Football players are threatening legal action over the increasing match demands placed on their bodies with new and expanding competitions, their union has told Sky News.
The welfare warning follows our analysis finding a male player could be required for an unprecedented 86 matches from next season with the UEFA Champions League adding games and FIFAintroducing a new summer competition for clubs.
The congested fixture list leaves players with little space for rest and recovery with FIFA yet to grant union demands for a mandatory 28-day off-season break.
Professional Footballers’ Association chief executive Maheta Molango told Sky News: “I feel like we’ve reached a stage where people are ready to take legal action, where people are ready to take tangible action on the pitch to try to resolve it, because it’s a sad state of affairs.
“I think it’s a defeat for football when the players need to take the justice in their own hands because they don’t feel protected.”
The concerns are magnified by FIFA introducing a new 32-team Club World Cup in 2025 when most Premier League players would be on holiday.
The 2025-26 Premier League campaign could start barely a month later and that season ends with another World Cup – for national teams – and the first since FIFA expanded it from 32 to 48 nations.
Asked if competition organisers risk killing football, Mr Molango responded: “I think they are. But I think that the players are ready now to take a strong stance.
“I do think that the authorities who are supposed to protect the players and protect the games are not doing that. They are generating more competitions, generating more income to the detriment of the players.”
Advertisement
Growing the game
FIFA maintains its new Club World Cup – featuring 12 teams from Europe, including at least Manchester City and Chelsea from England – is about growing the game globally.
The world governing body points to the backing of the European Club Association, although that organisation’s support came amid a deal to help sell commercial rights with FIFA.
But Premier League chief executive Richard Masters has protested about the new tournament in a letter to FIFA through the World Leagues Forum (WLF), which he also leads.
Sky News understands the WLF claimed FIFA is overlooking the needs of national competitions by overloading the calendar and prioritising its own interests and events over governing the sport.
FIFA, under Gianni Infantino since 2016, has been seeking a bigger footprint on football and more and bigger tournaments.
Mr Molango said: “What we all seem to forget is that ultimately, they’re all using the same assets – and I’m using the word assets for purpose because they all want to milk the same cow.
“And it’s just impossible because ultimately, the players – for as much as they are privileged people who make a very good living – the human body only allows you to do so much.”
Manchester City could face 86-game season
This is what could be required of a Manchester City player in the 2024-25 season – with 86 games potentially in total.
If City are English and European champions again, they will be contesting the domestic Community Shield and UEFA Super Cup in August around the start of the 38-game Premier League season.
Then comes the launch of the new-look Champions League with the group stage growing from six to eight games between September and December.
National teams will also have a pair of games in September, October and November.
December will see another FIFA launch, with the Intercontinental Cup final contested by the European champions.
January will see the start of the FA Cup and a maximum of six games to win it – assuming replays are scrapped to address congestion concerns.
There have been talks about the League Cup switching to single semi-finals rather than playing over two legs – although City could still face five games in total with a run to the final.
February could see a team facing a new Champions League playoff round to reach the last-16 of the knockout stage if they are not among the top eight teams in the reformatted group stage.
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
That means it could now take 17 matches to win Europe’s top prize rather than the 13 fixtures in City’s journey to glory last season.
And once the Champions League final is played on 31 May in Munich, players are far from being able to rest.
The ninth and tenth national-team games of the season will be played which, for some, could be the Nations League finals – an addition to the calendar since being launched by UEFA in 2018.
And that brings us to 15 June and the start of the Club World Cup.
After a three-team group stage, there will be another four matches up to the final.
The competition is taking the quadrennial slot used up to 2017 for the now-defunct, eight-country Confederations Cup that served as a World Cup test event.
But the union feels its alarm about the burden on players was disregarded by FIFA with little time for recovery and a pre-season before the 2025-26 season has to begin.
It is a quandary football must address – the more matches for players the less likely they could be fit to play them all.
“It’s yet another example of authorities making decisions without contemplating what the consequences would be for player welfare,” said Mr Molango, who sits on the board of international union FIFPRO.
“This is a defeat for football. As fans we want to see the best players on the pitch and performing at the best level.
