Connect with us

Published

on

GRAPEVINE, Texas — Before the College Football Playoff selection committee members even began their first meeting here on Monday at the Gaylord Texan Resort, Texas coach Steve Sarkisian lobbed the first public pitch of the season in their direction.

“I’d argue we have the best win in the country right now,” Sarkisian told reporters on Monday at his weekly news conference. “The fact that we go into Tuscaloosa, Alabama, and beat a team that was 52-1 in the previous 53 games.

“I hear so much about how tough the SEC is, but I haven’t seen any of those teams go into Alabama and win either, so I feel pretty good about our team.”

He’s right. The Longhorns have the best nonconference win in the nation. But are they the best one-loss team? Or will that honor go to Oregon when the committee releases its first of six rankings Tuesday evening?

Nothing that has unfolded through the first nine weeks of the season will make this any easier for the 13-member group tasked with determining which of the five remaining undefeated Power 5 teams will be on the bubble this week: Georgia, Michigan, Ohio State, Florida State or Washington.

Adding to the drama is the ongoing investigation into Michigan, which is facing allegations of cheating by scouting future opponents in person at games. It’s an unprecedented situation for the committee members to consider — or try to ignore.

There are seven sitting athletic directors on the committee, including Michigan’s Warde Manuel, who is here and will recuse himself during voting and discussions about his team. The CFP on Monday declined to answer any specific questions about what Manuel can speak about as it relates to the investigation or how the committee will be instructed to handle it. CFP executive director Bill Hancock referred to his original statement: “The answer continues to be that the committee considers teams that are eligible to participate in a bowl game.”

Selection committee members are rotated every three years, so what might have been important to last year’s group could change this season with three new members in former Nevada coach Chris Ault, Miami (Ohio) athletic director David Sayler and Utah athletic director Mark Harlan, who replaced Jennifer Cohen when she was hired as USC’s AD.

Harlan is the Pac-12’s representative in the group, working alongside the ACC’s Boo Corrigan (NC State), the Big Ten’s Manuel, the SEC’s Mitch Barnhart (Kentucky) and the Big 12’s Gene Taylor (Kansas State). Navy athletic director Chet Gladchuk is entering his second year with the committee.

Other committee members include former Wake Forest, Ohio and Baylor coach Jim Grobe, former Nebraska All-America offensive lineman and NFL All-Pro Will Shields, former Notre Dame linebacker Rod West and Hall of Fame coach Joe Taylor, whose career spanned stops at Florida A&M, Hampton, Virginia Union and Howard. There is one woman in the group, former USA Today sportswriter Kelly Whiteside.

Committee members are directed through written protocol to consider strength of schedule, head-to-head results and outcomes against common opponents. Conference championships are the final piece of the puzzle, but the committee ranks 25 teams each week based only on what they’ve done to date.

These are the biggest questions facing the group, and their answers when the rankings are released will be the first clues to the playoff pecking order in the final season of a four-team field:

Who’s No. 1?

Ohio State, Florida State and Washington have the three best résumés, according to ESPN’s strength of record metric. Georgia’s strength of schedule so far ranks 100th, while Michigan’s ranks 111th.

Ohio State could have the best résumé in the country if both Penn State and Notre Dame are top-15 CFP teams. The committee also would value the Buckeyes’ recent road win against a respectable Wisconsin team. While its offense hasn’t been as consistent or explosive as others, Ohio State’s defense hasn’t allowed more than 17 points in a game all season.

Georgia has won back-to-back national titles and is undefeated, but the Bulldogs might not have any wins against CFP-ranked opponents, and the committee isn’t supposed to let previous seasons influence its voting. Georgia has played well against its toughest competition, though, and it proved Saturday against Florida that it can be a top-four team even without injured tight end Brock Bowers. How the committee evaluates Florida and Kentucky, which are both three-loss teams, will factor into where the Bulldogs are placed. Those are also the only two FBS opponents Georgia has defeated that have a winning record.

Florida State’s best win is against LSU in Orlando, and it trumps anything Georgia and Michigan have done yet, but the Noles’ overtime victory against Clemson no longer looks as impressive because the Tigers are a four-loss team. Washington arguably has the best overall win in the country — against Oregon — but the Huskies have won unconvincingly in each of the past two weeks.

Michigan has looked like the most complete team in the country and is No. 1 in ESPN’s game control metric (though Ohio State is No. 2, and Washington is No. 3). As good as the Wolverines have appeared, their best win is against Rutgers (6-2).

Speaking of Michigan …


How will the allegations against Michigan impact its ranking, if at all?

play

0:53

Finebaum: It’s time for Jim Harbaugh to take some responsibility

Paul Finebaum reacts to Jim Harbaugh’s passive response to a question about Michigan’s sign-stealing scandal.

It’s highly probable the investigation won’t impact Michigan at all, at least not if the selection committee members follow the written protocol committee chair Corrigan reminds them of at the start of each meeting. If the NCAA or the Big Ten levies a postseason ban, the Wolverines are out, but the investigation process at the NCAA level typically moves at a glacial pace.

ESPN reached out to past committee members to understand how the topic likely will be handled in the room.

“Because these things take so long, I think the committee tries to do things based on their criteria, based on the letter of the law, and I really don’t believe this would come into discussions during our meetings,” one former committee member said, “and if it did, it would be shut down really quickly because it doesn’t go with our standards. If for some reason [the investigation] was fast-tracked, and they vacated wins during the season, obviously that’s a different story.”

That doesn’t mean, though, that committee members won’t be talking about the allegations against Michigan outside the room.

There will likely be some “private disgust and conversations away from the table about how this is a kick in the gut to sportsmanship and, especially among coaches, kind of sacrilegious,” the same former committee member said.

“I think this is totally against everything that is fair and ethical about college football,” another former committee member said.

Another said “it’s almost worse” if a committee member penalizes Michigan because he or she thinks the school might have done something.

“That’s not a metric, right?” the person said. “That could end up really adversely affecting the other rankings, and that’s not right either.”

“I would say at this stage the committee should rank them as they deem appropriate,” the same committee member said. “Keep an eye on their eligibility. But I think they’d have to rank the team based on what they see. There’s plenty to question outside of the alleged cheating. They’re doing everything they’re supposed to against the schedule they’re playing, but there’s not a lot of meat on the bone as far as their opponents yet. So that may be more of a discussion point.”


Who is the highest-ranked one-loss team?

Sarkisian would like to think it’s Texas — and it could be — but Oregon has a strong case and enters the committee’s first conversation after a convincing win at Utah, where the Utes had won 18 straight home games. Harlan, the Utes’ athletic director, can certainly weigh in on what he saw from the Ducks firsthand, just like Kentucky’s Barnes will certainly have some opinions on what he witnessed about Georgia.

The Ducks have three wins against Power 5 teams .500 or better (Colorado, Washington State and Utah) and one victory against what should be a ranked CFP team in Utah. Four road wins is a detail the committee will notice — but so is a win against an FCS school, Portland State.

