Connect with us

Published

on

Sir Keir Starmer is under investigation for a possible breach of parliamentary rules after failing to declare that some of his wife’s high-end clothes were bought for her by his biggest personal donor, Lord Alli.

The Labour peer paid for a personal shopper, clothes and alterations for Lady Victoria Starmer, reportedly both before and after the Labour leader became prime minister in July, according to The Sunday Times.

This year, Sir Keir has received – and disclosed – nearly £19,000 worth of work clothes and several pairs of glasses from Lord Alli, the former chairman of online fashion retailer Asos, The Times reports.

In addition, the peer, whose personal wealth is estimated at £200m, spent £20,000 on accommodation for the now prime minister during the election and a similar sum on “private office” costs, which was also disclosed, the paper says.

Newly elected Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, with his wife Victoria Starmer, greet wellwishers as he arrives at his official London residence at No 10 Downing Street for the first time after the Labour party won a landslide victory at the 2024 General Election. Picture date: Friday July 5, 2024.
Image:
Sir Keir Starmer and his wife Victoria Starmer arrive at No 10 Downing Street after Labour’s election victory. Pic: PA

A Labour Party spokesperson told Sky News it was an oversight that had been corrected after it “sought advice from the authorities on coming to office”. They added: “We believed we’d been compliant, however, following further interrogation this month, we’ve declared further items.”

The Tories called for a “full investigation” following The Sunday Times report.

A Conservative Party spokesman said: “It’s taken just 10 weeks for Keir Starmer to face an investigation for his conduct.

“After facing allegations of cronyism and now apparent serious breaches of parliamentary rules there must be a full investigation into the passes for glasses scandal.

“No doubt the millions of vulnerable pensioners across the country who face choosing between heating and eating would jump at the chance for free clothes just to keep warm in the face of Labour’s cruel cut.”

Read more from Sky News:
Tax the rich and spare pensioners, Davey says
No assessment carried out on winter fuel payment cut
Starmer talks up US-UK relationship after White House meeting

Sir Keir Starmer and his wife Victoria ont he campaign trail in London. Pic: PA
Image:
Sir Keir Starmer and his wife Victoria campaigning in London. Pic: PA

Lord Alli’s involvement with the Labour leader has already proved controversial after it emerged he had been given a Downing Street security pass without apparently having a government role.

The revelations are awkward for the prime minister, who has promised to clean up politics.

Lord Alli in 2014. Pic: Rex
Image:
Lord Alli in 2014. Pic: Rex

Sir Keir, like all MPs, must declare any of his relevant interests under rules set up to protect politics from improper influence and uphold transparency.

The Times said the prime minister’s office approached the parliamentary authorities to make the late declarations last Tuesday.

His advisers were already in touch with them by then after several designers had approached Lady Starmer asking if she was interested in free products such as clothes, jewellery and make-up.

Staff had asked if the prime minister would need to declare his wife being given those items if she accepted and were told he would.

Image:
Starmer and his wife at his general election count. Pic: PA

That prompted his team to ask if the previous gifts from Lord Alli should also have been declared on the same basis and it was decided they did.

They then wrote to the authorities to update the prime minister’s register of interests, which is scheduled to be published next month. Lady Starmer has separately declined to accept the offers from designers.

Continue Reading

Politics

Senator Lummis probes US federal law enforcement about Bitcoin sale

Published

on

By

Senator Lummis probes US federal law enforcement about Bitcoin sale

“Democrats legacy: A loss of more than $18.5 billion in unrealized value for American taxpayers,” the senator wrote on social media.

Continue Reading

Politics

Sex robots, agent contracts a hitman, artificial vaginas: AI Eye goes wild

Published

on

By

Sex robots, agent contracts a hitman, artificial vaginas: AI Eye goes wild

AI agent plans assassination on dark web, are social robots just sex robots, artificial vagina prize, Brad Pitt deepfakes and more: AI Eye

Continue Reading

Politics

MP Mike Amesbury admits punching man – and will remain suspended from Labour Party

Published

on

By

MP Mike Amesbury admits punching man - and will remain suspended from Labour Party

MP Mike Amesbury has pleaded guilty to assault by beating for punching a man in Cheshire.

The Runcorn and Helsby MP appeared at Chester Magistrates’ Court on Thursday morning where he admitted attacking 45-year-old Paul Fellows in Main Street, Frodsham, Cheshire, in October.

Speaking outside the court, he said his actions were “highly regrettable” and he was “sincerely sorry” to Mr Fellows and his family.

Politics latest: Russian drones strike Kyiv during PM’s visit

CCTV footage showed Amesbury, who has been an MP since 2017, punching Mr Fellows to the ground.

Other previously released videos from another angle show Amesbury punching Mr Fellows repeatedly after knocking him to the floor as members of the public intervened.

It was reported to police at 2.48pm on Saturday 26 October.

The court heard how Amesbury told Mr Fellows “you won’t threaten your MP again” after punching him in the head with enough force to knock him to the ground.

The 55-year-old politician is currently an independent MP after he was suspended by Labour at the end of October when the CCTV footage emerged.

After admitting assault, the Labour Party confirmed his suspension will continue and he will remain an independent MP.

Reform UK said Amesbury should “do the honourable thing and resign immediately so a by-election can be held”.

The PM’s official spokesperson declined to comment on whether the MP should resign.

Pic: Richard Townshend/UK Parliament/PA
Image:
Pic: Richard Townshend/UK Parliament/PA

Punch followed chat about bridge closure

The court heard Mr Fellows recognised Amesbury in the taxi rank in Frodsham town centre at about 2am on 26 October last year.

Both were alone and had been drinking.

Alison Storey, prosecuting, said Mr Fellows approached the MP to remonstrate about a bridge closure in the town and CCTV then shows they spoke for several minutes but there was no aggression or raised voices.

Mr Fellows then started to walk away but Amesbury re-engaged and was heard saying “what” a few times before shouting it.

The victim then put his hands in his pockets and turned towards the taxi queue and when he turned back Amesbury punched him in the head, knocking him to the ground.

He then punched Mr Fellows again, at least five times, Ms Storey said.

She told the court he was then heard saying “you won’t threaten your MP again will you”.

Amesbury was voluntarily interviewed under caution by Cheshire Police in October and was charged with common assault on 7 November.

At the time, Amesbury said what happened was “deeply regrettable” and that he was cooperating with police.

Read more:
Starmer makes surprise visit to Kyiv to sign 100-year deal

PM rules out emergency budget as he defends chancellor

‘It is right he has taken responsibility’

A Labour Party spokesman said: “It is right that Mike Amesbury has taken responsibility for his unacceptable actions.

“He was rightly suspended by the Labour Party following the announcement of the police investigation.

“We cannot comment further whilst legal proceedings are still ongoing.”

Amesbury is set to be sentenced next month. If he is sent to prison or given a suspended sentence, he could lose his seat in the Commons.

A sentence of less than a year, even if it is suspended, would leave him liable to the recall process, which would trigger a by-election if 10% of registered voters in his seat sign a petition calling for it.

A jail term of more than a year would mean he automatically loses his seat.

Continue Reading

Trending