheffield Central, both flew to the country from Luton on Saturday.

According to a statement from the Israeli immigration ministry, they were accompanied by two assistants and during questioning, the MPs claimed they were visiting Israel “as part of an official parliamentary delegation”.

The ministry branded their claim as “false”, but UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy reacted to news of the MPs’ detention saying their treatment while “on a parliamentary delegation to Israel” was “unacceptable”.

In their own statement, the two women said they were “astounded at the unprecedented step taken by the Israeli authorities”.

“It is vital that parliamentarians are able to witness, first-hand, the situation in the occupied Palestinian territory,” the statement said.

More on Israel

“We are two, out of scores of MPs, who have spoken out in Parliament in recent months on the Israel-Palestine conflict and the importance of complying with international humanitarian law. Parliamentarians should feel free to speak truthfully in the House of Commons, without fear of being targeted.”

They said they had travelled to “visit humanitarian aid projects and communities in the West Bank” with “UK charity partners who have over a decade of experience in taking parliamentary delegations”.

“We thank them, the staff of the British Embassy in Tel Aviv, the British Consulate in Jerusalem, the Middle East minister and the Foreign Secretary for their tireless support,” the statement concludes.

Israel’s UK embassy said the MPs were denied entry because they had “accused Israel of false claims, were actively involved in promoting sanctions against Israeli ministers, and supported campaigns aimed at boycotting the state of Israel”.

Its statement said the women “chose not to exercise their right under Israeli law to petition the court to reconsider the decision”.

As a result, they were “offered hotel accommodation, which they declined” and their return flight was covered by the Israeli state.

“The visit was intended to provoke anti-Israel activities at a time when Israel is at war and under attack on seven fronts. Its purpose was to harm Israel and Israeli citizens and spread falsehoods about them,” the statement added.

“The state of Israel has both the authority and the duty to prevent the entry of individuals whose presence in the country is intended to cause harm to its citizens – just as such authority exists in the United Kingdom.”

Read more from Sky News:
UK carmaker to ‘pause’ US shipments over Trump tariffs
Two people die after caravan fire at holiday park

Mr Lammy said in a statement to Sky News: “It is unacceptable, counterproductive, and deeply concerning that two British MPs on a parliamentary delegation to Israel have been detained and refused entry by the Israeli authorities.

“I have made clear to my counterparts in the Israeli government that this is no way to treat British parliamentarians, and we have been in contact with both MPs tonight to offer our support.

“The UK government’s focus remains securing a return to the ceasefire and negotiations to stop the bloodshed, free the hostages and end the conflict in Gaza.”

In an interview with Sky’s Trevor Phillips, chief secretary to the treasury Darren Jones echoed Mr Lammy’s accusation of “unacceptable” behaviour by the Israelis.

But Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch told Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips that “every country should be able to control its borders” and “that’s what Israel is doing” because they “gave reasons why those people shouldn’t have come in based on their laws”.

“It’s really important, I believe, to respect those countries’ decisions,” she told Sky News.

Ms Badenoch also said she is “very concerned” about the “rhetoric” on the Middle East from Labour MPs – and six independents – and therefore she was “not surprised” by the move of Israeli border officials.

She claimed there is “a lot of repeating of misinformation, repeating of conspiracy theories” during Prime Minister’s Questions.

“I see Labour MPs standing up and saying things which even Keir Starmer has to disagree with and shut down at PMQs,” she added.

Continue Reading

UK

Artist behind Trump portrait branded ‘the worst’ by president says her business is ‘in danger of not recovering’

Published

on

By

Artist behind Trump portrait branded 'the worst' by president says her business is 'in danger of not recovering'

An artist whose official portrait of Donald Trump was publicly criticised by the president said her business is now “in danger of not recovering”.

The Republican leader made headlines at the end of last month when, in a post on his Truth Social platform, he said the portrait hanging in Colorado’s State Capitol had been “purposefully distorted”.

Following the criticism, officials said the portrait would be taken down and it has since been removed.

Sarah Boardman, the British artist who painted the Trump portrait, said in a statement to Sky News she felt her “intentions, integrity, and abilities” had been “called into question” when the president criticised the oil painting.

In his post, Mr Trump said a portrait by the same artist of former US president Barack Obama was “wonderful” but “the one on me is truly the worst”.

Sarah Boardman. Pic : AP
Image:
Sarah Boardman. Pic : AP

Read more from Sky News:
Thousands protest against Trump at rallies in every US state
Do Trump’s numbers on tariffs really add up?

Referring to Ms Boardman, whose collection of official portraits also includes one of former president George W Bush, Mr Trump said “she must have lost her talent as she got older”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Trump’s portrait to be taken down

He then added: “In any event, I would much prefer not having a picture than having this one.”

Almost two weeks since the criticism, Ms Boardman has now responded saying her business has been detrimentally impacted.

She said: “President Trump is entitled to comment freely, as we all are, but the additional allegations that I ‘purposefully distorted’ the portrait, and that I ‘must have lost my talent as I got older’ are now directly and negatively impacting my business of over 41 years which now is in danger of not recovering.”

The artist also described how “for the six years that the portrait hung in the Colorado State Capitol Building Rotunda, I received overwhelmingly positive reviews and feedback”.

“Since President Trump’s comments, that has changed for the worst,” she added.

👉 Follow Trump 100 on your podcast app 👈

Ms Boardman said the Colorado State Capitol Advisory Committee, Denver, commissioned her to paint the official portrait of President Trump for the Denver State Capitol Gallery of Presidents.

“The reference photograph and my subsequent ‘works in progress’ were all approved, throughout that process, by that committee,” she said.

“I completed the portrait accurately, without ‘purposeful distortion’, political bias, or any attempt to caricature the subject, actual or implied. I fulfilled the task per my contract.”

Continue Reading

Trending