TUSCALOOSA, Ala. — A month ago, a nearly empty Bryant-Denny Stadium felt like a ghost town as the clock ticked toward midnight. The only sound was the whir of gas-powered blowers pushing trash into piles for pickup. While Texas celebrated becoming playoff contenders inside the visitor’s locker room, it appeared the sun had set early on Alabama’s season. Kiss the seemingly annual trip to the national championship game goodbye. Those travel reservations might as well have gone in the refuse bin alongside empty shots of whiskey and shattered gas station sunglasses.
A week later, an ugly 17-3 win at South Florida seemed to signal something even more damning: the decline of the dynasty under Nick Saban, which had dominated college football with six championships since 2009. The offense, which had in recent years evolved into one of the best in football with star quarterbacks and receivers, reverted to a shell of its former self. Quarterback Jalen Milroe, the heir apparent to No. 1 draft pick Bryce Young, was benched; his replacements, Tyler Buchner and Ty Simpson, yielded the worst combined QBR of the Saban era. Saban stood on a water cooler in Tampa and preached positivity while the sky was falling around him.
Numerousformerplayers took to social media during and after the game to question how it had gotten so bad, so quickly. And those who resisted the urge to post were no less distraught. A former offensive player focused on the line’s struggles to help the running game and protect the quarterback; “It’s a perfect storm,” he said, noting that the personnel across the board was no longer elite. A former defensive player went big-picture, wondering if Saban was still a fit for the modern game given the tandem impact of the transfer portal and NIL.
The scrutiny on the Mal Moore Athletic Facility, home to the football program, was intense. But internally, questions were being asked and answered. Veteran players were taking ownership. And a formula — imperfect though it was — was taking shape that would bring about a turnaround few saw coming. It’s a turnaround reminiscent of eight years earlier when Saban famously chided the media for burying the team after an early loss to Ole Miss. His exact words were, “If it was up to you, we’re six-foot under already. We’re dead and buried and gone.” Alabama went on to win the championship.
The rush to eulogize the program came quickly after Texas and USF, and since then public acceptance of this Alabama team has been gradual. But after five-straight wins, an air of belief has taken root among players. The defense is playing as well as it has in years, especially the front seven, which has turned up the pressure on opposing quarterbacks. Meanwhile, Milroe has settled in after being named the starter — still shaky in the short-to-intermediate passing game, but incredibly effective at pushing the ball downfield.
After a closer-than-expected win at home against Arkansas on Saturday, Alabama sits at No. 11 in the AP poll ahead of back-to-back games against Tennessee and LSU — the most pivotal stretch of the season.
Each game will be a reminder of the team’s two losses last season — the enduring images of fans rushing the field in Knoxville and Baton Rouge, celebrating the downfall of a rival that had tormented them for the better part of a decade. After Tennessee won, it rubbed salt in the wound by playing Alabama favorite “Dixieland Delight” over the loudspeakers inside Neyland Stadium.
If motivation was part of the problem early in the season, it shouldn’t be on Saturday (3:30 p.m. ET, CBS) when the Tide host the Vols.
AS BAD AS losing to Texas was, marking Alabama’s first double-digit loss at home since 2004, Saban didn’t see his team splintering under the pressure.
That changed against USF, though.
“This was the first game where I saw some guys a little frustrated,” Saban said at the time. “I think the frustration came maybe because we weren’t as focused as we needed to be, which is my responsibility.”
But it wasn’t his responsibility alone.
The Sunday after the game, players called a meeting to clear the air and get everyone on the same page. As junior offensive tackle JC Latham put it, it was about “holding guys accountable.”
A vocal leader who this summer called talk of the Alabama dynasty ending “extremely disrespectful,” Latham was reluctant to divulge too many details about what was said behind closed doors. But after hearing from other players in subsequent weeks, a picture of the meeting has come into focus.
The tenor wasn’t combative, more matter-of-fact as if the team leaders felt the need to hit the proverbial reset button — albeit early in the season.