The Longhorns’ double-digit road victory at Alabama will be a focal point of the committee’s discussions about Texas, and their only loss was to their rival Oklahoma, by four points. Even without injured starting quarterback Quinn Ewers, the Longhorns earned a convincing home win on Saturday against BYU. Following Kansas‘ upset of Oklahoma on Saturday, it’s possible the selection committee has the Jayhawks in their top 25. That would give Texas a second win against a ranked opponent, along with the victory against the Crimson Tide. With the exceptions of Baylor and Houston, all the Longhorns’ wins have come against FBS opponents at .500 or better.

While Alabama is certainly one of the nation’s best one-loss teams, the Longhorns’ head-to-head true road win against the Tide will keep Alabama from leapfrogging Texas — for now.


Will the committee honor Oklahoma’s head-to-head win against Texas?

It would be surprising if the committee did, even though the teams have identical 7-1 records, considering the Sooners lost to Kansas and didn’t play well in their win against UCF. Oklahoma beat Texas 34-30 on Oct. 7, but the selection committee has caused controversy before by discounting a head-to-head result.

In 2021, the group ranked Michigan ahead of Michigan State in spite of the Spartans’ 37-33 October win over their in-state rival. At the time, committee chair Gary Barta said the group deemed Michigan the “more complete team” and better statistically “in just about every category.”

With OU and Texas, there aren’t many glaring statistical differences, though any can be pulled as an example in either team’s favor. The key factors could be Oklahoma’s two-point win against a 3-5 UCF team and the Sooners’ lack of a nonconference win against a Power 5 opponent.


Who’s on the bubble at No. 5?

With five undefeated Power 5 teams remaining, somebody is going to get snubbed. The most likely candidates for this dubious distinction are Washington, Michigan and Georgia.

What’s unique about this first ranking is Michigan could truly be No. 1 or No. 5 in such a subjective system. Michigan is No. 9 in ESPN’s strength of record metric, while Georgia is No. 7 and Washington is No. 3. (Strength of record measures how difficult it is for an average top-25 opponent to achieve the same record against the same opponents.)

The Huskies’ concern is how they’ve played each of the past two weeks, particularly in an unimpressive 15-7 win against Arizona State, which is now 2-6. Washington’s high-powered offense was held without a touchdown against the Sun Devils. On Saturday in a narrow victory against Stanford, Washington had two red zone turnovers. The Huskies’ win against Oregon, though, is looking better than ever after the Ducks’ triumph at Utah.


Where are the contenders’ opponents ranked?

This is where strength of schedule starts to be determined — at least in the committee members’ eyes. One of the most repeated justifications for where a team is ranked has been how many CFP top-25 opponents it has defeated. Well, the committee is the one that sets that bar.

So how good is the Big 12 beyond Texas and Oklahoma? Will the Sooners have defeated any ranked opponents besides Texas? Will Texas get a shot Saturday at another top-25 team in Kansas State?

How much has the ACC fallen with Clemson, North Carolina and Miami having multiple losses? That answer could help determine how much pressure is on Florida State to finish as an undefeated ACC champ.

And where is LSU ranked? Does Georgia have any top-25 wins yet?


Does any two-loss team have a chance?

No two-loss team has made the cut in the nine-year history of the CFP, but that doesn’t mean it can’t happen.

While Notre Dame could be the committee’s highest-ranked two-loss team, it’s incredibly difficult for the Fighting Irish to overcome that without a conference championship win against a ranked opponent. It will be hard for the committee to overlook their loss to Louisville, as well.

LSU is in a similar position to that of last season, when it had an opportunity to finish as a two-loss SEC champion and push the committee to see how seriously it would consider the Tigers. Instead, the Tigers finished as a three-loss runner-up to Georgia, and it was a moot point. The same could happen again on Saturday if LSU loses at Alabama.

One other possibility is two-loss Oregon State, which will end the season with back-to-back games against Washington and Oregon.

Keep an eye on where these two-loss teams are ranked Tuesday.

The lowest a team has ever been ranked in the initial CFP ranking and still made the playoff was No. 16 Ohio State in 2014, but the Buckeyes only had one loss and went on to win the national title that year.

What the first ranking really means

Over the first nine years of the four-team format, 21 of the 36 teams (58%) that were in the top four in the initial rankings ended up in the playoff. That leaves room for teams outside Tuesday’s top four to land a spot in the semifinals.

The lowest-ranked teams in the initial rankings to make it to the final four are Ohio State in 2014, when the Buckeyes started at No. 16, and Oklahoma in 2015, when the Sooners started at No. 15. Those are the only teams that were outside the top 10 of the first CFP rankings to make that year’s playoff.

On the other end of the scale, seven of the nine No. 1 teams in the first CFP rankings and 15 of the 18 teams initially ranked in the top two have reached the playoff. The exceptions are No. 1 Mississippi State in 2014, No. 2 LSU in 2015 and No. 1 Tennessee last year.

Only once, in 2020, did all of the top four teams in the initial rankings make it to the playoff.

ESPN’s Chris Low takes a year-by-year look at the top four in the first rankings, where those teams landed in the final rankings and the key elements that shaped each year’s race.


2022

No. 1 in first ranking: Tennessee (sixth in final ranking)

No. 2 in first ranking: Ohio State (fourth in final ranking)

No. 3 in first ranking: Georgia (first in final ranking)

No. 4 in first ranking: Clemson (seventh in final ranking)

Other playoff teams: No. 2 Michigan (fifth in first ranking), No. 3 TCU (seventh in first ranking)

No team in the 2022 playoff chase suffered a more crushing defeat than Tennessee, which was shredded 63-38 by unranked South Carolina in the next-to-last week of the regular season. The Vols were No. 5 heading into that Nov. 19 game, and their only loss was to No. 1 Georgia on the road. With Ohio State losing at home to Michigan in the final regular-season game, and TCU falling in the Big 12 championship game to Kansas State the next week, the door would have been open for the Vols to make the playoff as a one-loss team. Things fell just right for the Buckeyes to slide into the final playoff spot when USC blew its chance by losing to Utah (for the second time that season) in the Pac-12 championship game. The Trojans were No. 4 in the CFP rankings heading into their rematch with the Utes, but USC was beaten soundly, 47-24.


2021

No. 1 in first ranking: Georgia (third in final ranking)

No. 2 in first ranking: Alabama (first in final ranking)

No. 3 in first ranking: Michigan State (10th in final ranking)

No. 4 in first ranking: Oregon (14th in final ranking)

Other playoff teams: No. 2 Michigan (seventh in first ranking), No. 4 Cincinnati (sixth)

Michigan State seemed to be in great shape after beating Michigan 37-33 on Oct. 30 to secure the No. 3 spot in the first rankings. But that didn’t last. The Spartans lost 40-29 the next week at Purdue and were routed 56-7 by Ohio State two weeks after that. And the Wolverines only picked up steam after their close loss in East Lansing. They reeled off five straight victories, including a 42-27 win over Ohio State (their first in the series in 10 years) and earned their first playoff appearance. Meanwhile, Cincinnati went unbeaten during the regular season to become the first Group of 5 team to make the playoff, benefiting from Oregon losing twice to Utah in the final three weeks.


