Swift‘s music needs no introduction of course, while Barbie makes the cut thanks to the contributions to the film’s soundtrack by Billie Eilish and Dua Lipa (Ryan Gosling’s I’m Just Ken sadly didn’t make it a hat-trick, despite the Oscar nod).
After cementing herself firmly as the biggest pop star on the planet with the start of her Eras tour last year, this year’s Grammys ceremony could be a record-breaker for Swift.
If the star takes home the award for best album for Midnights she will become the first artist to win the prize for a fourth time, having previously won for Fearless (2010), 1989 (2016) and Folklore (2021).
However, despite being the most-nominated songwriter ever, shortlisted for song of the year seven times over the years, Swifthas never won in that category before.
Surprising, you might think, for a woman hailed as arguably the most influential songwriter of her generation. But then again, despite a record 32 Grammy wins – the most decorated artist ever – Beyonce has never won album of the year.
Could Anti-Hero win Swift the prize for the first time?
Advertisement
The lead single from Midnights was released in October 2022 and spent six weeks at the top of the charts in the UK, remaining in the top 100 songs for a year. In the US, it topped the Billboard chart on eight weeks, leading a top 10 entirely made up of Swift songs – making her the first artist to achieve the feat – when it initially charted.
At the Grammys, Anti-Hero faces competition in the category from the likes of Eilish’s What Was I Made For? and British star Lipa’s Dance The Night, their songs from the Barbiesoundtrack, as well as Flowers by Miley Cyrus. Vampire, by Olivia Rodrigo, Kill Bill by SZA, Butterfly by Jon Batiste, and A&W by Lana Del Rey.
Swift is up for six awards in total, also including best pop vocal album, best pop solo performance, best duo or group performance for Karma featuring Ice Spice, and record of the year for Anti-Hero once again.
(If you’re wondering what the difference is: record of the year deals with a specific recording of a song and recognises the artists, producers and engineers who contribute, while song of the year celebrates the composition and recognises the songwriters.)
But Swift is not the top nominee
The honour of most-nominated artists goes to alternative pop and RnB singer SZA, who is up for nine awards.
As well as the big prizes already mentioned, these include (deep breath): best melodic rap performance; best traditional RnB performance; best progressive RnB album; best RnB performance; best RnB song; and best pop duo/ group performance.
The star, whose real name is Solana Rowe, garnered critical acclaim for her second album SOS, released at the end of 2022, and will likely win in a few of the genre categories at least.
However, with competition from the likes of pop force phenomenon Swift and Grammys favourite Eilish in the main groups, a clean sweep of nine could be unlikely.
Following closely behind SZA is Victoria Monet, with seven nods, and Eilish, Rodrigo and Cyrus all have six alongside Swift.
Who’s performing?
Alongside SZA, Burna Boy, Billie Eilish, Billy Joel, Dua Lipa, Olivia Rodrigo and Travis Scott are set to take to the stage.
Plus, Joni Mitchell will make her Grammys performing debut and U2 will deliver the first-ever broadcast performance from the multibillion-dollar Sphere venue in Las Vegas, where they began a residency in September.
Who won’t be performing? Swift, apparently. While she will attend, the fact the next leg of her Eras tour kicks off in Japan on Wednesday means she’s saving her energy, according to reports.
And don’t expect to see NFL star boyfriend Travis Kelce there either – he’s busy preparing for something called the Super Bowl, apparently, but will no doubt be tuning in to “watch her win every single award that she’s nominated for”, as he said in a recent podcast interview.
The ceremony will be hosted by Trevor Noah, and stars presenting awards include Christina Aguilera, Samara Joy, Lenny Kravitz, Maluma, Lionel Richie, Mark Ronson, Meryl Streep, Taylor Tomlinson and Oprah Winfrey.
The striking thing about the big categories…
You might have realised that with the exception of Batiste, all the artists nominated for song of the year are women. The category recognises songwriters so all collaborators, male and female, are also in the running – Eilish’s brother Finneas O’Connell, for example, and Mark Ronson as a co-writer of Dance The Night, while Jack Antonoff is nominated twice.as a co-writer for both Anti-Hero and A&W.
But the artists fronting the songs are predominantly female. The same is true in the record of the year group, which sees female indie trio boygenius and Victoria Monet up against Swift, Cyrus, Rodrigo, Eilish and SZA. And Batiste once again representing the men.
For album of the year, the nominees are: Guts by Rodrigo; the record by boygenius; Midnights by Swift; SOS by SZA, The Age Of Pleasure by Janelle Monae; Did You Know That There’s A Tunnel Under Ocean Blvd, by Lana Del Rey and Endless Summer Vacation by Cyrus. And – you’ve guessed it – World Music Radio by Batiste.
