Connect with us

Published

on

The stifling heat inside some warehouses where workers might spend 10-hour days isnt just a summer problem. In Southern California, it can feel like summer all year.

This story also ran on CNN. It can be republished for free. Are you covered by Medi-Cal?

We want to hear about your experiences and, with your permission, may incorporate your story into our coverage. Please tell us what it has been like for you as you have sought and received care, including the good and the bad, the obstacles and the successes.Share Your Story

Its easy to break into a sweat and grow tired, workers say. The ventilation feels inconsistent, they say, and workers have testified in a public hearing about nosebleeds, nausea, and dizziness. In some warehouses, the walk to find a place to cool down is at least half a mile.

We are in constant motion. Throughout the day, my shirt is soaked in sweat three to four times, said Sara Fee, a former worker at an Amazon warehouse in San Bernardino, California, who testified before a state workplace safety board in May. I have been nauseous, dizzy.

As the climate warms and the threat of extreme heat spreads, California is poised to protect people who work in poorly ventilated warehouses, steamy restaurant kitchens, and other indoor job sites where temperatures can soar to potentially dangerous levels. The state has had heat standards on the books for outdoor workers since 2005, and indoor workplaces are next.

Only two other states, Minnesota and Oregon, have adopted heat rules for indoor workers, according to the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Nationally, legislation has stalled in Congress, and even though the Biden administration has initiated the long process of establishing national heat standards for outdoor and indoor work, the rules are likely to take years to finalize.

If California adopts its proposal in the spring, businesses would be required to cool worksites below 87 degrees Fahrenheit when employees are present and below 82 degrees in places where workers wear protective clothing or are exposed to radiant heat, such as furnaces. If businesses are unable to lower the temperatures, they must provide workers with water, breaks, areas where they can cool down, cooling vests, or other means to keep employees from overheating.

It is only getting hotter every year, said Alice Berliner, director of the Worker Health & Safety Program at the University of California-Merced. Having protections for both indoor and outdoor workers, it empowers someone to feel like they can ask for access to drinking water, and access to a break when they feel like they’re hot.

Neither workers nor businesses are satisfied with the plan. Some businesses fear they wont be able to meet the requirements, even with the flexibility the regulation offers. Workers argue buildings should be kept even cooler.

Heat stress can lead to heat exhaustion, heatstroke, cardiac arrest, and kidney failure. In 2021, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported 1,600 heat-related deaths, which is likely an undercount because health care providers are not required to report them. Its not clear how many of these deaths are related to work, either indoors or outdoors.

In California, 20 workers died from heat between 2010 and 2017, seven of them because of indoor heat, according to the Rand Corp., which analyzed the states proposed indoor heat rules. Email Sign-Up

Subscribe to KFF Health News' free Morning Briefing. Your Email Address Sign Up

After a record-breaking heat wave in the Pacific Northwest in 2021, Oregon in 2022 adopted protections for indoor workers that trigger when temperatures hit 80 degrees. Minnesotas threshold temperatures range from 77 degrees to 86 degrees, depending on the type of work. The sheer size of Californias workforce, estimated at about 18 million, could usher in changes for the rest of country, said Juanita Constible, senior climate and health advocate at the Natural Resources Defense Council.

As California goes, so goes the nation on so many things, she said.

California regulators have crafted the indoor rules to complement the states protections for outdoor workers. Those say that when temperatures exceed 80 degrees, employers must provide shade and observe workers for signs of heat illness. At or above 95 degrees, they must come up with ways to prevent heat illness, such as reducing work hours or providing additional breaks. Colorado, Oregon, and Washington also have rules for outdoor workers.

The California Occupational Safety and Standards Board, which is charged with setting worker protections, is weighing the regulation that would require employers to cool their buildings with air conditioning, fans, misters, and other methods when the temperature or the heat index hits 82 or 87. Some employees would be exempt from the rule, including employees who work remotely and those involved in emergency operations.