“We are all capable — the whole team,” said linebacker Chris Braswell. “We’re way better than that. … We just wanted to get back to that Bama standard.”
Running back Jase McClellan echoed the importance of playing to the standard as well as finishing and being more aggressive. Multiple players spoke during the meeting. In a radio interview, cornerback Terrion Arnold singled out Latham, Milroe, linebacker Dallas Turner and cornerback Kool-Aid McKinstry. Arnold said it had gotten to the point where they needed to get things “off their chest.”
“You call yourself a family, a brotherhood,” Arnold said. “When we have those type of meetings … if you don’t feel like you can say it to your brother, you’re not a real brother.”
Defensive tackle Tim Smith agreed that it wasn’t a lack of knowledge or ability holding the team back. Rather, he said, the message that stood out was, “We need to have the focus to execute.”
“Everyone understood that [the meeting] was needed and very much necessary,” Smith said. “There wasn’t any complaining like, ‘Aw, why do we have to meet as a team?’ We’re a brotherhood and everybody is trying to be on the same page.
“But a lot of guys took accountability in what was said throughout the meeting, so I think it was a pretty good one.”
Milroe said he sensed a change after beating then-No. 15 Ole Miss by two touchdowns. The Rebs’ 10 points in the game were the fewest they’d scored against an SEC opponent during coach Lane Kiffin’s tenure.
“We do have our swagger back,” Milroe said, “but we do have to acknowledge that we’ve got a lot of work to do.
“But I will say this: that we are hungry to improve and we’re excited for what the future holds.”
Kiffin came away a believer — not that he wasn’t before. The way Alabama fought back from down 7-6 at halftime and pulled away in the second half, Kiffin said, was as simple as the Tide having great players that “you can only keep … down so long.”
Kiffin went on to say he doesn’t like playing the Crimson Tide after they have had a bad game. He called his former boss the “best in the world” at motivating players after a setback.
“He does a great job of getting them back and using what everybody says — all you guys saying the dynasty’s over and they aren’t any good anymore,” he said. “He uses that all week and the guys come out playing really well.”
Whether Saban pushed all the right buttons or players pushed themselves coming out of that players-only meeting, the Tide have been a different team. After beating Ole Miss, they took care of business at Mississippi State, 40-17, and then went on the road to Texas A&M and came back from down a touchdown in the second half to win, 26-20.
Afterward, Saban lauded his team’s poise late in the game — which is not something he could have said the first three weeks of the season. He said he “couldn’t be more proud” of the way they competed.
“For guys to pull themselves up, to overcome adversity and [show] resiliency, this is a great win for our team. … It was an opportunity for this team to sort of show who they are in terms of what kind of team we have, and I think we can have a really, really good team.”
SABAN TRIED TO warn everyone. Before the offensive train wreck at USF — 5 of 15 third downs converted, 4.7 yards per pass, one total touchdown — he harkened back to the team’s offensive struggles in the 2015 season when Jake Coker and Cooper Bateman competed for the starting quarterback job.
“We were sort of struggling on offense, couldn’t find an identity, eventually found an identity and had a really good season,” Saban recalled. “So you keep searching.”
At the time, the comparison seemed like a stretch. For one, Milroe appeared more turnover prone than Coker, and for another, he didn’t have the same caliber line Coker did (see: future pros Cam Robinson and Ryan Kelly). But most importantly, the No. 2 Milroe was handing the ball off to was Jase McClellan, not Derrick Henry. No disrespect to McClellan, who is a solid player, but Henry won the Heisman Trophy that season.
So maybe there was some wishful thinking on Saban’s part. But at least one person saw where he was coming from: Coker. Like this season, Coker was reminded of the nine starters they replaced in 2015 and the early issues that caused. Like this season, Coker was reminded of his own struggles while competing for the starting job — the feeling of looking over your shoulder.
