Connect with us

Published

on

Professor Sir Chris Whitty, England’s chief medical officer, will be the latest high-profile figure to reveal his first-hand experience of the COVID pandemic when he gives evidence to the inquiry later today.

Sir Chris became a household name alongside the chief scientific adviser, Sir Patrick Vallance, when the pair appeared alongside politicians at the daily COVID press conferences.

As chief medical officer, Sir Chris is responsible for providing public health and clinical advice to the Department of Health and the rest of government. Along with Sir Patrick, he helped steer the UK through the unprecedented crisis.

Before he was launched into the limelight, Sir Chris played a leading role advising on the UK response to the Ebola epidemic in 2014 as chief scientific adviser to the Department for International Development.

He has previously given evidence to module one of the inquiry, which looked at how prepared the UK was for a pandemic when COVID-19 struck.

Sir Chris said during that module that the UK did “not have the ability to scale up” quickly to deal with the pandemic in areas such as testing, and that the non-pharmaceutical interventions – social measures such as quarantine, individual isolation, closing schools – were not new and some went back to the Middle Ages.

Follow latest: Why Cameron’s re-entry into Westminster was ‘like he’d never been away’

More on Covid Inquiry

In WhatsApp messages leaked to The Daily Telegraph by journalist Isabel Oakeshott after she helped write Matt Hancock’s book, Pandemic Diaries, it was revealed that Sir Chris advised against imposing a lockdown “sex ban” because couples were “not likely to listen” to orders to stay apart.

But it is module two of the inquiry, on decision-making, that is more overtly political and is likely to generate the most headlines.

His colleague at the time, Sir Patrick, was doing just that yesterday, telling the inquiry about some of the reflections he had written in his contemporaneous diary.

Tensions between politicians and scientists, and among themselves, were palpable.

‘Just let people die’

Among the most eye-catching claims yesterday was that Dominic Cummings, Boris Johnson’s former chief adviser, had said that Rishi Sunak thought the government should “just let people die” rather than see the country go into another lockdown.

Sir Patrick’s diary entry said Mr Cummings made the remark during a heated meeting over whether to impose stricter pandemic measures in October 2020.

In the extract, shown to the inquiry on Monday, Sir Patrick said Mr Johnson had argued against any lockdown, saying he was for “letting it all rip” and that those who would die from contracting the virus had “had a good innings”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Science was not Boris Johnson’s forte’

Sir Patrick then detailed a row between Mr Johnson and his chief adviser, with Mr Cummings calling for the PM to act, but the former prime minister was “getting very frustrated” and “throwing papers down” in the meeting, before saying he did not want another lockdown.

The meeting ended with an agreement to “beef up” the tier system being implemented across the country at the time and to “consider a national lockdown”.

Sir Patrick also wrote: “DC [Dominic Cummings] says ‘Rishi thinks just let people die and that’s OK’.”

Sir Patrick also told the inquiry that neither he nor Sir Chris knew about the Eat Out to Help Out scheme before it was announced, but that they felt it was “very obvious to anyone that this inevitably would cause an increase in transmission risk, and I think that would have been known by ministers”.

Mr Sunak’s witness statement refutes this, saying: “I don’t recall any concerns about the scheme being expressed during ministerial discussions” – including those attended by Sir Patrick and Sir Chris.

‘We found it useful to work together’

Sir Patrick was also asked about differences of opinions he had with the chief medical officer in the early stages of the pandemic after scientist Sir Jeremy Farrar wrote his own diary entry in which he described “friction” between the two.

Asked whether there was tension between himself and Sir Chris, Sir Patrick said the chief medical officer was a public health specialist who was rightly concerned about the adverse effects of interventions such as lockdown.

Read more:
Analysis: PM will have to answer serious allegations at the COVID inquiry
Coronavirus laws were confusing, says ex-home secretary Priti Patel

He said Sir Chris was “concerned that there would be more than just the issue of the direct cause of death from the virus”, including the impact on the NHS, isolating, mental health and loneliness as well as “indirect long term consequences” such as poverty.

“And that I think is a totally appropriate worry from the chief medical officer and a legitimate public health concern throughout,” Sir Patrick said.