The board is expected to vote on the rules in March, and they would take effect by this summer, board Chief Counsel Autumn Gonzalez said.

Workers say buildings should be cooler than the proposed temperatures, especially in warehouses, food-processing plants, and other places where employees routinely move and lift.

These temperature thresholds are too high, said Robert Moreno, a UPS driver in San Diego who told the board in May that he has spent most of his life working in warehouses. At the proposed temperatures, its too hot to sit outside and eat lunch, let alone work inside a building thats been baking in the sun all day, he said.

Most of these warehouses are sheet metal, zero to no airflow.

At the Amazon facility in San Bernardino where Fee worked, company spokesperson Steve Kelly said the building is air-conditioned and outfitted with ceiling fans, and workers are encouraged to take cooldown breaks anytime they need to.

Weve seen the positive impacts of an effective heat-mitigation program and believe all employers should be held to the same standard, said Kelly, who declined to say whether the company supports the California proposal.

The temperature inside the 658,000-square-foot building hasnt risen above 78 degrees, Kelly said.

Regulators have acknowledged that some businesses wont be able to cool their workplaces, such as laundries or restaurant kitchens, where commercial boilers, ovens, and fryers operate, and have offered them the option of giving workers cooldown areas and other relief.

But those solutions arent always feasible, Katie Davey, former legislative director of the California Restaurant Association, told the board in May. For instance, there isnt room for a cooldown area in many small restaurants, she said. And lowering temperatures in a kitchen could put restaurants in violation of food safety laws that require food to be heated to specific temperatures, she added.

We are concerned that the proposed indoor-heat illness regulations may conflict with regulations which affect our ability to heat and hold food to the necessary temperatures to protect the public health from foodborne illness, Davey said.

California regulators have spent years drafting their proposal, and it appears unlikely they will lower the threshold temperatures of 82 degrees and 87 degrees. Doing so would increase the number of businesses that have to comply and the cost, triggering a new review that would delay the regulations release, said Eric Berg, deputy chief of health and research and standards at Californias Division of Occupational Safety and Health, which would enforce the regulation.

I think that the threshold should be lowered, in general, said board member Laura Stock, at the May meeting. But equally, if not, more importantly, is that we don’t hold the process up so that we can get a standard in place as quickly as possible.

The urgency comes, in part, because of federal inaction. Legislation has stalled in Congress to require OSHA to publish an emergency rule to enact temporary standards for all workers while the agency purues a permanent standard. The bill is unlikely to pass the Republican-controlled House, which hasnt favored regulations on business.

Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas), a co-sponsor of that bill, said the situation has become dire in his state. In June, Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott signed a law eliminating existing local ordinances in Austin, Dallas, and other cities that required employers to give outdoor construction workers water breaks.

As the climate worsens, and as summers get hotter, we should be doing more to protect workers, rather than taking their rights away, Casar told KFF Health News. Too often, worker protection rules have been allowed to die a slow death in a prolonged rulemaking process, and we can’t let that happen here.

This article was produced by KFF Health News, which publishes California Healthline, an editorially independent service of the California Health Care Foundation.

Samantha Young: syoung@kff.org, @youngsamantha Related Topics California Public Health States Environmental Health Minnesota Oregon Texas Contact Us Submit a Story Tip

Continue Reading

UK

PM makes rare visit to nuclear-armed submarine to show UK’s strength – but Putin will notice a potential weakness

Published

on

By

PM makes rare visit to nuclear-armed submarine to show UK's strength - but Putin will notice a potential weakness

Sir Keir Starmer has boarded a nuclear-armed submarine as it returned from a lengthy patrol – in a rare showcasing of the UK’s deterrent that will catch Russia’s attention at a time of growing tensions.

While being reminded about British nuclear strength though, Russian President Vladimir Putin will also doubtless take note of a potential weakness.

HMS Vanguard was kept patrolling at sea for more than 200 days – one of the longest-ever deployments that will likely have put a huge strain on the submariners and the vessel – as issues with maintaining the ageing fleet make it harder to rotate the boats more quickly.

