Connect with us

Published

on

Tesla is already pulling back Supercharger plans after Elon Musk came in like a wrecking ball and fired the whole charing team.

As reported earlier today and since confirmed by many departing Tesla employees, Elon Musk has fired Tesla’s entire charging team.

In an email announcing the move, the CEO said that Tesla would continue building Supercharger stations that are currently under construction without further commenting on how the lack of charging team will impact Tesla’s plan to grow the critical EV charging network.

We now learn that there are already direct impacts on planned future Supercharger stations.

Sources familiar with the matter told Electrek that Tesla backed out of four leases for upcoming Supercharger locations in New York: one in Maspeth, South Bronx, two in Queens, and one in Gateway Center, Brooklyn.

These were new stations recently announced to address concerns with overcrowded Supercharger stations in New York.

We reported on this issue in January when several stations saw long wait times to access a charger.

The problem was partly due to a surge in Tesla vehicles used by Uber drivers due to a new incentive for the city to electrify its ride-sharing fleet.

In order to address the situation, Tesla promised to deploy 100 additional chargers around New York City by the end of the year and even worked directly with Uber to gather data to locate the new stations at optimal locations.

These four new locations represented the bulk of these planned new stations in the city, and they are gone.

Three of the four sites were “power-ready” – as some work was already being done to prepare them to become charging stations for Tesla.

There’s a silver lining. When contacted, Revel, which operates its own fleet of electric taxis and charging stations in New York, expressed interest in these sites because of their location and capacity for high-volume fast charging stations.

Tesla deployed a record number of Superchargers last quarter and now operates 57,579 Superchargers at 6,249 locations around the world.

Electrek’s Take

I’m really perplexed by Tesla firing its charging team. If one thing was a clear success at Tesla, it’s the Supercharger network.

Tesla had just won the charging standard battle – making NACS the new standard in North America and all other automakers adopting and jumping onboard with the Supercharger network.

Now more than ever, Tesla needs to grow the network to support the onboarding of non-Tesla EVs and its own growing fleet. And yet, Tesla fired the team instead and slowed down Supercharger installations – if not stopped entirely.

This is a bearish move if I have ever seen one.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

Volvo CE brings mobile charging to the construction job site

Published

on

By

Volvo CE brings mobile charging to the construction job site

Volvo CE and Penta revealed two new mobile charging solutions for North American construction fleets at the Advanced Clean Transportation Expo in Las Vegas.

Volvo CE unveiled two Volvo-branded mobile charging units at a press conference held last night, calling them the next logical step towards full job site electrification.

“We all have a common goal to revolutionize the landscape of sustainable technology within the heavy equipment sector,” said Dr. Ray Gallant, Vice President — Sustainability and Productivity Services at Volvo CE. “Collaborating on these products allows us to make significant steps forward in the adoptability of electric machines.”

The first mobile charger, PU750, is a mobile DC fast charging solution developed to be an ideal solution for fast-charging larger equipment onsite without the need for a converter. The portable power unit (hence, “PU”) packs 750 usable kWh into a towable chassis that can fully charge the batteries in a machine like the Volvo EC230 Electric excavator from 0-100% three times before needing to be recharged itself.

Volvo PU quick specs

Volvo CE mobile charger quick specs; via Volvo CE.

When the PU750 does need charging, it can be managed using the grid interactive UIG power system. That enables the battery-hauling rig to maximize available AC power while tracking multiple assets simultaneously, all managed and visualized within the GridSure platform to make vehicle and charging power management clear to the fleet manager.

“We teamed up with UIG last year because of their expertise in integrating multiple assets to maximize on- and off-grid charging possibilities,” said Darren Tasker, Vice President Industrial, Volvo Penta North America. “Weaving our Volvo CE teammates into the partnership was always the plan, and it’s exciting to see what has come of this relationship so quickly.”

Volvo PU130 mobile AC charger

Volvo mobile AC charging solution; via Volvo CE.

On the AC side of the equation, the new Volvo PU130 is a portable Level 2 charger, designed for more compact machines (like the ECR25 Electric we first covered last April).