“And I didn’t have exactly the same worry. I was more on the side of we need to move on this, but I think that’s partly why the two of us found it useful to work together.”

If Sir Patrick’s testimony is anything to go by, then the inquiry will likely be braced for further revelations later today.

Continue Reading

UK

This mum faces a nightly battle to keep her daughter alive – but the NHS won’t help her

Published

on

By

This mum faces a nightly battle to keep her daughter alive - but the NHS won't help her

For Shelley Mclean, every night is a sleepless one, just to keep her 11-year-old daughter alive.

Missy was born with a rare genetic condition that affects her breathing, digestion and movement.

She spent the first nine months of her life in hospital before coming home with a breathing tube in her throat, a feeding tube in her stomach, and a line into her bowel.

At first, the family had some NHS-funded nighttime care to help keep Missy safe while she slept.

But when her local NHS body decided she no longer met the threshold, that support was taken away.

Missy has a breathing tube in her throat, a feeding tube in her stomach, and a line into her bowel
Image:
Missy has a breathing tube in her throat, a feeding tube in her stomach, and a line into her bowel

Now, Missy’s mother is responsible for her care.

“I’m her nurse, her physio, her carer,” says Shelley. “I don’t sleep properly because I’m scared she’ll stop breathing.

“They say we don’t meet the threshold – but I don’t know what more they need to see.”

Every night, Shelley prepares Missy’s medicines, checks her tubes, and monitors her breathing.

“This is an epilepsy medicine,” she says, holding up a syringe.

“If she’s not tolerating food orally, I put it down the tube.”

Despite her exhaustion, Shelley is grateful for the care that once saved her daughter’s life.

“I’m very grateful the NHS saved Missy – she wouldn’t be here without them. But they’re crippling the parents.”

Shelley Mclean cares for her daughter Missy round the clock
Image:
Shelley Mclean cares for her daughter Missy round the clock

The postcode lottery

Children like Missy who leave hospital but still need intensive support are meant to receive what’s called NHS continuing care – specialist help for those with the most complex, life-limiting or life-threatening needs.

But Sky News has seen new data which shows access to this care is deeply inconsistent across England, creating a postcode lottery that leaves many families struggling to survive without the help they require.

New figures obtained by Sky News reveal just how uneven continuing care has become.

NHS spending on children’s continuing care ranges from just 80p to £6 per head depending on where families live.

Out of almost 100,000 children in England with a life-limiting or life-threatening condition, only around 4% – roughly 4,400 – receive NHS continuing care funding.

And more than half of all disabled children referred for this kind of support are rejected.

Anna Bird, chief executive of charity Contact, says the system is leaving thousands of families on the brink.

“We’re not seeing the commitment to make sure those who need continuing care are getting it,” she told Sky News.

“Our research shows there’s a huge postcode lottery – families are running kind of little hospitals at home just to keep their children well and alive.

“They’re being let down by continuing care, and they’re not getting the support they need.”

In some areas, campaigners say local NHS bodies have cut back on support even for children with the most serious medical conditions.

Parents report being told their child no longer qualifies for help despite their needs remaining unchanged.

For Shelley, that decision means she rarely sleeps through the night.

“If I don’t go to her, she could be dead,” she says quietly. “She could have a fit and… you know, she could be dead.”

Shelley, Missy and her brother
Image:
Shelley, Missy and her brother

In a statement, NHS Cheshire and Merseyside said: “We understand Ms Mclean will be disappointed with the decision relating to her daughter’s funding.

“While we’re unable to comment on individual cases due to our commitment to patient confidentiality, all patients are reviewed jointly by health and care professionals to ensure they are receiving the most appropriate care for their needs.

“Patients who wish to discuss their funding decision are able to contact NHS Cheshire and Merseyside using the contact details included in their patient letters.”

But campaigners say that without national standards – and without the law forcing consistent assessments – those reviews will continue to vary wildly from one area to the next.

Read more from Sky News:
Seasonal affective disorder isn’t just ‘winter blues’
It’s not your imagination, these products are shrinking

Alderhay hospital
Image:
Alderhay hospital

The human cost

The result is that parents like Shelley find themselves trapped between two systems – the NHS and social care – neither of which can agree who is responsible.