Coker recalled the Sunday night when, after watching film of the loss to Ole Miss and his two interceptions, then-offensive coordinator Kiffin told him he needed to go see Saban. Coker was too angry to be scared about getting called to Saban’s office without a reason.
After the two shared their thoughts on the team, Coker said Saban told him he was the starter and, “You need to make this thing work.”
“I said, ‘Let’s do it,'” he recalled. “I was excited. It was a way to just move forward. It was a freeing feeling knowing that I wasn’t going to get pulled.”
And that feeling extended throughout the team.
“It’s like a judge throwing the gavel down,” Coker said of Saban’s decision, “it’s over with and everybody falls in line and believes that’s the guy.”
Alabama came out the following week and throttled Louisiana-Monroe 34-0. Then came the big test: at No. 8 Georgia.
Coker smiled on the far end of the field in Athens when a pre-game scuffle broke out. “Oh, hell yes,” he thought. “Thank you. You don’t know what you just did.”
“The Georgia game is when the tone was set that ‘OK, we’re back,'” he said. “I don’t think anybody really cared about the rankings whatsoever. I think we knew we’d be there if we just took care of business.”
Maybe it’s not an apple-to-apples comparison, but Coker sees another through-line between 2015 and this season. Just as Georgia’s smack-talk lit a fire under his teammates, he thinks Kiffin’s suggestion that Kevin Steele wasn’t actually calling the defense woke up this year’s squad.
“I know it bothered the team, but I guarantee you it really bothered the coaching staff a lot,” Coker said. “I got a feeling that week of practice they were absolutely just dialed in — if you screwed anything up, you were getting just torn apart.”
Alabama’s defense, which had regressed the last few years, is looking like its old self again, ranking 12th in scoring (16 points per game), third in sacks (26) and eighth in disrupted dropbacks (54).
The offense might not be great yet, but it’s been good enough. Milroe, who said he’s getting better every week, has established himself as a big-play threat. Roughly one-fourth of his pass attempts have traveled 20 or more yards through the air; his 19 such completions rank third nationally. Since getting benched against USF, he’s scored nine touchdowns (six passing, three rushing) and turned the ball over twice.
“It kind of felt like we weren’t there in the beginning of the year, but we’re finally getting that confidence and understanding of how to play together and really how to be just malicious on both sides of the ball,” Coker said.
TO BE CLEAR: Alabama’s still far from perfect.
Just look at Saturday’s 24-21 win over Arkansas. The Crimson Tide sleep-walked through the 11 a.m. kickoff, struggling to run the ball, struggling to stop the run, struggling to do the simple things, like get the timing down on the center-quarterback exchange. By the time they woke up, they were down 6-0. And no sooner than they rattled off 24 unanswered points to take complete control of the game, they let their foot off the gas and gave up back-to-back Razorback touchdowns to make it a one-score game late.
Afterward, an agitated Saban drew a distinction between winning the game and beating the other team. While he said he was happy with the progress the team had made from the start of the season, he wasn’t pleased with a lack of execution and discipline. A face mask penalty by safety Jaylen Key felt symbolic — in a bad way. It was an instance of a player, he said, “putting himself ahead of what’s best for the team and putting yourself in harm’s way of having a chance to win.”
Could they learn from a close call? Saban said noncommittally, “I hope so.”
Offensive lineman Tyler Booker wasn’t pleased with the team’s lack of consistency. What it comes down to, he said, was them losing intensity in the second half and not finishing.
“When you lose attention to detail,” he explained, “you don’t execute as often.”
Reminded of the similarity in tone to the USF win and the reaction it caused, Booker acknowledged a “common theme” because they “shouldn’t have been in that kind of game” in the first place. Against Arkansas, he said, “We let them back in the game.”
“We have to put teams out,” he said.
But Booker wasn’t hitting the panic button yet. Overall, he felt the team was heading in the right direction in recent weeks. The talent’s there. There are flashes of a team that can find a way in a down SEC to make it to Atlanta and play for a conference championship.
