Connect with us

Published

on

The government was “well aware” of the deadly risks posed by combustible cladding and insulation a year before the Grenfell Tower fire, but “failed to act on what it knew”, a landmark report has found.

The report also said “systemic dishonesty” from cladding and insulation companies and a “toxic” relationship between the tower’s residents and the Tenant Management Organisation (TMO), which was responsible for running services, were contributing factors.

More than seven years on from the fire that claimed 72 lives, Grenfell Inquiry chair Sir Martin Moore-Bick has published his final findings into how the building in west London came to be in such a deadly state.

Pic: PA
Image:
Pic: PA

Sir Martin also concluded:

• Government officials were “complacent, defensive and dismissive” on fire safety, while cutting red tape was prioritised

• There was an “inappropriate relationship” between approved inspectors and those they were inspecting

• Grenfell residents who raised safety concerns were dismissed as “militant troublemakers”

A huge fire engulfs the 24 story Grenfell Tower in Latimer Road, West London
Image:
Flames engulfed the 24-storey tower block in Latimer Road, west London, on 14 June 2017

The report details what it calls a “path to disaster” and “decades of failure”.

It asked: “How was it possible in 21st century London for a reinforced concrete building, itself structurally impervious to fire, to be turned into a death trap?”

“There is no simple answer to that question.”

Sir Martin’s report runs to nearly 1,700 pages, and encompasses years of work and the testimony of hundreds of witnesses.

It contains 58 recommendations to ensure a similar disaster never happens again.

Firefighters continue to dampen down the tower block following the deadly blaze
Image:
Hundreds of firefighters tackled the blaze. Pic: PA

Firefighters rest as they take a break in battling a massive fire that raged in a 27-floor high-rise apartment building in London, Wednesday, June 14, 2017. Fire swept through a high-rise apartment building in west London early Wednesday, killing an unknown number of people and sending more than 50 people to area hospitals. (AP Photo/Matt Dunham)
Image:
Crews tackled the fire in shifts – resting at the scene. Pic: AP

Complacency in government

The first phase of the inquiry’s report found in 2019 that combustible cladding was the primary cause of the rapid spread of the fire.

The inquiry has now concluded that the tragedy was the culmination of those in charge failing for decades to properly consider the risks of combustible materials on high-rise buildings, while ignoring the mounting evidence before them.

Grenfell tower
Image:
The building was covered in combustible products. Pic: Reuters

Read more:
The Grenfell children who survived the blaze
Grenfell victims likely to wait over a decade for justice

Successive governments missed opportunities to prevent the tragedy.

The deadly risks of combustible cladding panels and insulation had been identified as early as 1991, when a fire engulfed the Knowsley Heights tower block in Huyton, Merseyside.

The block had recently been covered in “rainscreen” cladding.

Six people were killed at Lakanal House in Camberwell, south London, in 2009 after a fire spread to combustible cladding.

“By 2016 the department [for communities and local government] was well aware of those risks, but failed to act on what it knew,” the report states.

It adds that by the time Grenfell Tower was being renovated in the 2010s, a “seriously defective” system was in place to regulate the construction and refurbishment of high-rise buildings.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘We want changes and justice’

Unsafe products kept on market and dangers ‘deliberately concealed’

The report condemns cladding and insulation firms involved in this work, saying they engaged in “deliberate and sustained strategies to manipulate the testing processes, misrepresent test data and mislead the market”.

It said that “systemic dishonesty” from the companies resulted in hazardous materials being applied to the block.

Arconic, the company that made cladding for Grenfell Tower, “deliberately concealed” the danger of the panels used on the tower, while Celotex, which supplied most of the insulation, similarly “embarked on a dishonest scheme to mislead customers”.

Kingspan knew its insulation product failed fire safety tests “disastrously” but continued to sell it to high-rise buildings, the report found.

The firms got away with this because the various bodies designed to oversee and certify their products repeatedly failed to monitor and supervise them.

Grenfell residents dismissed as ‘troublemakers’

There was also harsh criticism of the Tenant Management Organisation (TMO), which was responsible for running services at Grenfell Tower.