“I’m not the type of person who wants to ask anyone for help,” she says. “But it’s brought me to my knees.”

For Shelley, that gap is more than bureaucratic. It’s personal, relentless, and exhausting.

“I would invite them to come and have a week in my position – to try to wake up every hour, on the hour, every night. Then they might understand.”

Campaigners say no parent should have to shoulder that burden alone – and they want ministers to act.

They’re calling on the government to make continuing care a statutory entitlement, with consistent assessments, proper funding, and transparency about who gets help and who doesn’t.

Until then, families like Shelley’s will continue to do the work of the NHS from their own homes – unpaid, unsupported, and exhausted.

Shelley feeding Missy
Image:
Shelley feeding Missy

The Department for Health and Social Care said: “Our thoughts go out to Shelley and Missy – everyone should have access to high-quality, compassionate care.

“As part of our 10-Year Health Plan, the government is shifting more healthcare out of hospitals and into the community, to ensure patients and their families can get the care they need, where and when they need it.

“Integrated Care Boards are responsible for meeting the needs of local people – including Children and Young People’s Continuing Care and ensuring the care requirements of people like Missy and Shelley are met.

“This government has set out best practice, and provided guidance around assessments, decision-making and agreeing care packages for Children and Young People’s Continuing Care.”

Continue Reading

UK

PM dismisses calls for investigation into Reeves over rental ‘mistake’

Published

on

By

PM dismisses calls for investigation into Reeves over rental 'mistake'

Sir Keir Starmer has dismissed calls for an investigation into his chancellor after she apologised for putting her family home up for rent without obtaining the necessary licence.

Rachel Reeves wrote to the prime minister to “sincerely” apologise for the “inadvertent error”, which was first reported by the Daily Mail.

The newspaper reported that the chancellor rented her family home in Dulwich when she moved into Number 11 Downing Street, but was unaware she had to obtain a licence to do so.

Some London boroughs require private landlords to obtain a specific kind of licence if they are putting their property up for rent – including Southwark Council, where Ms Reeves’ home is listed.

The newspaper said Ms Reeves had now applied for a licence, but the Conservatives have called for an investigation.

A spokesperson for Ms Reeves said: “Since becoming chancellor, Rachel Reeves has rented out her family home through a lettings agency.

“She had not been made aware of the licensing requirement, but as soon as it was brought to her attention, she took immediate action and has applied for the licence.

More on Labour

“This was an inadvertent mistake and in the spirit of transparency, she has made the prime minister, the independent adviser on ministerial standards and the parliamentary commissioner for standards aware.”

It is understood that Sir Laurie Magnus, the prime minister’s ethics adviser, has not launched an investigation into Ms Reeves.

Sir Keir said further investigation into the issue was “not necessary” after consulting Sir Laurie.

In a letter to Ms Reeves, he suggested her apology was a “sufficient resolution”.

Daisy Cooper, deputy leader of the Liberal Democrats, said the chancellor was adding to the government’s “list of scandals”.

“The chancellor is meant to be delivering growth but the only thing she appears to be growing is the government’s list of scandals,” she said.

“Just weeks before the budget, this risks seriously undermining confidence in this government and its ability to focus on the urgent tasks at hand.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Chancellor faces tough budget choices

The development comes weeks before Ms Reeves delivers her budget on 26 November.

She is rumoured to be considering a series of tax hikes, including a new tax on the sale of homes worth more than £500,000 to replace stamp duty.

Read more:
What tax rises and spending cuts could Reeves announce?
Why is there a budget black hole?

Under the proposal, sellers, instead of buyers, would be responsible for paying the tax.

The chancellor is understood to be looking at an annual 1% charge on the amount a property’s value exceeds £2m – a £10,000-a-year levy for homes worth £3m.

Another proposal would see capital gains tax (CGT) charged when someone sells their main home, based on the amount it has increased in value during ownership.

Reports suggest this would only be applied to the most expensive properties, with a possible threshold of £1.5m, which would affect about 120,000 homeowners and higher-rate taxpayers getting CGT bills of nearly £200,000.