***PHOTOS EMBARGOED UNTIL 2200 March 19th 2025  FOR PRINT AND 0001 FOR ALL OTHER PLATFORMS..17/03/2025. Scotland, United Kingdom. Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Defence Secretary John Healey visits a Vanguard class submarine off the coast of Scotland as it returns home from a period of duty at sea. Picture by Simon Dawson / No 10 Downing Street
Image:
Sir Keir Starmer on the HMS Vanguard

Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Defence Secretary John Healey visits a Vanguard class submarine off the coast of Scotland
Image:
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Defence Secretary John Healey visited a Vanguard class submarine off the coast of Scotland

The Royal Navy must keep one nuclear-armed submarine at sea at all times.

The so-called “continuous at-sea deterrence” is the cornerstone of UK defence strategy and the ultimate guarantor of the nation’s security.

It is the first time a prime minister has visited one of the Royal Navy’s four top-secret nuclear-armed submarines as it returned from a deterrent patrol – a moment known as “Day Zero” – in more than a decade.

The last time this happened was with David Cameron in 2013.

More on Keir Starmer

Video released by the Ministry of Defence (MoD) showed Sir Keir, eyes pressed to pair of binoculars, and Defence Secretary John Healey sailing out to greet the ageing submarine – which had surfaced – as it re-entered UK waters off Scotland earlier in the week following what was reported to have been a 204-day patrol.

The MoD declined to confirm the length of time the boat had been at sea. The longest known deployment – of 207 days – was carried out in 2021 by HMS Victorious.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Defence Secretary John Healey are shown the control room as they visits a Vanguard class submarine off the coast of Scotland as it
Image:
Sir Keir Starmer and John Healey are shown the control room

Patrols by one of the UK’s nuclear-armed submarines – which used to last three months – have had to be extended in recent years because of prolonged periods of maintenance and repair work on the other boats.

The fleet is operating well beyond its original in-service life of 25 years because of delays in the building of four replacement boats.

In a show of support for what is known as the “silent service”, the prime minister, dressed in a Royal Navy-style coat, could be seen in the footage stepping onto the topside of HMS Vanguard as it bobbed in the water.

He was joined by Mr Healey as a line of submariners stood to attention, before they both clambered down a hatch into the vessel.

The two men, followed by Admiral Sir Ben Key, the head of the Royal Navy, walked around inside the submarine and received what was described as a “hot” brief on the deployment.

HMS Vanguard

The official release of any information about the UK’s nuclear deterrent is extremely rare.

Filming of any of the boats is also highly unusual and strictly controlled.

Britain’s enemies will likely be scouring the images that were made public for any clues that might reveal any information about the military’s most potent weapon and the ultimate guarantor of UK security. All audio was removed before release for security reasons.

The decision to publish details and images about the visit appears designed to send a signal to Moscow that the UK remains a nuclear-armed power.

It came as the prime minister and defence secretary prepared to visit a sprawling BAE Systems manufacturing site in Barrow, a port town in Cumbria, where the new generation of nuclear-armed submarines is finally being built to replace the Vanguard-class vessels.

Sir Keir Starmer posing for a selfie
Image:
Sir Keir Starmer posing for a selfie in Barrow

Prime Minister Keir Starmer
Image:
The HMS Vanguard was reported to have been on a 204-day patrol

The whole programme to renew the UK’s nuclear deterrent – the submarines, missiles and warheads – is expected to cost more than £30bn, with an additional contingency of £10bn – making it the UK’s most expensive and important procurement programme.

Sir Keir described Barrow as a “blueprint” for how defence spending can bolster security and boost economic growth by generating highly skilled jobs and opportunities.

“This week, I saw first-hand the sacrifice our submariners are making every day to keep our country safe, but I know they are only able to do that because of the support of the town of Barrow,” he said, in remarks released in advance by the government.

“Each and every person living and working in Barrow is contributing to our nation’s defence, whether that is building our world-class submarine programme, or supporting the workforce here through vital public services or proud family businesses.”

