Connect with us

Published

on

All over American college campuses, students are chanting anti-Israel slogans, backing Hamas, and accusing Israelis of war crimes. Democratic Michigan Rep. Rashida Tlaib accused President Joe Biden of supporting genocide by supporting Israel.

The chant From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free has echoed in town squares and on social media screens around the world for the past month. This anti-Semitic rallying cry has long been used by anti-Israel voices, including supporters of terrorist organizations like Hamas . Fundamentally, its a call for a Palestinian state extending from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea, which would mean the dismantling of the Jewish State of Israel and amount to genocide.

Frankly, its absurd and alarming to have to make this point at all: Israel is not perpetrating a genocide; it is defending itself from a terrorist group that wants to annihilate it.

It also deserves our unreserved support for several reasons.

Israel is the historical home of the people God chose to covenant with and the land where Jesus walked two things American Christians, in particular, should never forget. Israel is also an irreplaceable geopolitical ally and asset. Israel is the only true democracy in the Middle East, a region otherwise turbulent and, in many cases, actively hostile to Western forms of liberty.

Some Iranians consider the U.S. the Great Satan and Israel the Little Satan. These radical voices want nothing more and nothing less than the total annihilation of America and Israel. And the sentiment is, unfortunately, not uncommon.

Israel provides stability and military insight into a geopolitically important and ideologically complex zone where the U.S. has few friends. Without a strong Israel, the U.S. and the Middle East would both suffer.

The political volatility of the area is part of what made the Abraham Accords such a striking victory for former President Donald Trump: Normalizing relations between Israel and four Arab countries over the course of a few months brought the Middle East closer to relative peace, economic freedom, and regional interdependence than it has been in a very long time. The explicit hope of the Accords was to foster peace and justice by expanding diplomatic, economic, and cultural exchange between former enemy states.

That is a bold goal and it was close to being reached. Rumors began to circulate prior to the brutal surprise assault by Hamas that Israel and Saudi Arabia were close to normalizing their relationship. If that happened, Saudi Arabia would likely gain significantly in regional and global standing. Iran, Saudi Arabias chief rival, couldnt bear to see that happen.

And so, they employed one of their regional proxies, Hamas, to disrupt the process of attaining peace. On Oct. 7, Hamas terrorists slaughtered children and infants, raped and kidnapped women, and killed or displaced entire Israeli communities. Rockets totaling in the hundreds hurtle toward Israel now, every day.

If Americans value global stability at all or fear the spread of terroristic, genocidal hatred, we owe Israel our support in this war.

And for that support to happen in Washington, D.C., American Christians must rally to Israels defense. If it werent enough to gesture at our shared religious heritage in the region after all, it is the land of Christs life and work then you need only look to Gods promises to the Israelites in Scripture.

God makes a remarkable promise to Abraham, the father of Israel, in Genesis :

And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing: And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.

Later, in Zechariah, Israel is called the apple of [Gods] eye. Its abundantly clear throughout the Scriptures that Israel and the Jewish people have a unique covenant with God. What, then, would be the Christian justification for standing idly by while Israel is dealt grave, horrific blows by her enemies in the region? There is none.

American Christians are bound by religious heritage as well as geopolitical self-interest to come to her aid. Israel must be allowed to defend herself, and we must do what we can to make such defense possible.

This level of aid is also Americas historical norm. It is neither a recent nor a fringe position to support Israel in the United States.

Weve had a strong relationship with Israel economically, politically, and militarily since Harry Trumans presidency a Democrat. We formally recognized Israels statehood on May 14, 1948, when Israel declared its independence, and we havent backed down since. Weve contributed over $130 billion to Israels defense since its founding.

And this support has also been until quite recently a solidly bipartisan effort. Under an Obama-era agreement, Israel receives $3.8 billion each year for defense systems.

Thats why the radical leftist embrace of Hamas is nearly unbelievable. Pro-Hamas protesters and politicians are choosing to back a terrorist regime whose own charter calls for the genocide of one of our most strategic and long-standing allies. Importantly, that ally is committed to defending some of our own most vital political principles: The dignity of each human being, the sanctity of life, the value of self-governance and of democratic justice.

And Israel defends these principles more or less alone, against myriad nations that reject their right to exist at all. We must not turn our backs on Israel now. Its obscene that there are those among us who would consider doing so.

Timothy Head is the executive director of the Faith & Freedom Coalition.

The views expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Trump has ‘obligation’ to sue ‘very dishonest’ BBC

Published

on

By

Trump threatens to sue BBC for bn over speech edit

Donald Trump has said he has an “obligation” to sue the BBC over an edit of a speech he gave before the US Capitol riot in 2021.

The president doubled down on his legal threat to the corporation in a Fox News interview on Tuesday night, as the corporation remains in crisis after the resignation of two of its top figures – including director-general Tim Davie.

“They defrauded the public, and they’ve admitted it,” Mr Trump said.

“And this is within one of our great allies, you know?”