2020

No. 1 in first ranking: Alabama (first in final ranking)

No. 2 in first ranking: Notre Dame (fourth in final ranking)

No. 3 in first ranking: Clemson (second in final ranking)

No. 4 in first ranking: Ohio State (third in final ranking)

The selection committee’s top four remained intact in the final rankings, although Texas A&M lost just one game (to Alabama) while playing an all-SEC schedule during the shortened COVID-19 season and thought it deserved the No. 4 spot over a Notre Dame team that lost by 24 points to Clemson in the ACC championship game.


2019

No. 1 in first ranking: Ohio State (second in final ranking)

No. 2 in first ranking: LSU (first in final ranking)

No. 3 in first ranking: Alabama (13th in final ranking)

No. 4 in first ranking: Penn State (10th in final ranking)

Other playoff teams: No. 3 Clemson (fifth in first ranking), No. 4 Oklahoma (ninth)

Alabama transfer quarterback Jalen Hurts helped Oklahoma rebound from a 48-41 loss at Kansas State on Oct. 26 to win its next five games, including a 30-23 overtime win against Baylor in the Big 12 championship game, to climb to the No. 4 spot. Georgia had been No. 4 the previous four weeks but slipped to No. 5 in the final rankings after losing 37-10 to LSU in the SEC championship game.


2018

No. 1 in first ranking: Alabama (first in final ranking)

No. 2 in first ranking: Clemson (second in final ranking)

No. 3 in first ranking: LSU (11th in final ranking)

No. 4 in first ranking: Notre Dame (third in final ranking)

Other playoff team: No. 4 Oklahoma (seventh in first ranking)

Similar to the 2019 season, Hurts played a big role in how the final 2018 playoff rankings shook out, only this time he was playing for Alabama. Hurts came off the bench for an injured Tua Tagovailoa to pass for a touchdown and run for another in rallying Alabama past Georgia in the fourth quarter for a 35-28 win in the SEC championship game. That loss cost the Dawgs a spot in the playoff, as they fell from No. 4 to No. 5 in the final rankings. It also cleared the way for the Sooners to move from No. 5 to No. 4 after beating Texas in the Big 12 championship game for their seventh straight win.


2017

No. 1 in first ranking: Georgia (third in final ranking)

No. 2 in first ranking: Alabama (fourth in final ranking)

No. 3 in first ranking: Notre Dame (14th in final ranking)

No. 4 in first ranking: Clemson (first in final ranking)

Other playoff team: No. 2 Oklahoma (fifth in first ranking)

The team that didn’t make the playoff in 2017 that most shaped the field was Auburn. In a span of three weeks to end the regular season, Auburn beat No. 1 Georgia and No. 1 Alabama to move to No. 2 in the next-to-last rankings despite having two losses. But in a rematch with Georgia in the SEC championship game, Auburn lost 28-7 to the Dawgs, paving the way for both Alabama and Georgia to move back into the top four and eventually play for the national championship. Alabama had been No. 5 and Georgia No. 6 the week before in the committee’s rankings. If Auburn had won the SEC title game, the Tigers would have been the only two-loss team ever to make the playoff field.


2016

No. 1 in first ranking: Alabama (first in final ranking)

No. 2 in first ranking: Clemson (second in final ranking)

No. 3 in first ranking: Michigan (sixth in final ranking)

No. 4 in first ranking: Texas A&M (did not make final ranking)

Other playoff teams: No. 3 Ohio State (sixth in first ranking), No. 4 Washington (fifth)

Penn State fans still grimace over this one. The Nittany Lions finished one spot out of the playoff, at No. 5 in the final rankings. That’s despite beating Ohio State head-to-head and winning their last nine games, including a 38-31 decision over Wisconsin in the Big Ten championship game. Ohio State was the Big Ten team that made the playoff, though, as the Buckeyes had just one loss as compared to the Nittany Lions’ two losses. Eventual national champion Clemson survived a 43-42 home loss to Pittsburgh on Nov. 12 to finish No. 2 in the final rankings. Pitt was unranked at the time of the game but was No. 23 in the committee’s final rankings.


2015

No. 1 in first ranking: Clemson (first in final ranking)

No. 2 in first ranking: LSU (20th in final ranking)

No. 3 in first ranking: Ohio State (seventh in final ranking)

No. 4 in first ranking: Alabama (second in final ranking)

Other playoff teams: No. 3 Michigan State (seventh in first ranking), No. 4 Oklahoma (15th)

One of the biggest kicks during the College Football Playoff era was courtesy of Michael Geiger, whose 41-yard field goal as time expired lifted Michigan State to a 17-14 win over Ohio State, snapping the Buckeyes’ 23-game winning streak. Ohio State was No. 3 entering the Nov. 21 game. The Spartans won their next two, including a 16-13 win over Iowa in the Big Ten championship game, to make the playoff. The Iowa-Michigan State tilt was essentially a play-in, as the Hawkeyes came in at No. 4 and the Spartans were No. 5 in the committee’s rankings. Oklahoma made its big move up from No. 15 after beating No. 6 Baylor on the road Nov. 14 then hammering No. 6 Oklahoma State 58-23 two weeks later to win the Big 12 championship game.


2014

No. 1 in first ranking: Mississippi State (seventh in final ranking)

No. 2 in first ranking: Florida State (third in final ranking)

No. 3 in first ranking: Auburn (19th in final ranking)

No. 4 in first ranking: Ole Miss (ninth in final ranking)

Other playoff teams: No. 1 Alabama (sixth in first ranking), No. 2 Oregon (fifth), No. 4 Ohio State (16th)

Three SEC teams in the initial playoff rankings? The rest of the college football world was fuming, but none of the three ended up in the final four. Eventual national champion Ohio State was the comeback story that season. The Buckeyes lost in Week 2 at home by two touchdowns to a Virginia Tech team that dropped six games. Ohio State also lost a pair of quarterbacks — Braxton Miller and J.T. Barrett — to injury but clawed back to secure the No. 4 spot in the final rankings, moving up from No. 5 after a 59-0 drubbing on Wisconsin in the Big Ten championship game. Nobody was more upset that season than TCU. At the time, the Big 12 didn’t have a championship game, and the Horned Frogs, who were No. 3 in the next-to-last rankings, closed the regular season by drubbing a 2-10 Iowa State team 55-3. That clinched the Frogs a share of the Big 12 championship, but it wasn’t enough to impress the committee, as TCU somehow fell to No. 6 in the final rankings.

Continue Reading

Sports

Burning questions for all 32 NHL teams: John Gibson’s impact in Detroit, a Sidney Crosby trade?