“And right now with the current calendar it is physically, humanly impossible.”
Additional reporting by sports producer Tyrone Francis
“Losing Gary, my soul mate, was beyond painful,” says Kathryn Croucher, whose husband died aged 42 in 2010.
“Every day was a struggle dealing with the knowledge he was HIV and Hepatitis C positive.”
“Mum always said she was given a death sentence,” recalls Ronan Fitzgerald. His mother, Jane, died aged 54 after being infected with Hepatitis C when she was 16. “It was a ticking time bomb.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
4:51
The faces of the infected blood scandal.
More than 30,000 Britons were infected with HIV and Hepatitis C after being given contaminated blood products in the 1970s and 1980s.
Around 3,000 people have died as a result of the scandal, while many more still live under the shadow of health problems, debilitating treatments and stigma. Now, the findings of a public inquiry, first announced in 2017, will finally be published.
These are 100 faces of infected blood victims that either they, or their families, have shared with Sky News.
Click the images to read their stories.
Sky News will have full coverage of the infected blood report on TV, online and on the Sky News app today.
Sky News would like to thank everyone who contributed to this project.
Julian Assange will be allowed to appeal against his extradition to the United States.
Two judges responded today to US assurances that Mr Assange will not face the death penalty – and can rely on the First Amendment right to free speech if he faced a trial for spying.
The WikiLeaks founder faces prosecution in the US over an alleged conspiracy to obtain and disclose national defence information after the publication of hundreds of thousands of leaked documents relating to the Afghanistan and Iraq wars.
Edward Fitzgerald KC, representing Assange, criticised the assurances of Joe Biden’s US administration at the hearing. He said: “Based on the principle of the separation of powers, the US court can and will apply US law, whatever the executive may say or do.”
He added most of the promises were “blatantly inadequate” – but they had accepted the promise about the death penalty.
In written submissions, the barrister said while the assurance over the death penalty was “an unambiguous executive promise”, the other assurance does not give “any reliable promise as to future action”.
The barrister added: “What needs to be conclusively removed is the risk that he will be prevented from relying on the first amendment on grounds of nationality.”
But James Lewis KC, representing the US government, insisted the “judicial branch of the United States will take due notice of this solemn assurance given by its government in the course of international relations”.
In written submissions, he said there is “no question” that Assange, if extradited, “will be entitled to the full panoply of due process trial rights, including the right to raise, and seek to rely upon, the first amendment as a defence”.
He later told the court: “The assurance does make it clear that he will not be discriminated against because of his nationality.
“He can and will be able to raise all those arguments and his nationality will not prejudice a fair trial.”
Today’s decision is the latest chapter in 13 years of legal battles and detentions for Australian-born Mr Assange.
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News
The US authorities want to put Mr Assange on trial over 18 charges, nearly all under the Espionage Act.
They claim his actions with WikiLeaks were reckless, damaged national security, and endangered the lives of agents.
During a two-day hearing in February, lawyers for Mr Assange asked for permission to challenge a judge’s dismissal of the majority of his case to prevent his extradition.
In March, Dame Victoria Sharp and Mr Justice Johnson dismissed most of Mr Assange’s legal arguments – but said unless assurances were given by the US, he would be able to bring an appeal on three grounds.
These assurances are that Assange would be protected by and allowed to rely on the First Amendment – which protects freedom of speech in the US – that he is not “prejudiced at trial” due to his nationality, and that the death penalty is not imposed.
Supporters of Mr Assange have already been gathering outside the High Court to continue their calls for his release.
Mr Assange is currently being held in London’s high security Belmarsh prison.
Detective Inspector Lesley-Ann McGee said: “It was a warm, sunny day and there were lots of people out enjoying the weather in Saracen.
“I am asking them to get in touch with us with any information that could assist us in establishing the motive for this attack. If you saw, heard or know anything please contact us.
“I’m also asking people with dashcam or doorbell recording equipment to check for any footage that could assist our investigation.
“A family is mourning the loss of a loved one and it’s imperative we are able to answer how their loved one died.”