It came after concerns emerged about a Panorama documentary from last year which showed Mr Trump appearing to tell supporters he was going to walk to the Capitol with them to “fight like hell”. There was in fact around an hour in between the two parts of the speech that were spliced together.

He told Fox News the Panorama edit had made a “beautiful” and “very calming speech” sound “radical”, which was “incredible” and “very dishonest”.

Mr Trump had faced charges of trying to overturn the 2020 election in light of the violence that befell the Capitol in January 2021, but those efforts were dropped when he beat Kamala Harris in 2024.

Trump’s three demands

Mr Trump is threatening to sue the BBC for $1bn unless it issues a “full and fair retraction” of the documentary, apologises immediately, and “appropriately” compensates him. It’s been given a deadline of 10pm UK time on Friday.

Read Trump’s legal letter in full

The BBC has come under increasingly heavy fire from its critics in the UK over the Panorama programme. The Conservatives have demanded it apologise to Mr Trump and the public, while Reform has reportedly pulled out of a documentary the corporation was planning about the party.

Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy defended the BBC in the Commons on Tuesday, denying accusations it’s institutionally biased and calling on MPs to “value it, uphold it, and fiercely defend it”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Nandy’s BBC warning to MPs

She said she has been in “regular contact” with BBC chair Samir Shah, ensuring that where standards were not met, “firm, swift and transparent action follows”.

Ms Nandy said a review of the BBC’s Royal Charter will begin “imminently” and a public consultation will be launched, with more details in the “coming weeks”.

‘We made a mistake – but need to fight,’ says outgoing BBC boss

Her Commons statement came after outgoing director-general Mr Davie said the corporation “made some mistakes that have cost us”, but added he was “proud” and that the organisation needed to “fight” for its journalism.

Mr Davie told staff on a call: “I think we did make a mistake, and there was an editorial breach, and I think some responsibility had to be taken.”

Mr Davie, who has worked for the BBC for 20 years and been in charge for the past five, is not stepping down immediately but hopes a successor will be put in place “over the coming months”.

There are several potential candidates who could replace him. The job effectively serves as both the corporation’s chief executive and its editor-in-chief across television, radio and online.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Inside the BBC staff call

Leak reveals staff anger at Tory-linked board member

In a Q&A with Mr Davie after the all-staff call, staff were frustrated by having their questions vetted, Sky News arts and entertainment correspondent Katie Spencer reported.

Some questions were about the controversial appointment of Sir Robbie Gibb, the former Tory director of communications for prime minister Theresa May, to the BBC board. But when these questions were getting through the vetting process, staff tried to ask questions in the reply boxes, which were public.

Read more:
The man behind the leaked BBC memo
Who is Sir Robbie Gibb and why are there calls to get him off BBC board?

Robbie Gibb, Theresa May's then director of communications, leaves No 10 in 2019. Pic: James Veysey/Shutterstock

File type: JPG
Image:
Robbie Gibb, Theresa May’s then director of communications, leaves No 10 in 2019. Pic: James Veysey/Shutterstock

File type: JPG

The anonymous comments included questions like “How can we claim to be unbiased if Gibb is on the board?” and “Why is Robbie Gibb still on the board?”.

“I find Robbie Gibb’s continued presence at the BBC to be incredibly demoralising. It feels as if he is fighting against and undermining the work we’re trying to do,” another comment read.

The leaders of the Lib Dems and SNP have both called for Sir Robbie’s removal.

But Ms Nandy told the Commons the government is “unable” to remove Sir Robbie, as “the charter sets a strict legal threshold that must be met before dismissal of a board member”.

Continue Reading

Politics

Nationally chartered bank SoFi rolls out crypto trading for US customers

Published

on

By

Nationally chartered bank SoFi rolls out crypto trading for US customers

US bank SoFi Technologies has launched crypto trading services to its customers, as clearer rules have allowed the crypto market to court greater interest from traditional finance.

SoFi said on Tuesday that its crypto service will aim to offer dozens of cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH), and started in a phased rollout on Monday, with more customers able to gain access in the coming weeks. 

SoFi CEO Anthony Noto told CNBC’s Squawk Box on Tuesday that his bank is the first and only nationally chartered bank to launch crypto trading to consumers and was spurred to do so after the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) eased its stance on how banks can engage with crypto in March.

“One of the holes we’ve had for the last two years was in cryptocurrency, the ability to buy, sell, and hold crypto. We were not allowed to do that as a bank. It was not permissible,” he said. 

Source: Anthony Noto

SoFi withdrew from the crypto industry in 2023 as a condition of obtaining a bank charter in a stricter regulatory environment. The bank returned to crypto in June, when it rolled out international payment options, allowing conversions from fiat to crypto and transmission via the blockchain. 

Blockchain and crypto a “super cycle technology”

SoFi also plans to introduce SoFi USD, a stablecoin backed dollar-for-dollar by reserves, and integrate crypto into its lending and infrastructure services for borrowing and faster payments.