If they can compete for 60 minutes, Booker said, “That’s how we get to playing Alabama football.”
Perhaps the most poignant is this: If not for Barry Bonds, Jeff Kent — the only one of the eight players under consideration selected Sunday — might not be bound for Cooperstown. While Kent is the all-time home run hitter among second basemen, he was on the same ballot as Bonds — who hit more homers than anyone, at any position.
During a post-announcement news conference, Kent recalled the way he and Bonds used to push, prod and sometimes annoy each other during their six seasons as teammates on the San Francisco Giants. Those were Kent’s best seasons, a fairly late-career peak that ran from 1997 to 2002, during which Kent posted 31.6 of his 55.4 career bWAR.
The crescendo was 2000, when Kent enjoyed his career season at age 32, hitting .334 with a 1.021 OPS, hammering 33 homers with 125 RBIs and compiling a career-best 7.2 bWAR. Hitting fourth behind Bonds and his .440 OBP, Kent hit .382 with runners on base and .449 with a runner on first base.
During Kent’s six years in San Francisco, he was one of five players in baseball to go to the plate with at least one runner on base at least 2,000 times, and the other four all played at least 48 more games than he did. Turns out, hitting behind Bonds is a pretty good career move.
To be clear, Kent was an outstanding player and the numbers he compiled were his, and his alone. When you see how the news of election impacts players, it’s a special thing. I am happy Jeff Kent is now a Hall of Famer.
But I am less happy with the Hall of Fame itself. While Kent’s overwhelming support — he was named on 14 of the 16 ballots, two more than the minimum needed for induction — caught me more than a little off guard, what didn’t surprise me was the overall voting results. In what amounted to fine print, there was this mention in the Hall’s official news release: “Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens, Gary Sheffield and Fernando Valenzuela each received less than five votes.”
By the new guidelines the Hall enacted for its ever-evolving era committee process — guidelines that went into effect with this ballot — Bonds, Clemens, Sheffield and Valenzuela aren’t eligible in 2028, the next time the contemporary era is considered. They can be nominated in 2031, and if they are, that’s probably it. If they don’t get onto at least five ballots then, they are done. And there is no reason to believe they will get more support the next time.
I thought that the makeup of this committee was stacked against the PED-associated players, but that’s a subjective assessment. And who knows what goes on in those deliberations. With so many players from the 1970s and 1980s in the group, it seemed to bode well for Don Mattingly and Dale Murphy. But they were both listed on just six ballots. Carlos Delgado had the second most support, at nine.
Why? Beats me. I’ve given up trying to interpret the veterans committee/era committee processes that have existed over the years. But the latest guidelines seem perfectly designed to ensure that for the next six years, there’s no reason to wail about Bonds and Clemens being excluded. Then in 2031, that’s it.
Meanwhile, the classic era will be up for consideration again in 2027, when Pete Rose can and likely will be nominated. Perhaps Shoeless Joe Jackson as well. What happens then is anybody’s guess, but by the second week of December 2031, we could be looking at a Hall of Fame roster that includes the long ineligible (but no more) Rose and maybe Jackson but permanently excludes the never-ineligible Bonds and Clemens — perhaps the best hitter and pitcher, respectively, who ever played.
If and when it happens, another kind of symbolic banishment will take place: The Hall will have consigned itself, with these revised guidelines, to always being less than it should be. And the considerable shadows of Bonds and Clemens will continue to loom, larger and larger over time, just as they happened with Rose and Jackson.
Washington recalled forward Bogdan Trineyev and goaltender Clay Stevenson from Hershey of the American Hockey League.
Lindgren (upper body) was a late scratch Friday night before a 4-3 shootout loss at Anaheim. Leonard (upper body) didn’t return after his face was bloodied on an unpenalized first-period check from Jacob Trouba.