Published

on

By

Burning questions for all 32 NHL teams: John Gibson's impact in Detroit, a Sidney Crosby trade?

The Florida Panthers hoisted the Stanley Cup for the second straight season back on June 17. The 2025 NHL draft was decentralized, but there was no shortage of memorable moments and celebrity cameos. Finally, free agency was not quite as frenetic as in years past, but hundreds of players signed new deals.

And then, the hockey world went into its hibernation period for the rest of July and August.

But as a chill enters the air, the leaves start to change color and many pumpkin-themed items appear on food and drink menus, it’s time to get ready for another NHL season.

To help you get fully prepared for the coming weeks of the preseason — as teams make final decisions on rosters, lineups and goaltending tandems — let’s take a look at the biggest lingering question for all 32 clubs, thanks to ESPN reporters Ryan S. Clark (Western Conference) and Kristen Shilton (Eastern Conference).

How to watch the 2025-26 NHL season on ESPN networks — including 100 exclusive games and the out-of-market package (over 1,050 games).

Atlantic Division

No one could fault Swayman for chasing a big-time contract extension after the way he carried Boston at the end of the 2024-25 campaign. But after the netminder secured the bag — with a protracted contract negotiation last summer culminating in a seven-year deal worth $8.25 million per season — he was meant to perform like one of the league’s highest paid goalies.

That didn’t happen. Swayman posted career-worst numbers in 2024-25 with an .892 SV% and 3.11 GAA. Without a genuine tandemmate to back him up — as he had with Linus Ullmark before the latter departed to Ottawa — Swayman carried a hefty 58-game schedule and didn’t wear it well.

Boston requires better this season, especially considering the Bruins still don’t have a bona fide backup for Swayman (that would be Boston’s Burning Question, Part II). Regardless of who is second though, Swayman must prove he can be a true No. 1 — and what will it mean for the Bruins’ chances this season if he can’t?


Buffalo Sabres
Will Buffalo finally end its postseason drought?

It’s the overarching theme for Buffalo seemingly every year: Can the Sabres actually snap their historically long skid as non-playoff contenders? Or in other words: Is Buffalo’s rebuild over yet?

It’s only been …15 years now since Sabres fans saw their team in postseason action. And the better part of this decade has been an exercise in slow progress. For every step forward Buffalo has taken — most notably building its enviable young core — the Sabres have repeatedly stalled short of reclaiming a place as playoff contenders.

GM Kevyn Adams made a risky move acquiring oft-injured forward Josh Norris; but if Norris can stay healthy, that’s a potential No. 1 center for Buffalo. And the Sabres have intriguing newcomers Josh Doan and Michael Kesselring to fill out their roster.

What impact could those fresh faces — plus improvements from players like goaltender Ukko-Pekka Luukkonen (already dealing with a “tweak” heading into training camp) and forward Jack Quinn — have on Buffalo’s chances? Every little bit helps. Ottawa and Montreal have proven to be quicker studies that Buffalo in rising through the Atlantic Division ranks. Is it the Sabres’ time now to do the same?


It’s not like Detroit hasn’t had decent goaltending in recent years. What the Red Wings have lacked is consistency. For all the good runs Ville Husso and Petr Mrazek managed to put together, they inevitably bookended too many subpar stretches that, combined with Detroit’s below-average defensive play, held the Red Wings back from fulfilling their potential.

Well, the midseason addition of head coach Todd McLellan yielded improvement. And now, enter John Gibson. GM Steve Yzerman traded for the veteran netminder from Anaheim in a bold offseason move that could be the difference between whether Detroit sinks or swims this season.

Gibson struggled a bit with the rebuilding Ducks, but the Red Wings are a more established team with enough talent to support him. He still posted a .911 save percentage in 29 appearances last season, showing he has the potential to reclaim his form as a No. 1 goalie. If Gibson can indicate early on he’s a reliable presence in the crease, then confidence should spread in Detroit and give the club a boost that’s been missing. Can Gibson provide all that in Year 1? We’ll find out.


Florida Panthers
Are the Panthers built for a three-peat?

Listen, what Florida GM Bill Zito pulled off this offseason was quite impressive. While the Panthers were basking in a second straight Stanley Cup victory, Zito managed to re-sign Sam Bennett, Aaron Ekblad and Brad Marchand, while also acquiring an intriguing backup goalie in Daniil Tarasov.

All good … right? Florida can’t be concerned about their depth when they’ve kept so many key players in the fold … correct?

It’s at least worth wondering whether the Panthers might run into issues there, given all they’ve invested salary-cap-wise in their top skaters. There’s an excellent chance that growth from within — from top young players like Mackie Samoskevich — will give Florida quite an edge in their bottom six. But there’s also the fact Matthew Tkachuk‘s health status is in doubt — that torn adductor and sports hernia issue suffered at the 4 Nations Face-Off has been a problem for Tkachuk ever since, and may hold him out to start the season — and there’s no telling what shape Tkachuk will be in when he can return.

Then, of course, there’s fatigue. Of course, we’ve wondered about that in regards to Florida before and they’ve shown serious mettle in reaching three straight Cup Finals (winning the last two). Do the Panthers have it in them to do it all over again?


Montreal Canadiens
Can the Canadiens’ youth movement produce another playoff run?

Montreal was a surprise postseason contender last season thanks to a 91-point campaign that provided just enough juice to secure the second wild-card spot. Was that a fluke? Or are the Canadians more ready to step forward than we thought?

GM Kent Hughes improved Montreal with the offseason addition of defenseman Noah Dobson and physical winger Zack Bolduc. Now the Canadiens are eager to see if their internal growth can continue as well.

All eyes will be on how 2024’s fifth-overall pick Ivan Demidov develops, how Lane Hutson keeps maturing and what sort of gains Juraj Slafkovsky can make, too. It’ll be a combination of factors — from Montreal’s established stars in Nick Suzuki and Cole Caufield — to it’s burgeoning skaters and questionable returnees (what does Kirby Dach have to offer when he’s healthy?) that will ultimately decide what trajectory the Canadiens take this year.

While their first-round experience in 2024-25 was valuable, there’s no telling what a regular season of sustained success could also do for Montreal’s core confidence. Certainly Hughes has put his weight behind this roster to signal his own assurance that they’re capable of reaching last season’s threshold.


Ottawa Senators
Has Ottawa adequately addressed its offensive depth?

It’s no secret the Senators struggled to score at 5-on-5 last season. Ottawa tallied the second-fewest even-strength markers in 2024-25, and if it wasn’t for a strong power play, it’s possible the Senators wouldn’t have forced their way into the playoffs at all. Despite what alarm bells could be ringing in that respect from Canada’s capital, GM Steve Staios didn’t do much to alter the Senators lineup in free agency, save for adding defenseman Jordan Spence and veteran Lars Eller.