In a sign of the importance of the programme, the prime minister will lay the keel to the first Dreadnought-class boat on Thursday afternoon.

In addition, the King has agreed to give the “Royal” title to the Port of Barrow “in recognition of the town’s unique and critical contribution to national security”, the government said.

The Royal Navy has maintained one of four submarines loaded with nuclear-armed missiles permanently at sea since the first patrol was launched in 1969.

But the age of the current fleet and increased requirement for repair work raise the risk of failure. Any break in the continuous at sea deterrence would be a devastating blow, undermining the UK’s ability to deter the most existential of threats.

As well as visiting HMS Vanguard earlier in the week, the prime minister and defence secretary also spoke with family members of the submariners who have been at sea for more than half a year. Four crew members returned to meet newborn babies.

Continue Reading

UK

Teen boys blackmailed by gangs in ‘sextortion’ scams – as victims given new advice on what to do

Published

on

By

Teen boys blackmailed by gangs in 'sextortion' scams - as victims given new advice on what to do

Teenage boys in the UK are being blackmailed by Nigerian crime gangs that pose as young women online – with the National Crime Agency offering advice on what victims should do.

NCA officials said boys as young as 14 have been targeted with “sextortion” scams on social networks including Snapchat and Instagram.

Criminals trick them into sending sexual images – and then threaten to share the pictures with their family, friends and school unless they pay about £100.

While most victims of child sexual exploitation are female, the NCA said 90% of online sextortion victims are boys aged 14 to 17.

In some cases, those affected have taken their own lives out of fear the images will be shared.

Marie Smith, a senior manager at the NCA’s child exploitation and online protection command, called the abuse “extremely disturbing”.

As part of an NCA awareness campaign, she urged victims: “Do not pay – stay calm. We can help. If you pay once, they will just demand more.”

More on Crime

Pic: iStock
Image:
According to the NCA, boys as young as 14 are targeted by scammers online. Pic: iStock

Sextortion ‘unimaginably cruel’

Most of the offences are committed by people from West African countries, including Nigeria and the Ivory Coast.

“Nothing is off the cards and we hope to hold these criminals accountable,” Ms Smith said.

NCA director of threat leadership Alex Murray said: “Sextortion is unimaginably cruel and can have devastating consequences for victims.

“This campaign will help empower young boys, giving them the knowledge to spot the dangers posed by this crime type and how to report it.

“It supports them to understand that if it does happen, it is never their fault. It will also take the advantage away from the criminals responsible, whose only motivation is financial gain.

“Sadly, teenagers in the UK and around the world have taken their own lives because of ‘sextortion’, which has been a major factor behind launching this campaign.”

Read more:
Investigation under way after girl, 8, targeted in sextortion plot

How parents and teenagers can tackle ‘sextortion’

Last year alone, the NCA’s CEOP safety centre received 380 sextortion reports. In the first five months of 2024, UK police forces recorded an average of 117 monthly reports involving under-18s.

And in the US, the National Centre for Missing and Exploited Children received more than 28,000 sextortion reports globally in 2024 – up from 26,718 the previous year.

Continue Reading

Environment

Trump’s US Commerce Secretary, who owns Tesla stocks, publicly recommends to buy TSLA

Published

on

By

Trump's US Commerce Secretary, who owns Tesla stocks, publicly recommends to buy TSLA

Trump’s US Commerce Secretary, Howard Lutnick, who indirectly owns Tesla (TSLA) stocks through his firm, has publicly recommended buying Tesla stocks today.

This is likely the first time that a sitting US Commerce Secretary publicly recommends to buy a specific stock.

The circumstances in which this first is happening are genuinely astonishing.