Residents who raised concerns about safety were dismissed as “militant troublemakers”, while there was “a toxic atmosphere” with the TMO “fuelled by mistrust of both sides”.

👉 Tap here to follow the Sky News Daily podcast – 20 minutes on the biggest stories every day 👈

Relations “were increasingly characterised by distrust, dislike, personal antagonism and anger” and “some, perhaps many, occupants of the tower regarded the TMO as an uncaring and bullying overlord that belittled and marginalised them”.

The TMO and the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea were jointly responsible for managing fire safety at Grenfell Tower – but the years between 2009 and 2017 were marked by a “persistent indifference to fire safety”, the report said.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘I realised the burning building was my own home’

Next steps

The Counsel for the inquiry has accused parties involved in the disaster of a “merry-go-round of buck-passing” – largely blaming each other for the disaster.

The inquiry can’t make findings of civil and criminal liability.

Now its work is complete, the police investigation into the disaster will continue.

The UK Tonight With Sarah-Jane Mee will have a special programme on the Grenfell Tower report at 8pm on Sky News

Continue Reading

Business

UK economy continued to flatline in July recording no growth as Labour came to power – ONS

Published

on

By

UK economy continued to flatline in July recording no growth as Labour came to power - ONS

There was no growth in the UK economy in July, official figures show.

It’s the second month of stagnation, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) said as GDP – the measure of everything produced in the UK – flatlined in the weeks following the election of the Labour government.

The flatline was not expected by economists, who had anticipated growth.

Money blog: Online fashion giant U-turns on returns fee

Economists polled by the Reuters news agency forecast the economy would expand by 0.2%.

Some signs of growth

But there’s “longer-term strength” in the services sector meaning there was growth over the last three months as a whole and 0.5% expansion in the three months up to July.

Among the G7 group of industrialised nations, the UK had the highest growth rate for the first six months of 2024.

Why stagnation?

While there was growth in the services sector, led by computer programmers and the end of strikes in health, these gains were offset by falls for advertising companies, architects and engineers.

Manufacturing output fell overall due to “a particularly poor month for car and machinery firms”, the ONS said, while construction also declined.

What will it mean for interest rates?

Market expectations are for interest rates to remain unchanged by the Bank of England when they meet next week to consider their next move in the fight against inflation.

The central bank had raised the rate and made borrowing more expensive to reduce inflation.

A cut in November, at the next meeting of rate-setters, is expected. Rates are forecast to be brought down to 4.75% at that point.

Political reaction

In response to the figures Chancellor Rachel Reeves said:

“I am under no illusion about the scale of the challenge we face and I will be honest with the British people that change will not happen overnight. Two-quarters of positive economic growth does not make up for 14 years of stagnation.

“That is why we are taking the long-term decisions now to fix the foundations of our economy.”

Continue Reading

Business

Oil prices at lowest level since 2021 – but will motorists benefit?

Published

on

By

Oil prices at lowest level since 2021 - but will motorists benefit?

A slump in oil prices could lead to further reductions at the fuel pumps but any benefit risks being stripped away next month as the chancellor seeks ways to bolster the public finances.

A barrel of Brent crude, the international benchmark, slipped below $70 for the first time since December 2021 on Tuesday afternoon.

The month ahead contract was down by as much as 4% on the day at one stage, following a monthly report by the OPEC+ group of major oil-producing nations that further cut demand expectations for both 2024 and 2025.

Money latest: These job titles could be hiking your car insurance premiums

The weakening prospects, coupled with growing expectations of oil oversupply, kept the market suppressed according to analysts.

They said the only upwards pressure was being applied by an incoming storm that could affect production in the Gulf of Mexico.

Oil prices have plunged from levels nearer $90 since the beginning of July, largely on the back of evidence that major economies are slowing.

More from Business

Motoring groups have long complained wholesale fuel prices have failed to keep pace with that decline – being quick to rise but slow to fall.

Sustained oil weakness should push fuel costs down further

Wholesale costs, also recently aided by a stronger pound versus the oil-priced dollar, stood last week at their lowest levels since October 2021, according to the AA.