“He’s going to miss an extended period of time,” Capitals coach Spencer Carbery said about Leonard, the rookie who has seven goals and 11 assists after having two each Wednesday night in a 7-1 win at San Jose.
Lindgren is 5-3 with a 3.11 goals-against average in his 10th NHL season and fifth with Washington.
“We’ll see once he gets back on the ice,” Carbery said. “But [we] put him on the IR, so he’s going to miss, what is it, seven days at the bare minimum. And then we’ll see just how he progresses.”
ORLANDO, Fla. — Jeff Kent, who holds the record for home runs by a second baseman, was elected to the National Baseball Hall of Fame on Sunday.
Kent, 57, was named on 14 of 16 ballots by the contemporary baseball era committee, two more than he needed for induction.
Just as noteworthy as Kent’s selection were the names of those who didn’t garner enough support, which included all-time home run leader Barry Bonds, 354-game winner Roger Clemens, two MVPs from the 1980s, Don Mattingly and Dale Murphy, and Gary Sheffield, who slugged 509 career homers.
Bonds, Clemens, Sheffield and Dodgers great Fernando Valenzuela were named on fewer than five ballots. According to a new protocol introduced by the Hall of Fame that went into effect with this ballot, players drawing five or fewer votes won’t be eligible the next time their era is considered. They can be nominated again in a subsequent cycle, but if they fall short of five votes again, they will not be eligible for future consideration.
The candidacies of Bonds and Clemens have long been among the most hotly debated among Hall of Fame aficionados because of their association with PEDs. With Sunday’s results, they moved one step closer to what will ostensibly be permanent exclusion from the sport’s highest honor.
If Bonds, Clemens, Sheffield and Valenzuela are nominated when their era comes around in 2031 and fall short of five votes again, it will be their last shot at enshrinement under the current guidelines.
Kent, whose best seasons were with the San Francisco Giants as Bonds’ teammate, continued his longstanding neutral stance on Bonds’ candidacy, declining to offer an opinion on whether or not he believes Bonds should get in.
“Barry was a good teammate of mine,” Kent said. “He was a guy that I motivated and pushed. We knocked heads a little bit. He was a guy that motivated me at times, in frustration, in love, at times both.
“Barry was one of the best players I ever saw play the game, amazing. For me, I’ve always said that. I’ve always avoided the specific answer you’re looking for, because I don’t have one. I don’t. I’m not a voter.”
Kent played 17 seasons in the majors for six different franchises and grew emotional at times as he recollected the different stops in a now-Hall of Fame career that ended in 2008. He remained on the BBWAA ballot for all 10 years of his eligibility after retiring, but topped out at 46.5% in 2023, his last year.
“The time had gone by, and you just leave it alone, and I left it alone,” Kent said. “I loved the game, and everything I gave to the game I left there on the field. This moment today, over the last few days, I was absolutely unprepared. Emotionally unstable.”
A five-time All-Star, Kent was named NL MVP in 2000 as a member of the Giants, who he set a career high with a .334 average while posting 33 homers and 125 RBIs. Kent hit 377 career homers, 351 as a second baseman, a record for the position.
Kent is the 62nd player elected to the Hall who played for the Giants. He also played for Toronto, the New York Mets, Cleveland, Houston and the Dodgers. Now, he’ll play symbolically for baseball’s most exclusive team — those with plaques hanging in Cooperstown, New York.
“I have not walked through the halls of the Hall of Fame,” Kent said. “And that’s going to be overwhelming once I get in there.”
Carlos Delgado was named on nine ballots, the second-highest total among the eight under consideration. Mattingly and Murphy received six votes apiece. All three are eligible to be nominated again when the contemporary era is next considered in 2028.
Next up on the Hall calendar is voting by the BBWAA on this year’s primary Hall of Fame ballot. Those results will be announced on Jan. 20.
Anyone selected through that process will join Kent in being inducted on July 26, 2026, on the grounds of the Clark Sports Center in Cooperstown.