The lack of significant movement indicates Ottawa is likely banking on internal improvement to win the day. That would have to include better performances from Dylan Cozens — still finding his way post-trade from Buffalo — and Fabian Zetterlund — a deadline pickup from San Jose — now that they’re acclimated to the organization. But will that be enough to give the Senators’ offense a true boost? Claude Giroux is also back in the fold — although where he plays in the lineup is up in the air — and Shane Pinto should be a top offensive driver coming off a gold medal-winning showing at the men’s world championships.

Ottawa just needs to find its mojo more often in the coming year — and that’s going to require a stronger collective effort up front.


Tampa Bay Lightning
Can Tampa Bay’s offense maintain an elite scoring level?

It’s easy to gloss over the fact Tampa Bay was the NHL’s highest-scoring team last season, given how their playoff run ended (with a first-round thud against Florida). The Lightning were formidable up front though all season long, averaging 3.56 goals per game and owning a top-five power play.

Four Lightning skaters eclipsed the 35-goal mark, two hit 40-plus (there were only eight players in the league who reached that benchmark) and Nikita Kucherov won the Art Ross Trophy (again) with 121 points.

Suffice to say, Tampa Bay felt confident in running it back with a similar roster of offensive threats. Is that wise, though?

Oliver Bjorkstrand and Yanni Gourde will have a better handle on the Lightning system after coming in at the deadline, but beyond those new faces Tampa Bay is counting on a repeat from Brayden Point, Jake Guentzel, Kucherov & Co. to maintain their place as perennial postseason contenders. Given how the Lightning continually find ways to keep the spark alive, so to speak, it won’t be shocking if they maintain their status quo. But it’s worth wondering how far they can stretch when their Atlantic rivals keep loading up around them.


The Maple Leafs accepted a true gut punch when trading Marner to Vegas before he could walk away (for nothing) in free agency. And no disrespect to Nicolas Roy — the returning player in that transaction — but losing a top-line, 102-point producer who appears in every situation — including as one of your most reliable penalty killers — creates a crater no team would envy trying to fill. The Leafs’ success this season will depend on their ability to do just that.

More responsibility than ever falls on Auston Matthews, William Nylander, Matthew Knies and John Tavares to anchor Toronto’s top two lines, while depth performances will be more critical than ever to keep the Leafs from falling too far off a cliff offensively.

What sort of strategy will head coach Craig Berube employ to have Toronto evolve into a new chapter for the franchise? Don’t forget: former president Brendan Shanahan is gone, too, and there are new voices behind the scenes being amplified. This is a transitional time for the Leafs in multiple respects. What sort of maturity have they cultivated to be able to handle what’s ahead?

Metropolitan Division

Carolina Hurricanes
Did Carolina do enough to tackle its scoring woes?

The Hurricanes landed a big fish in free agency when Nikolaj Ehlers came on board with a six-year, $51 million contract. That cemented him as the consistent scoring winger Carolina’s been lacking in previous seasons (particularly when it came to the postseason).

But even with Ehlers in the mix, Carolina has questions to answer about its offense.

The Hurricanes have been using Jesperi Kotkaniemi in a second-line center role for which he’s not wholly suited. Carolina opted not to re-sign free agent Jack Roslovic — who remains a free agent, and could be an option in that spot — and there’s no obvious upgrade over Kotkaniemi at the moment.

Will Logan Stankoven or Seth Jarvis have to move off the wing to cover for Carolina’s flimsy depth down the middle? Or will GM Erik Tulsky look at what’s available on the market before the season starts and make a change? It has to still sting the way Carolina produced just 10 total goals in their Eastern Conference finals loss against Florida last spring. If the Hurricanes expect to advance to the Cup Final, they’ll need to have the scoring prowess to match the competition.


The Blue Jackets didn’t have trouble scoring goals last season. It was keeping pucks out of the net that held Columbus back.

GM Don Waddell’s priority was addressing the latter issue this offseason and, well, he did. Sort of. As some of the top free agent defensemen were snapped up on July 1, Waddell opted to simply re-sign Ivan Provorov to a seven-year, $59.5 million contract.

Meaning there has been no specific upgrade on a blue line that — while anchored by a Norris Trophy-worthy performance from Zach Werenski — ranked eighth-worst in the NHL in goals against last season (3.26 per game). Considering Columbus was also eighth overall in goals scored (with 3.26 per game), it’s clear the defensive deficiencies were a serious factor in the Blue Jackets falling just shy of making the playoffs.

Are they doomed to a similar fate this season? Coach Dean Evason was transparent about Columbus’ need to improve on the back end; the only question is whether there’s enough internal improvement to make that a reality early and often. Steady goaltending would help in this regard as well; will the low-risk move of trading for Ivan Fedotov give the Blue Jackets some insurance behind (or beside) Elvis Merzlikins?


It’s not every team that has a single player capable of making or breaking their success. Jack Hughes is that for New Jersey, though.

The top-line forward just isn’t available as much as the Devils need him to be. Hughes has been hampered by injuries throughout his young career, limited to 62 or fewer games in two of his six seasons, and currently coming off shoulder surgery that cost him the final 25 regular-season games and five playoff contests.

Hughes is practically a point-per-game player when he’s healthy, and the 24-year-old is inarguably New Jersey’s best, most impactful skater. But what more might the Devils be able to do in helping Hughes maintain his on-ice presence? Is there something amiss in their training protocols? Does he require more rest days? Whatever the recipe for keeping Hughes on the ice ultimately has be New Jersey’s priority to figure out. The Devils can’t afford to lose more of what a generational talent like Hughes can bring to their lineup on a nightly basis.


The Islanders made a no-brainer decision by drafting defenseman Matthew Schaefer at No. 1 overall in June. The just-turned 18-year-old has all the makings of a franchise blueliner who will capably patrol New York’s back end for years to come. The question is whether that NHL tenure starts immediately, or if the Islanders ease Schaefer into the pro game. It’s a trajectory that will have ripple effects at multiple levels of the organization.

There’s a scenario where Schaefer jumps right into the Islanders’ lineup, joining Adam Pelech, Alexander Romanov and Ryan Pulock to punctuate their top-four rotation and start this new era for a New York defense corps that saw Noah Dobson depart via trade on draft night. Throwing Schaefer directly into that mix would be a strong statement about how the Islanders’ view their coveted new addition. But defensemen notoriously take longer to thrive in the NHL than their forward counterparts, and New York won’t want to shake Shaefer’s confidence out of the gate, either.

It’s a delicate balance, and how the Islanders choose to manage him ahead of their season opener could have short- and long-term effects on the team’s year overall.


New York Rangers
How will Mike Sullivan restructure the Rangers?

There’s no doubt New York needed a new voice behind the bench. And it’ll fall on Mike Sullivan to build the Rangers back into a contender.