So unless there’s a major upset, the ceremony looks set to be a celebration of a year in which female artists have dominated the charts and our playlists – reflected to a lesser extent in the Brits nominations here in the UK, where more than half the nominees are women.
Best new artist
This award is one of the big ones, previously won by Eilish, Rodrigo, Sam Smith, Adele, John Legend, Amy Winehouse and plenty of other performers who went on to become huge stars.
In the running this year are:
• Jelly Roll • The War And Treaty • Victoria Monet • Noah Kahan • Coco Jones • Ice Spice • Fred Again • Gracie Abrams
Noah Kahan’s Stick Season has been a huge hit, and rapper Ice Spice is also a favourite.
Grammys fact: should The War And Treaty win, they would become the first husband and wife duo to take home the prize.
And another one: if US rapper Jelly Roll, who is 39, takes the prize, he’ll be the oldest solo artist to do so – taking the title from Sheryl Crow, who was 33 when she won in 1995.
What other records could be broken?
Well, one that definitely won’t is Beyonce’s. With 12 wins under her belt heading into the ceremony, even if Swift wins all six she’s up for her tally will stand at 18 – still a fair way to go to match Queen Bey’s 32. And SZA has won one before, so a clean sweep for her would take her to 10.
If Eilish wins record of the year for What Was I Made For? she will become the only female artist to have won the prize three times – having won previously for Bad Guy and Everything I Wanted – and only the third artist in total, matching Paul Simon and Bruno Mars.
Then there’s eight-time winner Antonoff, who this year is up for five prizes in total – including record of the year as a producer on Anti-Hero (as almost all paths lead back to Swift, it seems). Should he win that one, he becomes part of the elite Grammys club for those who have won all of what are considered the four major awards – record, song, album and best new artist. Current members are Adele, Eilish and Christopher Cross, so it’s pretty exclusive.
The Grammys ceremony takes place at the Crypto.com Arena in Los Angeles on Sunday, with the red carpet starting at about 11pm UK time and the ceremony at 1am on Monday
A well-known Iraqi social media influencer has reportedly been shot dead in her car by a gunman on a motorbike.
Om Fahad, whose real name is Ghufran Sawadi, was killed outside her home in Baghdad’s Zayouna district on Friday, according to the AFP news agency, citing security officials.
It appears the unidentified attacker pretended to be delivering food to the victim, one security source said.
Om Fahad, who has nearly half a million TikTok followers, became famous for posting light-hearted videos where she dances to Iraqi music.
TikTok
This content is provided by TikTok, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable TikTok cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to TikTok cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow TikTok cookies for this session only.
Six days ago, she shared footage of herself driving in a car and also posing in front of a mirror. They have each been watched hundreds of thousands of times.
The influencer was sentenced to six months in prison in February last year for sharing videos that a court ruled contained “indecent speech that undermines modesty and public morality”.
TikTok
This content is provided by TikTok, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable TikTok cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to TikTok cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow TikTok cookies for this session only.
A campaign was launched in 2023 by the Iraqi government to clamp down on social media content which broke the country’s “morals and traditions”.
The interior ministry set up a committee to look for “offensive” clips on platforms such as TikTok and YouTube, with several influencers being arrested.
“This type of content is no less dangerous than organised crime,” the ministry declared in a promotional video which asked the public to help by reporting such content.
Advertisement
“It is one of the causes of the destruction of the Iraqi family and society.”
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News
In 2018, gunmen in Baghdad shot dead Tara Fares, who was a model and influencer.
After years of war and sectarian conflict following the 2003 US invasion that overthrew dictator Saddam Hussein, Iraq has returned to some semblance of normality despite sporadic violence, political instability and corruption.
But civil liberties, particularly among women and sexual minorities, are still constrained in a conservative and male-dominated society.
A wave of demonstrations have swept the Canary Islands as locals protested against a tourism model they say has plundered the environment, priced them out of housing and forced them into precarious work.
The seven main Canary Islands are home to 2.2 million people – and welcomed almost 14 million international visitors in 2023, up 13% from the previous year.
The protests were not aimed at individual tourists, activists say, but at the governments that have created a system that skews so much in favour of investors at the expense of local communities.
The tourism industry accounts for 35% of gross domestic product (GDP) in the Canary Islands and local residents who spoke to Sky News agree the islands can’t survive without tourism.
But they are also questioning whether local communities and the environment can survive if things stay the way they are.
What’s the problem? Tourism is a ‘cash cow’ – but not for locals
If you’re looking for what’s behind the wave of protests, you need to look back decades, Sharon Backhouse tells Sky News.
Along with her Canarian husband, she owns GeoTenerife, which runs science field trips and training camps in the Canary Islands and conducts research into sustainable tourism.