But it said that without the 5p-per-litre fuel duty cut imposed by the last government to keep a lid on rising prices in 2022, that three-year low for wholesale costs would have been delayed by up to a fortnight.

The AA said the gap between wholesale costs – what retailers pay – versus pump prices had reduced in recent weeks amid regulatory pressure.

Critics have long accused retailers of profiteering, bolstering their margins for a third year after the Competition and Markets Authority accused filling stations of overcharging motorists to the tune of almost £2.5bn during 2022 and 2023 combined. Supermarket chains were singled out for particular criticism.

But with oil costs falling further, it is speculated that chancellor Rachel Reeves may feel able to remove the 5p duty cut without drivers noticing much change at the pumps, assuming pump prices continue to ease – albeit slowly.

She is widely expected to use her first budget on 30 October to fill, what she can, of a £22bn “black hole” she claims to have found in the public finances inherited from the Tories.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Winter fuel decision ‘totally wrong’

Cuts to winter fuel payments are among measures already announced.

The Treasury has refused to comment on possible other announcements though the wealthy have been put on notice that they will bear the brunt of tax hikes.

A fuel duty reduction has, therefore, not been ruled out.

AA president Edmund King said last week of a fuel duty hike threat: “Removing it threatens to send millions of low-income drivers back into the era of ‘perma-high’ road fuel prices.

Read more from Sky News:
State pension to rise by more than £400
Apple launches new artificially intelligent iPhone
The Spectator finally sold to GB News investor

“Getting rid of the fuel duty cut unleashes a £3.30 a tank (standard 55 litres) shock on the personal and family budgets of the 28% of drivers who spend a set amount when they go to a fuel station.

“With 33 million drivers in the UK, that is more than nine million affected private motorists – most of whom are low-income and struggling to balance their budgets.

“If the current pump price rebounds to 144p a litre, and then 6p is added with a fuel duty hike and the extra VAT it will bring, it will plunge the least well-off families and families back into the nightmare of petrol at 150p a litre or more”. he concluded.

Continue Reading

Business

State pension to rise by more than £400 a year in April – double some winter fuel payments

Published

on

By

Government will not 'water down' winter fuel payment cut to 10 million pensioners, minister says

The state pension is due to rise by 4% in April, giving an extra £460 a year to recipients.

The payment increases by the highest of total average weekly earnings, inflation for September or 2.5%.

How much will pension payments rise?

Figures on Tuesday showed average weekly earnings rose by 4% in the three months to July.

More on Unemployment

Inflation data for September has not yet been published but stood at 2.2% for July, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

Money blog: Will White Maltesers return to UK shops?

It means the weekly pension payment will rise from the current £221.20 a week to £230.05 a week. From April, when the payment rises, pensioners will get an extra £8.85 a week, equivalent to a top-up of £460 per year.

Last year pensioners got a rise of 8.5%.

This year’s pension increase comes with the government under pressure after scrapping the winter fuel allowance for most pensioners. The annual rise in pension payments is more than double the allowance for some, worth either £200 or £300.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Government ‘picking the pockets of pensioners’

Why are wages going up?

Public sector pay rises may be behind part of the growth, the ONS said.

“Growth in total pay slowed markedly again as one-off payments made to many public sector workers in June and July last year continue to affect the figures,” said the ONS director of economic statistics Liz McKeown.

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

Also released on Tuesday was data on unemployment, which eased to 4.1% from 4.2%. At the same time, however, the number of jobs available fell across every industry, the ONS said.

Despite this, the number of jobs on offer remains above pandemic levels.

Wages had been growing even higher in the past months, the 4% rise is down from 4.1% a month earlier and from a high of 8.3% a year earlier.

What does it mean for interest rates?

High wage rises had been a concern for the interest rate-setters at the Bank of England as they battled to bring down inflation through more expensive borrowing.

A continued fall will be welcomed by the Bank but is unlikely to push it to cut the rate from 5% when it meets next week.

Current market expectations are for the interest rate to be held.

Continue Reading

Trending