Volvo co-developed the PU130 with Portable Electric, and used its proprietary 48-volt technology, the PU130 provides the ability to charge equipment in less than an hour with 130 kWh of energy storage capacity and a 20 kW charge rate, while simultaneously providing up to 40 kW of onsite power to run portable offices or other buildings.

Volvo says the mobile chargers are further proof of the OEM’s commitment to providing the best solutions possible to make carbon reduction in the construction industry a reality. “Battery electric equipment is not feasible for every job site or application, but its use cases continue to grow,” said Dr. Gallant. “As long as owners and operators are making an effort to reduce emissions in whatever way they can, that is forward progress.”

Electrek’s Take

Volvo’s press events at ACT Expo always bring something exciting and, more importantly, useful to the table – and these mobile chargers are no exception.

As fleets are forced to electrify through a combination of legislation, environmental requirements, noise regulations, customer ESG goals, and volatile fuel costs, the need to get usable power to where work is being done becomes a critical variable for fleets to solve for. Solutions like this will help some fleets electrify sooner than later, and that’s why we’re all here.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

Uniswap fights back against SEC as the Ethereum crackdown continues

Published

on

By

Uniswap fights back against SEC as the Ethereum crackdown continues

Here's why DeFi platforms using Ethereum are facing SEC scrutiny

For years, the Securities and Exchange Commission has been cracking down on the crypto sector writ large, but in the last few months, the agency appears to have trained its sights on Ethereum, in particular. Some of the biggest names in decentralized finance are now fighting back.

In a 40-page filing on Tuesday, Uniswap Labs — which builds decentralized finance infrastructure including a popular DeFi crypto exchange that enables users to custody their own coins — details to the SEC all the reasons why the agency shouldn’t pursue legal action against them. It comes a few weeks after the commission issued Uniswap a Wells notice, warning the company that it identified potential violations of U.S. securities law.

“The SEC’s entire case rests on the false assumption that all tokens are securities. Tokens are in fact, simply a file format for value,” said Uniswap’s chief legal officer Marvin Ammori.

“The SEC has to essentially unilaterally change the definitions of exchange, broker, and investment contract in order to try to capture what we do,“ continued Ammori.

A Wells notice is typically one of the final steps before the SEC formally issues charges. It generally lays out the framework of the regulatory argument and offers the potentially accused an opportunity to rebut the SEC’s claims.

So far this year, the federal regulator has sent Wells notices, filed lawsuits, or reached settlements with a host of crypto firms, and the agency’s legal challenges are increasingly focused on ethereum and players working in decentralized finance, including ShapeShift, TradeStation, Uniswap and Consensys. It also comes as the agency is reportedly investigating the Ethereum Foundation.

CNBC reached out to the SEC about the recent batch of Wells notices sent out to crypto firms, and an agency spokesperson declined to comment.

In April, Consensys tried to preempt the SEC’s action with its own lawsuit, alleging regulatory overreach on the part of the regulator. The 10-year-old crypto firm said its suit followed three subpoenas issued last year, plus a Wells notice from the SEC that claimed the company was violating federal securities laws.

“This action is about the almost certainty that we hold that the SEC is trying to slow or kill ethereum, decentralization, disintermediation, and disintermediated technology in the U.S. and probably wouldn’t stop there with its long arm,” said long-time ethereum veteran Joseph Lubin, who went from co-founding the blockchain to launching and running Consensys.

“It might influence other nation states to do similarly draconian things,” continued Lubin.

Read more about tech and crypto from CNBC Pro

Security vs. commodity

The recent spate of actions targeting major names working in the Ethereum ecosystem come ahead of a long-awaited decision on whether the regulator will approve or deny applications to launch spot ether exchange-traded funds.

To date, the agency’s stance on ether’s classification as either a commodity or a security remains uncertain.

“We think big banks like the way things are organized. We think certain factions of the U.S. government like the way they operate,” said Lubin. “Without explicitly stating their intentions, without public discussion and clear rule-making, the SEC seems to have decided to reclassify ether as a security without being able to utter that that’s what they’re doing.”