The tourism model in the Canary Islands hasn’t been updated since before the tourism boom of the 1980s, when the islands were “trying desperately” to attract investment, she explains.
Advertisement
The answer back then was a model that was “incredibly generous” to investors, who only pay 4% tax and can send the profits earned in the Canaries back to the firm’s home country, Ms Backhouse explains.
But the model hasn’t changed.
That’s created a situation where “more and more of these giant, all inclusive resort hotels” are being built, and the proceeds of this “incredible cash cow” aren’t shared equitably with the local population, she says.
“It is absurd to have a system where so much money is in the hands of a very few extremely powerful groups, and is then funnelled away from the Canary Islands,” she says.
“We’re seeing really low salaries, zero-hour contracts and awful working conditions in some of these hotels.”
Ms Backhouse was at the 20 April protest in Tenerife and says she has “never seen anything like it” in terms of Canarians being united for a single cause.
‘My misery, your paradise’
Earlier this year there was a spate of graffiti in Tenerife.
Andy Ward, director of Tenerife Estate Agents, tells Sky News the media coverage of a smattering of “tourists go home” graffiti has been “100x greater than the on-the-ground reality”, where there is little visible animosity.
But there was one spray-painted message that sums up the gulf between Canary Islands residents and the tourists who flock there: “My misery, your paradise”.
More than a third of the population of the Canary Islands – nearly 800,000 people – are at risk of poverty or social exclusion, according to a recent report from the environmental group Ecologists in Action.
The average wage for restaurant staff and cleaners is between €1,050 and €1,300 a month, Mr Ward says, while the cost of renting an apartment can be almost as much.
‘Shanty towns’ in the shadow of luxury
One of the main issues is the dearth of affordable or social housing, Mr Ward says.
“The governments here have completely neglected this need, instead selling land for more hotels and selling land for luxury villas and high-end apartments, which locals are unable to afford.”
What has caused anger is property managers renting out properties to tourists that are “completely inappropriate and inadequate”, such as small apartments in residential buildings.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:45
Protest against tourism in Canaries on 20 April
The regulations on short-term lets “are a complete mess and a mish-mash”, he says. Landlords aren’t incentivised to let their properties long-term because they must sign up to long leases, and if tenants default on the rent it can take 18 months to evict them.
His views are echoed by Kris Jones, a British citizen who was born in Tenerife, taking over the bar his parents owned in Playa de la Americas, the Drunk’n Duck.
Many hotel employees are forced to live in the multiple motorhome sites that have popped up around the south of the island because they can’t afford anything else, he says.
“Shanty towns” is what Ms Backhouse calls them, built in the shadow of “uber luxury hotels”.
Mr Jones questions why planning permission has been granted to hotels without ensuring their employees will be able to live nearby.
He says the idea the island’s population hates foreign visitors is “utter garbage”.
He stresses that the protests were against the government – not tourists.
“It’s nothing to do with the behaviour of British tourists, and isn’t even part of the agenda at all,” he tells Sky News.
Hunger strike to stop hotels
Protesters say they are having to take increasingly drastic actions to have their voices heard.
Subsequently six members of Canarias Se Agota – which translates to the Canary Islands Are Exhausted – have been on hunger strike since 11 April.
As well as demanding a halt to new tourism developments and a limit to the number of visitors, the campaigners want to stop the development of two luxury resorts in Tenerife.
Both developments faced legal hurdles on environmental grounds that had paused construction, but stop work orders were lifted earlier this year.
Campaigners maintain the developments breach environmental laws – claims the developers deny – and have committed to continuing the hunger strike until the government intervenes, despite some strikers needing hospital treatment.
The hunger strikers, who have not been named, were among fellow protesters on the streets of Tenerife on 20 April.
A spokesperson for the campaign said: “If anything happens to any of our comrades… you (Fernando Clavijo – president of the Canary Islands) will have to face the fury of the people.”
The strikers met with the Canary Islands president on 23 April, but their demands were rejected.
Representatives of the strikers said on 26 April the “medical condition of the six is deteriorating, but they are determined to continue” until their demands are met.
Protesters are also demanding “access to respectable housing”, an “eco-tax” and “immediate measures to put an end to the raw sewage discharges into the sea”.
Salvar La Tejita, an environmental organisation which helped organise the mass protest, says: “It is vital to clarify that these protests are not against the tourists or tourism in general, but are against the political class, administrations, hotel chains, and constructors who are jointly responsible for the unsustainable circumstances which Tenerife is now in.
“This platform is not in any way responsible for the graffiti messages ‘Tourists Go Home’ which have been sprayed in and around many tourist resorts.
The environmental cost of tourism
The Canary Islands are a “biodiversity jewel in the Atlantic”, Ms Backhouse says – but they haven’t been fully protected or valued.