Sullivan’s first task will be deciding where exactly Mika Zibanejad should be playing — at center or on the wing. Zibanejad turned in a disappointing 62 points over 82 games last season — his lowest output through a full campaign since 2017-18 — and it wasn’t until Zibanejad moved from center to J.T. Miller‘s wing in the latter half of the season that he began to look like himself again. Will that encourage Sullivan to load up the Rangers offense by keeping Miller and Zibanejad together? Or will he put Zibanejad back at center so as not to disrupt the team’s overall depth?

And beyond where to place Zibanejad, who exactly will Sullivan find to make up for the contributions that left with Chris Kreider — looking at you, Will Cuylle?

But before we move on from the subject of who plays where, how will Sullivan piece together the blue line now that Vladislav Gavrikov is in the lineup? Fortunately for Sullivan, he has had a long summer to think about what might work for the Rangers. The preseason will be a valuable time to tinker with the various options to get this team back among the postseason contenders.


Philadelphia Flyers
Have the Flyers upgraded enough at the right spots?

Philadelphia had two glaring needs after last season: better center depth and stronger goaltending.

The Flyers acquired Trevor Zegras from Anaheim in the hopes he could slot into a top-six center role despite the 24-year-old having spent the better part of the previous two seasons pushed off to the wing. Zegras maintains he’s more comfortable at his natural center position, and that should be music to Philadelphia’s ears — if Zegras’ defensive game can match his offensive capabilities. Going after him was a low-risk, high-reward move for the Flyers. New coach Rick Tocchet should give him every chance to excel there.

But then there’s the Flyers’ goaltending. GM Danny Briere brought in veteran Dan Vladar to play opposite Samuel Ersson, but given the numbers each netminder produced last season (with an .898 SV% and .883 SV%, respectively), there’s reason to wonder whether Philadelphia is truly better off with that tandem. Vladar stated his case to suit up in more than 30 tilts as he did a year ago, and if sharing an even workload gives Ersson more confidence when he is in the crease, the experiment might work.

Time will tell if Briere’s offseason changes will move the needle for Philadelphia.


There’s no such thing as an un-moveable star. If the Edmonton Oilers would trade Wayne Gretzky, well, it could happen to anyone.

Is this the year Pittsburgh completes a once-unfathomable transaction of its own by trading franchise icon Sidney Crosby? If the Penguins were ever going to do it, is now the time?

Crosby is under contract with Pittsburgh through the 2026-27 season (thanks to a team-friendly extension he inked last year). But the 37-year-old wants (and deserves) another chance or two at not just competing in the playoffs, but contending for the championship. Those aren’t necessarily opportunities Pittsburgh can offer him now. The Penguins are young and hungry, and they are being guided by a first-year NHL coach in the newly instated Dan Muse.

Evgeni Malkin is in the final season of his contract, too, signaling that more changes are to come in the next 12 months for the Penguins. It might be in everyone’s interest — Crosby’s and Pittsburgh’s — to part now while the return can help the Penguins in their ongoing retooling. And while Crosby wearing another NHL sweater would be jarring, there’s no denying he has earned the right to make the final years of his career as successful as they can be. But whether the Penguins could find a suitable partner who checks all the boxes on both sides remains to be seen.


Washington Capitals
Can Washington’s offense run deeper than before?

The Capitals had an enviable 2024-25 season, producing 111 points as the Eastern Conference’s top squad — and having Alex Ovechkin break Wayne Gretzky’s all-time goals record. The problem is, Washington was top-heavy. It leaned on its top six to produce, and while Dylan Strome, Ovechkin, Pierre-Luc Dubois & Co. were happy to oblige with impressive output, relying too much on too few is rarely a championship-winning strategy.

So, the question must be asked: Is Washington deeper now than it was last year?

Connor McMichael is key to that answer. If he can step into a third-line center role for Washington — and build off his career-best totals from last season in goals, points and assists — then the Capitals will be in good shape. They’d be better off, though, knowing how various personnel will deploy on the wing. Lars Eller, Taylor Raddysh and Andrew Mangiapane are gone. The Capitals then will turn to their own internal skaters — like Ryan Leonard and Hendrix Lapierre, plus trade acquisition Justin Sourdif — to fill in the gaps.

Washington can’t count on a repeat of the extraordinary years that guys such as Ovechkin and Strome had in 2024-25. Coach Spencer Carbery will need to maximize the Capitals’ collective talent to see their success stretch beyond just the regular season.

Central Division

Chicago Blackhawks
How much advancement does their rebuild make in 2025-26?

Suggesting this is one of the most frustrating stretches in Blackhawks history isn’t quite as hyperbolic as it sounds.

Having a fifth straight season of less than 70 points is the franchise’s longest streak of that regard since it went seven consecutive campaigns of doing the same from 1953 through 1960 — when the NHL had only six franchises.

Many items contributed to why the Blackhawks finished with the second-fewest points in the NHL last season. They were in the bottom 10 in goals scored per game, goals allowed per game, shots per game, shots allowed per game and team save percentage per 60.

Finding a solution to those challenges is what awaits Jeff Blashill in his first season in charge of a team that will seek to find cohesion with its young core led by Connor Bedard and a veteran group that added Andre Burakovsky in the offseason.


Colorado Avalanche
Is their supporting cast enough or do they need to add more?

Signing Brent Burns and Victor Olofsson was an indication of two items facing the Avalanche entering the season. The first is the need to find proven depth at a team-friendly price, which is why Burns signing for $1 million and Olofsson for $1.575 million has its own value.

The second is: Do the Avs have enough options within their supporting cast, or should they use the rest of their $1.325 million in projected cap space to do so?

Burns is expected to play on the Avs’ third defensive pairing with Sam Malinski, while Olofsson looks as if he’ll be on the third line with Ross Colton and Jack Drury. It leaves them a fourth line that could have Parker Kelly, Joel Kiviranta and rookie Ivan Ivan.

What complicates the decision to spend their remaining cap space is Logan O’Connor. He underwent knee surgery and is slated to come back some time in November or December, meaning they’ll need space for him when he does return.


Dallas Stars
What adjustments will Glen Gulutzan make to reach the Cup Final?

Are there other questions that could be asked about the Stars? Sure. It’s just that any question that’s worth considering all comes back to if it can be the difference between the Stars winning the Stanley Cup or falling in a fourth straight Western Conference finals — or possibly not returning to the conference finals at all.

Championship windows are difficult to open, with the argument that they might be even harder to sustain for an extended period. Part of the reason why the Stars hired Gulutzan, who previously coached the team from 2011 to 2013, was his experience as an Oilers assistant. He has been on teams that advanced to the conference finals three times in four years — and the Cup Final two years in a row — with their two most recent appearances coming after a coaching change.


Any time a star player or a team’s most important player is in the final year of his contract, it’s always going to be a primary topic of conversation. The discussion around Kaprizov further intensified on Sept. 10 when Frank Seravalli reported that Kaprizov turned down an eight-year extension worth $128 million that would have given him the highest average-annual-value deal in the NHL.