Continue Reading

UK

Wrongly-released migrant sex offender Hadush Kebatu claims he was ‘ignored’ by police while trying to hand himself in

Published

on

By

Wrongly-released migrant sex offender Hadush Kebatu claims he was 'ignored' by police while trying to hand himself in

Migrant sex offender Hadush Kebatu, who was wrongly freed from prison, has claimed in an interview with Sky News that he tried to hand himself in to police a day before he was arrested, but was ignored by officers.

The Home Office said Kebatu, 38, was deported from the UK on Tuesday night.

Speaking to Sky News after he arrived back in Ethiopia on Wednesday morning, Kebatu shared details of his accidental release from HMP Chelmsford on 24 October and the two-day manhunt that followed.

The convicted sex offender was repeatedly questioned on his crimes, but Sky News has chosen not to broadcast this part of the interview.

‘Ignored’ by police

The morning after he was released from prison, Kebatu claimed he tried to hand himself into police, but was ignored.

He said: “I [told] police, look here, police I am wanted man, I am arrested, I will give you my hand, please help where is police station? He ignored me, he drove [off].”

He added that he told the officer his name and that he was mistakenly released from prison.

“I am not unknown. The police station, where is the place? But also I go to police, I will give you my hand please help me where is the police station, take me, I am wanted.

“You know me, or my image, my name is Hadush Kabatu, nationality Ethiopia. Please, I was the mistake release from Chelmsford prison. Please help me.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Moment Hadush Kebatu put on deportation flight

Responding to Kebatu’s claims, the Metropolitan Police told Sky News: “The Met is not aware of any evidence to support the claims that Kebatu approached officers on Saturday morning.

“The actions of officers who responded to the sighting of him on Sunday morning show how seriously they were taking the manhunt. Kebatu’s actions on the morning of his arrest were more like those of someone trying to avoid officers, not trying to hand himself in.”

Release from prison

Kebatu was released by HMP Chelmsford a month into his 12-month sentence on the expectation he would be picked up by immigration enforcement.

He said after he was released he waited more than three hours outside the prison, for what he described as someone who was “responsible” for him.

He said: “At that time I am waiting more than three hours… who [is] responsible for me? Where is Home Office, where is [immigration]?

“I was told there was a bus. Also, all the experts, they all ignored me.”

In another Sky News story, a delivery driver who spoke to Kebatu outside Chelmsford prison said he looked “confused”.

The driver said he was approached by the prisoner, who had no idea where he was supposed to go. He said Kebatu waited outside the prison for roughly “an hour and a half” before leaving.

Kebatu said after he left the prison, he asked a passerby where the train station was. He claimed someone helped him, and bought him a train ticket for £18.

Kebatu then travelled to London. He was spotted later that evening in Stratford, east London, and then the Dalston area of Hackney.

Kebatu's movements the day he was released from prison
Image:
Kebatu’s movements the day he was released from prison

The Ethiopian national arrived in the UK on a small boat on 29 June. Days after his arrival, he sexually assaulted a 14-year-old girl and a woman in Epping, Essex, where he was staying.

He was found guilty of two counts of sexual assault, one count of attempted sexual assault, one count of inciting a girl to engage in sexual activity and one count of harassment without violence.

He was jailed on 23 September.

When approached by Sky News, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) pointed to a statement made by Justice Secretary David Lammy upon Kebatu’s deportation: “Kebatu has been returned to Ethiopia where he belongs.

“I am grateful to Home Office colleagues for acting swiftly to secure his deportation. I have been clear from the outset that a mistake of this nature is unacceptable, and we must get to the bottom of what happened.

“I have established an independent investigation chaired by Dame Lynne Owens into last Friday’s events to get the public the answers they rightly deserve, and we have introduced the strictest checks ever seen in our prison system to stop similar unacceptable errors in future.”

Essex Police, who arrested Kebatu after the assaults in July, told Sky News: “Our officers responded quickly to the reports of the sexual assaults committed in Epping and arrested Hadush Kebatu on the same day the offences were reported to us.

“Kebatu was then immediately remanded in custody, while officers acted diligently and professionally securing charges and building a case which saw Kebatu convicted following a trial. Protecting women and girls is a priority for Essex Police and our swift and thorough actions highlight our commitment to this.”

Continue Reading

Trending