The industry argues if ether — the native token of the Ethereum blockchain — gets classified as a security, it could throw the future of the Ethereum network and many adjacent crypto firms into question. Exchanges, both centralized and decentralized, would be forced to choose between registering with the SEC, or delisting ether altogether.

“If the SEC, in fact, does take the position that Ethereum is a security, pretty much everyone in this business that is using or providing services of the Ethereum blockchain, they’re going to be on notice that they might need to be registered,” said digital assets attorney Christopher Gerold, who previously served as the chief of the New Jersey Bureau of Securities.

“Whatever protections they thought they had before are no longer going to be there, and we’re going to see a shift in the industry,” continued Gerold.

Ethereum co-founder Joseph Lubin on bitcoin ETF decision, prospect of a spot ether ETF

The head of litigation and investigations at Consensys told CNBC that they’ve been alarmed that the SEC has been targeting developers.

“They asked for a list of the names of any Consensys developers who contributed any coding to the merge,” said Laura Brookover.

The so-called merge was a years-in-the-making systemwide upgrade to the Ethereum blockchain that took effect in September 2022 and changed the way transactions are verified. The proof-of-stake model, which replaced the proof-of-work model, requires volunteers on the network to put up their ether tokens, or “stake” them, in order to secure the network.

Brookover says the agency has explicitly asked for the identities of public and private Consensys software developer code repositories.

“Those are very strange requests from a financial regulator,” continued Brookover. “I can speak to that, because I used to be in the CFTC’s enforcement division and investigated cases myself.”

Multiple coders and industry executives have told CNBC that it is possible the SEC could be taking more of an interest in Ethereum, because the regulator thinks its native token functions more like a security after the merge.

Brookover told CNBC that their suit asks the court to declare both that ether is not a security and that the SEC lacks jurisdiction to investigate Ethereum. Ultimately, the regulator will have to respond to the Consensys complaint in a legal filing.

“They’re going to be hard pressed not to stay in their answer whether they think Ethereum is a security or not,” said Gerold, adding that he suspects that the agency will take the position that it is a security because of the proof-of-stake change that took effect two years ago.

One thing the SEC has been clear on is its classification of bitcoin as a commodity. With ether, the narrative has changed.

In 2018, when Bill Hinman was still the Director of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Corporation Finance, he told CNBC that, “When we look at bitcoin or if we look at ether and the highly decentralized nature of the networks, we don’t see a third-party promoter where applying the disclosure regime would make a lot of sense.”

“So we’re comfortable…viewing these as items that don’t have to be regulated as securities,” continued Hinman.

In April 2023, when Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.) asked SEC Chair Gary Gensler whether ether was a commodity or a security, Gensler demurred.

Ether up 50% this year as trader optimism soars over possible spot ether ETF approval

SEC vs. crypto

Gensler has, in multiple interviews, repeatedly shared that he believes much of the industry already belongs under its jurisdiction, and its lawsuits are simply bringing the industry under compliance. Crypto firms argue that the recent legal battles haven’t given the regulatory clarity the industry has been seeking for years.

With the Uniswap Wells notice, for example, a source at the company told CNBC that dealing with the SEC was akin to “talking to a wall.”

For two years preceding the Wells notice, Uniswap described the protracted interactions with the agency as an opaque process that involved responding to multiple requests, including giving testimony and sending several documents to the agency, without getting much feedback about the regulator’s concerns around potential wrongdoing. This source also told CNBC they had not heard from the regulator at all in 2024 until the agency told them in a half-hour phone call that they would be receiving a formal notice.

SEC Chair Gary Gensler dodges Trump Media campaign finance questions

Both Consensys and Uniswap suggest the SEC’s broad approach to classifying securities may be outdated.

“The SEC is arguing that the Uniswap protocol is an unregistered securities exchange, and that the Uniswap interface and wallet are both unregistered broker brokers,” Ammori said.

But Uniswap argues that the protocol itself is a general purpose computer program that anyone can use and integrate.

“So the protocol is not an exchange also, because under the law, it would have to be specifically designed for securities trading, and it is not,” continued Ammori.