Wild GM Bill Guerin said on a podcast later that day that he and Kaprizov’s agent have “a very good relationship” while both sides were “working through things.” Guerin stated that he didn’t want the market to go into “an all-out panic mode” while noting he believes the Wild are “in a really positive place” with their star winger. But this remains a significant question until pen is put to paper on a new deal.


Nashville Predators
Can the Predators find the defensive stability that eluded them last season?

The Predators’ 2024-25 challenges can be viewed in one of two ways. The first is that Brady Skjei, who played in all 82 games, was the only Preds defenseman who played more than 70 games in 2024-25. Another is that he was one of 15 defensemen whom the team used to get through a campaign that began with high expectations — only to end with Nashville being high in the draft lottery.

Adding Nicolas Hague and Nick Perbix in the offseason gave the Preds a pair of proven options who have been top-four fill-ins when needed. But how will they handle being a consistent top-four option for the first time in their careers?

The same questions exist for Justin Barron and Nick Blankenburg. Barron emerged as a top-four option after he was traded to the Predators, and Blankenburg played more games last season than he had in his previous three combined.


St. Louis Blues
Where do they fit in the Western Conference landscape?

The Blues scraped together a playoff appearance last season. The moves they made in the offseason — adding Nick Bjugstad, Logan Mailloux and Pius Suter — along with the idea that prized prospect Jimmy Snuggerud is expected to challenge for a top-six place, suggest that they are in a window to return to the playoffs for the foreseeable future.

But what if the Blues are more than just “a playoff team”? Should they be included in the group of top Stanley Cup contenders in the Western Conference?

They return seven players who finished with more than 16 goals, with the expectation that Snuggerud can join that group. Meanwhile, Suter scored a career-high 25 goals in 2024-25. Couple that with how they responded to systematic changes made by Jim Montgomery, and the Blues should be setting their sights higher in 2025-26.


Utah Mammoth
Will they make the playoffs in 2025-26?

Exactly what was it that prevented the Mammoth from making the playoffs in their first season in Salt Lake City? Was it not scoring enough goals? Was it goal prevention? Was it both?

Or was it something different altogether?

Mammoth GM Bill Armstrong’s actions in the offseason saw him provide a potential answer to those questions.

Armstrong traded for one of the most sought-after top-six winger options in JJ Peterka, with the hope he can help the Mammoth improve upon being 21st in goals per game. Their defensive concerns led to them signing a proven two-way, bottom-six forward in Brandon Tanev, a veteran top-six defenseman in Nate Schmidt and goalie Vitek Vanecek.

Schmidt and Vanecek, who won the Stanley Cup with the Panthers, now give the Mammoth five players in their defensive setup with a championship ring, joining Ian Cole, Olli Maatta and Mikhail Sergachev.


Winnipeg Jets
Can their new-look second line find continuity amid change?

Options aren’t necessarily the challenge facing Scott Arniel and his staff when it comes to what they’ll do with their second line. If anything, it’s more about what’s the best way to manage their second-line situation, with the realization that change might be the constant, at least to start the season.

Nikolaj Ehlers is gone. Adam Lowry is recovering from a hip surgery but told reporters last week that he is targeting a late October/early November return. Jonathan Toews is coming back to the NHL after missing the past two seasons with inflammatory and immune system issues. Gustav Nyquist is seeking cohesion on his third team in the past year, and Cole Perfetti could be in line for a breakout season after scoring a career-high 50 points.

It appears the Jets might use Perfetti, Nyquist and Toews on their second line to start the season, with the idea they’ll face a decision about finding the strongest possible combination when Lowry returns.

Pacific Division

Anaheim Ducks
Is this the season the Ducks reach the playoffs again?

While still young, their homegrown core has varying levels of experience, from Troy Terry going into his seventh season to Cutter Gauthier seeking to build on a 20-goal rookie campaign. Over time, the Ducks have insulated that group with veterans. What began with getting Alex Killorn and Frank Vatrano years ago continued this offseason as they added Chris Kreider and Mikael Granlund.

They finished the 2024-25 campaign with 80 points for the first time since the 2018-19 season, which gives the Ducks confidence to reach the next stage of their rebuild — that stage being the end of the rebuild itself.

So, is this the season in which the Ducks transition from promising project to the latest perennial playoff contender? Or is this the campaign that allows them to understand what gaps they must fill in order to reach that desired destination?


One of the Flames’ most important players is entering the final year of his contract. This is nothing new for them, based on recent history. But Andersson’s circumstances are different from those of Noah Hanifin and Elias Lindholm because this version of the Flames is in contention for a playoff spot.

Teams will be willing to pay a premium for a proven top-pairing, right-handed defenseman like Andersson. The Flames need to determine the strongest window for them to maximize any potential return if they can’t re-sign Andersson.

Does it make more sense for them to see how they start the season before making a decision? Do they wait until closer to the trade deadline? Could they hold off if they’re in a playoff spot or close to one at the deadline, and seek to add help instead? What can they receive for him? Or do they possibly risk losing him for nothing?

It’s going to be fascinating to watch this saga play out.


Edmonton Oilers
Is this version of the Oilers as good as the past two seasons?

There will be frequent conversations surrounding 2026 free agent Connor McDavid and his future — and if that future includes staying with the Oilers or heading elsewhere next summer.

But another issue that’s likely to be raised is whether this can be the season in which the Oilers win another Stanley Cup and, in turn, allow the game’s premier player to win a title and stay with the only pro team he has known.

Edmonton parted ways with veterans such as Viktor Arvidsson, Connor Brown, John Klingberg, Evander Kane and Corey Perry in cost-cutting decisions this offseason. That opened the door for them to make the trade for Isaac Howard, with the intent that having young forwards such as Howard and Matthew Savoie can provide the Oilers with promising talents on cheap cap hits.

Like any team, the Oilers face questions about what lies ahead, and if there are any other changes that need to be made prior to the postseason. It’s just that those questions are ramped up with the world’s best player on an expiring contract.


Los Angeles Kings
Does the regular season really matter that much for the Kings?

Posing that particular question is usually reserved for teams that have won a championship, or ones that are in a championship window, mainly with the idea that the regular season is a necessary formality in order for them to advance to the postseason.

This current iteration of the Kings hasn’t won a championship. Nor has it shown it is in a tangible championship window. What the Kings have shown is that they’re a perennial playoff team that can finish with more than 100 regular-season points.

But failing to get beyond the first round for a fourth straight postseason ultimately cost GM Rob Blake his job and led to a summer overhaul that saw his replacement — Hall of Famer Ken Holland — sign numerous veterans. Above all, it’s also led to the reality that any of the major questions about the Kings won’t be answered until the end of the first round of the playoffs.


San Jose Sharks
Can they win 30 games this season?

The strongest sign concerning the state of the Sharks’ rebuild was witnessing the three main pillars of the young core — Macklin Celebrini, William Eklund and Will Smith — finish in the top four on the team in points in 2024-25. More growth is expected from that trio this season, with the expectation that goaltender Yaroslav Askarov could be the next promising prospect to carve out a key role.