Lutnick is known for his multi-billion-dollar stake and long-time leadership at the investment bank Cantor Fitzgerald.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

Starting in 2022, Cantor Fitzgerald began to buy Tesla stocks and significantly increased its investment in the automaker in 2024 during a bull run:

After Trump won the election last year with the help of a $250 million political donation from Elon Musk, the Tesla CEO started to recommend Lutnick for the significant role of Secretary of the Treasury. He tweeted:

My view fwiw is that Bessent is a business-as-usual choice, whereas Howard Lutnick will actually enact change. Business-as-usual is driving America bankrupt, so we need change one way or another,”

Trump ended up going for Bessent, but Lutnick still managed to land the role of Secretary of Commerce – with the help of Musk’s push.

After being nominated by Trump, Lutnick said that he would be divesting from his holdings, which are mainly linked to Cantor Fitzgerald, within 90 days.

The 90 days are not up yet, but there is no update on whether he has started divesting yet.

Today, he went on Fox News and recommended viewers buy Tesla stocks:

“I think if you want to learn something on this show tonight, buy Tesla. It’s unbelievable that this guy’s stock is this cheap. It’ll never be this cheap again,”

Here’s the video:

The blatant stock pump comes after Tesla’s stock lost more than 40% of its value so far this year.

Musk uses 238 million Tesla shares worth over $55 billion as collateral for personal loans. If Tesla’s stock goes too low, he could potentially be forced to sell his shares to cover the debt.

Furthermore, on the analyst side, Cantor Fitzgerald just upgraded Tesla’s stock to a buy earlier this week – raising their price target to $425 a share. Tesla’s stock closed at $235.86 today.

Howard Lutnick’s son, Brandon, is now in charge of Cantor Fitzgerald as Chairman.

Here’s a summary of Cantor Fitzgerald’s Tesla holdings:

  • Early 2022: The firm held a very small position (only ~8,400 Tesla shares in Q1 2022)​ but rapidly increased to about 297,000 shares by Q3 2022 (worth ~$79 million at the time)​. This large buy-in during mid-2022 marked a significant ramp-up in their Tesla exposure.
  • Late 2022: By the end of 2022, Cantor dramatically cut back its stake – holding roughly 72,000 shares in Q4 2022​. This reduction from nearly 300k shares the prior quarter coincided with a steep drop in Tesla’s stock price in late 2022 (shares fell by roughly 50% during Q4 2022).
  • 2023: Throughout 2023, Cantor Fitzgerald kept a modest Tesla position, fluctuating in the tens of thousands of shares. For example, they reported ~44,000 shares in Q1 2023, increased to 91,000 by Q2 2023, then adjusted to 56,000 in Q3 2023 and 83,000 by Q4 2023​.
  • These moves suggest active trading around Tesla’s short-term moves, with no huge long-only stake during 2023. Notably, it appears Cantor completely exited Tesla in early 2024 – Tesla was not listed in their Q1–Q2 2024 13F filings, implying they sold off the remaining shares during that period (when Tesla’s price rallied to local highs).
  • Re-entry in 2024: In the second half of 2024, Cantor Fitzgerald made a bold re-entry into Tesla. Their holdings surged to about 1.2 million shares in Q3 2024 (valued ~$307 million as of September 30, 2024). This coincided with a mid-2024 pullback in Tesla’s stock price, suggesting Cantor bought the dip. By the end of 2024, they trimmed the position down to ~740,000 shares (from 1.2M), likely taking profits after Tesla’s price rallied late in the year​.

Electrek’s Take

I mean, wow. This is something else.

The fact alone that a US secretary would recommend buying a specific stock is despicable, but it’s even more insane when it is the stock behind the fortune of Elon Musk, who has a relationship with Lutnick.

Lutnick’s Cantor invests in Tesla -> Musk invests in Trump -> Trump appoints Lutnick at Musk’s recommendation -> Tesla’s stock crash –> Trump recommends buying Tesla cars –> Lutnicks recommends buying Tesla stocks.

I’m no lawyer so I’m not going to claim whether this is legal or not, but it’s certainly not ethical.

Tesla must be really struggling if that’s what they are doing now: using US officials to promote Tesla’s stocks.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Trending