Politicians in the past have said the development of the controversial resorts can’t be stopped “just because of a weed”, she says.
“These aren’t just weeds. What they’re actually doing is interfering with an ecosystem which will have difficulty surviving if you plonk a resort right in the middle of it.”
The building of these resorts has an environmental costs as “beautiful landscapes are cemented over”, Ms Backhouse says – and the cost only mounts once they open.
“The problem with these resorts is that we just don’t have enough resources in terms of water, what happens to all the rubbish, how is it all recycled.
“Locals are feeling disenfranchised from their spaces because it all becomes tourist territory.
“Towns and villages that locals grew up in or would go on holiday in suddenly are completely unrecognisable.”
What solutions are on the table?
One of the proposals is a tourist tax which would be invested in protecting the environment.
Ms Backhouse says the hotel industry is against it and the government is nervous about it – but GeoTenerife’s research indicates it wouldn’t put tourists off.
“I think the reality is very few people will cancel their holiday because they have to pay a little bit of money that goes towards protecting the landscapes they’re coming to see.”
Hoteliers have proposed instead putting up IGIC, which is similar to VAT, but Ms Backhouse says that isn’t welcomed by campaigners “because again, that just puts the onus on the locals to prop up the system”.
A tourist tax is one part of the answer to protect the environment, but it doesn’t answer the question of job insecurity and unaffordable housing.
Ms Backhouse says it is encouraging to see solutions proposed, but “it’s going to take something far more wide-ranging to put this train on a more sustainable track”.
Impending crackdown on holiday homes
A draft law is expected to be passed this year which would ban newly built properties from becoming short-term rentals and toughen up the rules for existing properties.
It comes as official figures show the number of rental beds on the island reached 220,409 in March this year – an increase of more than 40,000 from the same point in 2023.
Canaries regional tourism chief Jessica de Leon told the Reuters news agency that enforcement support for the islands’ 35 inspectors is key to the success of the new rules.
“We are going to empower [the police] so that they can act when fraudulent behaviour is detected in homes,” she said, adding that the plan could involve 1,300 people, which would include all of the islands’ police forces.
“The first step is to contain the growth, the second is to clean up [existing listings],” said Canaries director of tourism Miguel Rodríguez.
An example of the crackdowns to come occurred on 16 April, when police raided a property in Tenerife after its owner was reported for listing the building’s rooftop as a campsite on Airbnb, offering renters tents for €12 (£10) a night.
The plans have not proved popular with landlords, who would be forced to comply with the new rules within five years.
“Everything that the government is trying to impose is problematic,” says a spokesperson for Ascav, the Canary Islands Vacation Rental Association, adding it is “the most restrictive” legislation of its kind in Europe.
They believe around 95% of the existing holiday homes that abide by current laws will not be able to meet the new criteria, which includes getting consent from local authorities to open, meeting higher energy classification thresholds, having a minimum surface area and more in a long list of “impossible compliance”.
“The consequences will be immediate,” they warn. “If holiday homes are banned on the islands, visitors who demand this type of accommodation will choose other destinations, Canary Islanders will be even poorer, bars, restaurants, rent a cars, supermarkets, leisure activities, etc. will lose economic activity. Undoubtedly, we all lose.”
Ascav acknowledges “something is going wrong” for the island’s economy, but argues it’s not down to those providing holiday homes, nor the tourists Canarians “love”.
“The message is for our governments, for their passivity, incompetence and lack of planning,” they say.
“They are the ones that have allowed that the resources of tourism has not to been shared with the local population. Locals has been excluded because governments preferred permitting to exploit the territory and tourism to the maximum, without any return for the islands and their inhabitants.
“The solution is to listen to ourselves, to listen to our visitors, to listen and protect to the Canary islanders, to integrate, to plan, to be sustainable, to grow with, not at the expense of, to be responsible for the territory and the well-being of its people, to diversify, to ensure the quality of the destination.
“Our problems have to be resolved by politicians, but they lack will and predisposition, that’s why we are fed up.”
What have politicians said?
The islands’ president said the day before the 20 April protests that he felt “proud” the region is a leading Spanish tourism spot, but acknowledged more controls are needed.
“We can’t keep looking away. Otherwise, hotels will continue to open without any control,” Fernando Clavijo told a news conference.
Two days after the protest, Mr Clavijo posted on X saying: “What happened last Saturday in the streets of Canarias leaves a message that we share. Canarias has to review its model, where we want to go.
“It had to be done during the pandemic, but it is a challenge that we assumed and on which we are already working with the councils, with the city councils and that we must face as a whole in society.”
He has called a meeting of island presidents and Canary Island administrators on 30 April in the hope of finding a solution.