Part of the team’s growth was fostered thanks to veterans such as Tyler Toffoli. The addition of more experience in the form of John Klingberg, Dmitry Orlov and Jeff Skinner this summer could lead to additional gains.

Is that enough for the Sharks to win 30 games this season? They’ve finished with fewer than 30 wins for three straight campaigns. That’s only the second such sequence in franchise history. In fact, the Sharks have won 30 games just once since their most recent playoff appearance in 2019.


Seattle Kraken: What changes will new coach Lane Lambert make?

Through their first five years of existence, the Kraken are already on their third head coach, with Dan Bylsma lasting one season before they hired Lambert. In that time, they’ve gone through a number of questions that essentially come back to the same place: What must the Kraken do to attain consistency throughout all facets of their game?

Although they were 13th in 5-on-5 goals and 16th in goals per game last season, they finished in the bottom 10 in high-danger scoring chances, total scoring chances and shots per game. They also had a power play that was 23rd, with an 18.9% success rate.

Their defensive play also faced struggles, as the Kraken were in the top 10 in most goals allowed, most high-danger scoring chances allowed and total scoring chances allowed in 5-on-5 play, with a penalty kill that was 21st with a 77.2% success rate.


Vancouver Canucks
Is their current center situation good enough for them to compete in the loaded West?

There was Elias Pettersson‘s decline from finishing with 89 points in 2023-24 to scoring nearly half that amount (45 points) a year later. The friction between Pettersson and J.T. Miller going public led to Miller being traded, with the Canucks losing another proven scoring option down the middle. That was further compounded when Pius Suter and his 25 goals left for the Blues in free agency this summer.

Entering training camp, there’s a belief that Pettersson could rediscover the spark that allowed him to emerge as a franchise center. But what does that mean for the rest of the group?

Second-line center Filip Chytil, who came over in the Miller trade, has one 20-goal season in his career, which was also his only 40-point campaign on an NHL résumé that has been interrupted by injuries.

As for the Canucks’ bottom six? Teddy Blueger‘s two-way consistency makes him a consistent contributor who can chip in more than 25 points a season. Aatu Raty‘s stint with the club last season included seven goals and 11 points in 33 games, in his longest run in the NHL to date.


Yes, the Knights made the splashiest move of the offseason in landing Mitch Marner. But there was major news on the blue line, as Pietrangelo will miss this season while recovering from femur reconstruction surgery and might never play again.

That poses questions about how the Golden Knights will fill the void left by a physically imposing, right-shot, top-pairing defenseman who led them in average ice time and was second in short-handed minutes — while trying to win another Stanley Cup after winning one in 2023.

Vegas’ current top-four setup could have Brayden McNabb partner with Shea Theodore on the top line, while Noah Hanifin could be joined by Zach Whitecloud, who lost his longtime defensive partner, Nicolas Hague, in a trade with the Predators. That would slot Kaedan Korczak and Jeremy Lauzon as the third pairing.

Under that potential configuration, Korczak and Whitecloud are the Golden Knights’ only right-handed defensemen.

Continue Reading

Sports

Bowman, Francis lead Penguins’ 2025 HOF class

Published

on

By

Bowman, Francis lead Penguins' 2025 HOF class

PITTSBURGH — Scotty Bowman and Ron Francis headline the Pittsburgh Penguins‘ Hall of Fame class of 2025.

Bowman, the NHL’s all-time winningest coach, and Francis, the league’s fifth all-time leading scorer, were both important members of the Pittsburgh teams of the early 1990s that claimed the franchise’s first two Stanley Cups.

The duo, both of whom are in the Hockey Hall of Fame, will be joined by forward Kevin Stevens and former coach/general manager Eddie Johnston during an on-ice ceremony when the Penguins host Columbus on Oct. 25.

All four inductees played a role in Pittsburgh becoming one of the league’s marquee attractions during the late 1980s and early 1990s.

Johnston was the general manager when the Penguins drafted Hall of Famer Mario Lemieux with the first overall pick in 1984 and later served as the club’s head coach from 1993-97.

Bowman was Pittsburgh’s director of player personnel during the 1990-91 season, during which he helped the club bring in a series of veterans — including Francis — to round out a roster ready to compete for a title. Bowman took over as head coach in 1991 after Bob Johnson was forced to step down because of a brain cancer diagnosis shortly after leading the Penguins to a championship.

Pittsburgh won its second straight Stanley Cup in 1992 with Bowman behind the bench. He then guided the Penguins to the Presidents’ Trophy in 1992-93 but exited the following offseason in a contract dispute.

Francis spent eight seasons in Pittsburgh after coming over in a trade with the Hartford Whalers. He scored 164 goals to go with 449 assists with the Penguins, adding another 100 points in the playoffs.

Stevens was a three-time All-Star across his two stints in Pittsburgh, scoring 260 goals and adding 295 assists in 522 games with the club.

Continue Reading

Sports

Vegas star Pietrangelo (hip) won’t rule out return

Published

on

By

Vegas star Pietrangelo (hip) won't rule out return

Vegas Golden Knights defenseman Alex Pietrangelo will not rule out a return to play this season as he continues to rehab a prolonged hip injury.

Pietrangelo, 35, and the Golden Knights announced in June that he was stepping away from “the intensity of hockey” to see if his injured hip could improve to the point where he could have “a normal quality of life.” GM Kelly McCrimmon said at the time that the injury “would require bilateral femur reconstruction, with no guarantee of success.”

Multiple reports indicated that Pietrangelo, the team’s No. 1 defenseman, would miss the entire 2025-26 season at a minimum. The defenseman himself said in June that “the likelihood is low that my body will recover to the standard required to play.”

But Pietrangelo said Monday that he has opted not to have surgery while continuing a rehab program that has given him positive results. When asked if a return this season was off the table, Pietrangelo wouldn’t rule it out.

“Nothing is really concrete. I’m just going to continue to take it day-by-day and see where it goes,” he said at the Golden Knights’ training camp.

Pietrangelo said that the hip issue started years ago but that last season “was when it really took a toll on me.” He played through it, skipping the 4 Nations Face-Off to focus on the Stanley Cup playoffs. He played 71 games overall and then another 10 in the postseason, averaging 23:03 in ice time in the playoffs.

A 17-year NHL veteran, Pietrangelo led the St. Louis Blues (2019) and the Golden Knights (2023) to Stanley Cup championships. He has 637 points in 1,087 career games.

Pietrangelo has two years remaining on a seven-year contract he signed as a free agent with Vegas in 2020, and it carries an $8.8 million salary cap hit. The Golden Knights have limited cap space after acquiring star winger Mitch Marner from Toronto with a new contract that has a $12 million hit.

Vegas will open the season with Pietrangelo on long-term injured reserve. The NHL and NHLPA recently agreed to expedite changes to the collective bargaining agreement that address the salary cap benefits from players on LTIR and establish a postseason cap.

Continue Reading

Trending