Uniswap argues in its response to the SEC that the majority of its trading volume is obvious non-securities, like ether, bitcoin, and stablecoins.

“It’s not run by a group, as the definition requires, but as autonomous software no person or group controls,” added Ammori.

“The SEC knows that the current definition of exchange does not cover the protocol, or anything we do. That’s why as we speak, there’s a pending rulemaking, for the SEC is trying to redefine about a half dozen words in their own regulations to try to capture us,” contined Uniswap’s chief legal officer.

Alma Angotti, partner and global legislative and regulatory risk leader at the consulting firm Guidehouse, cautions that it is less clear whether decentralized exchanges function like an alternative trading system, or a market maker — or whether they really are just a technology that does not act as a broker dealer.

Meanwhile, as the SEC ramps up its focus on decentralized players in the crypto ecosystem, centralized players also remain under scrutiny by the regulator.

In May, investment platform Robinhood announced it received a Wells notice for the company’s crypto operations. The SEC has also sued Coinbase and Binance. With multiple pending legal challenges from the regulator and enduring uncertainty about the future of crypto regulation in the U.S., multiple crypto businesses have said they are considering decamping from the country altogether.

“We’ve got companies that are wasting resources trying to figure out, ‘Am I a broker dealer? Are these assets securities?'” said Binance’s former chief compliance officer, Christina Rea.

“We’re already having a hard enough time trying to get them to be compliant with other important laws — anti-money laundering laws, anti-bribery and corruption laws.”

On Thursday, the commission will issue a decision on whether to approve one of the spot ether ETF applications after a multi-month delay. Many are waiting to see whether the regulator will offer clarity on its stance on ether.

CNBC’s Jordan Smith contributed to this report.

Grayscale CEO Michael Sonnenshein steps down, replaced by Goldman exec: CNBC Crypto World

Continue Reading

Environment

Biden to release 1 million barrels of gasoline to reduce prices at the pump ahead of July 4

Published

on

By

Biden to release 1 million barrels of gasoline to reduce prices at the pump ahead of July 4

A customer gets gas at a Shell station on May 15, 2024 in Miami, Florida. 

Joe Raedle  | Getty Images

The Biden administration will release 1 million barrels of gasoline from reserves held in the Northeast to reduce prices at the pump ahead of the Fourth of July holiday and summer driving season.

“By strategically releasing this reserve in between Memorial Day and July 4th, we are ensuring sufficient supply flows to the tri-state and northeast at a time hardworking Americans need it the most,” Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm said in a statement Tuesday.

Gasoline futures have rallied 19% this year as oil prices have risen due to OPEC cutting production and fears the Israel-Hamas war could spark a broader Middle East conflict that disrupts supplies. Rising energy prices sparked speculation in April that the Biden administration might tap the strategic petroleum reserve ahead of the November presidential election.

White House National Economic Advisor Lael Brainard said last month that the administration would “make sure gas prices remain affordable.”

But gas prices have eased in recent weeks as oil has pulled back from April highs when traders bid up crude futures on fears that Israel and OPEC member Iran were on the brink of war.

Prices at the pump averaged $3.59 per gallon nationwide on Tuesday, about 4 cents higher than the year-ago average but lower than last month, according to the motorist association AAA. Though gasoline prices have come down over the past month, broader inflation has remained stubborn, irking consumers.

Retailers and terminals will receive the gasoline no later than June 30, according to the Department of Energy. The supply will be released in quantities of 100,000 barrels to ensure a competitive bidding process that maximizes the impact on prices at the pump, according to the DOE.

The barrels will be sold from storage sites in New Jersey and Maine that are part of the Northeast Gasoline Supply Reserve, which was established after Superstorm Sandy knocked out refineries in New York in 2012. Bids for the barrels are due at 11:00 a.m. Central Time, with the proceeds from deposited at the Treasury Department.

The gasoline sale comes as the separate Strategic Petroleum Reserve has fallen to the lowest level in decades. The Biden administration released 180 million barrels from the SPR in 2022 as energy prices spiked in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Continue Reading

Trending